Sartre nailed the alt-truth of the alt-right 75 years ago:

Sartre nailed the alt-truth of the alt-right 75 years ago:

"Never believe that anti‐Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly since he believes in words. The anti‐Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument has passed."

Other urls found in this thread:

ancestry.com/name-origin?surname=schweitzer
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

This is what they actually believe.

Sophistry has a name and it is "Jew".

Seems pretty tame compared to HAARP

what is the alt-right?
that's a jewish term

Make your posts shorter you stupid nigger, do you seriously think I have enough time to read all your shit, like there are other things that I could do instead...

Sartre btfo

/thread
I'm reading Nausea, it's degenerate as fuck.

Perfect example of Sartre's point.

>"They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert."

fucking manlets
when will they ever learn?

You act like there is some objective sliding scale of degeneracy when really there are just beings living their lives.

>pointing out a manlet
>intimidate and disconcert
Soyflake

>Don't argue in bad faith goy, you're culturally appropriating us

I grew out of my nihilist phase before I could even finish this book. You should too.

Top kek

>just
You know exactly how high you are on the scale.

WHEN WILL THEY LEARN?

Where the hell are you guys? All im met with are mouthbreathing NAV leeches and socialist parrots when i venture out my door.

Never change.

That's exactly how Jews behave.

You have to be 18 to post here. Sage

Sartre begins by defining antisemitism as characterized by certain opinions: attributing "all or part of his own misfortunes and those of his country to the presence of Jewish elements in the community, ... proposes to remedy this state of affairs by depriving the Jews of certain of their rights, by keeping them out of certain economic and social activities, by expelling them from the country, by exterminating all of them ...." (p. 7)[1] He then describes the concept that these antisemitic opinions are produced by external causes. such as the experience of objective situations involving Jews.(p.8-9)
source:Shittypedia

>existentialism
>nihilism
Pick one

>A nihilist loves Jews.
Shocking. Sartre was a fucking loser degenerate.

>by presenting arguments that are anti-semitic, you are literally inciting violence

the original antifa

>Manlet
>Brainlet
>Cross-eyed
I almost feel bad for him

>Jean-Paul "Everybody can fuck my gf" Satre

The great masses could be saved, if only with the gravest sacrifice in time and patience.

But a Jew could never be parted from his opinions.

At that time I was still childish enough to try to make the madness of their doctrine clear to them; in my little circle I talked my tongue sore and my throat hoarse, thinking I would inevitably succeed in convincing them how ruinous their Marxist madness was; but what I accomplished was often the opposite. It seemed as though their increased understanding of the destructive effects of Social Democratic theories and their results only reinforced their determination.

The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.

Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck.

I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying.

>reddit tier screencap
>commie accusing everyone else of being the ones to use alt-truths
This is just b8, right?

Let me educate you Sup Forums degenerates.
>nihilism: we can't know anything, nothing matters
>existentialism: you decide what matters

Very different things.

I'm not a commie. I don't believe in myths like that or the myth of the "jewish question."

The screencap is hilarious fuck you.

Degenerates? We're just beings living our lives.

You have a commie flag, sir. Bottom left quadrant of the political compass only exists as a mirror image of the top left quadrant.

spoken like a true liberalist faggot.

You got me.

Ahh yes
>nothing matters fuck all, we will never understand everything.
or
>I am the highest being, I can do anything, even fuck under aged students with my wife because at the end only I and my pleasure matter in MY life.
What delusion of incredible proportions. Both beliefs run contrary to a healthy society. There must exist a balance between individualism and collectivism, to merge too deep on either calls for degeneration of society. A man must be free and choose what's best for him and his family yet to abandon all communal interactions is to abandon your people and country. We are societal creatures but we are free to forge our own path. Whether you like it or not, at the end, tradition must remain as a counter balance to mans free will, a guide to prevent degeneracy, while man is still free to follow it as he sees fit.

Marx was a social scientist who made many poignant observations. This is often forgotten in the political rhetoric. My respect for him is like my respect for Galileo.

>Bottom left quadrant of the political compass only exists as a mirror image of the top left quadrant.
I was anarchist before I knew a thing about marx. For some anarchism isn't an intellectual or political exercise as a way of life. To me it's the political aspect of Daoism.

Just because your existentialism leads to egoism doesn't mean that's the way i go

I really don't care what some e-celeb faggot has to say. If it really had merit it would stand on it's own in the chaos that is this board. It doesn't. We've been through this game many times and with people far more skilled than he playing. It's always the same result with the same conclusions.
False jews are like blue dog democrats. They can't and don't learn any new tricks

Of course its bait, everything is bait.
This however is quite good bait.
10/10 would steal.
that said, get a different picture OP, nobody will take you seriously with that screencap

I thought it was just going to say he's a kike.
Fucking kek.

Lay off his height.

He was a second rate philosopher, though

Wait, who's the e-celeb?

