The robot age is inevitable but the robot uprising is not. Whether it's in 50, 20, or even 100 years, scientists believe humanity will lose most if not all of its jobs to the robots. I believe by passing laws that limit how much of Artificial Intelligence a business can use to produce in relation to what its human workforce produces and maybe some hefty AI taxes, with the some additional ethical thinking, not only will we still have humans at work, they will be able to work with Artificial Intelligence with minimal interference. I know that it hinders progress to stop businesses from cutting costs to produce, but if slowing down progress means to ensure humanity survives then so be it. That's just my opinion, what do you guys think?
Limit the Use of Artificial intelligence in the work force
Thomas Flores
Aaron Sanders
You cannot stop the future. Ted Kacyznski may be right, but there's nothing that can be done. Progress marches on.
Buy DBC.
Lincoln Harris
We can't stop the future but we can change it.
Tyler Gomez
Can't stop the march of tech, just pray that it becomes souless Fascism and not some mis-guided do gooder progressivism. More to fear and lose against something that believes it is doing good or in the greater good.
Jordan Cruz
lmao darwin
Evan Cooper
Why should we try to stop it?
Nathan Adams
>why would I cuck my species?
Luke King
If you had a successful AI ban, unless it was worldwide, what would likely happen is that some other country without these laws would develop a recursively self-improving AI millions of times smarter than a human, that your AI-less country would be defenseless against.
Jonathan Johnson
Humanity is overrated
Elijah Baker
No just make it