/wu/ - Congresswoman Brianna Wu General - High Energy Edition

This thread is for Wudogs ONLY to discuss Brianna Wu's 2018 congressional campaign.

>Quick Overview
Brianna Wu is running for congress and aims to support the rights of LGBT folks and to fight against online harassment which she was a victim of.

>SHE FOUGHT THE ALT-RIGHT AND WON
Now let her fight for you.

Are you ready for a Bolder Democratic Party?

>IF YOU DO NOT SEE A GENERAL IN THE CATALOG COPY FROM THE PASTEBIN & START ONE!
PASTEBIN - pastebin.com/kdq7C16w

RESOURCES:
>QUICK RUNDOWN
pastebin.com/ed1WhMuV

>Official Twitter
twitter.com/Spacekatgal

>Official Campaign Site
briannawu2018.com/

>Platform
briannawu2018.com/platform

>First campaign ad
youtube.com/watch?v=wRnuJ-JLAV0

>Based Wu interview on her Congressional Run - Greater Boston
youtu.be/rm915ayRQ4I

>Based Wu interviewed by David Pakman on her experience fighting (and beating) the Alt Right
youtu.be/ETVcInunAss

>Based Wu in the New York Times (March 2017 Interview)
archive.is/aEngT

>Based Wu interview with STN (September 2017 Interview)
archive.is/zqlFB

>Based Wu speaks out about her experience as a tech entrepreneur
archive.is/H6IXn

#imwithher

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/6xH0r
archive.is/xsM4W
archive.is/lZ9Xe
archive.is/N1TbD
archive.is/FhLm2
Sup
alisonmcbain.com/blog/speak-of-the-devil-the-lies-of-frank-wu
archive.today/69Qmn.
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

WU YOU GONNA CALL

>to fight against online harassment which she was a victim of
She was also the person harassing herself too but that is generally overlooked

WE WU'Z

LETS GO /femmepenes/

I'm a #wumissile now

Step 1: get laughed at because your only experience in life was chopping your dick off and making a shit video game

brian just stop

Is she going to be in a debate with more serious democrats? I hope so

#metoo

His name is John Walker Flynt btw

NU THX

NUCLEAR MOON ROCKS

brave retweet by our future senator

Flynt of Hustler btw

...

J O H N

.

...

How are people this ugly allowed to exist?

>Brianna Wu is running for congress and aims to support the rights of LGBT folks and to fight against online harassment which she was a victim of.

What the fuck
When does this timeline settle down

Jesus christ I wouldn't vote for that cunt just based on her looks.

>her
Wu lad.

...

>she
>her

>Based Wu kills virtual nazis to raise money for her campaign
archive.is/6xH0r

>Based Wu will make Telecom anti-trust her mission if elected
archive.is/xsM4W

>Based Wu plans to convert social security number to cryptographic keys
archive.is/lZ9Xe

>Based Wu says Super Mario Bros. is about "white colonialism"
archive.is/N1TbD

>Based Wu says "it's time for harassers to be held accountable"
archive.is/FhLm2

...

IGNORE ALL TRANSFAGGOT SHIT, IT BELONGS TO

For a racially pure people, conscious of its blood, can
never be enslaved by the Jew. It will forever only be the
master of bastards in this world.

Thus he systematically tries to lower the racial level by
a permanent poisoning of the individual.

In the political sphere, however, he begins to replace the
idea of democracy by that of the dictatorship of the
proletariat.

In the organized mass of Marxism he has found the
weapon which makes him now dispense with democracy and
which allows him, instead, to enslave and to 'rule' the
people dictatorially with the brutal fist.

He now works methodically towards the revolution in a
twofold direction: economically and politically.

Thanks to his international influence, he ensnares with a
net of enemies those peoples which put up a too violent
resistance against the enemy from within, he drives them
into war, and finally, if necessary, he plants the flag of
revolution on the battlefield.

In the field of economics he undermines the States until
the social organizations which have become unprofitable
are taken from the State and submitted to his financial
control.

