>Almost all white nations are now flooded with non whites making struggles for fascism or national socialism dead ends in single nation states
>Creating a greater European empire in the form of Evolas New Roman Empire or Mosleys Europe as a nation is our only realistic project
>In 100 years China, India, Africa will have undergone huge industrialization and economic growth leading to consolidated non white giant states capable of challenging Europe as a whole as power blocks
>Europa needs to remove all nation states and become a single economic unit, giving us an enormous army, economic strategy and material resource pool to rival these emerging powers
>All European people are descendants of the Indo-European race, comprised of three initial groups, the Middle eastern farmers, the western hunter gatherers and the Aryans
>Mass scale mixing of our race will result in a reintegration of the race and along with eugenics promote a healthier and more hardy peoples
>Nationalism is dead, Long live the Fourth European Reich!
I think nationalism is a dead end, Pan Europeanism is our only hope!
Other urls found in this thread:
>All European people are descendants of the Indo-European race, comprised of three initial groups, the Middle eastern farmers, the western hunter gatherers and the Aryans
You are contradicting yourself.
>Mass scale mixing of our race will result in a reintegration of the race and along with eugenics promote a healthier and more hardy peoples
How exactly would it help? Isn't it a loss of effort? Why just don't encourage healthy and intelligent people to reproduce, and leave rest to national selection? How mixing germanic and romance people would be beneficial itself to the point that state should encourage it?
Ethno nationalism is a dead end.
you are tell that to the jews or chinese
Europe needs a Pan European identity to survive, but this can't replace national identity, it has to reinforce it.
The French need to remain French, and Estonians need to remain Estonian, but they all need to be united in standing against Islam and Chinese political influence.
Creating a single macro state is just a ridiculous premise. The EU already has the issue of Germany being the primary economic producer, and places like Greece are just net drains. That system isn't sustainable. It opens up far too much weakness.
>but this can't replace national identity
Why?
Multi cultural plurality doesn't work in practice. You either have people who continually self segregate, retaining their own culture and traditions, or you have people who integrate into the aggregate culture and lose their historic identity. The form shows that people totally reject the premise, and the latter shows that those who accept the premise are worse off for it.
What happens to a people who they lose all national and cultural identity is that they become empty consumerists. With no real traditions left alive they turn into vessels to be filled by Hollywood morality, pop culture, degeneracy.
People need to retain their ties to blood and soil to remain who they are. What has happened to America culturally in the last 100 years shouldn't serve as an example to emulate. We're a living case of the dysfunction that deracination creates.
Yes, but why it can't be universal Western identity in place of national ones? It still can condemn hedonism or left wing values. Of course the culture in different parts of Europe wodn't be the same, but why should we stick to XVIII centuary's idea of nation state?
Pan Europeanism was invented by the same fagget who created the current method of white genocide.
>Why have 50 cultures the Jews would have to subvert to control you when you can make it easier for them by all sharing one?
Same reason we have different governments.
What is universal western identity?
What quantifiable elements are we talking about that would be worth destroying national identity for?
The notion that this would have any degree of benefit at all is an untested theory that could have potentially catastrophic fallout.
Wrong. It was the Charlemagne
How would it make it easier for them? With one culture they woudn't be able to use divide and reconquer tactics. Just look when world wars led.
Wrong. Pan-Europeanism as we know it was created by Kalergi.
Europe became the most powerful place on Earth through competition and rivalry, not through cooperation. Sure we banded together to defend ourselves from external threats, such as on the crusades, but to unite completely would lead to stagnation and a loss of national identity, not something I would like to see. We need to find other alternatives.
Actually western identity existed before nationalisms where introduced by free masonry in order to destroyed it. It was based on catholicism and ideas inherited from classical thought. And of course even today there are ideas universal for the west and some of them are beneficial like scientific method, rule of law, industry, meritocracy and so on. Also the identity could encourage preserve biological qualities of white men.
