We need guns because there's a small chance we'll need to resist the American gov-

>we need guns because there's a small chance we'll need to resist the American gov-,

Does anyone seriously believes this?

Can you please make up other exuse?You sound ridiculous.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/DeNBJ5o-b7s?t=1m29s
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

The guns are to protect ourselves from niggers and spics

>you stupid colonists will never defeat the british, look how strong they are.
same idiots different era.
please stop posting about american politics as it is now illegal to do so.

>Yes Sen. Feinstein i am going to begin the bombing run on that tiny rural community that looks just like the place i grew up in and blow up those evil racist gunowners who look just like the people in my family albums

said no US military person ever

>drones are the same as fucking sailboats

wew lolbertarians on suicide watch

Cuban revolutionaries defeated the US military invasion.

tyranny does not have to be the federal government. tyrants come in all shapes and sizes.

>we need guns because there's a big chance we'll need to resist muslims and niggers
There we go, now you understand.

Why can't I own this

>vietnam
>afghanistan
now go shill somewhere else, preferably reddit

The ZOG is aware of this resistance to murdering your own kin. This is why the US Marines sent out questionnaires asking if they would kill Americans if ordered. The govt. of China had its soldiers resisting as well in Tiannamen square, so they brought in units from far away to drive over the protesters with tanks. Basically, you don't know shit about the real world.

60 IQ goat hearders have somehow survived 16 years of sustained assault by the worlds greatest militarizes. Imagine what they could do if they lived in our back yard, next to family and friends, and were within the very armed forces they were trying to defeat.

>let's use an IBCM to blow up those armed citizens in that suburb

its one thing to fight a hostile army who wants to anihilate you and other thing is to fight a tyranical government who wants to control you, if the gov will bomb the shit out of the population, they will not have any population to govern, pay taxes and provide soldiers to their army.

youtu.be/DeNBJ5o-b7s?t=1m29s

watch from 1:30

soft targets are soft user. guerrilla warfare is real. study red teams

Afghanistan beat the russians and america.
with basic weapons and rocks/sticks.

>hey oregon national guard go blow up this suburb in florida

>sir yes sir!

Any of the things in your picture can't even stop Jamal from raiding a store, how do you expect it to stop a rebellion?

>bahia de cochinos
>murican invasion
Keep sucking that pinko dick faggot.

The moment the jews start to kill American citizens is the moment they lost

someone post it

So the muricans already lost?

Because all those things in your picture defeat the vietnamese, the Afghans and the Iraqis

Small chance? I'm looking at war this Spring

The us has lost all its recent wars, most are against guys with soviet era weapons

Why do foreigners care whether if we’re armed or not?

>afghanistan

A civil war in the US, would be like having the Taliban in your backyard except they have skills, training and superior arms.

you better have one hell of an ad campaign, your gonna need more than half/ most the country. this better be some great shit.

Everyone in america but the troops and citizens of the USA win when we go to war. Winning a war is the worst thing possible for them.

Yeah, I need a gun so I can legally murder a dumbfuck liberal like yourself when they finally "REEEEEEEEEEEEE" SO hard that I physically have to defend myself from them.

It will be used to stop hearts and explode heads.

Hollow point. Fucking faggots.

Sure, you can take my gun... One bullet at a time.

>tanks will secure the streets
It's like you haven't paid attention to the conflict in the ME. Heavy ordinance on its own citizens destroys the entire point of being a tyrant; remove the people, remove the power. Boots are the ones that will enforce the tyranny, there will always be more armed citizens than boots, so long as you don't take their guns away anyway, this is also assuming the military would readily fall in line

By what metric my dude? Curious cause I'm trying figure that timeframe myself

Ask Russian how well their aircrafts, tank and shit performed against outdated AK in Afganistan.

Or the same question to Murricans in Vietnam.

Guerrillas are very effective in asinetric conflits, but, without weapons, there is no chance of resisting against that hypothetical tyranic government.

this bait is so stale

Because our rules of engagement aren't: Kill everything that moves

If that dumb nigger hadn't nudered our military with bullshit rules of engaement, we would have ended Iraq and Afghanistan in weeks.

In an all-out war. Whoever the United States fights, would lose in less than a week.

Inb4 >but muh Russia and muh China

We would just use EMP weapons, Neutron Bombs and the Rods of God on them.

Game over bitches.

Anyone got the pic of the jap poster calling this bullshit out and completely ruining this narrative?

