Was she a good King (queen)

...

No.

Yes.

Myabe

Maybe.

fucking retard delete this post right now

probably

Depends on if you think the king must be a leader. She was an excellent manager of her state, but a miserable leader of her people.

Yes (no)

She caused her country to fall to ruin. She's a bad king who betrayed her people.

not really

...

Depends on what you want out of a monarch. The meeting of the 3 kings covers this.

She wasn't real user...

Fuck off, Mordred.

Yes!

It was determined from the start that it would happen

Mordred would have been a better king than Arturia. At least she wouldn't have been a massive fuckup that led her country to ruin.

The only thing the meeting covers is that Iskandar is a shitty king who should keep his mouth shut.

>country
>in the 500s
what did everyone mean by this??

>5-year old autist
>Not a massive fuckup.

Arthuria at least held the realm together for 10 years, Mordred's kingdom wouldn't last 2 days before the first tantrum.

Yes, the greatest of all Kings.

King of the who?

All kingdoms are doomed to fail sooner or later. At least she made her people's lives as prosperous as was possible for as long as was possible.

KING OF THE JEWS

He was a good king in that his people looked up to and envied him. He regretted nothing in the end.

He was a good leader and a garbage head of state, that's why he's opposite to Artoria who's the reverse.
All he did was name whatever city he just conquered "Alexandria", tear one of his lieutenants away and say he's a governor and he works here now, and run off to the horizon with the rest of his army.

Livin' the dream

She was both because the reason she failed was because she was perfect.

Judging by how it worked out for him irl, I'd say that he was a good king that had 0 plans for his empire to outlive him. Live fast and die hard.

Tituria was better

She was a Perfect King.
Why would they rebel when they had a Perfect King? That one Knight said that the reason they rebelled was because she was too Perfect.