it's a fetish, the (((left))) used their typical semantic tricks to fool everyone that there are multiple orientations.
No you can't have degrees of homosexuality on a spectrum because to have sexuality you need to have sexes, meaning PENIS and VAGINA. Anyhting else is not actually sex, it's a fetish of the same sex body and of masturbation with a same sex person's mouth or colon. Homosexuality happens in nature because it's not a lifestyle choice in nature, animals masturbate with other animals for entertainment, they still have normal sex though. There exists only one sexual orientation because the only sexuality is between males and females, stop this "homosexuality" meme, make a hashtag of it or something cause I can't cope with these civilization ending lies!!!!
Gayness is not a sexual orientation
True
homosexuality is a mental disorder.
Like a lot of fetishes, true.
Pretty much. No use getting worked up over it. You aren’t going to change their minds.
youtube.com
it is perversion. ((they)) want to destroy white man's values and also make perversions normal, they want to also bind human consciousness to physical trough sins. lust.
You've got a fetish for a slimy tuna factory, I just like cock. Seems like you have the problem here.
I just combat it back with "necrosexuality" talk.
They usually get really triggered when I say I am necrosexual and that "love is love" and "what do you care what I do in privacy of my own home, NECROPHOBE"
It's so funny seeing their cognitive dissonance trying to justify saying "but it's wrong"
There's plenty of straight people who can't get off to vanilla stuff and have to involve themselves in heavy BDSM or some other shit. Being gay means just that - you can't get off to straight stuff and have to fuck hairy manholes instead. It's sad that there's no actual research being done on homosexuality because of muh homophobia.
Nope, gas yourself, you have a brain damage from having a shitty or no father, eroticising male attention and watching gay porn or having gay sex to fill the spot in your brain dedicated to a father with men that you think will love you. Go to a camp and pray/electrocute the gay away or find another way to fix your fucked up head.
tell that to this guy
I don't give a shit about homosexuality as long as traditional familial organizations remain intact and aren't undermined. But identifying as "LGBTQ" and takin up excessively promiscuous lifestyles is a psyop sex cult used for political control.
And this is fact because...? Usually homophobes are just sexually insecure.
That is a fact because to have sex you need to have genitals of two sexes. Leaf calling me a homophobe for stating simple logical truths, wow, so unusual.
Don't think you understand, I cannot get my dick up for women, however I can for men. I'm never had an attraction for women, even as a kid I used to have a crush for the news reporter on the tv. I do not think Homosexuality is natural, I do think it's a genetic disorder. But it isn't some type of fetish you retard.
Just because you say man with man isn't sex doesn't mean that it's not sex. Don't let Sup Forums turn you delusional. If you were to openly say that in public you know how much of a retard you would look like? I think you missed the point of my post.
I look at women, I can tell when a women is extremely hot, but it does nothing for me. But when I look at most women, I can't tell if they're more attractive than the other girl. However with guys I can. The brain's of homosexuals are different to heterosexuals, I think it's a mix of biological, genetic and environmental
Sup Forums is like varg, a lot of bs but with a few nuggets of intellect.
>simple logical truths
The absolute state of polish logic
>"what is sexual intercourse?"
Well you're wrong, if you can't get it up for a woman then you have probably fetish spiraled, did you watch a lot of porn? Did you have a attentive father growing up? Yes, there are people who have genetically bigger chance to be gay but it doesn't make it a sexual orientation, it still is just a fetish that isn't a worthwile lifestyle choice and can be cured.
Started masturbating and watching porn at 15. I knew I liked guys long before that.
Well if you disagree with the statement that "sexual intercourse is between genitals of two kinds then I'm afraid your german logic keeps you retarded."
Did you have a attentive father?
Do I think homosexuality can be cured? Yes, but science is politicised and so nobody is trying to find a cure for it. Is it a lifestyle choice, yeah i'd say so too. But is there honestly anything wrong with me rather spending my life with another man as long as I don't shove it down people's throat, keep it to myself, and don't live a life of hedonism and debauchery?
>blowjobs, handjobs, anal are not sexual intercourse
>why?
>Cause the pedophile in church said so! REEEEEEE
Stay closeted, ,mate
Yes i'd say so. He was a good father to me, as was my mother.
If you need to know everything from when I was a child. Low income family, single child, father worked at a grocery store, my mother worked as a cleaner, I had friends, most were male, I wasn't depressed, I finished school with very good grades, I'm now in university
Two men together is still sex
Two women together is still sex
A man and a woman together is still sex
Seems like you're the one having problems here bud
> german logic
> as if that's an insult
Post more of these Xtreme feels images please. I need them for my collection.