Politically he denies to the State all means of self-
preservation, he destroys the bases of any national self-
dependence and defense, he destroys the confidence in the
leaders, he derides history and the past, and he pulls down
into the gutter everything which is truly great.

In the domain of culture he infects art, literature, the-
ater, smites natural feeling, overthrows all conceptions of

beauty and sublimity, of nobility and quality, and in turn
he pulls the people down into the confines of his own
swinish nature.

Religion is ridiculed, customs and morality are presented
as outlived, until the last supports of a nationality in the
fight for human existence in this world have fallen.

(e) [sic] Now begins the great, final revolution. The Jew,
by gaining the political power, casts off the few cloaks
which he still wears. The democratic national Jew becomes
the blood Jew and the people's tyrant. In the course of a
few years he tries to eradicate the national supporters of
intelligence, and, while he thus deprives the people of their
natural spiritual leaders, he makes them ripe for the slave's
destiny of permanent subjugation.

The most terrible example of this kind is offered by Rus-
sia where he killed or starved about thirty million people

That Bolshevism was a creation of Jewry has long been a
favorite anti-Semitic assertion. In 1920 Hitler met Dietrich
Eckart, a journalist of ability who for some years edited the
Vdlkischer Bcobachtcr. Mein Kampf closes with his name, and
some of it reflects his style. It may be that Eckart suggested
writing the book. His statue, festooned with wreaths, is the
ptice de resistance of the Brown House, Munich. Eckart was
the author of a pamphlet, Der Bolschewismus von Moses bis
Lenin (Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin). It was believed at
the time that Lenin was a Jew.

The Russian Revolution had its roots in bad government.
Jews suffered from this at least as much as did other groups,
but in addition they had to contend with fanatical anti-Semitic
organizations for which the Czar was not radical enough. That
does not explain, however, why the Kerensky Revolution was
undermined by Bolshevists, and the door is left open to specula-
tion. Lenin was transported from Switzerland to Russia in
1917 in a sealed railway coach by order of General Ludendorff.
The hope was that he would be able to wean the Russian army

with a truly diabolic ferocity, under inhuman tortures, in
order to secure to a crowd of Jewish scribblers and stock
exchange robbers the rulership over a great people.

But the end is not only the end of the freedom of the
peoples oppressed by the Jew, but also the end of these
peoples' parasites themselves. With the death of the victim
this peoples' vampire will also die sooner or later. <
If we let all the causes of the German collapse pass before
our eyes, there remains as the ultimate and decisive cause
the non-recognition of the race problem and especially of
the Jewish danger.

The defeats in the battlefield of August, 1918, would
have been easily bearable. They were out of proportion to
the victories of our people. Not the defeats have over-
thrown us, but we were overthrown by that power which
prepared these defeats by robbing our people systemati-
cally, for many decades, of its political and moral instincts

from thoughts of continuing the War, and thus make possible
a separate peace with Germany. It is usually held that the
original idea came from Dr. Helphand, an adventurer with a
flair of genius and a gift for intrigue. Lenin, aided by Trotski,
gained control of Russia, and the separate peace which al-
most cost Lenin his prestige was negotiated at Brest-
Litovsk. That (if one excepts Trotski) Jews had an unduly
important part in these developments is disproved by two
facts: that only a small percentage of either the Communist
Party leadership or its following was Jewish ; and by the reac-
tion of leading Jewish Socialists not favorable to the Bolshevist
minority. There is little evidence to support any current as-
sumptions that international Jewish aid was given to Lenin.
In America, England, and France, Jewish groups naturally
favored Kerensky.

and forces which alone enable and entitle peoples to exist
in this world.

The old Reich, by inattentively passing by the question
of the preservation of the racial foundations of our nation-
ality, disregarded also the sole right which alone gives life
in this world. Peoples which bastardize themselves, or
permit themselves to be bastardized, sin against the will of
eternal Providence, and their ruin by the hand of a stronger
nation is consequently not an injustice that is done to them,
but only the restoration of right. If a people no longer
wants to respect the qualities which Nature has given it
and which root in its blood, then it has no longer the right
to complain about the loss of its worldly existence.

its politics. boston liberals are retarded enough to elect a tranny.

