REFUTE THIS

I dare you. The constitution is old and guns are needed in modern, civilized society.

*aren't

Shall not be infringed.

>they also said you can own people

no, they didn't. that was never in the constitution.

Today,
we should have flying Robot with mounted machine guns surroundingto protect us from all the illegals killers Obuma let come in here!

You're right you fag LARP! Guns ARE needed to stop other psychos with guns

>guns are needed in modern, civilized society
Glad we're on the same page.

>slavery was in the constitution
Breaking news: black man fails high school civics, more at 11.

>listens to mediocre comedians about matters concerning the future of western civilization
Yeah you're just a dumb failure
Sage

>what we're gonna do about him
We're going to wait for you to make the first move, then we're going to hang you all with short rope

at harvard, they're developing biological weapons to be deployed by a fly. they're stuck on the wings right now. Daniel Jafferis' brother is the one working on it. all of this is under NDA. both of them are jews. Sparc, before they were acquired by Booz Allen, developed a weapons AI for the DoD. withholding the names of the coders who did it.

Liberty for security, spend some time in jail in isolation to know what security for liberty feels like you freedom hating retard

Had it right the first time.

Guess what? They amended the Constitution to end slavery. If they want to end gun rights, they can do the same thing and amend the Constitution. Good luck.

/thread

I agree, its a shitty document. Stuff like the thirteenth amendment is outdated and should be removed.

This.

great logic for reforming the public education system. NOT for gun control.

It is necessary to keep a narrow power gap between citizens and the government. Maybe I'd be down if police de-armed themselves too like in bongland

>and guns are needed in modern, civilized society.
Couldn't agree more.

you absolute degenerate i believe you have never read the constitution as there is LITERALLY A AMENDMENT BANNING SLAVERY, THIS ABSOLUTE FUCKING RETARD

they could have at least argued "three fifths" instead of owning people

why do all niggers look like ninja turtles?

The constitution was very fucking broad and didn't need to change with the times. The problem was the government kept adding and subtracting from it, mostly the stuff they put in. Yet again, the problem is the government not the constitution.

As long as there are niggers like you I’ll be carrying all the time.

all fields

he has to go back, all of you have to go back

I guess we have to reopen all the old treaties we signed too, since they were signed so long ago they cant be relevant anymore. cant wait till we finally kick out the fucking natives.

Those who are in power do not want the people having access to anything that can potentially force them to remove the boot from your neck.
Libruls today are still puppets of capitalists, who are your masters.

Why stop there tho?

Phones, texting, and THE GODDAMNED internet didnt exist back then so the 1st amendment which protects the press and speech should not protect phone, text, or internet use... right?

See how fucking stupid saying X didn't exist back then.

Also slavery isn't in the constitution

>The constitution is old
Our firearm rights aren't subject to the age of the documents that protect our firearm rights.

Refute me, I fucking dare you.

George Soros is paying people to post about replacing the constitiution all over the internet. Tell Mr. Soros to fuck off

I just want someone to tell me how they plan to stop muh government with an AR.

The founding fathers didn't regard negros as people. Owning them wasn't unethical.

...

We aren't going to fight the gubment, We are going to fight their wives and children .

its shills first day on the job.

>it also said you could own people
Funnily enough this is why the left wants to do away with the 2nd amendment.

Talk about a Freudian slip. Eat a dick, faggot.

This.

For most of human history it was recognized that blacks are subhumans. Only within the last century have the masses been tricked into thinking otherwise.

I'd agree with you but our society is clearly going the other way in regards to being civilized.

A civilized society wouldn't need to change this law.

...

Come take em.

The constitution does not say you can own slaves.

This is my daddy's land and my daddy's shotgun!

DONT TREAD ON ME!!! AAHHHHHH!

He also said nigs could not vote, very wise indeed.

Leftist ignorance and willful stupidity is the ultimate white privilege

Proof of why common people need automatic weapons.

During the revolutionary war common people were bringing artillery to battles and the navy had a ton of privateers

Here, I'll refute it. You're not going to disarm us. You're not going to replace us. We're going to rise us. And if you think taking away the second amendment isn't going to spark the race war... give it a shot, kike.

Whites win this either way you want to play it.

Why the fuck are all progressives have this dumb, unimaginably face-punchingly smug fucking look on their faces?

This!

I don't give a fuck about your smug bullshit that boils down to subverting the constitution into a so-called "living document." Fuck off. Shall not be infringed. Molon Labe you pieces of shit. Try anything and you'll have 1776 so far up your ass you'll be seeing the tips of rifle barrels in the mirror when you go to brush your teeth!

> grandpa said something I don’t like
> execute him

fuck off. these shootings are fucking fake anyway

...

