How come Sup Forums is unique among political groups in that the majority of the news it reads is fake or scientifically found to be junk?
The University of Oxford has used science to determine that you have no connection to reality. 12 scientists familiar with US politics were asked to classify news sources as phony or real and a subsequent analysis of the kinds of links Sup Forums shares on social networks reveals that you are sharing, reading and thinking about fake news more than real news.
>the majority (55%) of news shared and consumed by Trump supporters is fake
Please keep in mind the database of officially fake news sources also included democrat sites, so there's no issue with bias. This is science and it's time for us to reflect and make a change.
They used science and a team of highly trained University of Oxford researchers to classify sites as "junk" based on several fake/trash factors.
Charles Gray
>lulz.com
Luis Williams
>Highly trained
Elaborate
Zachary Wright
Reference the University of Oxford site and the study pdf, it's all there.
Colton Sanders
Woo another slide thread.
Brandon Roberts
Science makes people who live in fantasyland very uncomfortable, yes. But confronting this head on is the only way to heal.
Austin Parker
They considered CNN and TYT to be “authentic” news sources. This study is horseshit
Jack Hall
I'm sorry science didn't give you the finding you wanted in this case, this proves science is fake and a jooish conspiracy inside our intellectualized heads we r smarties.
Ryan Garcia
Sweetie, you believe in 63+ genders that didn't even exist a couple years ago. Project harder
Adam Price
No huffpo, no vice, no CNN Spicing this one
Brody Rodriguez
All of science and academia agrees on whatever gender belief you have an issue with. I don't know anything about it beyond that so I stay in my own lane.
Chase Adams
>we r smarties
If you have to say it..it's probably just a lie you tell yourself so you feel less suicidal about the absolute state of your physical appearance.
Sebastian Sanchez
>12 scientists familiar with US politics were asked to classify news sources as phony or real
Ah yes, ask some random scientists to define something that is bias in nature. Makes perfect sense. You are aware that EVERY news outlet is bias right? Both the Left and the Right have biases in their respective media outlets. Why? Because they are there to make money, and Echo chambers make more money then actually telling the whole, and total truth. Also Fake News includes things like shitty, unrealistic "polls" and "Studies" that you see everywhere, such as "78% of Americans agree that X is better then Y". It's all fake and bias to some degree you fucking cancer.
Jeremiah Martin
You think if you just keep saying science over and over it validates your claim? This is shitty bait though. Sage
John Garcia
>Study finds anything that's not CNN is fake news.
Joshua Perez
No. You can't defend it because it's a clear example of magical thinking and btw there is no consensus it's actually hotly contested.
Julian Morales
>science is just another form of magic and Ogg no like black magic This naturally follows from living in fantasyland
Joseph Flores
Are you mentally retarded? You're not even making sense.
Camden Brooks
>OGG NOT UNDERSTAND SCIENCE MAGIC THIS MAKE OGG ANGRY
Levi Adams
>classify sites as "junk" based on several fake/trash factors.
As in, anything they didn't agree with.
Get the fuck out of here faggot. We're not buying it.
Kevin Perry
>science and reality not accept in this venue No shit, that's the entire premise of the thread.
Cameron Cox
Ya been scienced and ya don't like it well TOUGH shit snowflake
Science is repeatable and has a control group. This has neither.
Tyler Murphy
Jesus fuck you are dumb, so dumb.
They studied a dozen groups and only Trump supporters shared fake news a majority of the time.
Brayden Johnson
>my ignorance is an argument
Nathaniel Nguyen
...
Sebastian Torres
They had a bad list of subjective criteria, and we just can powerhouse the new internet medium better than democrats.
Julian Cooper
Qualify "bad" scientifically and then prove it
Carter Carter
They should have included infowars and the Washington Times.
Owen Cruz
InfoWars is on there. they were thorough.
John Peterson
...
