Assume all guns are banned in the USA

> The liberals get what they want
> Sinead O'Taco makes Time magazine's person of the decade
> Assumingly, shootings go down and there will be little to no gun violence, if any, at all
> If gun violence does happen then what? Death penalty / life in prison for owning one?

How worse can it get?

Suspend your conventional belief system and play devil's advocate for a second.

Let's pretend the left has the answer to everything and that were another shooting to occur, that that would be impossible because guns would be banned

Inb4 showing world history of disarming the public and mass executions, that couldn't happen in America, right?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battles_of_Lexington_and_Concord
youtube.com/watch?v=TVrTUIAXWO4
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

the Stalinist purges would begin and everyone on this board would be shot against a wall

You go to gulag

You're obviously a jew. Remember (((your))) old saying about Hitler disarming his people?

Liberals get purged. It will start in Chicago when the power, water, and food are cut off by rebels. Within 30 days the niggers will be chopping up soyboys for their fatty meat.

Anyone who is to the right of Karl Marx, and/or White will be rounded up and killed if they get the guns.

"To conquer a nation first disarm its public"

So I guess the only way we can avoid a Leftist Fascist Dictatorship is to uphold The Constitution like every sworn in leader takes an oath to.

I am just honestly curious how the left would run things if they were in full control, and how they would justify eating ground up white people as a new form of progressivism.

Why is an Anarchist using the internet?

Why is she, herself, a seemingly white person blended in with a Troll doll, not rid of as she states would be a good thing?

actually history has shown that more often than not the "useful idiots" go first

The "feels" crowd will die in mass as they are useless to a society

This is about the only single action that would start a full-blown civil war.

So will Feels Government Inc go to?

What weapons do Feels Group use when the Left decides to eat them? Social media platforms and false allegation threats?

What will the side who doesn't believe in guns use? Katanas, flower pedals and mace?

Criminals are exactly so because they don't follow the law. Guns are banned... so what, that doesn't matter to a criminal, who will break the law, to do criminal shit. I don't see how this is so hard to understand.

I fully agree, but to critically think (ha) for the left's side they'd say, "What's the point of laws at all if we're gonna break 'em?"

Replace 'guns' with 'drugs' and you'll have your answer. Now kys.

>Guns illegal
>Good goys take part in buybacks
>Nigs do not and nig like they have never nigged before

Illegal Guns= more firearms deaths

Also the amount of people suddenly unemployed would be fantastical

Look at literally all of south america then kill yourself
Reading this post has the same effect as 10 minutes without oxygen

>gun deaths are already dropping
>while number of guns per citizen increases

they will claim this was their achievement

If the lefts need to break laws outweighs their moral concious... then they are too far gone. I know you were just posting the question, not agreeing to it, but you are going to get a lot of triggered responses here. Including mine.

I had one of these water guns when I was a kid

>Sinead O'Taco
ay caramba my sides

Then I guess the asphyxiation of it will complement your masturbation

>sinead o' taco
Top kek. I'll bet 98% of Sup Forums has no idea what youre talking about

Honestly I'd be okay if the government said they were going to try strict gun control for a few years. Let's say 5. No AR-15s, no handguns, no civilian ownership. You can apply for 1 hunting rifle in .243 caliber and you can only ever have 5 rounds at any one time. Also the hunting rifle is bright pink and is controlled by an RFID chip.

Just the most draconian type laws you can imagine. And then we wait and see what happens. If gun violence sinks like a rock, well maybe it was for the best. If gun violence stays about the same or gets worse, then after 5 years all gun control is repealed. Not only the draconian shit, but the GCA of 68, the NFA, fucking everything. You can go walk into Walmart and buy a new production M249 and all the ammo you can afford. If you want a LAW or something just head over to the closest gun shop and put one on layaway.