AND YOU'RE RETARDED ENOUGH TO BUMP A TRANSFAGGOT THREAD!

Sup Forums.org/faq
>What is "sage"?
>Entering "sage" (by itself) into the [Options] field while replying will cause the thread not to bump to the top of the page. Contrary to popular belief, a sage is not a downvote, and should not be used as one. "sage-bombing" or announcing that you've saged a thread may result in a ban.

This, desu

Shits gonna be lit

TRANSFAGGOT SHIT DOES NOT BELONG ON THIS BOARD, IGNORE IT!

It's politicis you retard. Wu is running in Boston like said

The title of this board is Sup Forums - Politically Incorrect, there are a plethora of places where you can promote transfaggot shit, so why don't you take it there?

Everything in this world can be improved. Any defeat
can become the father of a later victory. Any lost war can
become the cause of a later rise, every distress the fertiliza-
tion of human energy, and from every suppression can come
the forces of a new spiritual rebirth, as long as the blood
remains preserved in purity.

Alone the loss of the purity of the blood destroys the
inner happiness forever; it eternally lowers man, and never
again can its consequences be removed from body and mind.
Only upon examining and comparing, in the face of this
sole question, all the other problems of life, one will be able
to judge how ridiculously small the latter are as compared
with the former. How all of them are only temporal, while
the question of the preservation of the blood is one of human
eternity.

All really important symptoms of decay of the pre-War
time ultimately go back to racial causes.

No matter whether questions of general law or excres-
cences of economic life, whether cultural symptoms of de-
cline or political processes of degeneration, whether ques-
tions of faulty education at school or evil influence on the
grown-ups by the press, etc., are involved, always and
everywhere it is fundamentally the non-recognition of
racial considerations of one's own people or the non-recog-
nition of a foreign, a racial, danger.

Therefore, all attempts at reforms, all works of social aid
and political efforts, all economic rise, and every apparent
increase of spiritual knowledge were nevertheless unimpor-
tant in their consecutive symptoms. The nation and that
organism which enables and preserves its life on this earth,
that is, the State, did not become internally healthier, but
they visibly languished more and more. All the sham pro-
sperity of the old Reich could not conceal the inner weak-
ness, and any attempt at an actual strengthening of the
Reich failed again and again on account of passing by the
most important question.

It would be wrong to believe that the adherents of the
various political doctrines which doctored about the Ger-
man national body, nay, that even the leaders, to a certain
extent, were bad or malevolent men. Their activity was
condemned to unproductiveness for the sole reason that, in
the most favorable case at best, they saw and tried to fight
the symptomatic forms of our general sickness, but passed
blindly by the germ. He who systematically follows the
political development of the old Reich is bound to arrive,
upon quiet examination, at the realization that even at the
time of unity, and thus of rise of the German nation, the
inner decay was already on its way, and that, despite all
apparent political successes and rising economic wealth, the
general situation became worse from year to year. Even
the elections for the Reichstag, with their outward swelling
of the Marxist votes, announced the more and more rapidly
approaching internal, and, with it, external, collapse. All
the successes of the so-called bourgeois parties were of no
value, not only because they were unable to check the
increasing numbers of the Marxist flood even with so-called
bourgeois electoral victories, but because above all even

they themselves harbored the ferment of deterioration.
The bourgeois world itself, without its knowing it, was
infected with the cadaveric poison of Marxist ideas, and its
resistance originated frequently rather from the competi-
tive envy of ambitious leaders than from a rejection in prin-
ciple of the adversaries, determined to fight to the extreme*
There was only one who, during these long years, fought
with imperturbable regularity, and this was the Jew. His
star of David then rose higher and higher in the same
measure in which our people's will for self-preservation
vanished.