Rivalry don't have to be on national level. Let individuals and corporations(in original, not a meme sense) compete, also we would still have Far East to compete with.
>. We need to find other alternatives.
I believe that alternative is fierce nationalism and market competition in new domains. We could have nations issuing crypto coins competing against one another, developing new speculative markets, pursuing small governments and investing in their own infrastructure to spur growth.
The stagnation of maintaining status quo is a poisonous thing in its own right.
The Catholic church definitely spread some core values across Europe, but everywhere it reached still retained its own unique national identity. In some instances the people were so adverse to change that the church itself changed to accommodate them. The religious doctrine and scholarly thought alone weren't overwriting the traditions and practices of these newly converted people.
So a very loose union? Maybe that could work as long as it remained centered on improving trade and wealth and not on increasing political centralisation like the EU.
>How would it make it easier for them?
How would it not? They need to get 3-4 good agents into the mainstream to push their ideas without people knowing the longterm effects of those ideas. Same as they do with Hollywood, but now they own it completely.
Pan-Europeanism is nigger tier Spencer faggotry. Far right nationalism in each country is the best solution and could easily solve this problem. There was no nigger problem in Europe until this current era of E.U kikery.
Yeah, let Europeans start killing each other once more, to enforce position of USA as leader
Under what would europe unite though? Religion? Most western europeans are godless or larping as pagans, christianity there is below 50%. Monarchy? The current system of liberal democracy cannot sustain such a drastic transformation without wholesale collapse, absolute monarchism is also a shit system that was consciously rejected in most european countries.
I wholly support your idea OP, but we have to be realistic , first you need to take the US bandaid off. Europe needs a nice civil divorce from the US empire, before we can look at transforming our societies. Then you have the EU, which is a liberal capitalists globalist wet dream, it cannot be reformed, and it looks like it will be replaced by Putinist-Erdogan mafia style nationalist regimes.
The only reason why absolute monarchies failed is the weren't absolutist enough. Stuarts and Bourbons shoudn't have tolerated very existence of parliaments.
Yeah life for the white masses was great as oppressed peasants and later working class totally emiserated by poverty.
Anything other than pro worker racial nationalism is not i the interests of 99% of white people.
Baed on ancestry, blood, soil, metaphysics, common military history, spirituality and a shared new view of Volk.
Well that all sounds great in theory and I'm sure the apparatchik in Brussels would love it
People impoverished by todays standards because of lower technology level. I don't think that totally free market is optimal solution, but while USA where more or less classical liberal the living standards of working class has greatly improved. And you can have absolute monarchy linked with corporatism as Charles Maurras envisioned.
People * were
Capitalism is a jewish anti racial anti nationalist economic system. Free markets are why every polish man has left for the shekels.
As I said it is not the optimal solution, but there were free market states that where successful. And saying it is jewish invention is kind of childish it emerges naturally and kikes adopted to this because in middle ages their religion was the only one that didn't opposed usury.
Kill Yourself Mongrel
I can trace my bloodline back to Norman Royalty, you SwedeCuck.
Many WN want to hijack the EU and turn in into a rational pro white apparatus. As much chance of that as voting someone onto office who isn't a zionist cuck.
Fuck off, North is for the Nords.
We Nords want a new Kalmar union. Norway, Sweden, Denmark and the danish islands.
Germany can team up with Britain and France.
Soon the North will be massively non white. This petty nationalism is why we will be replaced in 100 years.
Rome and Greek empires were multi racial.
I'm a Scot, I'd rather team up with you guys than the English cunts
you mean they enslaved all races
No shit, our best hope is for fascist revolutionaries to gain control of the EU and enact pan European policy. They have created a powerful bureaucratic structure with very few checks and balances that can be Exploited
Scottish nationalism is implicitly left wing. Scotland and England and Wales together did things no other peoples have. What a shame the scots seems to of become anti-colonial faggots.
Okay, scotts can join the North.
You're not nordic you faggot. Stop trying to soil my bloodline.