>walk into Walmart and buy a new production M249
Only in dreams, lad. Only in dreams

Thank you for the reasonable answer, and I get the reaction despite everyone's misreadings

I am honestly trying to wonder
> How the Left thinks and what their best argument is
> Why all these points are not being said by current politicians since the answer is so easy

Not trying to start an echo chamber here, just dipping my toes in moldly Converses and playing devil's advocate for a few seconds

more people are killed with handguns than rifles

The second you give way on legislation like that within 10 years the state and nigs will have the monopoly on violence

To be fair, I stole it from Sup Forums from another thread. It was too good not to use and propagate

You never give an inch on gun control. Not one fucking inch.
They succumbed to the feels in 1934 with the NFA and then again in 1968 with the GCA. Both need to be repealed. Both are infringements. BOTH ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Also damn, let me know where I can get an (actual) SAW, not the fully neutered pos they let civilians own.

>All guns are banned
>Still shit loads of bullets left
>Zip guns and self loaders are being made
>Some weapons are manufactured almost perfectly
>Cartels start pumping in weapons, just another thing to make money off of, might as well do it
>Chinese smugglers will more than likely make a killing selling weapons as well
>Murder rates stay the same
>BUT OH JOY NO MORE MASS MURDERS YAY! :D XD LOL!

>murder rates stay the same
Bullshit, criminals target more peoples homes because they don't believe people to be armed,only to find out everyone is armed with home made shotguns.
This will cause a spike at first.

Leftards want to ban guns, but the only thing they could do, at most, is ban the sale of new guns. However they couldn't prevent the guns already in circulation to be part of a massive black market.
So yeah, they could do something like death penalty for owning/selling/buying a gun. I wouldn't put it past them. However, that would mean they would have to kill like 200+ millions of people? Sounds difficult.

Anyway, after they've banned guns, of course gun crime and shootings won't go down, not even a little. But the media will stop acting so outraged and repot extensively every single school shooting like they are doing currently. Instead it will be just another news item that you hear about 1 minute on TV in the evening then never hear from again. Because it's going to be unnecessary to keep crying like little bitches since they achieved their goal.

...

WTF, I have that exact same gun :DD
What are the odds?

>Sinead O'Taco
First time seeing this. Actually zozzled

Wrong. Read it again. You know what Devil's Advocate is... right?

It's meme magic

What do you mean "shootings go down", what are you fucking retarded? Did alcohol use go down after prohibition? Did drug use go down since the war on drugs? When are you guys going to understand that criminals don't obey the laws?

You equating this to something like fatalities going down for car accidents after seat belt laws. The difference is the lack of a criminal.

Criminals do not obey laws by nature therefore making laws to hinder criminals is virtually ineffective every time.

>Assume all guns are banned in the USA
civil war

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battles_of_Lexington_and_Concord

This seems to be the most logical answer here in regards to it all.

The media would totally talk about it for 5 seconds while social media platforms would manipulate it so it wasn't trending or seen.

I really don't get why they do this. I can take a guess, but I just don't want to believe they are actually that fucked up

Your sperg outbreak for reading comprehension and limp grasp of devil's advocate

niggers and spics will still have smuggled guns, nothing new
although if this happens wont niggers and spics just kill each other enough for them to become the actual actual minority again?

You have a limp grasp of reality, and less of a grasp on devil's advocate. It doesn't mean suspend disbelief all around.

You literally believed I was believed in their side when I mentioned their "reasoning" of shootings going down.

You went for the ad hominem and made it personal. Take the L today and be humble

that's what everyone else here thinks too

wonder why

Just sage it and move on. He's trying to feel smart by wording something like a 5yo and insulting people that call him out on it.

Well, was pretty good about it and recogonized the possible triggering

> Me: Wording something like a 5 yr old
> You: Reacting like a 5 yr old

Ok, got it

>imagine all guns are banned
you're dreaming. police at least would have guns, then what? we get fucked regularly by them

Mexico, fuckface.

The answer to 'why' is simple: 1984, animal farm, and all of those other political dystopian books were a warning against very real policies that were being created.

I know, it's centralized to the "proper authorities" and not the public

What is the Left's best ammo for this argument and why aren't they changing their minds based off of all these points?

Is it really pathetic emotions with a mix of hidden agenda?

he just keeps making up this reality

Your argument is retarded faggot
Back2reddit

The only things that will come out of banning guns in America

>no change in mass shootings
>huge spike in house burglary
>gun violence will remain the same
>police deaths will increase due to them trying to take the guns away from unwilling owners

You want some cheese with that w(h)ine, Captain Emo?