I would say it's a mental disorder. Why would any human being willingly opt out of spreading his genes and continuing his bloodline?
this?
Yes, blowjobs, handjobs, anal are not sex and I have yet to see any definition of sexual intercourse that doesn't distinguish between sex and what people call "x sex" which aren't types or subtypes of sex, they are a completely separate thing to sex and they are only called that because they usually happen between two sexes and involve stimulation of genitalia. That doesn't make it sex. You dumb fuck.
Here's wikipedia
Sexual intercourse (or coitus or copulation) is principally the insertion and thrusting of the penis, usually when erect, into the vagina for sexual pleasure, reproduction, or both.[3] This is also known as vaginal intercourse or vaginal sex.[2][4] Other forms of penetrative sexual intercourse include anal sex (penetration of the anus by the penis), oral sex (penetration of the mouth by the penis or oral penetration of the female genitalia), fingering (sexual penetration by the fingers), and penetration by use of a dildo (especially a strap-on dildo).[5][6][7] These activities involve physical intimacy between two or more individuals and are usually used among humans solely for physical or emotional pleasure and can contribute to human bonding.[5][8]
By your fucked up measure that may be true but in reality sex always meant and always will mean penatration of vagina with a penis, anything else are just entertaining distractions.
Well would you look at that
Respond to the comment that sources wikipedia, amigo.
No but oo dayum. So much for my no fap February.
Pretty sure you're just stupid lol
Based OP
I removed most because i don't stop getting banned for pornography, I had tons of better ones :(
Maybe this is up your alley
(((wikipedia))) only demonstrates the genral consensus, it doesn't mean the consensus is right. Also notice how it's "principally". That's because the (((left))) has watered down the definition to be more inclusive, it doesn't mean it's right.
I tried to be gay once but my gay friend farted into my foreskin when I was inside him.
>My opinion is right because I say it's right!
>Fuck common knowledge
I'm out.
Pretty sure you don't want to understand what is sex because you want it's definition to include your perversion to make it legitimate.
Oh so we should only source wikipedia when it fits your agenda, but when it goes against what you want. MUH JUDENS MUH ((()))) MUH ZIONISM! MUH CIA SHILL OP
explain this to me por favor
Make a baby with a man's asshole faggot
I don't understand what this is supposed to change, what's the difference to a childless latex BDSM fetish couple then for example?
if anything, this would make homosexuals less different and you should have less reason to discriminate them, because you don't ban marriage of infertile hetero scat fetishists either
...
accurate and well said
RIght now the goal is to ban all marriages because the harm faggots do to world by getting married is better than the good that straight marriage provides,
>en.wikipedia.org
There are people genetially more prone to be gay, it doesn't mean they have to turn out gay, it doesn't mean gayness is a sexuality. Kys.
so where do you have your definition from?
>my opinion is wrong, it must be teh joos controlling muh left!!
I got this pic when I visited cancun. Very hot
There is no genetic component to faggotry, it is all environmental. The biggest risk factor is faggot child sexual abuse.
currently, you've done nothing to prove it's a fetish, more than anything you just made yourself look retarded, and naturally your amerimutt friends gobbled it up because they see you slavshits as the most "based" and "redpilled" fags of all of Europe, when in reality you're all sad pieces of retarded shit that should get shot on sight. You're a cancer on europe slav.
fags getting married does nothing to you, adoption on the other hand I can understand.
You retarded americans...
you make a good argument. thanks OP, you changed my viewpoint.
you're right; sex is defined in terms of reproduction. if it's not reproductive, it's not sex. two penises poking each other isn't sex because of that. similarly, scissoring isn't either.
i'm not sure what it should be called, but i guess fetish is pretty close. or entertainment, as you suggested. perhaps physical companionship.
Of course it does nothing to me, I am talking about the harm that married faggots do to society.
perhaps, reproductive sex should be called as it has always been called you uneducated cunt and that is copulation or coitus, and sex can be what it has been for most of time. which is penetrative sex
>worst thing I've ever done
>masturbated to a video
God damn, he drank the entire pitcher of Kool-Aid, didn't he?
Ok, let me reiterate. What specifically does 2 faggots getting married do to society? I'm against homosexual adoption, but marriage, I rly couldn't care. I don't see a reason for why it should be banned
lol got a peer reviewed study on that? Because I know we can change your response to various visual stimuli by electrocuting you as you look at faggot porn.
nuh uh when i fuck you in the mouth your still a fagot op
Well specifically, mentally healthy people have a duty to not collaborate with the mentally ill.
Also, faggot marriage damages flower shops and bakeries.
It was published by the british journal of psychiatry. It's peer reviewed
So are the electrocution pleismograph studies...
