What actually causes violence, Sup Forums

Fellow Sup Forumsacks, this gun control debate has been going on forever and it doesn't seem like any progress is ever being made. Everyone says they want to end the violence, but without knowing what causes violence, how can we find a solution?

Here's a few starting points I think we can all agree on:
>the United States has a unique mass shooting problem among Western nations
>the United States has the most guns per capita in the world
>different groups (whether the group is racial or based on class) commit violence at different rates
>IQ and crime are correlated in some way
>guns do in fact make it easier for people to kill large numbers of people quickly, but guns also allow for self defense
>most of the mass shooters we've seen have similar backgrounds: isolated from people their age, some history of mental illness, broken families

What can we say about what causes violence, pol?

Other urls found in this thread:

crimeresearch.org/2015/06/comparing-death-rates-from-mass-public-shootings-in-the-us-and-europe/
crimeresearch.org/2014/03/comparing-murder-rates-across-countries/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>What can we say about what causes violence, pol?

The human causes the violence. Weapons are only tools.

Human nature to destroy between ourselves

Not very insightful. No shit buddy, nobody with a brain believes otherwise. But what causes them to use the tool to inflict violence? That's the central question.

>But what causes them to use the tool to inflict violence?

Rats in a cage. Society builds tension. When there is no out, the animal lashes out.

Perhaps the problem really lies in how people are socialised. Do you really think there would be as big a problem if Movies and TV did not glorify violence as a means of conflict resolution?

Guns don't cause violence but they facilitate it.

Jews

>What actually caused violence
Niggers

Also true

It's the destruction of society as we knew it a mere 50 years ago.

Diversity, the gay agenda, trannies, villification of the nuclear family and women as wives and mothers, the general destruction of any semblance of modesty, and myriad of propaganda that vilifies the ethnic collective.

The only common thing here is that it's all shit peddled by jews.

>What can we say about what causes violence, pol?
niggers and jew media +kike-pharma, how new are you?

two objects can't occupy the same space at the same time.

The sate of nature is a state of war

Resource scarcity

There's only so much pussy to go around

Look into the rat park experiment. It related to drugs not being the root cause of addiction but I think this can be applied to violence as well. Essentially the root of violence is not caused by "mental illness" but environment. The "illness" is merely a symptom to the environment.

there is no solution.

Seriously though, in the case of school shooters, it's all SSRI's and false flags.

lack of philia.

Honestly I'm surprised these things don't happen more often. No one should be forced to endure a public education.

The US will continue to breed violence and apathy:
-As long as teens today are groomed to be narcissistic sociopaths, taking selfies and idolizing superficial and temporary vanity.
-As long as the elder people in the US continue to push their own conservative and liberal agendas, over practical sustainability.
-As long as teens ostracize each other and relentlessly target and harass intended victims, both through technology and at school.
-As long as US society looks down at skilled and physical labor, demeaning entire populations as worthless, and mocking hard work.
-As long as Americans continue to look the other way when they see something wrong, either because they are benefiting from the scam or are too lazy or feckless to speak up.

...

They have suppressed the male psyche and thus allowed for a pent up rage to simmer right below the surface. They dumb us down, they deny us our nature. They destroy God and morals and overall virtuous behavior. All the while the male is unable to challenge himself and grow. Eventually the mind snaps and aggression ensues.

I have no idea what i am talking about. just shitposting at work.

>the United States has a unique mass shooting problem among Western nations

yeah, in that the US mass shootings aren't as frequent or fatal. the EU has more mass public shootings per capita than the United States
crimeresearch.org/2015/06/comparing-death-rates-from-mass-public-shootings-in-the-us-and-europe/
ex. France had more casualties from mass public shootings in 2015 than the US suffered during Obongo's entire presidency (532 to 527)

moreover, the US has more firearms than any country nowhere near the most firearm homicides

crimeresearch.org/2014/03/comparing-murder-rates-across-countries/

People need to have full rights over their property.

If a neighbourhood wants to ban niggers from physically entering there, they need to have the right to do so as ugly as it may sound.

As long as there is no initiation of agression on someone else's property everthing should be allowed.

If a school wants to ban weird kids for whatever reason, they should have the right to do so.

If the entire block wants to ban weird kids from entering there, they should have the right to do so.

Leftists (((jews))) directly stage mass shootings using groups of two or three swat team members, all dressed like the patsy. 10-15 people can be killed in literally one or two minutes. Then the guns are planted on a pre-chosen patsy, who conveniently has died at the scene.
We don't have a gun problem, we have an an evil people problem.
The people who want your guns are the exact same people ALREADY killing us. What do you think is going to happen after you can't defend yourself?

>What can we say about what causes violence, pol?

I think I know the answer. I'm channeling Hans Hermann Hoppe when I say that public property increases levels of violence.

1. You shouldn't have to go into a public space to live your life because public spaces can barely be regulated.
2. If we started seeing shootings at Walmart you get bet they'd ramp up security because they'll foot the bill in the form of liability or terrorism insurance, but also because of people choosing other stores.
3. Public spaces, on the other hand, can't go out of business when they don't ramp up security.
4. The public schools are a good example of this. There should be no educational mandate. Sending kids out onto public property is dangerous.
5. We have a system of free public roads which will take you to anybody's doorstep uninterrupted.
6. We also have a lot of antidiscrimination laws which make it hard for homeowners' associations to keep out undesirables.

7. If everything is public, then there's no way to keep undesirables in their ghettos with checkpoints etc. If there were a "Downtown Inc." all the shareholders would find ways to keep burdensome people and races out. Their liability insurance would actually force them to do so under thread of raising rates. Assuming they're not compelled to be "fair" (unfair in reality) to niggers, insurance companies would actually be great. Now of course anybody of any race or background could pay a security deposit and pay a visit, but that'll be fine if discrimination isn't criminalized.

In short, we need to transfer all public property to private shareholders. Maybe every citizen should get a number of shares. Only if we do this will we see a bright future full of white neighborhoods and privately maintained apartheid zones.

And before people say "myah... Downtown Inc would ship in niggers if it caused a profit; you can't trust capitalism!"

No. Business owners want to bring in people who have money to spend and who don't cause crime. They want to bring in white people. Private extreme vetting will keep the vast majority of nonwhites out, and only let in the cream of the crop. Allowing thugs on your sidewalk scares away whites with money to spend.

Niggers and single mothers are a good track if you're genuine, user.

The men behind the stories on the violence you think is occurring.