Still don't see the difference between the far left and far right

Still don't see the difference between the far left and far right.

They seem like two sides of the same coin.

Libertarian version

1. "State Bootlicking"
2. The State/Statists
3. Statism
4. Statism-free liberty
5. Outright market™ censorship

...

You forgot Sup Forums has actual evidence on their side F4GG0t-T.

This is the most accurate because none is saying anything meaningful.

Love it.

Ha, "evidence".

Lol, what "evidence"?

Sup Forums isn't a single person, but things that Sup Forums tends to collectively believe are all things backed up with research. They blame Jews for lots of things, but that's because actual Jews are behind those things -- whether it's because they're Jewish or not is debatable. Degeneracy is also a concern of the average person's, whether they agree with Sup Forums or not, and it's not even a word Sup Forums brings up that often even though you put it twice in your cute little chart there. You also claim Sup Forums wants outright censorship, which isn't true, they just don't want scientifically proven inferior people leeching off white people which is also true.

Anarchist Version
>Fascist
>The State/Capitalism
>Bullshit?
>The Land of Do What You Will (Provided You Don't Hurt Anyone
>Not doing a goddamn thing.

I mean, at least our end goal is alright!

MUH JOOZ!!1!

>replying to a faggot leaf shill
>in all fields

>user provides an argument
>Doenst refute his argument but just says "Muh jooz"
And leafs wonder why their so hated

ahh the typical shill blown his own cover

SAGE slide threads

Blaming Jews for your life sucking isn't an "argument."

>Degeneracy is not even a word Sup Forums brings up that often
You cannot be serious.

There really isn't too much of a difference.

Savage & well put

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

>leftist """"""""memes""""""""
laughable

...

...

Yes

I approve this thread.

...

Perhaps the substantive content of their desired political ends? Means aren't everything, user.

That image is mocking OP's position.

Hardly.

...

Why do you think this is an interesting topic?

Yes, they have some similarities, it is inevitable that they do given the development of each is a reaction to the other.

A frame of reference exists for all complex concepts to be viewed with similarities and closeness, just as a frame of reference exists to view differences and distance in the same concepts, such is the nature of complexity and context. Both views are simultaneously in/correct due to the flawed nature of perception.

What is your point with your comparison?

>ID is literally faggottt
K
Y
S A G E

...

...

I was referring more to the Confederates.The rest are pretty much the same.