It is a
> Fact.
No matter how much you spin it, the orange dotard is bound to crash the economy again, as this is what all republicans do.
And the (((Economist))) shills can't spell it out as they are bought and paid for by the corporations - it is not "LUCK", it is
> Skill.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
presidentialdata.org
twitter.com
Even the orange
> Dotard.
admits it:
youtube.com
waw, did he actually told the truth once?
> Unbelievable.
Also, when numbers speak, even Sup Forumstards need to shut the fuck up.
You think trends, data, and facts work on Trump? LOL fucking Europe, man. You don't understand shit.
Fake
I feel your pain, you must feel doomed.
Once the economy crashes, we can openly accept you - we accept refugees!
Butthurt much?
So what increased borrowing is part of GDP, even though it shouldn't be.
Just Sage
Borrowing higher under Republicans.
Want to try one more time?
this guy gets it
And? What's the big deal? He said "it shouldn't be that way", maybe he has come to change the tempo of democrats vs republicans.
Also, democrats have been committing a lot of crimes lately and Hillary told Iran she was going to start a war on them just because "reasons" and because she is a sociopath.
Also, Trump is pretty much doing as "well" as Obama. Obama fucked up in X and Trump is fucking up in Y, but you know, nobody is perfect, so who cares.
...
I fully intend to exterminate leftists like you in my lifetime.
>meme flag
>Doesnt look at wars
bu... buu... Averages!
You are missing the point of the argument. The orange dotard is only one part of the problem. I am talking that on the grand scale, over a long period of time, democrats do better.
The day the orange dotard fails would just add further proof to the data point. So you have been warned. (for those that still do not believe)
Show your flag, faggot.
Hey guys OP here.
I
So when you cannot win an argument based on facts, you better silence the opponents, hmm?
Tell me, are you a republican?
> Kek.
Oh, don't come at me with the (((Federal Reserve))) argument, that's just sad.
oh, hi obamaleaf. there was a study done on this that explained this. oil shocks and other unforseen events seem to have favored dems. the study called it "luck"
the economists are from princeton, i'm sure you'll have no trouble finding it. section 7 is the conclusion.
And you are a nigger that is to scared to show flag.
>he's not really a republican
You guys cried for months while we anticipated voting for him.
Now he's a republican suddenly.
I'm a patriot, someone like me will eventually hang you.
I
>baby boom
>dotcom bubble
>Quantitative easing
Not much to take credit for
>you guys
>we anticipated
What are you, some commie faggot that thinks in terms of "the group"?
I really hate (((leftists))).
So, so far (beyond the absolute monkey-tier keyboard bashing) the arguments for why Liberals rule and Republicans drool are:
>muh (((Fed)))
(Ignoring the fact that Republicans have also been appointing the chairs of the Fed)
>muh wars
(Ignoring the fact that it was republicans that started said wars)
>muh oil shocks
(Ignoring the fact that there were multiple other shocks during democratic governments, it is just that democrats do better during tough times)
aaaaaaaaand... hmm... that's it.
Good. Hope you got the point across. Stay salty, stay orange.
Eurotrash OP doesn't believe in facts bro. Dont even try.
>Eurotrash OP doesn't believe in facts bro. Dont even try.
What, as in numbers? Yes, I do believe in them, there they are:
Time to sleep off the fentanyl high, cletus.
Your mother, I mean sister, I mean cousin is waiting for you.
(You)
Did anyone verify OP’s bs website? I am no economist, but this shit looks suspicious at best.
I mean, I hate the Bushes as much as the next guy, but even Bush managed to achieve higher growth than Obama, right?
>right-wing retard worshiper posts a funny
Guess I should "kek" like the rest of you downies.
Democrats in the time of Kennedy were not socialist. Keneddy went after the deepstate and cut taxes
>choosing to go to war makes your shit economy ok