Dating is all about trying to get a mate just a little better, just a little above one's own level of attractiveness

Dating is all about trying to get a mate just a little better, just a little above one's own level of attractiveness.

That's the reason people spend years dating;
they (usually futily) all hope to find a more high-quality mate.

But at the end, I find it fascinating how exactly the attractiveness scores, the sexual market values, of couples match:
Often exact to a hair's width, male and female match in looks/income/genetic quality.


This means:
Practically nobody ever "levels up" in life sexually, that is, will improve the genetic quality of one's offspring.
Ugly people will have ugly children,
dumb parents dumb kids,
and the smart and beautiful will enjoy having superior offspring only.


Human society, therefore, is not really about wealth, income, social class - all these things are just and only derivatives of an underlying trait: Genetic quality.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Son_Also_Rises_(book)
youtube.com/watch?v=EFnJMPQow7A&t=1094s
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

And that is where leftists, socialists, communists and all others of that ilk have it wrong:

Inequality is not in the results;
its cause lies in genes, and genes alone.
I REPEAT:
ALL POLITICS HAS IT WRONG.
IT'S ALL ABOUT BIOLOGY, NOT SOCIAL CAUSES.
POLITICAL SYSTEMS AND IDEOLOGIES CHANGE NOTHING IMPORTANT AND ARE INEFFECTIVE TO BRING ABOUT EQUALITY OR "JUSTICE".
IT'S A CLOWN SHOW; A CIRCUS; THE ONLY REAL CAUSE OF POLITICAL DIVIDE IS COMPLETELY OVERLOOKED BY EVERYBODY.

>He hasn't seem Demi Moore and Bruce Willis' daughter

Look up genetic recombination. It's enough to combat the effects of assortative mating.

but after sexual liberation everything change and there is no kids anymore so it will be a natural selection as it finest

That's not how this works.

Dumb people have dumb offspring and rarely normal one only.

Smart people have dumb, normal and smart offspring, due to recombination and mutations.

This still means that all smart people are descendants of other smart people.

This even has been proven by Clark:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Son_Also_Rises_(book)

Here, try to compete with these opponents for social and sexual success.

And those are not even the very best.
There are others who are much smarter, stronger, strong-willed, much more healthy and handsome.

And they all come out, again and again, from the same families.

Just like the human garbage in the social welfare ghettos stay, over generations, the same dumb and ugly genetic trash.

And wealth and income and power are no independent variable for life success;
they are the result of that genetic superiority, not the other way around.

>level up
yes
>attractiveness
not necessarily

You (or your genes) can climb the social/economic ladder with looks or intellect, dating below your looks/smarts, but above your pay grade

Weak pretty boys. This is what you see as admirable ?

>Weak pretty boys. This is what you see as admirable ?

Not necessarily.

But good looks are an advantage already.

I would guess that 99%+ of the guys on Sup Forums are ugly gnomes in comparison, especially if they are honest with themselves and use photos/mirrors, not their overconfident self-delusions.

"Weak" can mean low in willpower or physical strength.
But in the end, only success is what counts.
Life success, reproductive success.
And those guys are already better than the vast majority of men.

Scores of women will cheat their husbands with them, raising their superior genes on their husbands money.
This is "strength".

The phrase you're looking for is "Culture Exists Downstream from Biology"

Meaning, we behave according to biological imperatives (and limitations), then evolve our cultures around that.
Any culture that imposes itself over biology will ultimately run into trouble.
Culture can only channel biological forces, it can't stop or kill them.

We have sports to channel aggressive urges in our more physically powerful males.
And the group desire to witness combat/physical testing of our figurative warrior caste.
We have games and nerd-hobbies to channel the pent up aggression and frustration of our intelligent beta males.
These are people who crave intellectual challenges, problem solving and stimulation or they get socially disruptive.
And so on. We create cultural constructs to tame (in the relative sense, but not outright deny) biological realities.

Some people never had and will have a chance.

Is that a pin I hear dropping?

Dating is degeneracy, there is no way around it.

Arranged marriages and polygyny are the only solution to this mess.

i don't think you understand genetic mutation and natural selection very well. read more.

>polygamy
No it destroys societies. Look at muslims. Look at celts or germanics robbing and looting just for pussy instead of inventing

the stupidest post ever
have you heard of money? promiscuity? child support?

Monogamy got the West to where it is today.

It, along with democracy, has utterly failed.

I believe in monogamy.
Very much so.

