Guns are USELESS for anything anymore

>AH NEEDS MAH GUNZ TA SHOOT DA TERRANIKUL GUBBERMINT CU-
>BBBBBBBRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPP
>*your dead from a drone 13,000 miles away*
Go ahead and argue against this one protip you can't

The number of cases of guns used for self-defense exceeds the number of cases where guns are used for killing.
In defense of gun-regulations, a 30 round magazine in a rifle is probably overkill for that, and the self-defense statistics don't take into account the number of shootings that maim someone.

...

If you kill your enemies they win.

A drone could damage industrial or habitable buildings, it would be better to just send Swat in.

>Your

Such a sound argument how could one ever argue against it...

Vietnamese rice farmers would disagree

...

...

...

Iraqis too

How many of these threads do we have per day?

>MUH DRONES
liberals prove once again they have zero clue of what they winge about

The US government won't use big expensive bombs to blow up someone carrying around a rifle that costs $300.00 to make with $40.00 of ammunition. This is the same problem in the middle east. The only way to win is with an occupation. Occaisonally you see some murder cams of Obama's baby killing drones bombing some arab goat farmers, but it's probably an intentional leak policy to make it seem like king nig was doing things.

Join up now it is only $30

why do you hate women liberals?

Going to a shooting range.

You can trust the government... no one needs an AR15

Here you go dumb fuck. This has already been talked about on pol. Learn the language and Please fuck off. Sage.

checked. post in every anti-gun thread.

And what if you want to go to a shooting range and shoot it?

>inb4 "thats recreational use"

OP is clearly a faggot and does not understand base level civil strife and consolidation of political control. Men with guns will always be used at a base level of control, drones cost money, the Air Force costs money, the army costs money. Men with guns cost less money, fanatics even more so. Kys OP

saved. Do you think I'll be put on a watchlist for spreading this shit?

If you cant hold ground then no victory.

checked and saved.

anti gun shills dont have a single arguement against this screencap

30 bucks? Deal.

>Go ahead and argue against this one protip you can't
In a civil war the government will do all in its power NOT TO bomb its citizenry, that is common sense.
The guns will provide adequate protection against any army trying to invade, every hill and every street corner will be fought over.

Not that this matters, the US (and most of the rest of the world) already lives under an oppressive destructive regime, which controls the beliefs of most of the public.

This
Sage
a
g
e

Have you seen how retarded the soy boys are who controll those drones? Constantly misfires over seas cuz they can’t 360 no scope and their sensitivity is on 2. No thumbs at all drone pilots play the wii

What a dumb fuck you are.

All these big bad weapons can't even neutralize crude insurgencies in the Third World. And it's not just America, even Russia is barely subjugating tiny little Chechnya.

At some point you're gonna need to send in a soldier to police and subjugate ur enemies. And if those enemies don't mind dying and are armed then they already have a powerful advantage over some soldier who just wants to make it home to his wife.

Pop pop pop watch those niggers drop.

pew pew pew another 3 jew

Do you realize that the invader will want to enslave your people and use them instead of turning the whole country into ashes. Yes guns are useful.

>Hello citizen I'm here to confiscate your guns...

really made me think

E
V
E
R
Y

F
U
C
K
I
N
G

D
A
Y

you wanna talk strategy? Okay, let's go! A war in this nation, a civil war, a war against a rogue government that the founding fathers warned us about would go down like this.
>Urban guerrilla warfare, building to building using small arms/scoped rifles
>A government will only do so much damage to its infrastructure before it begins to harm its own interests
>you gotta drone?
>I gotta rifle to shoot out your power transformers, any patriot could knock out a whole electrical grid in any major city.
>You gotta a thousand traitors? the patriots have a bead on the people writing their paychecks. Lights out, Shemp.
>You got a (((navy seal)))? You'll need him, cuz Johnny Patriot spent the last 20 years stalking White Tail through the woods with a Savage Arms slung over his shoulder, now times that by 500,000 in my state alone.
You getting the picture?

I swear I've seen this image 100 times and now it makes a lot of sense.

You're already on it

...

I have NEVER seen an Op respond to this, but ill say it again

How did 13 year old vietnamese potato farmers armed with shitty pistols and plastic ak's make the ENTIRE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES retreat?

how? How?
HOW?
HOW?

...

let me know when America wins in Afghanistan

Officers have to take a constitutional oath. I don't have to worry, it's you who does if you are guilty of sedition or treason, shillingstein. That would make you an enemy of the United States and a qualified target for acquisition. How's that for a protip you dual citizenship parasite?

>>BBBBBBBRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPP

So you are saying we need to make Jets legal for civilians?

Yeah but they all had muskets.

Now ordinary people have small arms and the government has laser guided bunker busters.

>talk shit about guns
>show a plane that can't even fire its guns yet due to no budget to code 6 lines into its computer
are all all left burgers this retarded?

gotta give props to the English teacher in Japan who wrote this

How old is this fucking shitpost anyways? I swear I see it once or twice a day.

The
>how you gunna overthrow the government with your AR-15 THEY GOT DRONES'n'SHEET
meme posting has been around for a loooooooong time - you'll notice OP is meme posting by his
>1 post by this ID

As a result the counter meme post was to start a thread with that pic and say something about collecting guns.
So it seems you've probably seen the counter-meme without seeing the original meme.