>that's the way I go
>way I go
>I go
>I
See it's all about you. Me me me me, how I live my life, how my existentialism works and that's enough, even tho existentialism applied over large amounts of people will, guess what? Yield different results and different ways of thinking. Eventually ending in the degrading of society. Your own individualism will be the cause of your ideal's demise.

Sartre. Did I mention he fucked underage students and wanted to reduce the consent laws in France (which already had pretty low age consent laws at the time)
But go ahead, worship him.

>Yield different results and different ways of thinking.
That is why I'm an anarchist...duh. Degeneracy, degradation, it's all arbitrary if you don't take society to be a religious phenomena as Durkheim did, and every religious person did unconsciously. Dogmatic adherence to, or worship of, social constructs is collectivist trash.

Jews are demonstrably responsible for a number of society's ills. It's a simple matter to prove. kys

The point being that holding onto traditions (social constructs), old or new, is cuckoldry.

I don't care for Sartre. I prefer Heidegger and Chaung-tzu. I also don't care for sexual morality prudes.

Unironically using generalisations and ad hominem to side step the argument and attack on a separate front rather than face statistical evidence backing the "alt right racist anti Semites"

>collectivist trash
Again falling for the individualist/collectivist meme.
It's a balance between the 2. Libertarians and Natsocs have had this same fucking debate here for years, at the end conforming for a society that respects both views as long as both remain right wing. You can't have family(your freedom) Without a nation that defends it, you can't have a nation( your dogma) without a people willing to defend it.

> I also don't care for sexual morality prudes.
Pedo detected.
>The point being that holding onto traditions (social constructs), old or new, is cuckoldry.
Social constructs is what defines us ultimately. You are born a blank slate, it's society and the way you interact with it what defines who you become in the future. That's why having a good social constructs guarantee a prosperous society.

Sartre was a slave of his kike faggot overlords. His ideology could be described most accurately as a vague distressed panic feeling. Have you ever read "Nausea"? I did, shortly after my older brother died, and related deeply to it. It is an ideology which makes sense to people in the depths of utter nihilism, who could not navigate the depths of the self, much less the depths of group dynamics, inter- or intra-. The kike is a monster. The rivers must run red with their beast blood before we can breath deeply and clear in the city. Have you read "Culture of Critique"? Have you read "Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin"? Group dynamics are long founded. After reading the both you wonder if even usury is embedded in their genes. These are a monstrous people. They are hardly human. I would not think twice about running over some bastard deer who runs in front of my car. If a Jew ran in front of my gun, I would likewise give thought to whether or not my gun would be damaged from such an encounter, and proceed from there.

>uses statistical evidence without an understanding of methodology and certainly not an understanding of the context the statistic was originally derived for.
>probably doesn't have an education in stats, certainly not in social stats.

>you can't have a nation
Look at my flag.

I should say i don't support traditional sexual morality.

I agree about social constructs, they do define us. That's why we need to redefine them, because the old ones don't work anymore. I am also suspicious of people who think they can or even should try to "engineer" a good society.

That's where he's wrong. The argument my life sucks because Jews is a straw man. Society is shit due to Jewish influence. I don't care about their money or their power just what they do with it.

>That's why we need to redefine them, because the old ones don't work anymore.
> I am also suspicious of people who think they can or even should try to "engineer" a good society.
Choose one.

then stop trying to help engineer a dystopian society, dipshit

>cites culture of critique and a book with a title that says moses was a bolshevik

>cites nothing and resorts to ad hominems
a bloo bloo

LMAO look at this dude. Look at his eyes. He looks like he spent too much time with mature hookers riding top trying to keep both eyes on her floppy titties bouncing in different directions.

Found the manlet. You know, 5'6, maybe even 5'5 I could handle. This motherfucker was shorter than my 60y/o mom dude. Have you ever met somebody 5' tall? 4'8" is the threshold for being legally considered a midget.

ITT: babbys first philosophy lesson
Fuck off back to high school

I'm speaking of action grounded in reality. If you see something that offends your moral intuition, do something about it according to the evil of the offense. Otherwise let be. Don't plan social engineering campaigns, as this board has done.

Honestly you have caught me in something I'm not sure of yet. How should one reconcile a desire not to "objectify the world", that is, turn the world into a tool/function/means, and the desire to make it a better place? Karl Popper said we have to be intolerant of intolerance.
I think that is why i can't consider "my anarchism" a political position so much as an existential one.

I'm high and tired, good night.

You literally said nothing in your post besides
>Me anarchist because morality hard. Everything subjective. I be lazy and stand for nothing.

Dude literally gives up and goes to bed.

MANLET
INTERNET
DEFENSE
FORCE

Schweitzer Name Meaning. German and Jewish (Ashkenazic): ethnic name for a native or inhabitant of Switzerland, from Middle High German swizer, German Schweizer.
Schweitzer Name Meaning & Schweitzer Family History at Ancestry.com
ancestry.com/name-origin?surname=schweitzer

every time

>They counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about.
>But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. He had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day."

>I'm high and tired,
Pretty much all of you fucking anarfaggots pieces of crap

OP anally devastated

[spoiler]not that he minds[/spoiler]