Joshua Lee
Good. Let them keep thinking that. Let them keep believing there is nothing to the political Right in this country but "fake" news and bullshit. The election results in 2016 weren't fake though. lol.
This is called gas lighting. Its a tactic used to make you question your own sanity.
Sage and report.
William Barnes
>science is repeatable Seth Rich. Awan Brothers. EWO. Elsa. Pizzaranium. Calm before the Larp. Deep dish Sedition. Every happening thread. Anon5. Q.
Am I missing any? Feel free to pitch in.
James Thomas
And there we have it.
Sup Forums is starting a campaign to have a University of Oxford study censored because the findings makes them look bad.
Sup Forums is anti-science, science deniers, hypocrites, totalitarians.
Carson Jackson
"the majority (55%) of news shared and consumed by Trump supporters falls into its “junk news” category. Junk news was defined as coming from sites associated with low-quality, extremist, sensationalist or conspiratorial content"
Stopped reading here. This is a baseless claim. Anything can be considered "extremist" or "conspiratorial" to anyone with a political standing. Your study is faulty,
Blake Hughes
TRUMP SUPPORTERS CALL FOR SCIENCE TO BE CENSORED BECAUSE THEY'RE TRIGGERED
Mason Russell
>CNN breaking real news >Your news isn't as good as our news and we never get things wrong >Also, our opinion is better than your opinion >Also, only you guys can read things out of context. Trump never makes jokes.
Owen Perry
Not being replicable. Not based on objective standards. Being intentionally uncharitable. Most journalists are leftists, therefore any dissidant journalists will have to either join a dissident news organization or have to create a news organization of their own. Ultimately, said dissident or start up news organizations won’t have the resources to perfectly fact check everything they say or won’t, unlike the entrenched news organizations, be able to establish themselves and make mistakes without the internet bombarding them with criticism. Entrenched news organizations had an opportunity to do what no start up news organizations can even try to accomplish in today’s day and age; they could make mistakes without being held responsible.
Nathaniel Fisher
> shareblue thread > sage
Wyatt Morris
NOWHERE NEAR AS HO EST AS CNN OR HUFFPO NIGGERS
Joseph Young
This is false and the data set is available.
Your other statements are lies as well. An established news source faces much harsher scrutiny and outrage when they mess up.
The difference between established media and right-wing "media" is the former retract stories they get wrong and frequently fire or reprimand the writers involved. On the right they instead go deeper down a conspiracy theory hole and become legends. "Oh, so you're saying fact X is wrong? You're just a jewish shill agent sent from the martian child sex colonies."
Brandon Miller
This is completely retarded. They included something like "pastebin.com" in this "study"? What the fuck is wrong with you? Why are you posting this shill shit and shitting up this board?
Another thing:
Drudge is nothing but a news feed. The ONLY original thing on his ONE page is his headlines. Guy is fucking brilliant!
Breitbart and INFOwars do very little original reporting of their own. They use original source reporting and "make" their own story based on it.
Try harder next time, Shlomo.
Henry Evans
Why do you keep posting this without addressing
George Zimmerman isn't white Michael Brown wasn't a good boy Dallas cop killer/blm Hillary Clinton actually broke the law Donna Brazille (LOL CNN OOPS) Trump isn't actually Hitler Etc etc etc All of these and policies in immigration, housing, business funding, academics funding, and more All of which are anti native, anti white and anti US.
You keep posting this silly stuff
William Martinez
>"Oh, so you're saying fact X is wrong? You're just a jewish shill agent sent from the martian child sex colonies."
NOT EVEN 2 MINUTES LATER: says I'm a jewish shill because I am posting a famous scientific study
Why is it so incredibly easy to be right and justified when arguing with Trump supporter subhumans? Jesus.
Cameron Gonzalez
>Same thread as yesterday. >Same meme flag as yesterday. >Same responses as yesterday. >Same shit dribbling from meme flag as yesterday.
You got btfo yesterday, what makes you think today will be any different?
