Muh Second Amendment

Why do americans worship this line of the constitution so much?

They say it is there to protect them against Tyrannical government.

Let's think seriously.

Assault Rifle vs Main Battle Tank, assault rifle loses.

Assault Rifle vs F-35. F-35 wins.

What can an average american do against a Tyrannical Government with just an assault rifle?


Isn't the truth they just want toys to compensate for their small penises?

Other urls found in this thread:

thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2016-07-01/obama-drone-casualty-numbers-a-fraction-of-those-recorded-by-the-bureau
goonsaloon.pro/intj/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>assault rifle
Semi-Automatic only rifles does not an assault rifle make.
Also, a bunch of rice farmers and goat herders would like to have a word with you.

...

So your argument is that because the government has access to certain weapons, citizens shouldn't have access to any weapons?

Those gun restrictions seem to have worked real well for your particular shithole.

...

>Sees Brazil Flag
>Sees an opinion not favorable of gun ownership

Oh man, get ready for the 56% telling someone they aren't white

The second amendment is fucking retarded because a) members of the military would never turn against their own citizens and b) even if they did the rest of the world would intervene.
Americans are too dumb to realise this though so just keep spouting what they've been brainwashed into believing even though it makes no logical sense.

Because it protects the rest of the Bill of Rights, whether you want it to or not.

>not white
I don't care

>Isn't the truth they just want toys to compensate for their small penises?
Of course I'm compensating.
If I could kill a Buffalo at 100 meters with my dick we'd be having a totally different sort of conversation.

Which kike paid you shekels to make this post?

Brazilian education must be worse than American government education.

/ourpolack/

>Brazil
>Any sort of educational instiutional.
American education.

spotted the guy with a small penis.

That’s why I was at the Bundy Ranch for a little under a month. Guess what, the little powerless citizens with the ARs vs. the Fed won! God bless the 2A

Why does no one want to immigrate to your country? Sort your own shit out before coming onto us.

By this logic I should have everything the govt has for weapons

Agree

>kike

Soros

Spotted the jew

Like how the military is protecting you from sandniggers raping and murdering your people.

Quit projecting Pedro

If the average citizen could do anything against a government they thought was tyrannical, Trump would be dead.

What is it with you people and your fascination with male genitalia? Every time you see a gun do you think about cocks? Do you play video games for fun or sexual thrill? Do you bring a box of tissues with you when you see an action movie?

But that only means americans should be allowed to own mbts and fighter jets

If you're telling the truth, you're a damn hero, as much as the patriots that sent King George's troops packing. There should be a monument to Bundy and everyone else that stood with him.

There are more murders in brasil than in america

>replying to slide threads

Everyone who does this ITT and doesn't hide it from here down is a dumbass fucking kike puppet

Didn't all of the Bundys end up losing and getting arrested, then later won though the court system, you know, the normal way?

Can you want a big gun for other reasons than a small penis? Newfag cracker here

>anything I disagree with is a slide thread

Oy vey. I am kike puppet now.
>gibs me shekels

Well than, we should have the right to own battle tanks and F35s then. It’s literally what our forefathers would want.

>algerian

Fuck off.

The same autistic shit gets posted all day every day and people still respond.

It would be funny if it didn't ruin our fucking board.

*distant reeeing*

Probably a Swede, spending his vacation learning where dicks come from

That was for Round #2 in Oregon, they had much less standing in that case. The real one in Nevada saw the Fed get BTFO.
I lived in Las Vegas at the time & was very libertarian (am I being detained) minded. Since I was off from uni at the time I figured I’d show up, it was great!

If you can't tell this is a bait thread you are absolutely fucking retarded.

Or an actual shill

Imagine being this retarded

I’m expat. Working as a contractor...wish I was back in NV to continue the fight

it's about bargaining power.
think of the constitution as an agreement between the government and the people.
because we don't have a concept of divine rule instead our government derives it's right to rule from the consent of the governed.
the constitution consists of first a list of responsibilities that the government will fulfill, and second a list of things that they promise never to do.
in exchange the people agree to follow the rules that the government sets.
if either party breaks the terms of the agreement, the other party is no longer bound by it.
in the case that a citizen breaks the contract the government has the right to imprison them and strip them of their rights under the agreement.
if the government breaks the rules though we have a lot less options.
yes the government is extremely well armed, but a small chance is better than no chance.
the second amendment exists to remind our rulers who really owns the country.

My dick is 8.75 inches and I love guns.

...

I don't know if you're sowing the stupidity of our people, of if you are a proxy shill, either way, sage

>Assault Rifle vs Main Battle Tank, assault rifle loses.
>Assault Rifle vs F-35. F-35 wins.
Maybe if you're thinking straight on. What you can do is wreak havoc on supply lines. A tank or plane that is in disrepair is no weapon of war at all.
>What can an average american do against a Tyrannical Government with just an assault rifle?
Same thing they did against the British.

