The Right of Conquest

How do you justify the right of conquest?

Pic unrelated

How the fuck is the pic unrelated? The entire Polish-German conflict goes back to the Teutonic order and their claim to the land they conquered at Polands request.

>How do you justify the right of conquest?
We have to tell the humans what we're going to do before we do it.
t. Luciferian
p.s. - We dropped a BIG hint in Bladerunner 2049.

OH NO NO NO..

AAAAHAHAHAHAH

LOOK AT THIS MILITARY

In the pre-colonial world conquest worked as a resolution to border disputes and as a general representation of human natures need to dominate resources and territory.

Post-colonialism there is no justification for it since our scope of understanding of the world, its landmass, and resources are all understood. Everybody's history and territory is defined and regarded as their right within the lens of post-Enlightenment theory defining rights. Conquest means essentially an ethnic cleansing of sorts and most people of the world would be against it. There's only one ((place)) on earth where this practice is actively shrugged off.

love teutonic knights but slavs get that land now.

Alsace lorraine is rightful german clay though

You used a moment of temporary weakness due to internal conflict to make Prussia a vassal and think it's something to be proud of?
Stick to muh winged Hussars.

You don’t
That goes against the teachings of Christ

because it's what white people do

This

OOOOOOOO

AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Well why wouldn't it be?
The Teutonic order tried to do the same exact thing by supporting Lithuanian claims for independence. They simply got blown the fuck out after asking for it.

Kill everyone who disagrees.

Might makes right.

Its as simple as that. There is no bullshit underlying universal morality. If you are capability of doing something, and the will do it, it is your right.

Not even trying to be edgy thats just the truth of the matter.

Not necessarily saying thats how we should organize our societies, but a darwinistic look at states seems reasonable to me.

>a victory with next to no political consequences
You gained Prussia thanks to the Prussian confederation and the reformation and not your great military skills.

>Poland hires kraut niggers to conquer balt niggers
>Krautniggers decide to turn against Poland
>Krautniggers slowly lose their allies, their lands, their military

Why did you have to act like typical niggers?
Why?
You had one job

Muscovy has a bit of a problem with Denmark and Crimea but its still probably big enough to end up raping Poland-Lithuania.

*clears throat*
OH NO NO NO

>''Rights''
Rights is something you take and give to in-group members. You don't go to war with in-group members. There are no transcendent ''human'' rights or ''rights'' in general. Really baffles me why humans can't simply be humans without having to justify their deeds with some supernatural bullshit.

Exactly.

except for Gdansk/Danzig. My family lived in Starogard Gdanski before it had Teutonic castle but you can take far north east of Poland.

>asks religious autists for help
>expects them to not act like religious autists

The same way taxes are justified. Might is right

DEAR NIGGERS

Face the facts, NIGGERS, your race are a failed race because you're a feckless, unruly, uncivilized horde of feral proto-humans. You never figured out how to live in a society bigger than one or two squabbling families. Starting thousands of years ago, everyone else on this planet without exception did - they invented religion, the idea of law, and the ideas of property and respect for the value of human life. This enabled tribes to coalesce into bigger groups and become organized. The rest is history, or rather civilization. But your lot never did this, did they? Abstract thought and problem- solving have never been the black man's strengths, have they? Did they invent a long-lived and intellectually coherent religion? Nope. Did they ever build a city? Nope. Did they even invent bricks? Nope (the reason there's no Stonehenge in Africa is because it took more than 20 people to move the slabs of rock - clearly a non-starter in Africa, where assembling more than 20 niggers normally results in a war). Did they till the land? Nope. Did they domesticate an animal for their use? Nope. Did they invent a written language? Nope. Did they invent the wheel? Mainly, nope. Were they curious enough about what lay out across the sea to sail upon it? Nope. And blacks are the only "humans" on this planet of which all this is true. Eskimos are more technically advanced than blacks were, despite the handicap of having no raw materials to work with other than dead fish and snow. Indians managed to domesticate the elephant. Why couldn't niggers? FUCK NIGGERS

