2nd Amendment/Gun Control Middle Ground

Is there a reasonable middle ground between gun control and the right to bear arms? What do you think? Any proposals?

I need to fuck that ass

Nothing a brother's cock won't fix.

I think all of you fucking disgusting united shitstains should own guns so that you can kill each other until there's none of you fucking monsters left so that the rest of the world can live in fucking peace. How about that proposal?

Make it illegal to not own a gun.

I would look at all the previous points in the last few decades where ground was ceded to liberals who said "all we want is X".
There is no middle-ground, just an advancing front.

>Any proposals?

I like guns and I wish we had them here. That said, minors ever touching or using one is retarded.

Shut the fuck up and fuck off you stupid fucking gun control spamming fucking kikes you’re all a fucking disease

Proper screening of people who want to buy a gun

No.
There is no middle ground.
Bring on the cake.

Kys you worthless dumbass salty Mexican

It's a pointless discussion because almost all gun crime in America is done with handguns with black teenage males shooting each other over drug disputes in inner cities, so solve that fucked up environment and if big bubba can get an AR won't be an issue anymore.

But that leads to the logical conclusions of there being a problem with the black community, the welfare system and the war on drugs which no American politician wants to talk about so it's back to argue about gun control legislation that'll never get anywhere.

No, Americans will keep shooting their own citizens. They are not willing to change gun laws and they are not willing to fund healthcare for mentally ill who do such a thing.

seems irrelevant to the discussion
also irrelevent
what?
have any studies been done of deterrence in an armed population of individuals?

>We need more school shootings the post

No now fuck off

A reasonable middle ground is to repeal all the bullshit arms control laws that are already around.

Learn basic geography, you fucking mutation. Your flagrant, proud public display of voluntary ignorance is embarrassing at best, concerning at worst. Shoot yourself with your handy Walmart 9, obese motherfucker.

No. There is no middle ground whatsoever.
Shall.
Not.
Be.

...

Sounds good to me.
Also:
>I’m so against gun violence I want everyone to get guns and shoot each other.

The only middle ground is background checks and mental health screenings.
I think there are ways that you should be able to lose your privilege to own a firearm but I think everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Also sane people with guns is the only defense against insane people with guns.

>I think there are ways that you should be able to lose your privilege to own a firearm
>privilege

go get a gun so you can kill yourself with it, kike.

how about no? shall not be infringed.

we're literal white nationalists here. we're already good with the idea of secession. we have literally no reason to negotiate.
SAGE

right, privilege, same shit
you don't actually disagree with the substance of my post you just want to be a faggot about it

dumb goy

>right, privilege, same shit
Incorrect.

You act as if we don't have gun control in this country. We do. Including several gun controls that are flat out unconstitutional, like the NFA. Gun owners have been compromising since the 1930s, and it's gotten us nowhere. Gun grabbers are never satisfied. They're always looking for more gun control while calling it compromise. But a real compromise is when both sides give up something to get something. Yet gun grabbers never seem to want to give up anything, even their most irrational, do-nothing laws, like the idiotic sound suppressor regulations. Why should gun owners deal with such bad faith actors?

do you think felons should be allowed to vote then?

>right, privilege, same shit
go die you kike

Darn i wanna fuck her

U just want our land faggot

Do you think criminals should be let out of prison if you can't trust them to do something as basic as vote?

>he doesn't know what it means to be an outlaw
I'd gas you myself schlomo

No. Give them your hand and they'll take your arm.

You need some balance between state power and the freedom of the individual; but you certainly need a powerful state for the security of the people against deranged individuals and violent groups.

In societies where central government has collapsed, bandits roam the land and take property, burn houses and farms, and drag the women off to entertain themselves.

No, now kindly kill yourself.

Nice dodge
Do you think criminals should be allowed to own guns if they aren't even allowed to vote?
Do you think that speech that incites violence is protected under the first amendment?
Rights can be taken away when you abuse them.

>In a discussion about the constitution, this faggot actually thinks being an outlaw is an argument

>
>You need some balance between state power and the freedom of the individual; but you certainly need a powerful state for the security of the people against deranged individuals and violent groups.
>In societies where central government has collapsed, bandits roam the land and take property, burn houses and farms, and drag the women off to entertain themselves.

hmmm, how about smaller, more cohesive societies? plenty of guns, a dash of militancy,.. hey i bet socialism could even work on that scale, by gully

The reasonable middle ground is making people take gun safety courses in school so that they don't do dumb shit and get themselves killed. You can own whatever gun you want provided you're a citizen and have a highschool diploma. In terms of restricting what sort of gun a law abiding citizen can own or when they can use it to defend themselves and their property, no, there is no middle ground. You either accept that people misusing guns is the price you pay to live in a free society, or you accept that living in a police state is the price you pay to prevent gun violence.

Australia solved this problem years ago.

Made up bullshit that can be taken away at any moment for any reason?
Correct.

Yeah, have some kind f aptitude test.

IDK Why yanks have a shitfit when anyone mentions any kind of gun control, but nobody moans about driving licenses.

At least be able to show you have the intellectual capacity to control whatever machinery you're using, especially if it has the capacity to harm/kill with incorrect use.

Unfortunately Amerimuts are too fucking retarded to understand basic concepts, so it'll never happen.

You americans are so idiots, you talk like the need for your gun is reasonable and it's not normal to not have one, but guess what here in italy has never happened a gun shooting in a school and never will. Have fun having your kids be killed by one of you gun psycos. If you Americans don't want to listen and solve the problem accepting guns aren't a right then keep having this mass shootings, actually to the world you're a joke.

