Question

If you could change the outcome of any election in U.S. history which one would it be and why?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-CvQOuNecy4
youtube.com/watch?v=I9LcAJOsFGg
youtube.com/watch?v=MCsGSMze_6Q
washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2000/11/17/another-race-to-the-finish/c810a41c-7da9-461a-927b-9da6d36a65dc/?utm_term=.98ed3ad7796c
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Truman and Dewey

2000

Al Gore actually won anyways and he would have paid off the debt, kept America safe on 9/11, no Iraq War, no Bush housing bubble, no 2008 Republican Recession.

Nixon be Kennedy

I would make LBJ lose.

1960.

Richard Nixon was robbed.

no he wasnt

Yes he was.

There is sufficient evidence to suggest that if Gore wins in 2000, 9/11 doesn't occur. (((they))) made sure that the 9/11 timeline occurred.

>Noah
Juden detected

Yes he fucking was.

Goldwater to beat LBJ

wrong

The last election so that a retarded narcissistic oompa-loompa doesn't become the most powerful man in the world.

The 2016 election.

Trump didn't win by enough.

Um, no theres not. Get back to fluffing dogs for k9 porn, Sven Rosenstein.

>2016
>diarrhea with peanuts
>diarrhea with corn
both candidates were shit, now we're all fucked

Has there ever been a smarter president?

>Rose from a dirt poor family in California, brothers all died of TB
>known as grumpy gus because all he did was study
>got everywhere through hard work

youtube.com/watch?v=-CvQOuNecy4

youtube.com/watch?v=I9LcAJOsFGg
youtube.com/watch?v=MCsGSMze_6Q

>Al Gore actually won anyways
No he didn't.

That's retarded. The US would still be on the arab peninsula and still inhabited regions of Saudi Arabia, which was Osama's entire reasoning for 9/11.

1860

>unironically flying the flag of the team who lost

go back to fucking your brother, jethro

As a city person I'll change the last one. US was catching up to Europe in terms of labor condition and human rights, but full 360 we go under trump.

Still have a hard on for Gore, huh cucky? You guys and your "definitive" proof with no legitimate sauce is hilarious.

its your brother Im fucking, Cletus.

My mother’s maiden name is Heufelder and my Great-Grandfather was in the Wehrmacht. I’m not a Jew, buddy.

Wait, I need to check some text first

FDR

underrated.

I think that FDR never should have been the president. Alf fucking Landen would have been better if he didn't get us into ww2.

Sup Forums is going to hate me for this, but if I had to choose one presidential election to change it would have been the 1964 election.

Yes, Barry Goldwater should have won. He was not the candidate for nuclear war, he was not anti-peace; all of the derogatory rhetoric used against him was better placed on Johnson.

>no 1965 immigration act
>no affirmative action
>freedom of association matters
>extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice

I unironically want to change history to make a jew win the presidency in 64'.

Just have Nixon win in 60 and then 64, as it should have been.

JFK won handily in 60

too bad for u

I have filtered you.

Bad arguments, no reasoning, poor spelling. Overall low quality poster. Not worth my time.

That is just the (((official))) story. The reality is, the muslim world knew there was a plan to invade Iraq once Bush got in the white house. 9/11 was a pre-emptive strike done by the Saudi's to put us off balance. It worked, Bush pretty much destroyed out international reputation and cratered the economy to chase dreams of glory in Iraq when we should have been bombing the Sauds. Israel helped perpetrate 9/11 to ensure our continuing support for the Jewish state.

If go back and make DJT win by the bare minimum electoral votes with a popular vote of 200 million against him. Just to squeeze a little more salt out of you soyboys.
>Ree ree he didn't win muh popular vote ree ree Russians reeeeeee
Feels good ma'am

Unironically Perot 1992 he could have prevented this

Then I would actually have picked Nixon over Kennedy 1960

Hoover 1932 over fdr

Also just kill Woodrow Wilson

No, Dems stole 1960 and Republicans acquiesced because they had already been in for 8 years and it was the "Dems' turn".

The whole reason why Chicago politics have a bad reputation is because they fudged it to give JFK the state, which was why he won the White House.

>You're just being partisan
No, because the two-party fake opposition system worked this way again in 2000 and to a lesser extent in 2004. Dems could have easily at least contested those elections harder than they did, but they didn't. Gore only contested a limited amount of Florida counties. Why not the whole state? Because he had to make it a show, to make it seem as if he was contesting, when he really wasn't and all top Dems knew it was the "Reps' turn" in 2000.

Similarly in 2004 on election night John Edwards said the Dems were NOT conceding but were going to contest OH. Then the big boys came in and said no, it was still the Reps' turn.

But yeah 1960 was Nixon's. They allowed dead people to vote in Chicago and that was the difference.

A million times this but Democrats fucked up majorly and Lincoln was too good of a candidate to beat.

Herbert Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt. The last true republican president, Roosevelt changed US into a welfare state. What do I know though im just a fucking leaf.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

u fucking retards with muh chicago

Donate Illinois to Nixon and JFK still wins

u retards are total and complete fucking morons

u can't even make your pizzaspiracies make sense

It's the true story actually sweetie

>Wait, I need to check some text first

The answer is the 1912 election.

Eugene W. Chafin is the winner

Assuming we can change other stuff too Woodrow Wilson get seventh place at least

>get seventh place at least
ops, seventh place AT MAX

92
Perot

What do? Stock market just crashed.

...

420

AHHHHH, we switched back to Trump economy again.

This, or Ted Kennedy never wins the Senate.

