ISS to be privatized

washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/02/11/the-trump-administration-wants-to-turn-the-international-space-station-into-a-commercially-run-venture/?utm_term=.078e32495bda

> The Trump administration wants to turn the International Space Station into a kind of orbiting real estate venture run not by the government, but by private industry.

> The White House plans to stop funding the station after 2024, ending direct federal support of the orbiting laboratory. But it does not intend to abandon the orbiting laboratory altogether and is working on a transition plan that could turn the station over to the private sector, according to an internal NASA document obtained by The Washington Post.

> “The decision to end direct federal support for the ISS in 2025 does not imply that the platform itself will be deorbited at that time — it is possible that industry could continue to operate certain elements or capabilities of the ISS as part of a future commercial platform,” the document states. “NASA will expand international and commercial partnerships over the next seven years in order to ensure continued human access to and presence in low Earth orbit.”

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_research_on_the_International_Space_Station
youtube.com/watch?v=QvTmdIhYnes
nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/benefits/ucyu_renshi.html
wallstreetpit.com/114310-bfr-spacex-afford-build/
reddit.com/r/spacex/wiki/cores
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RF_resonant_cavity_thruster
twitter.com/AnonBabble

trump is gonna sell condos on the moon
the gonads on that man
can he even be slowed down, its like its some kinda unstoppable train

and to think hes nearly eighty, some kinda super vitality or soemthing

Aliens

Why keep paying with public money for that thing forever? How much """science""" can they still be doing up there that hasn't been done already? Is it really worth THAT much money?
The Space Station Freedom would have been larger and much more useful. It was supposed to have what was needed to repair satellites, assemble spacecrafts, store lots of supply and fuel, etc.
The ISS never had much of a point to it. It made people feel warm and fuzzy that it was "international" though.

Who needs the ISS after Trump unseals 5000 classified patents and brings us Tesla technology?

> The ISS never had much of a point to it.
> an entire domain of experimentation relating to the effects of living off world in zero gravity which would be necessary for us to be aware of when sending our race to the stars in the next few millenia

yea, no purpose whatsoever, who even cares

What commecial ventures need the ISS? It's mostly a science mission as well as a testing platform for systems that will take us to Mars etc. We need to be able to test the ability of things to operate in space for very long periods of time.

I like the idea of privitization usually. SpaceX is a great example. But cutting edge science is often done without a direct application in mind. There are countless discoveries that turned out to be revolutionary that were not seen as revolutionary at the time.

Nobel Prizes are often awareded 20 or 30 years after the fact when we realize the importance of people's work.

You think people gave a flying fuck about the discovery of the electron in the late 1800's? Now it is the backbone of how electronics work. Good luck understanding semi-conductors without electron theory. Imagine telling the average person in 1900 about electrons. They would be like "whoopdyfukin doo, how is that ever going to help anybody"

And yet no one has stayed more than a year in the ISS. It didn't even set any record.
If that was the main use for it, they wasted it big time.

Bigelow will buy it

> implying ISS exists

More than anything the ISS proved how impossible non robotic space travel and industrialization is. Humans quickly go to shit without gravity, and any vessel that is light enough to be economic to move around is also almost totally unshielded from radiation.

maybe you fat fucks will actually do more with it if it makess you money.
>original plan
>manufacturing
>repairs
>refueling
>observatory
>staging base for missions to the Moon, Mars and asteroids

What a fucking retard.

2024 was it's normal end of life date anyway.

He's extending the project by allowing the private domain to invest in it, whilst NASA can go onto bigger and better things.

It's a win win.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_research_on_the_International_Space_Station
Wasn't that hard, leaf

> implying ISS exists

You can watch it fly overhead. I do it several times a year. Look up a how to online if you care. I'm not going to spoonfeed you.

That’s just a hologram

Exactly. But that’s not the implied nature of it by the title the kikes threw up there. Friendly reminder the kikes are fake news.

>implying the us owns the ISS

>Implying anyone can stop them

youtube.com/watch?v=QvTmdIhYnes
>youtube.com/watch?v=QvTmdIhYnes

the larp is over

I hate people like you who mindlessly repeat stupid shit that Joe Rogan and NDT tell them.