Therefore, in August, 1914, it was not a people, deter-
mined to attack, which rushed to the battlefield, but what
took place was only the last flaring-up of the national
instinct of self-preservation in face of the progressing paci-
fist Marxist paralyzation of our national body. As even in
those fateful days one did not recognize the internal enemy,
all outward resistance was in vain, and Providence gave the
reward, not to the victorious sword, but it followed the law
of eternal revenge.

Out of this inner realization there were to be formed lor
us the leading principles, as well as the tendency of the new
movement which alone, in our conviction, was enabled to
For assertions like these, General Ludendorff is primarily
responsible. Irritated by failure and by some rather tactless
attempts to taunt him for that failure, he took refuge in anti-
Semitic utterances, and lent his great name to reckless calum-
nies. Had either he or von Hindenburg remembeied the Jewish
dead of their armies and stopped the tirades with one dear
word of disapproval, the whole anti-Semitic campaign would
have collapsed. It may be that this was too much to expect of
men smarting under humiliation and defeat. In addition
Ludendorff retreated into the shadows of a mystical German
faith that lent fervor and significance to his attacks.

IF NOW at the end of this book I describe the first
period of development of our movement and deal briefly
with a series of questions caused by it, it is not done in
order to give a treatise on the spiritual aims of the move-
ment. The goal and the task of the new movement are so
enormous that one can deal with them only in a volume of
their own. Therefore, in a second volume I will deal in de-
tail with the foundations (and their programs) of the move-
ment and will try to draw a picture of what we conceive by
the word 'State. 1 With 'we* I mean all those hundreds of
thousands who fundamentally long for the same thing with-
out their finding the words in detail to describe the outward
appearance of what is before their inner eye. For with all
great reforms the remarkable thing is that at first they have
as their champion perhaps only a single individual, but as
their supporters many millions. For centuries their goal is
often the inner ardent wish of hundreds of thousands, till
one man stands up as the proclaimer of such a general will
and as the flag-bearer of an old longing he helps it to victory
in the form of a new idea.

That millions harbor in their hearts the longing for a
fundamental change in the existing circumstances is proved
by the deep discontent from which they suffer. It is ex-
pressed in thousandfold forms of symptoms, with some in
despair and hopelessness, with others in aversion, in wrath
and indignation, with the one in indifference and with the
other in furious exuberance. Also those who are sick and
tired of elections, as well as the many who tend towards the
most fanatical extreme of the left, may be looked upon as
witnesses to this inner discontent.

It was the aim of the young movement to appeal first of
all to these elements. It ought not to form an organization
of those who are content and satisfied, but to bring together
those who are tortured by suffering, those who are without
peace and unhappy and discontented, and above all it must
not swim on the surface of the national body, but has to
root in its foundations.
f Taken from the purely political point of view, the fol-
lowing picture presented itself in 1918: a people is torn into
two parts. The one, by far the smaller, comprises the layers
The elections of May, 1924, which followed the most hectic
period in the history of the short-lived Republic the Ruhr
invasion, inflation, the Hitler putsch, revaluations of the cur-
rency, and the parleys that led to the signing of the Dawes
Plan was marked by a trend to the Left and Right extremes.
The conservative German National Party became the second
strongest group in the Reichstag, the number of Communist
deputies rose to 62 (there had been only 2 in 1920), and the
DciUsch-voelkischc Frcihcitspartei (German Folkish Freedom
Party), founded by Right radical dissidents from the conservm-

of national intelligence with exclusion of all those who are
physically active. It is outwardly national, but by this
word it is unable to imagine something different from a very
lukewarm and weak representation of so-called State in-
terests which in turn seem identical with dynastic interests.
It tries to fight for its ideas and aims with spiritual weapons
which are as fragmentary as they are superficial, but which
in themselves fail completely in the face of the enemy's
brutality. With one single terrible stroke this class, which
just previously was still the ruling one, is thrown over, and
now, in trembling cowardice, it bears every humiliation on
the part of the ruthless victor.