Triggered

>Leftist Fascist
I fell for this meme once.

Let's not, and pretend we did.

There!

End thread, OP can go back to sucking dicks, everybody is happy.

>sinead O'taco
nice one

And then underwhelming coverage from the very news that set to push this legislation in the first place?

Just look to the UK first they take guns then theyll take ur knifes!
>not going to take my fuwakakkin knifes!!!!!

you forgot they came for the spoons too

I still have an unlicensed plastic spoon under my bed though, only admitting this because I have a proxy on

All of this basically.
You wont have a Constitution anymore, because there is no reproach or consequence for getting rid of it.

> if civilians have guns that means when you start burning the constitution... right wing death squads will hunt down politicians and shoot them in their homes and their protection services wont be able to put up a good enough defense

Also in the case of a Civil War the US Military loses all of its funky powers when it comes to fighting on its own soil against its own people.

The bridges cant be counted on to move the tanks, and the bases where the UAVs and Jets fly out of will be raided or their fuel support will be cut off.

> muh machineguns
Military rarely uses fully automatic fire, they do snap shots just like a semi-auto is capable of. An AR-15 might as well be an M-16 as far as how a marine or army soldier is going to use it while conducting business.

Main advantage the military has is armored vehicles and explosives, but rural dwelling resistance factions would make up for that with guerilla tactics.
It would also point of fact be 2 times as hard to deal with Kentucky Rednecks than Talibani's in rural afghanistan.

>Assumingly, shootings go down and there will be little to no gun violence, if any, at all
Right, because it's currently legal for felonious niggers to shoot each other and that's why it happens.

>Sinead O'Taco

Why the fuck would an anarchist want welfare and diversity enforced by the state in he first place?

Thanks for the response, fellow burger

Wouldn't the rednecks also have a large land advantage as well? And wouldn't some military / law enforcement ultimately defect?

I am thinking if the left wants all public guns gone, they'll do it piece by piece. I wonder when the tipping point is to enact civil war?

The current answer is Harrison Bergeron. That is the current policy. Read it if you haven't yet.

Hahahha good question!

Her clothing brought to you by Hot Topic, an anarchist store where they pay in fairy dances or just rob the place

Ah, Vonnegut, eh? Ok, I'll give it a read. Thanks for the rec

Meme magic indeed!

I use it to shoot vodka in to my mouth.

>You dream of a shitty weapon
If you sneeze too close to the SAW it jams.
I know your vidya makes it LOOK cool but that's it; in reality it is a massive piece of shit.
Upgrade your dreams to the 240 GOF or make them wet w Ma Deuce

Not strictly mass execution, but systematic persecution of entire races has been the norm throughout this country’s history. One example that isn’t talked about as much is Executive Order 9066, which resulted in the forced imprisonment and “internment” (read: forced onto concentration camps) of many innocent US citizens. They were treated as if they were enemies of the state by the color of their skin alone. And this wasn’t no rogue states or secession going on either. No, this was a federal mandate, by our own president, unjustly imprisoning innocent, loyal citizens on our own soil. So don’t you DARE say that our government wouldn’t turn tyrant on its own people. Because it’s done so before, even long before this gun control bullshit.

>Assume all guns are banned in the USA
You should ban drugs as well. While you're at it, ban crime too. And don't forget to ban pain, disease and unhappiness.

The guns are already in the country. The gangs, the criminals, the sickos, the terrorists, they won't be the ones giving up their guns. It will be the people who could stop the aforementioned with their own guns who will lose their weapons, thus making the country more dangerous.

I remember reading this 25 years ago in a junior high class. That teacher I had was the biggest red pill. Right after reading this we read Anthem, Animal Farm, 1984, Brave New World.
If she were teaching today they'd probably fire her with extreme prejudice.
Funny thing is even back then there were kids in the class who didn't see anything wrong with the mandatory Bergeron style equality. They liked it because it was "fair."
I've always liked Examination Day too: youtube.com/watch?v=TVrTUIAXWO4

1776 commences again

>> Assumingly, shootings go down and there will be little to no gun violence, if any, at all
>Suspend your conventional belief system and play devil's advocate for a second.
>Let's pretend the left has the answer to everything
Well the first thing I would do is make murder illegal, that would be a regulation that would work and everybody can get behind.