The ISS is about the size of a bus. The idea that you could "see" anything that size that far away with your eye is dumb. And even with a telescope you'll at most see a barely discernable spec of something. You're certainly not seeing a recognizable space station with no purpose where women don't even cut their hair before going up there.

You are confirmed retarded. You can see it cross the sky at the exact time and direction that it is expected to appear. It is going way faster than an aircraft.

Or do you think that out of pure fucking coincidence there is a white dot that crosses the sky at the exact right time and direction every single time?

>What is light reflecting off reflective surfaces
>What is transiting over the sun

0/10

don't respond to obvious trolls, you idiots.

Pic related

...

That's the thing with flat earthers. It really is impossible to tell the real ones from the people just pretending to be retarded.

lmao thats cheese

>things people used to write their phd thesis

>nothing that was used to benefit anyone else
What a good use of funds.

They literally cut their hair on the ISS with regular ass trimmers with a nigger-rigged vacuum on it that doesn’t even work.
I laughed so fucking hard I peed a little. There is literally no reason for any hair to be cut onboard the space station and a million reasons not too

>mfw sun is cheese too
>mfw all celestial objects are cheese in different stages of ripening

It's supposed to be decommissioned in 4 years, do they really think some excentric billionaire is going to buy it and do the repair for them? It's not going to happen. It's physically impossible anyway when something gets decommissioned it's because it's rotten anyway.

Why would you respond to either one as if you could change their mind by directly addressing their points?

Their mistake lies in a fundamental solipsistic distrust of everything. You'd somehow have to convince them that they can trust people before you could tackle anything upriver from that.

yeah who needs scientific research? Lets put all that money into welfare and being racist online.

it's going to be like that McDonalds barge that just sat in Vancouver for years

If humanity colonizes space, will we stay united or balkanize?

source?

what was the results of the research? did it have any pragmatic accomplishments or was it all esoteric?

>stay united
>implying

Pretty sure if any products or quality of life improvements were derived from it you'd hear about it because pop-sci faggots would croon about it for weeks.

nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/benefits/ucyu_renshi.html
I fucking LOVE science!

good idea, otherwise it would be trashed

You can’t be serious fucking lol.

Except now it's two football field worth of metal ready to crash god knows where.

Why not modify it into an actual spacecraft with space torpedos and shit? That would be cash.

Depends on governing structure and tech, followed by leadership and culture.

>products or quality of life improvements
Space programs don't exist for the benefit of worthless couch-ridden fatties. The only people who tout those benefits are people trying to justify space to worthless couch-ridden fatties.

This, it was planned to be abandoned after that point anyway.

If the private industry has any uses for it and is willing to pay for maintenance and upkeep, I'd say let them have at it. It's really a pretty good idea to get some more mileage out of the station than governments had originally planned.

The 2013 NASA's Office of Inspector General (OIG) report, Extending the Operational Life of the International Space Station Until 2024, shows the ISS annual operating costs at $2.9 billion.

SpaceX isn't going to buy it. They spent over a billion dollars just developing the falcon 9 and it's going to take them at least a decade to recoup that cost.

if they do, they're fucked. They'll end up like tesla after they bought the sinking ship Solar City.

Considering the harshness of space only the absolute best and brightest will survive.

I foresee space humanity basically becoming it's own branch of super humans which return to reclaim earth from the orcish hordes in a few hundred years.

THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED
THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN CALLED
>THE EMERGENCY SHUTTLE HAS BEEN RECALLED

>there is a black dot transitting across the sun

Yes, the only possible explanation for that is a useless space station. It can't be any satellite or natural object

You can go on fucking youtube you retard and look up live correspondences from the ISS with women who don't even bother keeping their hair together with a hairband. They just let it fly around wildly. Its so absurd how confident you people feel in making demonstrably false statements as if there was no way to look it up

It's very easy to direct it into the ocean. That's outside of the environment.

I already said it provided trust fund graduate students material for their Ph.D's.