It is faced, in the form of the second class, by the great
mass of the working population. This class is integrated
in more or less radical Marxist movements, determined to
break any spiritual resistance by the power of force. It
does not want to be national, but it consciously rejects any
promotion of national interests as, in turn, it promotes all
suppression on the part of foreign powers. Measured by
figures it is the stronger party, but it comprises above all
those elements of the nation without which a national re-
surrection is unthinkable and impossible.

For as early as 1918 one had to see clearly about this.

tive group, elected 32 men. Under the circumstances, it looked
as if dissatisfaction with the policies sponsored by the Re-
publican governments was growing rapidly, and that the ' Re-
volution ' was in danger. In many respects this election resem-
bles that of 1930. Yet six months later December, 1924
another Reichstag election completely changed the picture.
The Communists elected only 32 deputies, and the National
Socialists 14. The number and percentage of citizens voting in-
creased. Doubtless the principal causes of this reversal were
two the manifest inability of the extremists to accomplish
anything, and the beneficent effect to the capital that flowed
into Germany under the Dawes Plan.

Any resurrection of the German people can take place only
by way of regaining external power. But the prerequisites
for this are not arms as our bourgeois 'statesmen' always
babble, but the forces of will power. At one time the Ger-
man people had more than enough arms. They were not
able to secure its freedom, because the energies of the na-
tional instinct of self-preservation, the will for self-preserva-
tion, was lacking. The best arms are dead and useless ma-
terial as long as the spirit is missing which is ready, willing,
and determined to use them. Germany became defenseless,
not because there was a shortage of arms, but because the
will was missing to guard the arms for the preservation of
the nation.

If today especially our politicians of the left try to point
to the lack of arms as the necessary cause of their irresolute
and yielding policy, which in reality is a policy of betrayal
to foreign powers, then one must answer them only one
thing: No, the contrary is right. You have surrendered the
arms by your anti-national and criminal policy of giving

Bitterness was so great that moderate defenders of the poli-
cies adopted since 1918 resorted to the defense that an unarmed
Germany had no choice save acquiescence in Allied decrees.
Hence Hitler's rejoinder.

An attack on the German National Party, which had gained
so dominant a position in 1924. If this party really succeeded
in retaining large groups of Nationalist voters, Hitler's move-
ment was doomed to failure. Therefore he taunted the con-
servatives with their 'cowardice* in 1918 an epithet invented
by Philipp Scheidemann, Socialist leader, after the War. The
attack was politically shrewd. In this and subsequent passages,
the especial situation of 1924-25 is hinted at. The German
National leader up until October, 1924, was Oskar Hergt, an
honest veteran civil servant, without the skill or callousnrsi
needed to guide a party through such difficult times.

up national interests. Now you are trying to present the
shortage of arms as the fundamental cause of your misera-
ble wretchedness. This is, as everything in your activity,
lie and fraud.

But this reproach applies just as much to the politicians
of the right. For thanks to their miserable cowardice, the
Jewish rabble who had come into power in 1918 was able
to steal the arms from the nation. They, too, have there-
fore no reason and no right to palm off the present lack of
arms as the necessity for their clever caution (say 4 coward-
ice'), but the defenselessness is just the consequence of their
cowardice. -

But if one understands that the resurrection of the Ger-
man nation is a question of regaining our political will of
self-preservation, it is also clear that this is not fulfilled by
winning elements which are national at least according to
their will, but only by the nationalization of the deliberately
anti-national masses.

A young movement that sets before itself the goal of the
re-establishment of a German State with its own sovereignty
will have to direct its fight completely at winning the broad
masses. No matter how wretched in general our so-called
'national bourgeoisie 9 is, how insufficient its national loyalty
appears, it is just as certain that from this side a serious
resistance to a powerful national internal and external
policy is not to be expected. Even if, for notoriously nar-
row-minded and short-sighted reasons, the German bour-
geoisie were to remain in passive resistance, as once it faced
Bismarck in the hour of a coming liberation, nevertheless,
with its acknowledged and proverbial cowardice, an active
resistance need never be feared.

