Whitewashing Romans

Why do people think the Romans were white.?

Other urls found in this thread:

ethnicgenome.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/sicilians-have-10-sub-saharan-african-dna/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Top notch post, sparky. Keep up the good work.

Serious question?

they're whiter than spics. thats white enough

One drop rule dictates they were black, and the world was blacker in the past.

Proven by science

feel better about skin pigmentation now? No one actually cares about this.

They were olive skinned like spanish people and greeks. There was also less sub saharan african mixed in. Sage.

They left no mummies or any genetics behind for us to study. Blackness is determined by one drop.

ethnicgenome.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/sicilians-have-10-sub-saharan-african-dna/

> because we have first hand descriptions of Romans. Lots of blondes, red heads, light skin, etc.

The Romans didn't give a damn about race. If you could contribute positively to the empire, you were granted Roman citizenship, no matter your color of your skin. One of the reasons why modern Italy is a clusterfuck of distinct phenotypes, ranging from Nordic to Arabic looking.

This

First hand descriptions are not reliable as we have learned with the Egyptians

>Romans
>A race
Romans were a mixture of Magna Grecia Greeks, Italic tribes, osco-umbrians, etruscans and cisalpine gauls.
Also
>white
define white, you mean not white like the niggers you have in your country or the "rapebabies" you americans keep babbling about?

>Greeks
>Persians
>Egyptians
Are you saying these are all niggers? Don't give your race so much credit.

Blackness is dictated by the one drop rule, and whiteness is dictated by purity spiraling.

Sorry blacky, you don't get to claim a culture because a white roman fucked a nigger once

>Once

ethnicgenome.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/sicilians-have-10-sub-saharan-african-dna/

Do you have any genetic science to back up your claims.

Just the same as the original Chinese are all black.

That might actually be true. The Negritos of Asia could very well be a remnant of a people who used to populate asia. Similar to the recent brit findings

caracalla was a real bastard.

That's Caracalla, an Emperor of Pontic origin.

This still doesn't change the fact that the vast majority of Roman Emperors (and Rome itself) was Europoid Caucasian (white). Sorry.

ignore the kike and the anti-white bait

saged

whoops. Meant Punic rather than Pontic.

They arren't?

If romans were not white, you are gonna have to concede the fact that non whites contributed a good deal to western civilisation...

Therefore they were white...

haha u wish nigger

Even if our ancestors (romans) were not 100% european caucasoid they were still mostly an admixture of the caucasoid race (egyptian, persian) who were all Aryans anyways 5000 years ago so yeah try again.

none of that says they were black or had sub saharan blood.
>red/blonde hair and blue eyes = white
no otherwise slavs and britons are white.
facial structure determines race more than phenotypical colors, North Sea peoples are white, Romans are not North Sea and thus not white

Just keep making threads and eventually the indoctrination will work.

No. The Romans weren't Africans. Where their Africans in Rome? Yea your people were slaves and migrants who fucked up Rome just like every country that takes you in.

...