White Nationalism

You can't be a white nationalist on stolen Indian and Mexican land. It's hypocritical for you to call yourselves National Socialists since Hitler recognized the legitimacy of non-white nationalism in India and also Indonesia.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=K84c7NlZzno
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

We conquered that land though

>Bought it
>Conquered it
>Fought for it
>It's hypocritical for you to call yourselves National Socialists since Hitler [did anything whatsoever]

Bite me, retard.

Well most Americans are dirty immigrants. Go back on most White Americans history/timeline and you will see where the bloodlines bailed on the homeland and fellow countrymen. Now they want to talk about Nationalist pride. They got non.

You need a nation to have nationalism

A nation is more than an area of land, it's also its people, heritage and customs. If a people conquer and populate a land, it belongs to them until it's taken away. Whether it is rightful or not. Most nations place special status on their homeland, ie the area where they source their heritage. Their historical home.

Well Germans stole old Prussians land and called themselves after them and still remained nationalists.

You can't use horses or the wheel since white men brought them here

Prussians and Slavs are still Europeans. Anglos aren't indigenous to America. You're perpetrating a fraud.

Whites and Indians did some trading, but you also stole a lot of land.

Like a thief.

get off the internet you thief, it was invented by white men

A service isn't a robbery.

NO WE FUCKING DIDN'T

>You can't be a white nationalist on stolen Indian and Mexican land.
That's where you're wrong, kiddo.

He ain't wrong, white nationalism in the US it's a hair away from being labeled as terrorism.

>It's hypocritical for you to call yourselves National Socialists since Hitler recognized the legitimacy of non-white nationalism in India and also Indonesia.
he didn’t recognize the legitimacy of Mexicans now did he? Fuck up pabloberg sanchezowitz

haha.. says the guy using a picture of natives on a horse ( horses were brought to America by the Spanish ).. hahaha

>You can't be a white nationalist on stolen Indian and Mexican land.
Mexico isn't even 200yrs old and they copied us you fucking spic.

Also fuck Indians. They sold the land and then wanted it back the next generation because they have no concept of ownership without killing people over "gimme dat!"

>implying Indians possessed a sense of ownership
>implying the Indians were the autochthonous people of North America
>implying Whites didn't build up that land from scratch
Do you get some kind of satisfaction from making low effort shit threads?
youtube.com/watch?v=K84c7NlZzno

>if you conquer your enemies, you lose

agreed OP. All US citizens please refer to your ethnicity by the new official guidelines (pic related)

Nationalism aside, the former inhabitants are dead. Let them rest in peace.

Hitler actually admitted the way Americans took over the continent and pushed back the Savage Indians. Western novels were his favorite and he wanted to maintain a primitive border region in Asia where German youth could go to fight asiatic savages

Yeah he had more respect for the native american than for the modern anglo/jew american, and that before the mutts attacked him.

It's just incomprehensible that some whites think stealing something makes it theirs. Does that mean Danzig is rightfully Polish?

This is weird... I made a thread earlier today about alt-righters being hypocrites if they want to make an ethnostate out of American land. Now I’m seeing several threads with this theme. Did I just happen to think of this at the same time as you thought about it? Did my thread inspire others? I had just been thinking about this for a while and went here just to start a thread about it, so I know I wasn’t influenced by others here. I don’t recall hearing anyone else talking about this recently either. Hmm...

>maintain a primitive border region in Asia where German youth could go to fight asiatic savages
Hitler, the cossack LARPer

How about adressing arguments? This has been a leftist talking point for 50 years in America so don't be too proud.
See

Nah what inspired me was the fact that I see hypocrites lauding the illegitimate imperialist project of apartheid and seeking to apply it here.

Whites didn't build up the land by scratch. Black slave laborers and Chinese workers did.

>stealing something
Just like the Indians stole the land from the previous inhabitants? What makes you think Indians deserve anything that the whites built in America?

>the illegitimate imperialist project of apartheid
>Whites didn't build up the land by scratch. Black slave laborers and Chinese workers did.
Give me an honest answer please. Do you like seeing this board go to shit? I understand that you want to have a laugh but please do that somewhere else where you're not drowning actual discussion through bait.

1. You're going back to prehistoric times.

2. Whites were stealing land and engaging in slavery long after it became unacceptable to Europe.

This.

You're only right to a piece of land is your ability to defend it. The same goes for us whites. If we lose the West due to decades long gaslighting and psyops, then that will be the sad reality.

I'm being honest. You're not an honest nationalist.

>Indonesia

Alright Sup Forums, say it with me:

DUTCH EAST INDIES
U
T
C
H

E
A
S
T

I
N
D
I
E
S

>Whites were stealing land and engaging in slavery long after it became unacceptable to Europe
I wish. Sadly English liberalism put a stop to that.

What I'm advocating isn't liberalism. It's nationalism.

Thieves steal in the shadows and slink away like weak faggots.
We smacked the little muddies around and took their shit. And we made them fucking like it.
Kind of like what the Aztecs had been doing to the little peaceful natives before we got there.

Not really. You imported black slaves so much for self-determination.

and the aztecs conquered that land from another tribes they killed in order to sacrifice them to their gods

>the aztecs didn't have slaves
>literally every civilization didn't have slaves
Get fucked with your false morality faggot.

What is the right of conquest, gdansk is polish now. Your people have a right to their land only through power and their ability to defend it.

You brought slaves from other countries. Imperialism stopped being acceptable when America was doing it.

That's not how Blood and Soil works, mate.

>Hitler recognized the legitimacy of non-white nationalism in India and also Indonesia.
He did this out of pragmatism, not ideology. Hitler was fine with Italian and Japanese colonialism because they were his allies, he only opposed French, Dutch and British colonialism because he was at war with them. Pretending that Hitler was some pan-nationalist figure is historical ignorance and revisionism.

What about Germany supporting Mexico getting back Texas and California during the First World War?

>stolen Indian and Mexican land
Mexican land is literally stolen Indian land, you genius. The Spaniards conquered it, then the settlers won independence, then America conquered them (because they are inferior and weak).

Nice try you utter moron. But Mexico was independence since 1821.

During WW1 Hitler was a soldier in German army and had nothing to do with politics.

I know. I'm saying true nationalism isn't imperialist.

Nah, we just want a return of laws to the way they were before Marxism happened and Lincoln was killed.

i.e. Blacks sent back to Liberia like was originally planned., and no massive non white immigration.

the native americans weren't indigenous to america either.

You stole California and Texas though.

Maybe not in prehistoric times.

>You can't be a white nationalist on stolen Indian and Mexican land. It's hypocritical for you to call yourselves National Socialists since Hitler recognized the legitimacy of non-white nationalism in India and also Indonesia.
.
.
The Texas War of Independence was a war between the Spanish Europeans who settled Texas and the Mestizos in Mexico.
Mexican land is actually land stolen from the Spanish.

Mexico was independent since 1821. You don't know your history.

Texas war of Independence was in 1836. Separate from 1846, when America annexed Texas.

might makes right, faggot. Read some history

Sorry. That isn't nationalism. And yes, historically speaking America was doing imperialism when it wasn't accepted anymore.

In nature, weaklings get purged. By your logic, Mexicans are invalid because they are a racially mixed people that were not possible with Europeans.

So the land morally belongs to European, and by trying to lay a claim at it, you justify white nationalist self-defense. You don't even need to be a white nationalist to defend the claim, since you are a low IQ people that did not contribute much to the world.

No mate. Mexico was independent since 1821. The Anglo settlers were also more exterminationist to the Commanches then the Mexicans.