So you have no reason? Ok good, thanks for answering my question. It's a bit vague but oh well.
The Milgram Experiment?
Does this make traps not gay?
if you remove the horse part it's pretty hot desu
Got me hard honestly
I'm pretty sure there are twin studies that clearly suggest a genetic component
There are brain studies that have shown clear differences in the amygdala and other areas of the brain in homosexuals and heterosexual men. Not so sure for women though, desu I think a lot of them are bisexual and hate men
No, there is no genetic component to homosexuality. I looked at your junk science study by the way and they only looked at sex offenders, but the pleismograph stuff is all inarguable junk science anyhow.
So there is that. Faggots justify their faggotry by comparing themselves to sexual offenders.
wtf!?? HOW ARE PEDOPHILES GOING WILLINGLY LET THEIR PENISES BE TESTED??? OFC THEY'RE SEX OFFENDERS DUMBASS!
Brain scan studies are almost all junk science...
you fucking mutts have to be the most retarded pieces of shit, your intellect is at the same level as slavs i'm not even kidding. the only reason America's IQ is so high is because of the asians in America.
The pedofiles and faggots they tested in the pleismograph studies were all convicted sex offenders ordered by court to undergo testing.
>REEEEE FAKE NEWS
Ahh ok. So the studies you have which fit your agenda, aren't junk science. But mine that disprove your agenda are junk science. Ok thanks, I'm out.
Holly shit, you admit to being a sex offender, you are proud of it faggot. Or rather, when did you stop buggering miners?
Yes. How are paedophiles going to willingly have themselves tested. You needed people who have already offended so they can't lie.
I take my definition from not being a brainwashed fucking retard and from the definitons of things that aren't sex like "oral sex" which are defined as sexual activity and not sexual intercourse. Throught 99% of history sex meant intercourse between males and females for the purpose of reproduction and entertainment, it's only in the XXth century that the common definition of sex expanded parallel to the left's increasing grip on the establishment. Still the definiton of sex in common use that includes sexual activities and sexual intercourse is often confused because of the clear difference between the two which comes from the fact that they are completely different matters that were always treated seperatelly and should be treated seperatelly because they are different activities done with different intentions, activating different mechanism in the brain and having different outcomes in the brain as well as in the recreational aspect. If the broad definition of sex in wikipedia includes anal and oral etc then that means it was made too broad much like the definition of a "racist" or "nazi". But if you look at the definitons of anal or oral you can see that it's not described as sexual intercourse because even wiki knows it makes no sense to do that. There currently is no distinction between sexual intercourse and sexual activity in wikipedia article, the same people are pretending there is no such a thing as human subspecies(races). Just because the official definitions have changed because of politics doesn't mean the distinction can't be made and making no distincion is correct.
I looked at the study you indicated. It was all done of sex offenders. You think sex offenders are normal human sexual behavior.
what!? When!? ok dude you have to be autistic or something you can't be this stupid. How come someone who doesn't speak english as a 1st language has better comprehension than you?
Considering they're sex offenders, you'd think they'd be more promiscuous right? And more deviant?
Any study that includes paedophiles, they're going to be done by people who have offended. Does that mean every study that includes them is thrown out and concluded as junk science?
So the brain study is junk science, the twin study is junk science, the penile response study is junk science, fuck off. I'm done with you.
Of course not, why do you think we have to monitor Sup Forums pervs.
Yes, faggotry is part of the criminal intellect... Or rather people who commit crimes their whole life also tend to be faggots. Not that all faggots are criminal...
The definition used by wikipedia goes against what you use. The typical usage of sex by literally everyone includes oral, anal and vaginal. Your definition of sex does not supercede the conclusion the rest of the world has come up with
By the definition that wikipedia uses pleismography is all junk science...
Yeah you're right.
there would be a lot more gay niggers then following your logic
fck u fgt fite me
There ARE a lot of gay niggers. They have a whole association. The Gay Niggers of America Association. en.wikipedia.org
there's pretty much an association for anything I'd assume
that doesn't mean they are a lot of people
Ok so now wikipedia is relevant. Also you realise there's a religion for homosexuals called Radical Faeries right?
You need to learn to punctuate and structure your sentences mate, it hurt to read that fuming angry rant.
>I take my definition from not being a brainwashed fucking retard
Nice ad hominem, but again, you present no sources for your definition.
> Throught 99% of history sex meant intercourse between males and females for the purpose of reproduction and entertainment
You say because something was done one way for thousand of years, it has to be right.
>what is vaccination, evolution, physics, modern medicine.
You still speak in normative terms such as should etc, yet you present no data for a descriptive definition.
In other words, you should learn to argue and research before you REEE so much.