Lol the government will protect us
zerohedge.com
By running and hiding
Lol the government will protect us
He did more than you. Respect our law enforcement they’re more meaningful than some stupid gun rights.
>expecting coherent, logical thought from the gun control crowd
their whole argument is muh feels demand it. That's why only kids and opportunist buck makers are into it.
It’s a fact that if there were better mental health checks and age restrictions cruz never would have been able to do what he did. A simple background screening would have unearthed his threats on the internet and psychosis. I disagree with Trump on a lot of things but these new proposals are great.
A simple not dropping of the fucking ball by the FBI would have done it too. No new laws required, just the government not being losers.
I don’t think anyone can refute that
No one needs an AR15!
Australia said it was a good idea to turn in our guns!
We think the Second Amendment is outdated!
A musket is good enough!
>he did nothing
Nah he did exactly the same thing I did
Britain thinks we have too many guns!
This x10000
Gun control is like a dirty word to a lot on the right.
I don’t think anyone would deny that common sense laws and restrictions are a step in the right direction.
>implying they didn't let it happen on purpose.
His threats were unearthed. Which led to several FBI tips that were ignored. He also had the cops called on him 39 times.
Red flags up the ass and nobody did anything.
What would one more red flag have accomplished?
google it... black coyote
kek. exactly this.
When liberals say common sense laws you need to add "for now" at the end. They will always be pushing for tougher and tougher laws until the 2nd amendment is effectively dead and at that point they will say just repealing the 2nd amendment entirely would be "common sense"
If someone is so dangerous that access to a gun would likely turn them into a murderer then they are by definition antithetical to the American Ideal and should be nailed to a cross live on WWE.
> mental health checks and age restrictions cruz never would have been able to do what he did
Bullshit. Unless you were in an asylum (wait those don't exist any more), what are they supposed to do? Give everyone a fucking mental evaluation? That's retarded and impractical. And raise the age limit? Yeah, that does a lot to stop 12 year old niggers from shooting each other with handguns that can't legally be purchased until 21.
Savage
2nd amendment is not granted by government, you don't need government permission to by a gun. Background checks are unconstitutional and immoral. If you don't trust someone to buy a gun, nail them to a cross.
>"muh common sense"
Stop using buzzwords. "Common sense" to some might be murdering all the blacks. "Common sense" is nothing more than a futile attempt at appealing to an emotional group and has no place in any discussion of law or policy regarding ANYTHING.
>He did more than you
False, they both did nothing. The difference is the deputy was being paid to do something.
Not relying on the FBI to follow up every lead is a good thing. A background check that looks for those things specifically would be a huge boon for the safety of law abiding citizens.
Want to buy a gun? Don’t say crazy shit.
>common sense
Nice try! Not budging left even a fucking inch on this issue. Cry harder.
>last day for retirement
>school shooting happens
>not wanting to be killed last day
is this the new trope for cop movies
If the officer was an employee of the school doesn't he share the teachers duty of care to the children in loco parentis?
Who do you think does background checks?
A simple google search during a background check would have brought to light his crazed mental state. Now imagine what the tools available to our law enforcement could unearth. A huge amount of criminals saying shit online could be stopped before they buy a gun. I support trump on this one.
>Warren v D.C.
Cops protect the population as a whole but have no duty to protect any individual civilian. Taking cover during a shooting is probably SOP for his dept.
>if there were better mental health checks
So if they didn’t look into their own records and see red flags where then should they loo? Social media and anonymous accounts? Maybe anons here should have their constitutional rights revoked over unacceptable posts being made.
The difference is that charging someone with a crime and denying purchase of a gun are entirely different things with different requirements. They would have no doubt denied this man a gun with a simple background check.
I think if you want to buy a gun you should be prepared to prove your mental health. If you don’t want your mental health investigated then don’t buy guns you don’t need.
Simple.
Shills trying HARD to convince Sup Forums that support for "common sense" as told by Tide Pod munching bald lesbian spics is unanimously agreed upon.
My rights supercede all the dead kids in the fucking world.
That's a very ableist "solution", bigot.
I’m not saying we should do anything crazy. Just the common sense ideas put forward by Trump. I think there is a huge bipartisan support for some changes. No reason we need to be enemies on this as it potentially affects all our children.
>BTFO TWICE IN ONE MONTH
THE NEW FACE OF COMMON SENSE
...
Unironically this
>2018
>trying to disarm women
WOW, sexist and racist much!?
The duty of care doesn't extend to putting yourself in a life threatening situation for him, for teachers or for parents.
Theres a better chance of lightning hitting you than someone breaking and entering. A shotgun does the job better than an assault rifle anyways.
Finally...
You sir made the best post on this topic in the last week
This
>fbi are caught conspiring agaonst the president
>cnn turn out to be promoters of russian internet shill events
>schools turn out to be ineffective money sinks where teachers fuck students sexually and mentally
Then suddenly
>a shooting the fbi and local police were warned about happens the same day a scheduled mass shooter drill takes place
>gibs more moneys to police, fbi and schiols for security
>ban all guns, except for government employees
>lets arm the far left leaning teachers that churn out sociopaths, anarchists, and all other assorted personality disorders
>what could go wrong arming a group that has a hobby of removing monuments and protesting constantly
listen here you disengenious little shit. You miss the point entirely. The right to be armed is recognized because simple centralized systems are the easiest to abuse and fastest to become corrupt. and if you think the folks that gave us the dmv and social security office can competently collate and access mental health data? Or that there exists no motive or risk of abuse?
Subversion is still aggression. And I respond in kind. fuck off.
No. That duty actually does extend that far. If you have a gun you are bound to use it to protect your charges.
Aussie and Brit numales today are a disgrace. They have no sense of honour and no sense of responsibility. kys, faggots.
>I think if you want to buy a gun you should be prepared to prove your mental health
Prove it to who exactly?
Responding to self
...
I'll take the guy on the right
Actually I was moving in the general direction of Florida when the shooting happen.
So yeah, I did more than him.
only issue is Black Coyote was purported to be deaf but surely the tribe had someone who could sign or stop him. either way Wounded Knee was some bad mojo
...
Everything you have just said is objectively wrong.
The Supreme Court has ruled otherwise, sadly.