Isaiah Torres
>pastebin is a "junk news"
Alexander Collins
>You got btfo yesterday There's that "Trump supporters do not live in consensus reality, science finds" thing again.
Wyatt Miller
I'm a man of science and you're antisemitic conspiracy theorists who CALL FOR SCIENCE TO BE CENSORED:
Zachary Martinez
>Ignores pretty much everyone in thread >Makes zero counter arguments of his own >Memeflag >Takes things severely out of context >Thinks everyone who disagrees with him is a Trump supporter.
Looks like we found CNN in "human" form.
John Parker
>Consensus reality aka the shit we believe. >Trump supporters don't believe the shit we believe. >This is scientific!
Fucking idiot.
Lincoln Price
read the study
Jayden Edwards
Dude if your the real deal you're wasting your time. 45 could go on TV and tell us to drink bleach, and ost of us would ask for seconds.
tl;dr politics have nothing to do with intelligence. Its extremes are more structurally similar to a cult
>outsiders are nonbelievers >I'm the sole arbiter of what's true and fake >give me money & all your dreams will come true
A better approach would be to give them so much cognitive dissonance that it reprograms them, or they have a stroke.
Oliver Peterson
>tl;dr politics have nothing to do with intelligence Actually, scientific studies find that Trump supporters have much lower IQ than democrats.
Wanna do battle, you science denying schmuck? I can cite dozens of independent studies saying this and you can find nothing to the contrary.
Sebastian Ramirez
Why are most your comments appealing to how great “science” is unironically without any regard for what truly makes science great? It’s almost like you are trying to appeal to authority without knowing any possible problems with science. People can have problems with the methodology of a particular paper without disregarding science as a whole. Not all sciences are made equally. Statistically, it is true that most journalists are left wing. Additionally, it is also true that, when many of these entrenched news organizations first established themselves, information could not be fact checked as quickly or easily. I didn’t even claim what you are saying I did. Some right wing news organizations do issue retractions, some mainstream media organizations do not necessarily do honest retractions. They will include a line at the end of the article suggesting some of the facts are questionable; however, a decent chunk of people don’t read all that far down. More importantly, inconvenient facts are often buried in long diatribes. Did you even read the spreadsheet of news organizations? They are all right wing and some are considered somewhat reputable like the National Review or innocuous like campusreform. Why just cast them off entirely without exceed using any degree of nuance?
David Phillips
I agree with you, but it doesn't matter. People don't need facts or studies to vote. 2016 proved that.
You'll get better results with logic bombs like pic related. It's guaranteed to shut down a redpill thread, every time. We're forced to choose between hating jews and sucking orange cock.
John Parker
>why do normal people LOVE science? Because it DESTROYS delusional subhumans like you and that's top grade schadenfreude.
In the early 2000s creationists were our target, now it's Trump supporters. Both absolutely batshit science denying CULTS.
Jonathan Diaz
You’re intentionally ignoring the point he was making.
Ethan Jackson
Are you retarded?
Aaron Rogers
>Did you even read the spreadsheet of news organizations? They are all right wing LIE #78348421421
Absolutely a LYING LIE from a delusional dishonest LIAR from a LYING cult.
There are many left-wing sites on that list. Occupy, shareblue, etc.
Carter Morris
Stop LYING and calling for science to be censored then and we can discuss trivia like a random dumbshits thinking Drudge can't be listed as a phony news source for being the editor of a link list but actually he editorializes with headlines and links to several phony news sites so the trump supporter is objectively wrong again as always.
Camden Johnson
Yo, Looney Tunes. Take this message to your superiors.
You'll never get anywhere trying to win people over in the presidents main safespace and disinfo machine. But you CAN drive a wedge between the right and further right. The center right is disgusted by the anti semitism, and the batshit theocratic right is disgusted by the semitism.
Mason Wright
Originally meant to say most; forgot to change it. I like how you ignored my point below it.
James Perez
Nobody is calling for science to be censored.
