Could Anarcho-capitalism work?

Why or why wouldnt it work?

Other urls found in this thread:

desuarchive.org/his/thread/4161973/#4163959
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Only thing that works m8

Nothing really works.

anarchy is literally just anarchy. it's actually a total absense of any sort of political system or philosophy. so anarcho-anything is horseshit. every one of those philosophies are grossly authoritarian psycho-philosophies that use the "anarcho" meme to masquerade as libertarian.

why not just support small government and personal freedom. worked great here in the USA for many, many years until things went south with more rules and bigger government. turn off the welfare and let nature weed out the weak. you'll be amazed how well that will work to keep your population strong and competent and keep your society cohesive.

The world is anarcho-capitalistic by nature, we just have states that cut us off it, but they behave ancap themself, the sane ones at least

Wont work becouse there are too many loosers who wold surender their freedom to some warlord to attack me and take what is mine.
Or in the modern days outvote me and tax what is mine
Sad.

Not with an average IQ below 100, but it would work great in western societies.

Extreme autism about the 'natural' state of man does not a convincing military solution against foreign hordes burning your villages make. Btw I'm always curious what anarcho-NAP supporters are planning to do with all their criminals and parasites. Educate or relocate them?

this

I look forward to taking full advantage of this utopia by stealing, killing and raping everyone without fear of repercussions.

not for nothing, but if the world is "anarcho-capitalistic by nature" then why does the ideology necessitate the "physical removal" of everyone who disagrees with them in order to build such a society?

i don't think the world is any one thing by nature. that's why small government libertarianism works well. if you want to live in a hippie commune and share everything, go do it, nobody is gonna ask you for taxes. if you want to run your business, go do that. all anyone would ever have to deal with is a few tariffs.

it could work but it would be uncivilised and barbaric

I can't survive people who want to violate NAP banding together against it.

Anarchy means no rulers, not "no rules." The 'r' is important.

Sup Forums doesn't even know what Ancap really is. It's not a political ideology, it's a philosophy. It supports natural law, natural rights, and private property. If Sup Forums knew what it is, the whole board would be Ancap.
As more and more people start to live on space stations(Not planets) made ot of materials mined in asteroid fields, we'll see a rise of Ancapism and true liberalism, as well as a resurgence of monarchism. It'll be great.

If the system that that USA uses / used worked we wouldn't be in the current state that we're actually in.

Well we would all love it too if you could understand and address some of the objections to it.

It would work until an individual amassed enough power to become a warlord/monarch and then it starts all over again.

Ancap means that nobody has a right to rule others. People can only rule themselves, and their property, but can enter a contract with others, potentially many others, to create a society very similar to our modern states.

that's not true. that's a totally false statement. the reason things went badly for us was because we expanded the franchise to people who shouldn't have had it. even if you think women should have had it, niggers never should have. we always had about a 10% nigger population, and they ruined us politically. that's a totally separate issue. that has nothing to do with the principles of small government or anything like that. it's dishonest to suggest that it does.

there's also no system that works in an absolute sense. i'm sure you're aware there's no shortage of authoritarian societies you can point to that failed miserably. in fact, there are probably more of them than there are libertarian societies that failed.

the slave trade ultimately fucking ruined this nation. saddled us with guilt and saddled us with a 1/10th of our voting population having an 85 average IQ.

Good in theory but wont work in reality as long as we have sinister, power hungry people in society, ie. Jews

In a homogeneous white society it could do well. You could argue the early united states was ancap

I need to sleep soon, but here are some posts I made in a Louis thread on /his/.
desuarchive.org/his/thread/4161973/#4163959
I only browse Sup Forums a tiny bit for opportunities to proselytize, so I'm glad to see an chance.

Who will stop me? The police? There's no police The people I have murdered? They're already dead.

Requires a high IQ and morally strong society to work. Minimal government is the next best thing most suitable for our current situation in the west.

>nobody has a right to rule others

Hence no rulers. As an ancap, I understand how it works.

Cheers mate, but it is a profound mistake to think you understand "what Sup Forums thinks" when it's this disorganized, and personally I can say it's pretty tedious to argue with ancaps who are used to people not knowing a thing about their ideas. Modern ancap was pretty much born in rothbard's living room and it's really not all that complicated to understand (much to his credit).

we are already living in anarcho capitalism on the internet. how is it working out? the john podestas of the world bully every platform, every company, every employer into removing us from civilized society and seeing us starve. if we didnt have the first ammendment, enforced by the state, we would be in prison already.

at what fucking point do people admit ancapped is UTTERLY KIKED and that fascism is the only way to the moonbase?

But people may agree to recognize an other as his ruler.

It just seems like so many posters on Sup Forums post about it with no understanding. It's a shame.
Goodnight, Hunbro.

Self-defense doesn't violate the principle of non-aggression. Besides, you would be completely ostracized by society and would be forced to move out to the jungle if you want to survive.

Suggesting that a free society would mean chaos is a fallacy. That is equivalent to saying that a nation implementing a socialist-style welfare program would mean bread shortages in an hour, it's more complex than that.

It would be wise to have life insurance. In ancapistan, the life insurance company has incentives to investigate and find out who they can get to pay. They pay out to the family of the deceased, and they get their money back through your forced labor.

That's alright as long as there is no coercion.

Yeah but such is the internet no? For example there's plenty of knowledge in /his/ but not enough good taste. Also the anti-ancap memes that survive are not just based on superficial understandings of the theory but usually try to expose a certain type of logic or fault. For example you'll always be repeating to everyone that yes monarchs can form, but since you consider it possible to make everything voluntary ("property is natural law") the memes are not gonna go away until that's understood. And then there is still the problem of people utterly disagreeing with your estimate of human nature etc. Goodnight McBro