>t. Armando Moureira, 25 times victim of robbery with firearm in Rio de Janeiro

*showing

Sage.

It's just another demoralization tactic. Also when you are at a clear disadvantage in a debate muddy the water so that people can not see your flaws and their strengths clearly. It's straight up jew tactics dude. The sexual perversion and natural human tendency towards common decency only serves to benefit kikes in times like this. We feel shame they don't. Call them on it, but most importantly call them on acting like a jew.
T. Kike and or kike puppet. You can't shame the anonymous you dirty faggot. I can smell bagels and foreskins through your fucking post.

I git neet bux yet?

>What is it with you people and your fascination with male genitalia? Every time you see a gun do you think about cocks? Do you play video games for fun or sexual thrill? Do you bring a box of tissues with you when you see an action movie?

You didn't deny.

So you do have indeed a small penis. LOL!

J E W
E
W

This shit over and over again. b8, b8, and more b8.

But I will play.

>Why do americans worship this line of the constitution so much?

We don't worship it you faggot. We believe it. We also believe in the other 9 of the 10 amendments to the Bill of fuckin' Rights. Rights, not wants or needs motherfucker. RIGHTS

>They say it is there to protect them against Tyrannical government.

It is indeed.

>Let's think seriously.

I do. Apparently your stupid ass doesn't know how to search through old posts and read the already valid arguments that answer your stupid question.

>Assault Rifle vs Main Battle Tank, assault rifle loses.

Only a stupid motherfucker like you would fight a tank with an AR. You don't. You hide until the tanker is refuelling or gets out to take a shit, or the tank commander sticks his head out and then you kill the bastards.

>Assault Rifle vs F-35. F-35 wins.

See above. Although I did know a kid at Ft. Chaffe who sniped a fighter with MILEs gear during JRTC. War game shit. Guy got a coin out of the deal. Can be done. There used to be a page in the Soldier's manual of common tasks on how to lead aircraft.


>What can an average american do against a Tyrannical Government with just an assault rifle?

Kill the politicians who ordered up the tanks and fighter jets against their own peaceful, law abiding citizens who were not criminals before stupid spoiled leftists brainwashed children started fucking with them.


>Isn't the truth they just want toys to compensate for their small penises?

Sonny, I am hung like a fuckin' Pringle's can. Like a baby arm holding a damn apple. I have a cock so large and glorious it needs its own zip code. Ask you mom, she'll tell you.

You didn't deny thinking about cocks all day though? Tell me, when you see a police officer do you have to fight off sexual urges?

dont you shills ever get tired of shooting yourselves in the foot with your retarded tactics? everybody who comes to these threads walks away learning how gun control is retarded

That's the only reason I respond....... For the lurkers.........

because gun control works so well in Brazil

SAGE THE SAME SHITTY LIBFAG THREADS WE SEE EVERY HOUR DO YOUR JOB, MODS

...

>Because Trump is a bigger tyrant than king nigger. A bloo hoo hoo drumfs a meany.

Shall not be infringed.

RED RED RED RED RED RED REDNE- BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

well if ISIS can do it then I don't see why we can't. I think an armed militia could overthrow a tyrant, but that's just my opinion tbqh.

>What can an average american do against a Tyrannical Government
YOU UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF THE MIGHTY AR15 A teenager with just one AR15 can single handed paralyze as many as four armed officers without even firing in their direction

>Assault Rifle vs Main Battle Tank, assault rifle loses.
>Assault Rifle vs F-35. F-35 wins.
And yet somehow the sand niggers are basically doing just that in whatever the fuckistan.

Jets level buildings, they don't kick down doors. Tanks assault fortified positions, they don't clear blocks. It will come down to soldiers vs. civilians. Helicopters, jets, tanks, ect won't be the deciding factor in a gurilla war.

We're talking about the original one at the Bundy Ranch. The hostile takeover of the the nature preserve was a failed attempt since they didn't think through how to get supplies

When the first is constantly being ignored and flagrantly insulted, the second is literally the next best thing.

Have fun with that.

"Disadvantages of UAVs"

"According to the Project on Government Oversight, the Predator "cannot be launched in adverse weather, including any visible moisture such as rain, snow, ice, frost or fog; nor can it takeoff or land in crosswinds of greater than 17 knots."

>da goobermunt has unlimited tanks and planes and will be able to sustain a heavy assault against their own citizens using these, because it's not like our industry, taxpayer money, and US soldiers make the military work at all
Yeah, okay you fucking huehue. Go get some soup-a-de-monkey while it's still hot.