>forgetting about johnon's influence in texas
kys leaf

[citation needed]
Please explain how the cemeteries in Chicago came in for Kennedy

>forgetting about Nixon's influence in California
kys retard

AND how the LBJ fudged the numbers in Texas.

and how Nixon fudged the numbers in California

How he fudged the numbers in his HOME state?
Then explain how Kennedy fudged numbers in Massachusetts

>widely questioned voter fraud in 2 states with known political machines
>dead people voting
>counties sending more votes in then their total population
vs
>your claim of nixon rigging cali w/ 0 (zero) evidence
ok you fucking idiot

lol JFK won Massachusetts by 20 points u retarded freak

lol u retards just made up voter claims in Texas because your fucking feelings are hurt and because u were too retarded to do the math with Illinois

u don't get to change electoral results because your fucking feelings are hurt u pathetic snowflakes

JFK won Illinois and Texas. Deal with it bitch

>admitting you don't have any arguments
thanks obamaleaf

This, GWB is what doomed America.
Debt exploding, housing bubble, failing to oversee the FED, war in Iraq.
That guy should be hanged for treason, he was even worse than king nigger.

Your feelings are not an argument

u were doing fine until that last part

That's not the point, leaf. Massachusetts was his HOME state. Just about EVERYONE wins their home state. (Trump is the only exception I can think of off the top of my head.) Nixon didn't have to do shit to carry California. and JFK only "won" by 118,000 votes.

That's why I just filter him. His arguments are just "no u!!"

His spelling reveals his IQ.

Nixon barely won California. Are u retarded? It was one of the closest states. He only won by 0.55%.

JFK won TX by 2%.

Jimmy Carter Def. Reagan in '80

Obama overplayed with the debt and Obamacare, that's my opinion, but Bush was a complete mess and a total idiot, that's not arguable.

really he should just be banned, although he is probably using a proxy

btfo right wing retards and hurting your feelings is not a bannable offense bitch

avatarfagging is, seeing as how in practically every thread you announce your presence with the same gif and the same retarded screencaps

im not avatarfagging and this isn't your safe space u snowflake bitch

Well at least backs his statements with a good amount of data.
Keep up with the work Obamaleaf.

except you are avatarfagging obamaleaf

thanks Waluigi

who's gunna win the italian election?

why aren't russians taking interest like they do the US elections?

except im not and i present more data, facts and redpills than all u retards combined

All of them

Neat. Almost every state was decided by a margin of less than 5% nigger. That doesn't change the fact that Nixon didn't have to do ANYTHING to carry his HOME state.

lol this map

yes he did

did you ignore earlier posts in the thread where he just ignored evidence of election tampering in Illinois and texas by plugging his ears and screaming like a child?

>why aren't russians taking interest like they do the US elections?
Gee I wonder why the russians don't give a fuck about italy compared to a global superpower you maple huffing nutcase

except you are

your feelings are not evidence

>evidence

just like fucking pizzagate holy shit

Such as?

No russian collusion, don't worry.

i cant ask the italian a question without u being a bitch about it?

the same shit whatever u retards tell yourselves LBJ pulled in texas

1912, fuck Woodrow Wilson, no Fed Reserve and globalism stopped prematurely.

>trying this hard to deflect
>counties sending in more votes than registered voters heavily in jfk's favor are "feelings"

>no (zero) evidence again
sad!

>hurr durr let me compare a recession to the inevitable recovery

>inb4 50+ posts by this id

All of you faggots are newfags. Ron Paul 2008.

that never happened actually

u retards just make shit up when your feelings are hurt

Again [citation needed]
Literally any documentary on the election talks about voter fraud in Texas and Illinois. You are literally spouting nonsense with nothing to back up your claims. Good job I used to give Canadians the benefit of the doubt, but now I can't wait for the day of the rake.
.>inb4 you hurt my feefees or some other tumblr tier bullshit

Election of 1912. Would change it so that Teddy beat Wilson. If Teddy had won we'd have no federal reserve and the Kikes never would've gotten a foothold into our society.

republicans crash the economy

democrats thrive the economy

no shit sherlock

>Literally any documentary on the election talks about voter fraud in Texas and Illinois.

lol no it doesnt

Yes he was. Go look into what happened in Illinois.

Oh shit, it's obamaleaf

same here, then that 1965 immigration bill wouldve never been passed

>plugging your ears like a child

>In Fannin County, which had 4,895 registered voters, 6,138 votes were cast, three-quarters of them for Kennedy. In one precinct of Angelia County, 86 people voted and the final tally was 147 for Kennedy, 24 for Nixon.
washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2000/11/17/another-race-to-the-finish/c810a41c-7da9-461a-927b-9da6d36a65dc/?utm_term=.98ed3ad7796c

you are a child, and you have no idea what you are talking about

If give Ron Paul the 08 election. Things would be entirely different without that fucking kang spurring division and racial tension.
>if I had a son, he would look like treyvon

>Finally, in 1962, after an election judge confessed to witnessing vote tampering in Chicago's 28th ward, three precinct workers pled guilty and served short jail terms.

>A Republican National Committee member filed suit to challenge the Chicago results. The case was assigned to Circuit Court Judge Thomas Kluczynski, a Daley machine loyalist. On Dec. 13, Kluczynski dismissed the Republican suit. Less than a year later, on Mayor Daley's recommendation, Kennedy appointed Kluczynski to the federal bench.

>In Chicago, where Kennedy won by more than 450,000 votes, local reporters uncovered so many stories of electoral shenanigans--including voting by the dead--that the Chicago Tribune concluded that "the election of November 8 was characterized by such gross and palpable fraud as to justify the conclusion that [Nixon] was deprived of victory."

>So Mazo went out and looked. He went to Chicago, obtained lists of voters in precincts that seemed suspicious and started checking their addresses. "There was a cemetery where the names on the tombstones were registered and voted," he recalls. "I remember a house. It was completely gutted. There was nobody there. But there were 56 votes for Kennedy in that house."