That's because reading's apparently too hard for you.

Yeah, remember when they lost control of that Chinese one and when bits of Mir landed on farmers farm and they told them to stop selling bits because they're radioactive?

Why does it have to be a single company?

It could be a dozen different companies sharing the costs, just like many countries and space agencies are currently sharing the burden.

But again, it hinges on them being able to find uses for it, which remains to be seen. If they can't get a return on their investment, nothing is going to come of this. Will definitely be interesting to see how it pans out, though.

its bad businesss but with reusable falkkkon heavy, maybe not so much down the road

Communists don't have good track records with complex machinery.

>someone buys it
>removes all the science shit and makes it a luxury hotel instead
>reaps profit off richfags

I-Is this the power of schizophrenia?
Pretty sure we agree it’s fake and gay.

>will most certainly crash with 4 years because it's due to be decommissioned but let's keep not reading the thread and keep trying posting something screencapable

>Why does it have to be a single company?
>it hinges on them being able to find uses for it
You said it yourself. There just isn't any use for it. There never was. They can't even boost it out of its orbit. the structure wasn't designed for it.

>reusable
They've never demonstrated this. Oddly enough, they've never even flown an F9 first stage more than twice even though they say they're capable of at least 50 flights.

They would lose their insurance coverage so fast their heads would spin.

They -lost control- of that Chinese one. i.e. it wasn't a planned deorbit.

What are you talking about with Mir?

The ISS is a waste of money. We need to beyond low Earth orbit. The BFR will do that.

spacex would go bankrupt if they actually made that. Their ROI is extremely poor because of how much they try to undercut the competition.

Actually a very good idea. Federal budget for ISS runs out around 2022. The Russian propulsion segment will have to be jettisoned and replaced around that time because of its deterioration.

For reference the propulsion section was the first piece to launch and has been in space since the mid 90s. Very long time very rough on the components considering it was built before the soviet union collapsed before being repurposed after the collapse.


Only way for ISS to continue is as a commercial venture with science still at the core. Or better would be if commercial partners split the cost with nasa.

With iss not fully in federal money Nasa would have the budget needed to build deep space hardware for Mars.

However, trump should also outright cancel SLS since commercial companies are already building rockets cheaper and larger than SLS and SLS has still not flown even once.

Tldr if nasa focused all its power on developing deep space hardware and surface hardware for colonies and only leased launches and launchers we could get shit done.

Mir was a controlled deorbiting and debris felt all across NA. It's not because muh chinese are dumb, everyone gambles with whats up there. The best they can do is an educated guess but once it's out of it's carefully planned loop, all bets are off.

>They've never demonstrated this
All they did was glue three falcon 9's together

Why are you trying to pretend like you know more than the people in the actual business?
SpaceX operates through government contracts, if they make that rocket it'll be because NASA told them to.

so after landing and twice reuse you think its improbable that they go beyond this number? nonsense
what is improbable is launch costs going below 10 million for the next 40 years

nasa is shit, otherwise they woulndt be developing a SLS

>>They've never demonstrated this
I meant the reusability aspect. They've not published anything or allowed anyone to inspect the process by which they refurbish the first stages or the exact cost of doing so.

>SpaceX operates through government contracts, if they make that rocket it'll be because NASA told them to.
They're contractor, they're not a subsidiary. They do what they want and people buy their services.

>debris felt all across NA
Seriously tho, what are you talking about? You said it landed on Chinese farms before.

>everyone gambles with whats up there
True, but the gamble wasn't anything to do with deorbiting.

It's the size of two football fields number one.

Number two I have personally seen it irl on more than one occasion with and without a telescope.

Number three if you fall back on "Hurr it's a hologram im woke as fuck earth is flat durr" I will call you a Jewish disinfo shill because you people are.

Flat earth and space (((skeptics))) are literally funded by left wing sjws celebrity's sjws and brainlet tier mud race fake skinheads and are a cancer on the world.

If you think this is a hologram why even post? Just go move in with your masters in Israel you fucking filthy kikes.

>because of how much they try to undercut the competition
It's about being the first company to get it's foot in the door. Elon is making a huge gamble. That takes nuts.