What's your excuse for dating someone any longer than a year?

>Monogamy has failed

Monogamy gives women an inflated value that they simply don't possess.

What is a friend?

Would I betray my greatest of friends?

No, I would not.

Why would I damage the other half of my soul?

No, the culture does.

>Monogamy got the West to where it is today.
Where? All this technologic progress? Internet?
>It, along with democracy, has utterly failed.
Agree, middle ages were waaaay better.

its only and only about looks m8

youtube.com/watch?v=EFnJMPQow7A&t=1094s

You need to be redpilled it seems

As to OP, he has a point. Look around you, in most cases (95%+) OP is correct.

>Dating is all about trying to get a mate just a little better, just a little above one's own level of attractiveness.
No, it really is not.

All three of their kids are unattractive while Bruce and Demi themselves are both highly attractive.

Genetic outcomes are determined by environmental factors. Look into epigenetics. It is neither nature nor nurture that is the culprit of your hypothetical problem, but both.

An inflated value.

Amusing.

That is why you pair with your equal, it exemplifies the feelings you hold about yourself.

When you're actually ready to have kids you'll realize attractiveness doesn't matter at all, my husband could get some super ebola that melts his face and I'd still be glad I married him over the average immature retarded millennial who can barely look after themselves never mind children who happens to be handsome.

Easy to solve this in the USA. You find a big fattie that would be attractive if she was thin.
Her large body will be the perfect womb for your future children.
Your sons will be big and strong and you can shame your daughters to keep them thin. "You don't want to end up looking like your Mom do you?"

>its only and only about looks m8
When you're young maybe, but as women get older they expect you to have money & status also.

Why are you screaming about something the entire board agrees with?

A table of normies? You really see that and think that's some high quality competition? What are you a 300lb neckbeard?

>not dating with the intention of "accidentally" impregnating girls

Culture is downstream from biology in the sense that it didn’t arise from nothing. Culture can however take on a life of its own and become unhinged from biological reality to varying degrees.

For instance, an intelligent person that shares genetic traits with less intelligent people may feel like he’s dumb because of a self fulfilling prophecy. It goes without saying, but a mostly accurate stereotype is still *sometimes* inaccurate. In this case the stereotype held by the culture obscures biological reality rather than affirming it.

How could you know they wouldn't reveal that they're partial to abortion. You literally couldn't stop them. You need to know these things, especially if they're not explicit about having a family.

Men tend to be more visual. Its shallow, but true.

I just want to bleach black and asian women

This is a slide thread.
Someone needs to revisit their elementary biology specifically the section on Dominant and recessive genes.

If she aborts that's her problem. Date other women too. Impregnate!

>Meaning, we behave according to biological imperatives (and limitations), then evolve our cultures around that.

This is true. In this context it's funny how people blame the culture when sand rats and niggers do stupid shit when the culture has evolved to be pure shit due to their genetic qualities.

Preaching to the choir here.

Well culture has reinforced it. Its a viscous cycle. These alpha male cro-magnon sand niggers roam the desert killing smart, ahem, smarter sand niggers and raping the women polluting the gene pool.

It's pure survival of the fittest. I agree. it'll take hundreds of years to fix this and in the meantime it'll continue to impact the rest of us.

Yummy bread.
Thanks anons for legitimate discussion, debate, and observation.

Sup Forums has been a bit underwhelming this week... even with the habbenink in FL

Monogamy is the only way to run a decent society, that's why the best societies and civilizations were monogamous.

>Monogamy got the West to where it is today. It, along with democracy, has utterly failed.

You wot, now?

How can you or anyone possibly believe this to be even remotely true? The west — and by virtue of exponential exposure to the unmitigated and meteoric rise of its technologies and advancement in quite literally all facets of human development, the world as a whole — has made the most significant and fastest strides in literal success (as an entire state of mutual experience) in the history of humankind and this planet.

Any argument to the contrary is categorically incorrect, and frankly ridiculous on its face.

He's right. None of that shit you're bragging about would have been possible without monogamy and proper democracy (before women could vote). It's over for white people. Other races still have their genetic/cultural balance in check and taking over our resources. Only hope we can have is the jews and technology destroys them like it destroyed us.

t. 200 pound "strong" neckbeard loser

All they have to do is hold their mouths wide open for the camera and they'd look like soyboys

Yeah but in the old days, the doctor, lawyer or banker married the nurse, receptionist or secretary. Now the lawyer marries the lawyer etc