Easton Martinez
Like I said, you dense motherfucker, if you want a response to smaller things then you must stop sabotaging your posts with obvious LIES and batshit insane clown shit like calling for science to be banned.
James Collins
Another LIE. Sup Forums is calling for this science study to be reported to mods for removal. You want to ban science because science doesn't care about your feelings.
Sebastian Walker
Why are you lying? Read again. I didn’t say that. You caught a fuck up and are going to proceed to ignore the rest of what I said. That is a dishonest tactic on your part.
Carson Foster
How is that getting “science” banned?
Daniel Barnes
Just stop lying then. How hard is it?
Oh I know. You feed your head with a majority population of false information from fake news (science study from Oxford uni) and so you must lie or your brain will have a meltdown. Cognitive dissonance.
Cooper Young
You directly implied I was calling for science to be silenced. Why are you lying? See
Xavier Morgan
Snap out of it dude. You're getting worked up over nothing and proving your own point. Look back at your first couple posts. See how logical and rational they were?
The idea is to get them worked up, foaming at the mouth. Not you. Don't take the bait, fight it.
Zachary James
This post is argumentum ad verecundiam. The links you provided do not refute any specific claims and the whole point of the articles comes down to trust us, it's fake news.
You think you're smart by posting fallacious argumentation tactics, but in turn you expose yourself as a low information idiot that just trusts instead of verifies.
It's ok, you're as dumb as niggresses are obese, it's not your fault that you were born with a decreased cognitive function compared to humans, but it is your fault that you continue to shovel shit in your superiors faces.
Have fun with your Aunt Jemimas.
Adrian Moore
See Just stop lying. How hard is it?
Zachary Phillips
...
Andrew Phillips
Wow. 79 replies and only the Jap calls out bait?
Michael Sanders
>scientific findings from a famous study that makes me uncomfortable is bait, please censor it
Lucas Evans
HOLY SHIT, are you trump supporters aware of how fucking cringe you are to normal people? Pic related is how you "defend" yourselves and it's obvious you're in a cult. A cult of science denial and emotionally supporting each other in the face of BTFO like some weeping tumblrina circlejerk shit.
Landon Nguyen
Continue with the histrionics, ad hominems in lieu of real refutations and ad verecundiams.
You didn't follow the sticky. Each fallacious shitpost you respond with is bannable but it serves as an inspiration for the ways that no one should ever choose to be, so it's a net positive for the board.
I'll give ya a couple weeks to search every term I used that you don't understand, maybe someday it'll dawn on you that you're a trisomy 21 victim. But, inevitably when that day never comes we can take solace in the fact that some nigger will probably kill you before you turn 30.
Oliver Parker
is it russian too? faggot op
Brayden Wilson
>you posted science that makes my feelings go boo boo so you have down's syndrome Trump supporters, ladies and gentlemen.
Christopher Cruz
>this lowbrow, low effort shitpost
Keep proving my point. Good job!
Jason Campbell
*converts to Trumpism* no u downs syndrom
Nathan King
This is what black lives matter would like the world to believe. False reality.
Jayden Barnes
I don’t acknowledge their authority because epistemologically they do not discern truth or knowledge through ration, reason or logic. The “truth” academia produces is in reality normative claims made to support their moral and political narrative
Jose Brown
Whoa user, this nigger isn't going to understand half of that post and will call you a trumpcuck in response.
Bentley Wood
>I don't trust scientists because science is just a trick to promote ideology Got a source for that fantastical claim or do you base all of your world view on peyote trips?
Ian Torres
>This is science and it's time for us to reflect and make a change.
hahahah in the entire history of humanity, not one person has ever changed their mind as a result of reasoned argument
its not how we are wired, unfortunately
Ryan Allen
>call every conservative outlet but FOX™ 'fake' >conveniently now most conservative news is 'fake'
Joseph Russell
You have a nigger flag, you can't read
James Nelson
How can you have a list of fake news without listing Huffington Post?