>The constitution is old and guns are needed in modern, civilized society.

Agree.

pretty funny fagget
>MFW

>tfw you realize you fucked up a shill thread and the Clinton Foundation is coming to erase you from existance

So amend the constitution. Any gun control short of a constitutional amendment is going to run into significant and meaningful problems in the courts.

It's weird to me that people who advocate for gun control hardly ever mention a constitutional amendment. Surely, if guns are that bad and Americans are in agreement, it shouldn't be hard to get the votes necessary for an amendment, right?

1. God is everlasting, hence the Constitution: the rights He guarantees us, which men cannot take away nor replace.

2. The 2nd Amendment is not for self-defense or sport. It is for guaranteeing the right of every citizen to have armed rebellion against a tyrannical government.

Stop shilling with this repeatedly debunked garbage.
SAGE

Example of a tyrannical government: a government which repeatedly tries to restrict its citizens' rights and abilities to bear arms, by any means.

Fine. I want the left to admit that immigration needs are completely different in 2018 compared to 1888. We don't need a bunch of meat sack wage cucks to work on farms, building railroads, building all the cities west of the Mississippi. It's all set up. my ancestors built this country, and these new immigrants are here for the gibs and to live off the fruits of whites' labor and success. Immigration needs to be greatly curtailed and illegals should gtfo

Jefferson unironically makes the same point. This is the redpill Sup Forums refuses to swallow

Point taken. Tell ya what sport, when we invent an enlightened government that doesn't have a propensity to murder it's own citizens, grow larger by the year, start wars with other nations that just might invade us one day, can actually control the nigger 15% of the population that commits more than half the murders and other assorted crime, can secure the borders, and is so fuckin' good and just that it doesn't needs guns its damn self, come talk to me about doing away with the Second Amendment.

1. Not an argument, the founders specifically avoided that justification. You wont find any references to God in the constitution - But one on the signing - because the rights are not derived from God; but they are inherent by natural law.

2. Right on

>Thinking I'm justified in equipping myself and those I care for by paper.

It's a really nice document. One of the best in the world. But it's not what keeps the liberal wet dream supercops out of our houses. It's the big fucking guns we're allowed to put between them and us. It's almost a feedback loop by now. Gun begets gun.

...that's not what he said.

>Lack of reading comprehension

>The 1st amendment implies a machine
WEW LAD

he forgot the part where you then talk to grandpa about what you just discussed, he says fuck no, and that's that.
oh shit i just realized he's just reading lines and doesn't even know what a grandfather is.

Molon Labe

>Poster doesn't know how to read.
>News at 11

>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of THE PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

the constitution also put in measures to phase out the slave trade

it was called trying to postpone the civil war

>the 2nd Amendment only implies muskets
WEW indeed

>people
>niggers
Pick one

This. Why is this so hard to understand?

Pic unrelated

If the people don't have guns who are the only people that do? Criminals and the government, that's who

What a moron, the lower is in tact, I could just get a new upper.

>Such stretching
You guys should be athletes with such mental gymnastics! Woof!

>Such projection
You could be working the jumbotron.

>what is context
Leaf education, everyone

...

...

> Count slaves as 3/5ths of a person
> Slaves

Kek. It’s pretty clear the document is not infallible and so the argument falls flat on it’s ass. Plus we’ve made numerous amendments so far to fix it. Explain why his argument doesn’t hold.

They never ended slavery, bucko. Reread it.

We should have kept slavery.

Self defense is a human right.

>and guns are needed in modern, civilized society
Yes.

>A AMENDMENT
That was NOT written by our forefathers

Don't take advice from farm equipment.

>not realizing that the 2nd Amendment starts with the words "A well regulated militia...of the people"
>well regulated
What are "gun laws" for 400, Alex?

It just says slaves can vote, not that they can own slaves

sad thing is I don't think this will dissuade the grabbers... this will probably be their argument when they come after the first amendment under the guise of stopping "hate speech"

England and france...anything else fuckboy?

>nigger gives a shit eating grin and tells us freedom is an old concept that doesn't work anymore
One of these days I'm going to rip my fat cock off and beat these niggers to death with it like a baseball bat

...

Freedom is old too.
Lets go back to slavery.
I mean, why not ? The idea of freedom is old... just as the idea of human rights.
Why keep ? It's old. It's boooring. Lets try something new. Old stuff is stupid.

Hey, cunt, feel free to try. Just go through the process of removing the amendment. Only need 2/3 of state legislature's approval, surely if its so popular it shouldn't be too hard.

>Liberals take over the government and try to legislate the first amendment away
Oh dear, if only we had something that could help with that...

Jefferson would never advocate that natural rights change. Don't be a gay.