What are some shows that deconstruct their genre

What are some shows that deconstruct their genre

Fullmetal Alchemist.

>deconstruct their genre
No such thing. I hope you're not suggesting that Madoka was good.

Re:Creators is a deconstruction of the entire medium.

Re:Zero
Myriad Colors Phantom World
Neon Genesis Evangelion
Hunter x Hunter (2011 not the crappy 1999 version)

>implying deconstructions are anything but pretentious shit

That's a good joke comrade

OP is a deconstruction of his parent's genes.

Monogatari is a deconstruction of the harem genre.

So all deconstructions is just code word for this show is shit.

...

No joke

>deconstruction
*yawn*
Wake me up when this buzzword stops being spammed by brainlets who don't know it's meaning.

EVA wasn't a deconstruction, faggots. Its the same mecha shit with high school girls except with the protagonist being a whiny faggot

Umaru

I would've remembered this fondly if it just didn't end with that super gay shit.

HxH is a deconstruction of the shounen genre

The wheels aren't on the rails. It would keep bumping over the sleepers and be an uncomfortable ride.

Reminder that madoka magica simply subverts magical girl cliches. It's not a deconstruction

This is true.

MC threatens young villain with rape to show him just how edgy he can be, best part.

Subversion and deconstruction are not mutually exclusive.

No, but in this case the subversion is not deconstruction. Unless you'd like to make an argument otherwise?

Princess Principal is a deconstruction of the spy genre.

you forgot the pic

You have to start a thread at least with an example

No I didn't.

Phantom World is a deconstruction of the "good anime" genre.

Ninja Slayer

Phantom world was the show with the cute fairy that the MC didn't get with, right?

how would be?
like how does physical intimacy works with that size difference?

KLK

I'm pretty sure this was a deconstruction.
Really it's a masterpiece but I don't have the knowledge to delve into its more subtle symbolism.

FLCL does.

If you are implying what I think you're implying with that image, you are wrong.