800 million. Civilian guns. Infantry holdz territory. All other weapons are tactical or strategic. If you want territory you'll need 5.6 million military boots on ground

>Hey soldier, go there to kill your cousin, your father, your borther and your friends in the name of the State!!

Uhm, yes, sure...

Posse Comitatus.
cant use soldiers against citizens.

how you gonna convince all these people to die in the hot sun as fodder troops when they could be watching reruns of friends eating take out pizza.

forgot pic.

To me OP's argument has always seemed like a justification to loosen gun control laws, and laws restricting other weaponry, not to tighten them.

There are guides floating around on /k/ for how to make guns from parts you can buy at a fucking hardware store. You can 3d print a gun. You can buy a gun off the black market. Guns are never going away, criminals will always have access to guns. Even if guns could be banned, you can't ban Muhammad's trucks of peace. You can't stop people from making IEDs. You can't stop Mexican drug cartels from making fucking death drones. You can't stop an ambitious, patient criminal from making a fucking killdozer. Are knives going to be banned too? What if someone just sharpens a stick or something, retarded subhuman prisoners can find ways to make shanks out of practically anything you give them. People will ALWAYS find ways to kill each other in cold blood.

On the other hand anti-gun laws and similar prevent the masses from fighting off tyrannical regimes, by taking weapons out of the hands of the average law abiding citizen. Once you've rigged the elections and planted your ass onto the seat of power in a system where you control a fuckhuge military and where people are banned from owning knives, what recourse is left to the people? Gun laws also prevent people from protecting themselves from criminals, if someone decides they want to shoot up a school and nobody else on site has a gun, all the cops will be able to do is reduce the body count when they arrive, and then draw chalk outlines around the corpses.

The huge gap between the weapons that criminals and the government have access to and the weapons that the average Joe has access to, should scare the fuck out of you. And anyone with two fucking brain cells to rub together knows that these mass shootings are just fear porn, and that you're overwhelmingly more likely to die of heart disease, cancer, or suicide (which btw is used to inflate gun death statistics).

AKSHUALY!

Mentally retarded farmers with old guns have proven to be the US armies Achilles-heel on many occasions.

as long as you can pop on the tv and watch walking dead. pop a beer never gonna happen.

Nobody wants to be king of the ashes. No army can take over the USA with an armed population.

Just a bunch illiterate farmers from Vietnam took care of the French and American Armies. Just cause you want to give up your family without a fight,,,.

this

and this

>excuse
Literally a right. Fuck off, faggot. You'll never take my guns.

Drones can be hacked/killed like everything else you fuckin imbecile.

There’s a certainty we will face tyranny if we are disarmed. It’s just a matter of time.

They’ll need to take mine in order to take yours.

Our guns are not to defend against the might of the US military it's to cause any military and anyone else who fucks with us a fuck ton of problems.

That and to defend against SJWs if they ever sperg out and try to do their communist revolution.

This is wjy they pushed for daca fags to be in the military and imported war veteran muslims under the guise of refugees. Moved their army in and made them official.

Airplanes, helicopters and missile armed drones cannot hold ground and are useless in ground control, especially in urban zones.
Aircraft carriers and missiles are also offensive weaponry that can be used for air superiority and terror attacks but are useless for holding ground.
In conclusion if you tried to use those against civilian population of your own country you would have a disaster and a massive rebellion very fast.

Tanks are great for ground warfare but are limited and perform poorly in urban warfare and are easy targets to anti tank infantry and anti tank landmines, especially without fast mechanized infantry support.
So in the end it comes down to infantry against armed civilians.
And infantry usually comes from the pleb class and would not so easily obey orders to fight against other plebs.

Also one more thing chances of survival against an armed drone are much higher if you are armed with a machine gun than if you are armed with a knife.

Tanks jets and ships can't hold ground. Warfare has always and will always revolve around infantry. An infantry man certainly has an advantage over some yahoo with a gun, but he is by no means unkillable.

you can't convince people to fight when theirs no reason. everyone knew it was no reason. Vietnam, what are you kidding me.

we lost in Vietnam, and what happen, nothing. i think they make our tvs now our something.

>The US government can't defeat a bunch of 90IQ sandniggers with worn out russian guns without resorting to gross human rights violations and handwaved war crimes
>they could totally take on their own people, where unethical killings are under a stronger microscope

cause theirs no reason. those sand guys can't do anything to us, really.