The situation is different with the masses of our fellow
462 MEIN KAMPF

citizens who are internationally minded. In their primitive
originality they are not only directed more towards the
idea of force, but their Jewish leaders are more brutal and
more ruthless. They will beat down any German rise just
as once before they broke the German army's backbone.
But above all, in this parliamentarily ruled State, by force
of the superiority of their number, they will not only prevent
any national foreign policy, but they will further exclude
any higher evaluation of the German strength and with it
any chance of potential alliances.

For the weak momentum
which lies in our fifteen million Marxists, Democrats, Paci-
fists, and representatives of the Center is not only known to
us, but is recognized even more by the foreign powers which
measure the value of a possible alliance with us according
to the weight of this burden. One does not form an alliance
with a State in which the active part of the population has
at least a passive attitude towards any resolute foreign
policy.

To this is added the fact that the leaders of these parties
of national betrayal, merely out of their instinct of self-
preservation, must and will be hostile to any rise. From the
historical point of view it is simply inconceivable that the
German people could once more take its former position
without settling accounts with those who were the cause
and the occasion of the unheard-of collapse which afflicted
our State. For before the tribunal of posterity November,
1918, will not be evaluated as high treason, but as treason
against the country.

Thus the regaining of German independence in foreign
affairs is primarily connected with the regaining of the
domestic willful unity of our people.

But looked at from the purely technical point of view
the thought of a German rise as regards foreign politics
seems absurd as long as the great masses are not ready to
enter into the service of this idea of freedom. Taken from


the purely military viewpoint, with a little reflection it will
become clear, above all to every officer, that one cannot war
against foreign powers with the help of students' battalions,
but that for this purpose one needs, apart from the brains
of a people, also its fists. Thereby one has to keep in mind
that a national defense, which is based only upon the circles
of the so-called 'intelligentsia/ would only spoil the price-
less goods of the nation. The young German intelligentsia,
which found its death with the voluntary regiments in the
fields of Flanders in the fall of 1914, was sorely missing later
on. They were the best property the nation possessed, and
this loss could never be replaced in the course of the War.
But it is not only impossible to carry through the fight it-
self if the charging battalions do not have the masses of the
workers among their ranks, but it is also impossible to carry
out the technical preparation where the unifying will of the
national body is missing. Just our people, which, under the
thousand eyes of the Treaty of Versailles, has to live dis-
armed, will be able to make technical arrangements for
On November n, 1914, German regiments comprised of
student volunteers stormed the French positions at Langhe-
marcq (near Ypres) in Belgium, singing the DeutscUand song.
The losses were fearful. This deed is looked upon as the most
heroic in the German war record.

The theory that the November Revolution was an act of
high treason often led to highly emotional outbursts. Thus
Dr. Wilhelm Frick declared in January, 1928: 'To the gallows
with the criminals who have misgoverned us during the past
ten years!' But oddly enough the Nazis also attacked the
November Revolution on the ground that it was no genuine
revolution. Speaking in Munich during 1929, Goering said:
'Our misfortune was that this "revolution" was no German
revolution. Therefore we know the revolution is still coming,
and that it must, bring the release of German energies.'

regaining its freedom and human independence only if the
host of professional informers is decimated to those whose
inborn lack of character permits them to betray everything
to everybody in return for the well-known thirty pieces of
silver. One can manage these people. Unmanageable, how-
ever, seem the millions of those who oppose the national
rise out of political resistance, unless the cause of their ac-
tivity, their international Marxist view of life, is fought and
torn out of their hearts and brains.

No matter, therefore, from which point of view one ex-
amines the possibility of regaining the independence of our
State and nation, whether from that of the preparation of
foreign politics, that of technical armament, or from that
of the struggle itself, there remains the preliminary winning
over of the great masses of our people for the idea of our
national independence as the presupposition for everything.