We already have a "middle ground", in fact it's already on the gun control side, so to speak. No more compromises.

There is only one solution to this. Repealing the 2A, and then a blanket gun ban.

The police/FBI/SWAT should go door to door across this country and take every firearm. Anyone who refuses should be either thrown in jail or shot.

Thanks someone smart

Look at the mouth on this mexican.

>implying the shooting wasn't a false flag
>implying Sup Forums hasn't been spammed since this shooting
>implying you will ever care because you're a forum sliding shill

>I want to prevent people from getting shot and dying so as a solution I propose we shoot anyone that doesn't hand over their gun

>let the government administer a test to decide whether or not you can defend yourself
Are all yuros this cucked? Im guessing this is because they had monarchy treating them as property for most of their history

This.

>flaggot
goodbye

WELL
REGULATED
MILITIA

ITS THE FIRST THREE FUCKING WORDS.

Cars are responsible for far more civilian deaths and aren’t a constitutional right and vanguard against invasion and tyranny

WHAT PART OF SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED DONT YOU FUCKING NIGGERS UNDERSTAND?

Oh yeah, worked out great.

People often forget this... but the word "security" also appears in the second amendment.

Security = control... so obviously they intended for us to have gun control.

t. Amerimut

Also really retarded arguments.

If the US was to ever get invaded, which it won't.

Civilians would be slaughtered en-mass by airstrikes and drones.

IDK why all you Sup Forumstards think you're John Wick because you have an AR.

Youre right. The government has been illegally repressing well regulated nationalist militias for years now. What do we do to fix this?

> (OP)
>WELL
>REGULATED
>MILITIA
>ITS THE FIRST THREE FUCKING WORDS.

wow, too bad you're not on the supreme court

or even an american that has a claim to a legitimate opinion on the matter

leaf

>Civilians would be slaughtered en-mass by airstrikes and drones.
So what you're saying is we need to expand the 2nd amendment to include SAM turrets and rocket launchers yea?

Not for whiny liberals, no.

Wha I've understood the guy was a fucking walking red flag of school shooting. If the fucker didn't get his hands on guns, he would have still flipped. Just yank obvious crazies like him out of society when they show marks of not being fit to live in it.

>immediately resorting to le ebin mutt meme
I get it, you are descended from the cuckholds who stayed behind to let Lord Chad fuck their wives, whereas Im descended from the virile men who moved to a strange new land to forge their own destiny.

The only ground is for all arms to be 100% unrestricted.

Totally.

If your justification is to "Raise a militia" to actually do what the 2nd amendment was written for.

But as you can't, and you won't, the 2nd amendment is basically pointless.

All or nothing.

A CHALLENGER EMERGES

Repeal ALL gun-control.

No compromise. Ever.

I want McNukes!

and that kind of mentality is why UK turns into New Pakistani

Throw a nigger democrat into the African plains and say "here is your gun control, the lions are hungry and you don't have a gun"

Unironically this. We need to take care of the wierdos, get them help, isolate them, whatever. Its natural human behavior to bully the oddball, and this soccer mom, hand holding culture the left embraces is why they keep slipping under our noses.

“Screening” just turns into political bullshit. Look at what happened in Los Angeles - celebrities and rich people who sucked up to the sheriff got permits everyone else was screwed.

Gun control only matters when white people are killed by the dozen ok?

Oh no they are evolving

Owning a firearm isn’t a privilege.

SAY I WONT

...

I've already been over this with another faggot. Let me rephrase for your tiny brain,
>I think there are ways that you should be able to lose your right to own a firearm but I think everyone is innocent until proven guilty

We have a lot of these here. Bring your Aryan genes.

What is it like having to live as a dark skin monkey?

Do you feel shame when you look in the mirror?

HURRRR KEKED EUROPOOR

>Limit the law abiding citizens to handguns/no-guns
>So law breakers can get modded rifles and whatever the fuck else they want from the black market without fear of armed citizens shooting back in a robbery/murder/shooting.

lmaoo

Wanting to own a gun is now considered a mental illness.

Now what?

I'll take that as a yes.

Yeah now all the bikies have the guns now lmao

We should ban the AR-15. That seems to be the mass shooter's weapon of choice.

I don't think mental illness alone should be cause to take away your right to own a firearm. I think if a psych decides you are susceptible to being radically violent to innocents with your firearm, you probably shouldn't have one. Lets argue semantics though since you're such a huge faggot

>mass shooters should decide what guns we can own

You might regret it

NO.

Its disarmed GUN FREE zones that create this opportunity.

CRIMINALS AND TERRORISTS will ALWAYS get guns

Wanting to own a gun now means you are mentally ill and prone to becoming violent against innocents.

Now what?

>it won’t
Correct, guess why?

>inbred yuros slinging mutt memes at each other while americans try to have a discussion
When did the stereotypes switch?

>Wanting to own a gun now means you are prone to becoming violent against innocents.
this is a stupid fucking hypothetical.
What do you mean now what? At this point the government has radically changed from how it is now and probably already took the guns

stop selling assault rifles to people and just give them normal guns?
I never understood why you retards give non-military people assault rifles.
Shootings would still happen but the victims would be lower.
If Traini had an assault rifle he would have killed hundreds.

This is where we really are. If there are those who want to ban our birthright then let them come and try it. We are done debating with those of bad faith. Come and try take them or fuck off eternally. Protip: you will rue the day you were so foolish.

Says a guy from Spain. That's rich.