This is a thread dedicated to the discussion of white nationalism inspired by America's racially conscious founders.
14/76 General
Other urls found in this thread:
White nationalism was a feature, not the purpose. 1488 is also specifically a fascist thing, not just a white nationalist thing, and the founding fathers most certainly were not fascists.
I don't agree that 1488 is elusively for fascists.
I do agree that the FF's were definitely not facists.
I think they didn't forsee the future attempt at racially equality that we are in. I was guess that if they did they would've provisioned against it in the constitution.
I like this idea.
...
I rarely get redpilled these day. good image.
Thanks
White Christians came to the continent to found a new Jerusalem. Instead, those assholes in Philadelphia gave us a new Rome. It's about time for Rome to burn again.
...
You are deluding yourself if you believe anything can be accomplished through the electoral process. Politics is theater.
...
>I don't agree that 1488 is elusively for fascists.
The second half of it is is specifically about Hitler you fucking mongoloid.
You've got the supreme court and RBG is gonna die any day now. Protip: the judicial branch is the most powerful branch.
So i have a question for everyone.
So why did we go away from merit based immigration and move to chain and family migration.
my early assumption about were
>It was started to undermine the interest and culture of White America.
but the idea recently popped into my head, that because up until the mid-60's the only experience Americans had with hispanics was of the very white side. I.E. im talking hispanics who you would only call hispanic based on their last name rather than their actual looks. and so i sort of wrote up this idea.
>it was started to protect the interest of white americans because the white population was slowing and negro population was rising. So to counter the effects they thought they could bring in Mexicans(who they considered white at the time). So that the negro population remained a smaller portion of society.
and then of course it would have backfired.
I dont necessarily agree with either of these statements.
...
14 is for white nationalism, 88 is for fascism. That's why OP said 1476.
The Ideumean Jews corrupt everything they touch. Republics and democracies are perfect fronts for them. Why keep making the same mistake over and over? They thrive on revolution. Quit spinning your wheels. What we need is a reaction. It's time for a King.
You can separate the head of state from the head of government without crowning some asshat and his family
Hitler was not a fascist. He was a totalitarian despot that would have given way to a kind of democracy after removing ze juden, had he succeeded.
He's a personal hero of mine. He would have made a great King.
>but the idea recently popped into my head, that because up until the mid-60's the only experience Americans had with hispanics was of the very white side
That's a good point. Naivete.
>The brown ones will do the farming and then go back home to be noble savages
>I think they didn't forsee the future attempt at racially equality that we are in.
Yes, but the real problem is that they did not forsee the problems with mass industrialization to the extent that they occurred. A proper post-industrial America would consist of a True Federal Union (Secession is allowed and seceded states would be protected from invasion for a time) with a Jeffersonian Republic at the National level and individual National Socialist/Agrarian republics at the State level.
>realizes he's an american first
That subtle olive branch...
This picture has always been bitter-sweet to me.
>He would have made a great King.
>monachism
OUT
When you do, you let that den of vipers right back in the back door. They wield the real power without accepting any real responsibility. If the King fucks up too badly at least everyone knows where that asshat and his family live.
Then how would we be different from China's dynastic cycles? Our descendants would reach a point where they'd willingly install authoritarianism just to keep control
The fucking Federalists sure had to fuck everything up.
To all these faggots who think 88 is fascist. Read the fucking 88 precepts. 1488 is strictly white nationalist. Neonazis just shove Hitler into everything.
David Lane you stupid newfags.
The Chinks managed the most stable and longest standing civilization since ancient Egypt until that jewish bug known as communisim bit them. Now they call themselves the Peoples Republic of China. Im not sure I Inderstand your second sentence. Are you differentiating authoritarianism from monarchy? Our descendants would be in control. At least the best of them would. Every King needs a landed aristocracy of noble warriors.
I'm half asleep right now, user; by authoritarianism I meant something more akin to a Juche. I would support a monarchic-republican hybrid if there were about a billion or so Yanks. As it stands now we're at about 1/4th of that
Should be 17/76
"We must secure the existence for our nation’s people and a future for the United States Constitution."
Juche. I had to look that one up. en.wikipedia.org
*too great for North Korea