Liberals are small minded statisticians and are more concerned with reducing body counts than wondering why people are killing each other in the first place when the swiss can carry machine guns in the streets and somehow resist killing everyone.

>who cares if the people are uncivilized/mentally ill/violent/impulsive
>if we can get the world to a point where they only kill five people instead of fifteen, it will all be okay!

...

Its funny how youre implying the military would kill the people they fight for. Sounds like tyranny to me.

i have no doubt there would be mass revolts. would be interesting. maybe not interesting enough to see millions killed. kek

lol commiefag
even the biggest badass is made out of meat and has to sleep sometime

The US trained cubans and sent them to cuba, like they trained the afghan army (beat by talibans) and iraq army (beat by isis in months)

wew lad

>All that arsenal
>still can't beat few muhajediin

I think americans with top of the edge armaments and weapons training as a hobby could do pretty well

>using nukes to keep 300+ million civilians under control

OP is dumber than I thought

>Rods of God

Kinetic bombardment is still a concept on paper, but i could see the air force pushing to develop it if shit hits the fan with china

Im not immediately worried about the govt but you lunatic tranny fur fags being funded by people like Soros to forcibly push your bullshit on me. Time and time again your kind has preached kindness while you push our heads further underwater. Sooner rather than later your time will come and it will be met with a boolitt from my battle waifu.

That used to be my argument. But now the #1 reason that I will never part with my guns is because fuck you thats why.

>A nation is just going to tomahawk and airstrike its population and cities

Why are you so retarded bre

severely underchecked.

>why are you stupid goyim clinging onto your guns

Why have leftists suddenly found an affinity for firearms? Your suicide pill isnt fooling me. Listen, I get it.. You like the idea of suicide.. But I am telling you that suicide is not the answer! Come back to reality, life is beautiful!

you really think elon sent up a car? lol

Yeahhh, let me just put my hacker glasses on and fire this personal SAM missile real quick...
I'm sorry what were you saying?

>you really think elon sent up a car? lol

can you provide any evidence that it was anything else?

I think you're making an argument for private ownership of anti-tank, anti-aircraft missles, etc.

If sand niggers and tunnel gooks can do it... Why can't Muricans?

>Muh aricraft carrier

Navyfag here: If the government ever went tyrannical it would be very easy to sabotage the nuclear reactors to render it not fit for sea for years. Not that I would ever of course mister FBI/NSA/NCIS

It's exactly what we believe. That's why we enshrined these rights in our constitution. There's no stronger degree of affirmation than that.

This exactly.

pic is a repeated argument, that forgets we should be able to own tanks privately.

it goes in all fields.

Shareblue, like clockwork, you've now hit the "you couldn't stand up to..." shillpost. Jesus motherfucking christ on popsicle stick, don't you dumbasses in your meetings ever attempt anything original? This stupid POS has been dumped, mocked, ridiculed and debunked so fricking many times I'm starting to wonder if anyone there other than Willith has even a small chunk of sanity or intelligence.

You can't put a ship, tank, apc, or jet on every street corner to enforce curfew. You can't send a jet into someone's home to search for forbidden literature. You can't use a tank silently disappear opposition parties. You can't use an Aircraft Carrier to drive laborers.

You can use a picture of all these to demonstrate how retarded you are.

>America hasn't been in a war since 1945.

>If you don't declare a war you canät lose it

except we couldn't beat a bunch of malnourished rice farmers when we were way better equipped and way better trained.

Because the American government is definitely gonna carpet bomb its own country and use missiles and tanks against its own people in open warfare, right?

If the American people decided to stand up against their government you can be sure as fuck they wouldn't paint a giant bullseye on themselves and yell "HERE WE ARE, PLEASE TARGET THIS AREA" you gigantic and collosal retard.

I'm all for owning tanks privately to be honest

lol just lol if you think that gun owners would revolt against the government but the armed forces would form a united front against them. Veterans/the right in general are the largest gun owning demographic. If there was a real civil war the army would be divided against itself, and being armed in that situation never hurt anyone.

>YOU CANT SHOOT DOWN A PLANE WITH A GUN

yeah because the US air force is going to be bombing americans who want to uphold the constitution. Who is going to be flying the planes? Politifact writers? People who have this belief that an armed populace isn't the safeguard of liberty in the 21st century have a complete misunderstanding of how insurrections have worked historically. There has never in the history of the world been a civil war between a completely unified military against regular citizens in a state where the military is comprised of citizens.