Maybe
wallstreetpit.com/114310-bfr-spacex-afford-build/

It'll cost like $400 million to build the entire thing.

>so after landing and twice reuse you think its improbable that they go beyond this number? nonsense
They say they can, but thus far they have not. They launch and land them twice and then store them somewhere. Some autist on reddit has a big table of all the cores and they have never launched them more than twice and there are currently no plans to do so.

reddit.com/r/spacex/wiki/cores

No, I didn't say that, were you even born when that happened? Do you even know what I'm talking about? You seem to be under the impression I'm making something like you're actually unaware of stuff that happened. Like you'd be, say, an underage fag?

Floating cathedral above the earth, basically a monument to human achievement brought to the world by mostly white and Asian nations. Took 1.5 million human years work to accomplish when adding up all the time spent on designing building and putting into orbit. Says it was a waste of time, only comparable object maybe a cathedral that took a mere 15,000 years worth of human time to build in terms of all the human effort simultaneously put into it over multi generations.

...

Boeing did it 70 years ago. They made the saturn 5.

That's most likely the per rocket cost, not the R&D cost. The F9 alone cost over a billion dollars to develop.

No fucking way

Once human's have the vast expanse of space at their fingertips, they'll all split off

Then 50k years later, the fruits of those will meet back up, you'll have asians that have evolved into strange creatures with weird snorkels because of the atmosphere on the new planet


Shit will get weird

YEAR 2027
>DA-NA-NUH-NUH-NUH-ALWAYS ENJOY COCA COLA ! BOOOOOOOOOM !!!!!

wants and is are to very different words

They never demonstrated Falcon 9 reusability?

>They've not published anything or allowed anyone to inspect the process by which they refurbish the first stages or the exact cost of doing so.
Are you sure, or are you like apparently everyone else on this website and just too lazy to look simple things up?

>They do what they want and people buy their services.
People, meaning almost entirely the government.

>ISS size of a bus
You mightbe right if you don't incluse the solar panels.

The technology needed to build these was pioneered and tested on iss and the shuttle program.

How is it possible this many fucking brainlet retards exist and don't know recent tier American history?

How soon before people forget this history of the internet in the 00s also?

Fucking hell man you people are fucking retarded.

pepsiniggers can not and will not survive against Coca Cola master race

No he would still be fucking wrong the pressurized section is larger than a space shuttle and a space shuttle could carry the equivalent of TWO single decker busses in its cargo hold alone.


Please don't pet the retards folks they are beyond help.

>They never demonstrated Falcon 9 reusability?
Ship of Theseus. If they replace 95% of the parts, is it still the same rocket?

Mostly what i'm saying is that they've never demonstrated a cost savings. Landing a rocket on its tail is an old trick at this point in the game, the whole point is that doing as such is cheaper than making a new rocket. There is no evidence that it is.

>Are you sure, or are you like apparently everyone else on this website and just too lazy to look simple things up?
I've done my best to check and i've asked countless people about it.

>People, meaning almost entirely the government.
Pretty much.. But even nasa wouldn't be so stupid as to tell them to make a direct competitor to the SLS.

of course there are not. but there will be. how many launches do you think they have per month? also dont link that fucking page to me ffs its an insult

What techologies were developed for ISS?
We need to move on from low orbit.

it will be Industry Star wars, Google and Apple A.I. robot astronauts will be duking it out in orbit on space stations as genetically engineered space octopi strangle both robots and humans floating in the vacuum of space as star ships whiz by and blast them with lasers , OH SHIT BRO

You're right, you just said farms.
And no I still don't have a clue, since Mir was deorbited into the ocean.
So for the third time what the fuck are you actually talking about?

>but there will be
I think it is very conspicuous that they rate the things at 50 launches but cut them off at just two.

What are they afraid of?

>also dont link that fucking page to me ffs its an insult
Nobody is questioning your status, don't give them reason to.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RF_resonant_cavity_thruster

I think we are at least on the verge or robotic drone ships sent to other galaxies at near light speed travel.

for you