Can someone explain to me why libertarianism is good and liberalism is bad?

can someone explain to me why libertarianism is good and liberalism is bad?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Pike#American_Civil_War
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

because libertarianism allows you to be conservative/right wing
>see Hans Herman Hoppe
while liberalism is globalist anti-white progressivism

Wow that's the stupidest thing I've heard yet. Makes sense it's from a german

>canadian flags insults anybody

>Germany destroys the white race 3 times in a row

neither are good

A FUCKING LEAF!!!

Liberalism wants to rule every aspect of your life. Libertarianism wants to leave you alone.

This

Why don't you refute his point then you fucking stupid leaf

Who told you libertarianism is good?
Only complete regressive idiots call themselves libertarians

What would be "progress" for you user?

Libertarianism is liberal.

this is the correct answer

Far from the truth...
>Libertarianism is for smaller government which then equates to less Gibbs
>Social libertarianism also is different from economic libertarianism
>Modern liberals are socialist trash

Not asking for a social system that predates civilization is a good start
Ignoring the social nature of humans
Ignoring that the individual is totally depended on society
Ignoring that anything that harms society harms the individual in the long run
Libertarians are the most myopic head in the sand idiots you can possibly find
Careful user, cause libertarianism usually leads to anarchocapitalism, the most degenerate ideology in the history of mankind
Get a cure before its too late

Both are bad.
Brace yourself for a pretty hefty Red Pill.
The Jews use your desire for freedom against you.
It works like this.
>Britbongs decide to tax the colonies
>Shabbos Goy freemasons working on behalf of kikes start sperging about "no taxation without representation"
>normalfags like rhymes and hate taxes so they side with the kikes against the monarchy
>fast forward
>1776 "muh freedoms" intensify
>fast forward
>1861 south wants more "muh freedoms", VP of the Confederacy is a full on kike
>fast forward
>Modern day, all your "freedoms" are gone. Your country is full of nigger noggins and spics. Jews not only run the show but they run the opposition to the show. And it all started with "muh freedoms" over a 3% tax on tea.
There's a quote from the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion on this topic that should dispell any idea you have of "Liberty" being good for anyone but your Jewish masters.
"In all corners of the earth the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-being of the GOYIM, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the GOY States. As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph: it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card—the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the GOYIM, that class which was the only defence peoples and countries had against us. On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the GOYIM we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force. "

I recognize the pitfalls but the alternative in the US is Republicans or Dems...both of which are retarded in our current situation

Dat pill tho

Yeah it's a painful one.
It's hard to admit you're what the Jews call a "blind agent" for wanting smaller government and personal liberty.

Jews are behind the pro-life and gun rights movements because abortion kills lots of niglets and gun promotion ensure a lot of dumb burgers kill each other so other countries don't have to. The American Revolution was not just about taxes but many things and if you've ever read the Declaration of Independence you'd know that. Most of the founding fathers were not freemasons and some even outright hated them. Freemasons are behind modern liberalism promoting guns and treating niggers like equals.
>1861 south wants more "muh freedoms", VP of the Confederacy is a full on kike
Judah P. Benjamin was not VP, he was other things like sec of war, state, attorney general.
Albert Pike was a Confederate Mason but he was subversive not pro-Confederate.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Pike#American_Civil_War

Everything about the founding fathers was shabbos. Sure not all of them were masons but an amazing amount of them were.
Anywho you can find the same tones you'll find in the Declaration of Independance in the Protocols of Zion. Check it out.
"In any State in which there is a bad organization of authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying out of liberalism, I find a new right—to attack by the right of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their liberalism. "

So absolute liberatarianism allows you to do anything. The sky is the limit.

Liberalism is want of social progression. Social progression kind of implies putting limitations on what you can do. So uh yeah. Problems with that are less freedoms.

Some liberatarianists are anarchists.

A lot of people like freedom. It means you can organize how you want, marry who you want, make as much money as you want.

Liberalism is bad because then there become limits. Like you have to pay an amount of money because your friends are starving, or because something you do violates some regulation.

That's it. I could do the other two as well, but you didn't ask.

Thanks it helped a lot