So why do you fail everywhere even today? Let me offer you jigaboos a hypothesis. It's because feral behavior - innate savagery, murderous violence if annoyed, predisposition to rape many women and thus fecklessly father many children - conferred valuable survival advantages on individuals in the backward, Paleolithic milieu of Africa. But they don't help your kind in a civilized society. Unfortunately for the rest of us, the last few hundred years have not been long enough for these behaviors to have been domesticated out of you all. So you're all still at it. Let me illustrate this for you by analogy. Technically, an American pit bull terrier and an English golden retriever are exactly the same species. They can produce offspring, if crossbred. The former was bred to exhibit certain characteristics - wanton aggression, propensity to fight, physical strength, powerful bite, and so on. The latter was bred to retrieve birds shot and killed by its masters, and to do this, it has to have a docile, placid, non-aggressive nature; otherwise it would treat what it found as its own kill and refuse to hand it over. Now imagine that your small children, aged maybe two or three years old, are going to be locked in a room with five or six of those dogs, and the dogs haven't been fed for a week. Which breed would you rather lock in there with your children? Hungry pit bulls, or hungry golden retrievers? Or do you figure that, even though they look differently, they're all the same species really, so of course the pit bulls certainly won't act any differently? Exactly! All this PC crap we hear spouted in the media about how "there's no such thing as race" is just that - crap. A dog has four legs and a tail; a cat also has four legs and a tail, but that doesn't make it a dog. The superficial similarity between cats and dogs and between whites and blacks is just that - superficial. If there really were no genetic difference between niggers and humans,

No black Spartacus, is there, niggers? Why no slave uprisings among blacks? Slaves repeatedly rose against the Romans even they knew they'd be crucified for it, when captured. White slaves, that is. They cared enough about their stolen liberty that they were prepared to risk even that. So what's different about the negro? Why did you all sit there, enslaving each other even in America, and still enslaving each other even today in Africa, until a kindly but misguided white benefactor set you free? Is it because, as slaves, you were fed, watered, and housed, and that you as a race had no ambition beyond that if it entailed doing any work or taking any risks? What are you - lazy, cowardly, stupid, or all of the above? And you're still bleating about slavery now. If slavery is the root of all your problems, why did Australia prosper? England used Australia as a dumping ground when her prisons overflowed. Within a hundred years, a nation manufactured from convicts in irons had its own autonomous elected government, and barely a hundred years on from then, Australia is now a major economic power in the Pacific. And at no time have they niggerwhined for handouts from the mother country - in fact, if anything, it's mostly been the other way around. You know what? It's because Australia is white.

This is why all black nations fail economically and sink into corruption, civil war, and permanent dependence on the white man's generosity. And presumably this is also why you pathetically allowed yourselves to be enslaved: you're savage enough still to be angry about it long after it ended, but you were too backward to stop it at the time. No black Spartacus, is there, niggers? Why no slave uprisings among blacks? Slaves repeatedly rose against the Romans even they knew they'd be crucified for it, when captured. White slaves, that is. They cared enough about their stolen liberty that they were prepared to risk even that. So what's different about the negro? Why did you all sit there, enslaving each other even in America, and still enslaving each other even today in Africa, until a kindly but misguided white benefactor set you free? Is it because, as slaves, you were fed, watered, and housed, and that you as a race had no ambition beyond that if it entailed doing any work or taking any risks? What are you - lazy, cowardly, stupid, or all of the above? And you're still bleating about slavery now. If slavery is the root of all your problems, why did Australia prosper? England used Australia as a dumping ground when her prisons overflowed. Within a hundred years, a nation manufactured from convicts in irons had its own autonomous elected government, and barely a hundred years on from then, Australia is now a major economic power in the Pacific. And at no time have they niggerwhined for handouts from the mother country - in fact, if anything, it's mostly been the other way around. You know what? It's because Australia is white. Oh yes it is. Just imagine if there had been a Black Australia. Look how few aborigines were able to live in Australia's climate, and now look at how many whites can. If President Monroe had sent his niggers there, they'd be niggerwhining about how Bwana dumped de po' black folks on a desert island

'

pic related

So Mexicans are right to overwhelm and take over you?

How is Elsass-Lothringen rightful German? By far most of the people living there speak French and as far as I know they do not see themselves as German.

Taking it back would be an imperialistic act in my eyes.

Abslolutly, if we are too weak to stop them then yes. In fact the Jews subverting whites, and nigs nogging for gib mes isn't wrong either. They are the ones looking out for their own people's self interest.

It is whites that are being incredibly foolish. If we are able to wake up we will have no problem putting our foot down on all of this bullshit, but if we are unable to then we will have only have ourselves to blame.

For a better future for the conquered people, even if they don't know it yet. Think what Africa would be like if we didn't colonize it. It would be a bigger shithole than it is today.

because if I conquer someone they were a bitch

you dont have to justify it thats the point

>It would be a bigger shithole than it is today.
Not it wouldn't. It be a garden Eden free from human influences bar a few nog tribes that occasionally fling spears at each other.
Thanks to us the continent is hopelessly over populated, has AK carrying warbands and piles burning tires.
Colonialism was a mistake.

With a sword.

Yep.
I don't want whites to be saved.
I want whites to save ourselves.
If we go extinct, it's our own fault.

Found the jew

This. When we didn't apologise we had a huge empire. Now look at us. Only woman fail to believe in such things because they are too fucking weak to take anything.