>Guns are USELESS for anything anymore
Yeah, hunting and home defense are useless. SAGE

I don't need my gun for the government. We need our guns for when we drag you commies out of your houses and into the street for execution in the coming civil war. Purge this commie filth once and for all.

you must be an immigrant to Japan

The plane eventually has to land u know...

dipshit you go to syria and tell them how you don't need infantry to win a war

Do any of you have the one about how foreign armies would intervene and invade if the U.S. government drone striked its own citizens and violated their rights? I kinda need it.

this one?

YES! Thank you Mexibro!

all i can think of is this one

>he thinks the military isn't going to side with the people
do you know what kind of people make up our nations military, cuckboy?

Farmers with WWII weaponry kicked you out of 'Nam
Farmers with IED kicked you out of Afghanistan and Irak.
Somehow, the government should not fear farmers with state of the art weapons.

poo i was late. theres also this

And again, thanks, even though someone else already posted it.

...

And yet again, thanks. There was another one about a simulation where some warlord took over some city in the United States, controlled a large chunk of the United States, and just generally caused havoc for the government after the shit hit the fan.

Good point. Women need guns more than anybody. Especially nowadays, since they are all single-mothers, who would be very easy to rape, murder, and dissolve with lye in the bathtub. You just need a little a major catastrophe and you'll have blacks raping white women like a torrent.

Where do all the nonmarxist commies hangout at? I wouldnt mind talking about the evils of capitalism and the lies of individualism with them.

Theyre all fags hopped up on anti depressant meds that want open borders.

Yes, only women should be allowed to have guns.

>defending yourself from home invasion isnt viable anymore because nigs have drones
Well sheet

from muh cold dead hands AMERICAAAAAAAA

The American government can't deal with an armed insurgency consisting of its own citizens.

Vietnam

You can find the pilot of that drone at the end of the day very much in an unsecured place.

You mean anarchist commies? I don't think they are receptive to discussing "lies of individualism". You will also need to understand capitalism and socialism beyond "government doing/not doing stuff" before talking to any commies about anything.

ask vietnam how using state of the art killing machines works against people defending their homeland.
Or the afghans who fended off the Russians
Or any of the shitskins in (((the war on terror)))
>Braaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaap
>durr why are there still so many?

By hiding in holes until we got bored of fire bombing their land to ash.

Well, women and children.

In addition, if individual military members are being attacked on & off duty, they really can't repair, resupply, rearm, and operate the tanks and aircraft efficiently. Sustained logistics is always the weak point to any military operation where sniper shots regardless of the rifle dampen the efforts.

...

No, children may want to shoot up a school.
Female children are fine tho.

yeah that's pretty cool OP but who needs a jet fighter when we've got anime waifus

roll pls

What its with all these antigun shill threads and why are not people reporting them and saging them?

let's have some fun in this doomed thread.

politicians concerned about media coverage

reroll

Why would they bother destroying their own roads or other structures though?

drone are controlled from the ground dumbass

...

>A drone just shot a bullet that circled the Earth 2 times and it hit me.
I deserve to die.

Rolling

meh

Reroll

>Galko
>a slut
That's so mean!
Take that back!

This is the new version of the self-hating Japanese threads, everybody stop bumping this trash or I'll have you all killed.

First; You are assuming that citizen resistance to despotic government is carried out through open rebellion. It is not.

Second: Assault rifles, IEDs and rioting do not have a unit-cost in the tens of millions dollars. F-35s and Hellfire-missiles do. The economy of war is very much on the side of the insurgent. This is why the greatest armed forces on earth have found themselves utterly incapable of providing solutions to the conflicts of Iraq, Syria or Afghanistan. It is this simple strategic problem that makes Iran and it's favorite aggressive tool of civil-subversion such a potent adversary.

Thirdly: To quote T.R. Fahrenbach, and to quote Jim Mattis by extension since he likes the quote; It is possible today to destroy a land from the air, to pulverise it, atomise it and to wipe it clean of all life. But if you want to defend a land, hold it, preserve it and keep it for civilization, you must do it the same way the roman legions did 2000 years ago. By putting your young men in the mud. This isn't so much an argument, as it is to illustrate that even the American strategic leadership has a long-standing tradition dating back to the Korean War, that to rule a nation takes more than the ability to bomb it to bits.

>guns are useless in modern wars
>yet every standing military on the planet still has infantry and equips them with small arms for some reason

Dear diary: Today OP was a fag.

Wouldnt it be cool if all cell phones exploded at the same time?

Didn’t they cave in for banning bump stocks? I’ve heard that GoA is the new go to group.

As for the GUN DEBATE, and my American friends to whom the spirit of liberty I know to be dear:

You have a constitutional amendment with a long standing legal interpretation saying that you cannot stop people from buying, owning and operating lethal weaponry capable of killing other people.

There exists a procedure to get rid of an amendment. Any political attempts to undermine the existing constitution without the due process laid out in the constitution is not in the spirit of consensual government, that is, not in the spirit of liberty. Any such talk is nonsensical, regardless of the actual merits of the case.

I do support gun control. I do not support extra-legal means to it. The rule of law is the mightiest engine of liberty there is, without it there can be no justice, there can be no liberty and there can be no equality. Without the rule of law we are bound to live interminably underground, chained to despotic rule, never knowing the light of liberty in anything but shadowy reflections of historical nature.