Then the normies better build bunkers, our drones don't have the best record.
thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2016-07-01/obama-drone-casualty-numbers-a-fraction-of-those-recorded-by-the-bureau

RICE FARMERS

Weeeeeeeeee come get me drone

...

Guns are great for population control. In that way guns are probably doing some good, natural selection and all of that. If all americans shot each other, nothing really would be missed.

You're argument is compelling. Burn the Constitution Now!!!!1!!!!

Holy shit this! This is why we're going to win during the next civil war. Hundreds of fat Sup Forumstards will utterly BTFO law enforcement and military trannies and diversity hires, and we'll have fun doing it.

Dirty jap range banned you from Sup Forums? Come to goonsaloon.pro/intj/ where we don't ban anyone. +jITgatD

Why do you fucking third world retards speak as if my government will use fucking tanks against me and then call me stupid and crazy for believing in tyranny and the second ammendment. Go fuck yourself monkey boy. Who the fuck even gave you a computer and who the fuck invited you to speak on behalf of america. This is an A and B conversation. Mind your own fucking business.

>muh dick

Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up.

THIS ARGUMENT IS SO FUCKING OLD AND DEBUNKED

Even if we can't win, why would we just give up and let them trample us? Jesus Christ, you people are such pussies. You stand your ground until they kill you. With any luck, it'll be too much work for them to bother.

...

...

reminder that the range ban is a goon plot
>buy botnet access
>spam Sup Forums with cuck porn
>use range bans to advertise

I think he's arguing that the government, being socially mandated, should have a monopoly on the use of force.
This argument -could- be sound.

Works well for mine.

You know, not all people think that reducing the warzone-like status of their country is a troll topic. Some Americans agree with him.

You're arguing for turning every citizen into a fascist. "Do what I say or Ill kill you. From a grassy gnoll.

It works in Australia. Brazil gets its guns from America and Mexico. That kind of makes it your fault, burger.

Real mature. The adults were trying to discuss amendments, you know.

Then why are they bringing it up?
I don't care, but you're not right.

I think your guns pose a risk to your people. If you wish to defeat their arguments (the gun grabbers) you must be able to articulate your arguments for ownership coherently, such as the industrial / manufacturing argument for guns (American business), and not repeat the law as it stands as if it was a rhetorical answer to a proposed amendment.

Read

All gun grabbers are domestic terrorists, wanting a citizenry to be taken advantage of and oppressed by their friends in power. They are all opponents of a free and polite society. Gun grabbers are against the common people and their safety and freedom, encouraging corporate, institutional and federalized supremacy amongst the established elites.

Gun grabbers are the enemy of people who look to be able to make change. If you think an unarmed people can make armed elites who have tanks, heavy weapons, airplanes, helicopters, and grenades do anything the people want, you live in fantasy land. Weapons are an equalizer between the franchised and disenfranchised.

...

>the government, being socially mandated, should have a monopoly on the use of force
>This argument -could- be sound.

kek

Furthermore, deaths to guns according to 2014 FBI homicide statistics only account for about 0.0035% of the population. That's an acceptable amount of death. It's almost statistically irrelevant. Do we know how many people guns save? I don't.

/thread

OP is a faggot

I would argue that all people who say "I'd rather kill everyone who wants to take my gun" are the domestic terrorists, esp. if we're discussing a lawful order mandated by the masses.

I have a dog in this fight, but I'm on the conservative side of the debate, ironically, I don't want American law to be influential of local law.

Farmers need guns, for farming purposes.
Americans want guns to kill Americans.
You're going to argue that thats -not- terrorism :)

What you're talking about is empowering the maniacs, if I'm reading your rhetoric correctly.
Killing those who disagree with you is absolutely reprehensible when you live in a democracy. I agree arms would be justified against an anti-democratic despotic force, but you're a voter, not a partisan.

How many knife massacres at schools, hmm?
How many gun massacres at schools, hmm?

Don't be edgy, engage. Not me, I'm not particularly motivated here, but this is an American debate.
If you can soundly retort their points (some of which are as stupid as you think), more power to you, burger.
I just assure you that where I live is very nice. (Fuck off, we're full)

Why didn't this logic apply in Vietnam? Or throughout the ME? An armed population always ends up being enough of a pain in the ass for governments that it's a better option to avoid fighting. THAT'S THE POINT.
Some of the most horrific atrocities in history were committed by powerful governments, who preluded their atrocities by disarming the populations they ended up slaughtering. That it MIGHT not happen is a risk that you'd need tremendous ignorance to ignore.

...

>against a tyrannical govt. with just an assault rifle?
"Oh no! The government has bigger guns than me, I might as well give up." Hey Rube, how did you win your independence from Portugal, by rolling over and pissing your pants?

...