Very good points and history, screen capped

So you wouldn't put it past the far left to do the same thing if they had the chance?

All the other amendments start eroding and when someone says "You can't do that!" the only response will be "How are you going to stop me?"

>muh us constitution
>muh magna carta
>muh code of hammurabi

If you peeked my interested. 80's Twilight Zone too? Ok, you won me over

I read somewhere that an user on Sup Forums did an experiment with his college school government and turned it into a totalitarian dictatorship. It's a good read if you can find it

Also, a question to the posters who are saying that it would trigger a civil war- what side would the army take? I'd assume that they would carry out their orders? But then I really don't see a civil war happening even if what OP says came to pass.

Chilling response

>assume everything works just because I said so
Read the rules. Argument is part of the rules, that's why that chart is there. Deus ex machina is not a legitimate argument. We oppose this dumb idea because there are axiomatic reasons you are trying to dismiss without a fight. If fire wasn't fire you could put your hand in it, but that's preposterous, because fire is fire.
>Assumingly
Consider that you will never persuade anyone of anything if you think "assumingly" is a word.

>I assume they would carry out their orders
Why? Did you miss the Facebook Mutiny?
Also a plurality of officers especially after Obama are traitors but enlisted is by a large majority faithful to the Constitution.

If this happened, I would become a god.

>own several personal guns
>my dad and stepdad probably own at least 50 or 60 apiece, all of my siblings are soygoy faggots so I stand to inherit a fucking armory's worth of shit when they both kick off
>meanwhile all you fags that didn't buy one when you had the chance (or don't have relatives that own any, for those of you who may have been too young or poor to buy one when they were still legal) are fucked.

>or just rob the place.
Kek, I used to steal from there like 15 years ago when I was an edgy teen. They actually had some good quality back then. Still got a real leather belt from there that holds about 20 9mm rounds.
No prob bro, used to be required reading back in the day. Short story so it won't take long. A little over the top but it gets the message through and you can clearly see it happening today.
Holy shit, someone even older than me here! We read all those in school as well. Yeah, that was back when English class was still about learning to communicate and read. It's all about indoctrination now. I was talking to my younger brother who is taking English class in college and he said it's all just learning about how to hate the white man noe.

>Sinead O’taco

Also love the twilight zone. Prefer the Outer Limits myself. I recommend the episode "OBIT" right now.

Obama cockblocked for 8 years by Republican Congress.
Right-Wing blames Obama for Congress not passing Legislation after Trumps been President and Republican majority for over a year.
Good try, losers. You'r'e in charge. Fuc*ing do something! Pathetic!

Open season on law abiding citizens. Imagine what goes through a criminals mind when it hears that now the entire populace of a country has been massively disarmed. Probably the most massive crime wave in the history of the country. What would be used to combat a massive crime wave? A massive police state. What happens after that? You do the math. Shall not be infringed. Not one inch.

Not trying to persuade you, user, if you read, I am trying to see what would be the result of them getting what they wanted with the very shit claims they make

>How worse can it get?
Niggers start killing off white men and raping the women. Niggers with guns usually get them through illegal means and the mexicn cartel will me making bad bank when they sell their manufactured aks and ars that have no identifying serial numbers or anything. Then when gun violence becomes so one sided that it can't even be considered violence, instead a full scale slaughter the liberals will blame white men for their own genocide because the 1% back in the day owned slaves.

Civil war is what these leftist fucks want.
In no way does a civil war end good for the USA it leads the way for other states to put their fingers into trying to take over this country.

>> Assumingly, shootings go down and there will be little to no gun violence, if any, at all

Absolutely abhorrent post

Lots of dead cops and rednecks along with a general erosion of social trust. There'd be lots of Waco-style events if this were to happen and we'd be much closer to Helter Skelter

Don't shoot the messenger

Heh that works on TWO levels

Obama could have done great things for race relations here. He had one job and fucked it up badly. Now look at the shit we have to deal with.