But without regaining our external freedom, every idea
of an inner reform itself remains, in the most favorable
case, only the increase of our productivity as a colony.
Every so-called economic uplift renders its surplus only to
the commissions of international control, and every social
improvement increases, in the most favorable case, only
the capacity of working for them. Cultural achievements
will no longer fall to the share of the German nation at all,
they are too closely connected with the political independ-
ence and dignity of a nationality.
If, therefore, the German future's favorable solution is
connected with the national winning of the great masses
of our people, then this must also be the highest and the
greatest task of a movement the activity of which is not to
be exhausted in the satisfaction of the moment, but which
has to examine every hour and every activity only as to
their consequences for the future.**

Thus we realized as early as 1919 that the new movement
has to carry out, first, as its highest aim, the nationaliza-
tion of the masses.

it is because of insecure faggots like you that we need Wu
#metoo4wu

>what is accelerationism

Wu is /ourguy/ retard. We need him to win so all can see the insanity of the left.

I don't really care but if I were American right-winger I would support her. More freaks, better for you.

#WP #WuPower

alisonmcbain.com/blog/speak-of-the-devil-the-lies-of-frank-wu
I have an ex-husband named Frank Wu. When we married, I was 24 years old and he was 39. I was young and naive, and he was very manipulative. That, at least, has not changed.

For years after our divorce, his words rang in my ears - he told me in private that my writing was horrible, that I was no good, that I was shit. He let his friends talk down to me and call me abusive names. When I left him, he gave my phone number to his friends so they could call me up and shout abuse at me. In public, he would be all smiles, but in private was a different story. You want to talk about scars? I have a burn mark on my back that I covered up with a tattoo. I didn't want to talk about my first marriage, didn't want to carry that pain with me, so I tried to erase it.

When I was with him, I had just started writing for publication. However, he eroded all of my self-confidence and I stopped writing. For years after our marriage ended, I didn't write because I didn't want to be involved in that world and accidentally cross paths with him.

Only recently have I decided that what he did back then doesn't have to hold me back now. I decided to write again - that I wouldn't live in fear of him or what he could say. I decided this because of my current husband, who has been nothing but supportive and loving of my dreams.

I guess I was wrong about Frank. He made a very public post about me in September: archive.today/69Qmn. I just discovered it today because people are tweeting it. I am adding the link here so you can read it. Because I want you to read the outrageous things he is saying, and to know that what he is saying is BULLSHIT.

I am not going to stoop to his level of verbal abuse and lies. I am only going to defend myself with facts. He was 15 years my senior. He was older than me, taller than me, outweighed me. When I left - and yes, I was the one to leave - he came up to my parents' house, trying to get me back. When he wouldn't leave me alone, I moved across the country to get away from him. Then he showed up at my sister's apartment in New York City where I was staying while I got my feet under me - he talked his way past the manager by saying he was my husband, and being very persuasive that I would want to see him - and I opened the door to her apartment to find him waiting inside. Let me say, it was not a good surprise to think I was going to a safe space, only to find him waiting for me. So I cut all ties with my old friends, worried they would give him information about me. I changed my number because I was getting phone messages from his friends telling me I was a piece of shit - basically repeating everything he had told me for the year we were together. And then when I had done all that - left my whole life behind - the nightmare, I thought, was over.

My current husband and I are approaching our six-year anniversary. We have two beautiful children. It was my husband who convinced me to stop being afraid to write, to send my stuff out there. It was he who convinced me that nothing bad would happen to me. I tried to tell him that he didn't know my ex-husband and how vindictive and manipulative he was when we were together. I was afraid, but I decided to do it anyway, because I had my husband's loving support.

Let me ask you - what sort of woman runs away across the country, changes her phone number and cuts ties with all of her friends because SHE is the abuser? What sort of man publicly posts such outrageous shit about his ex-wife in a public forum? Yeah, I thought so.

I don't want to live in fear anymore. So, Frank Wu, take your lies and shove them. You can't manipulate me. And you can't hurt me anymore, either.

>she

>Based Wu says Super Mario Bros. is about "white colonialism"
what did it mean by this?

>her
Anyway, this is just a meme leftover from gamergate
He doesn't stand a chance against the incumbent