DUDE LIBERALS

>DUDE LIBERALS
>DUDE CONSERVATIVES
>DUDE RIGHT WING
>DUDE LEFT WING
>COMMUNISM/SOCIALISM/FASCISM/NAZISM/CAPITALISM!

So when are you fags going to realize basic civics? Pic related are the three main types of government of our modern era. If you like and support the United States and value the bill of rights ect. You are technically a liberal since the founders themselves followed liberal philosophy. Even the gun totting red neck guy who believes in liberty, he is literally a liberal (he may be a conservative one, but hes a liberal non the less)

If someone is a left wing authoritarian that wants to make laws about what someone can and cant say, they are from some school of socialist thought, which was born in the french revolution against the liberal thinkers.

How did all this shit get mixed up?

Suck my balls.

Classical liberalism /= modern liberalism

because people care too much about their labels and what others think of them. Goverments are not celebrities , they do what needs to be done. I wouldnt have called myself shit and proceed to kill everyone regardless , I am curious what kind of mental gymnastics both spectrums would engage in blaming me.

Big difference between the founding fathers and todays liberal.
You should be fucking skinned alive and dipped in acid for even hinting at a suggestion of equivalence.

>a suggestion of equivalence.
try reading my post again. My point is the exact opposite. The "liberals" you are talking about in the form of the radical left wing student groups/antifa ect. are not liberals at all, and are all in fact from different forms of socialism.

>How did all this shit get mixed up?
I think it's because the people who want to take your freedom away stole the term "liberal". They act like they're enhancing your freedom so useful idiots support them. If they just SAY they're a liberal, that's enough for most people.

>played a civ game
fake and gay

They're leftist

Thomas Jefferson and most of the founding fathers were liberal. I consider myself liberal. The leftist co-opted that term decades ago. They aren't liberal. There is nothing about their ideology that's concerned with individual liberty.

>no true scotsman

exactly.

Individual liberty is a failed concept, sadly.
Liberalism requires too many unwritten rules; it is enough to forget or break one of them - and everything will go awry.

The long-term consequences of the civil rights movement are still to be felt.
And I hope that everything will end like next Brazil, and not the new Dark Ages.

>How did all this shit get mixed up?
The left stole the word "liberal" from the right to make their anti-freedom platform more appealing to the masses.

In return, the right stole the word "libertarian" from them.

The trouble is, there's never been a scientific definition for any political term until very recently, with the creation of pic related. Even so, the cultural definitions for all the terms still hold strong, and as culture is fluid, they will continue to change until the end of days.

>still using Nolan Chart instead Sup Forums chart

Meh

so how do I find myself on that compass?

We all know about the classic political compass. He accurately determines the political views of man and allows you to accurately describe the current events.
However, people are generally inclined to compromise. In democracies, compromise is the only way to win elections.
Everyone has heard about such phenomena as "cuckservative", "fiscal conservatism, social liberalism", " muh based blacks" (thanks, r/t_dfags) in USA; “social democracy” in EU.
Let's dig into GOP (Or any other conservative party in the West):
GOP takes a conservative agenda in non-critical issues (Muh Christianity, MURRICA FUCK YEACH, FUCK FUEL ECONOMY) and neoconservative (read – liberal) - in critical issues of the 21st century: mass migration, the relationship of races, the economy, education and science, foreign policy, nationalism.
The position of the Democratic Party is clear to everyone.
About Europe and so everything is clear: Merkel and CDU is a sort of GOP.
Nevertheless, since people of different political views plus or minus lead their countries in the same direction, the traditional division on the right and left doesn’t work anymore.

It is necessary to look for other differences. What are the differences between Alt-Right and Alt-Light?
Between Classic Liberalism and neo (left) Liberalism? NazBol and Trotskyists? Paleocons and Neocons?
The Ethnic Question, Genetic Question and racial differences.
Racism, like gender, is the spectrum.
It all depends on how you feel about the issue of (un)equality of ethnic groups.
Refugees Welcome or Gas the Kikes, race war now?
Assimilation or racial purity?
Disgenic or eugenic?
Globalism or nationalism?
Now we construct a horizontal scale, where the left scale of the spectrum will be for universalists-integralists, and the right one for hardcore eugenics fans.
Now put the establishment of GOP and Dems on this scale.
Whoops! The Republican Party is more leftist than the Soviet Communists!
Now you understand why Reagan gave an amnesty in 1986?
Fearfully?
It's only the beginning!
But the linear spectrum is for faggots.
It is necessary to add a vertical scale. But here's what? Authoritarianism vs libertarianism? It’s pure boomer bullshit.
Let us turn to the theory of games and psychology.
There are two types of people's psychology: pragmatism-rationalism-accelerationism and mystical-metaphysical-aesthetic thinking.

Accelerationists believe that the whole world is a party in Sid Meier’s Civilization: in order to win in the Darwinistic competition between countries, our culture, science, economy, and politics should be bigger and better than ever before.
Leaders of the state should be in constant search of strategy and a multiplier of force.
For brevity, this phenomenon can be called capitalism.
Other people believe that politics is primarily the pursuit of aesthetic and moral ideals, metaphysics, mysticism, religious teachings and eternal wisdom.
These people do not vote with their heads, but with their hearts.

For elegance, let's call this state of the soul an eudemonism (do not confuse with hedonism).

Now let's use the newly created political compass and try to distribute political parties, media and famous personalities.
GOP and Democrats do not believe in differences between races, but aggressive neoconservatism moves GOP closer to capitalism.
Democrats are not against capitalism (socialism is the last stage of capitalism), as long as it serves the wants of their electorate.
MSM (The Economist, WP, Fox, even CNN) - also do not believe in differences between ethnic groups, but see the whole world as a chess board, where your task is to win.

Alex Jones, Trump, Alt-Light - de jure they declare equality and brotherhood, de facto they wish merit-based system and closed borders.
Lee Kuan Yew believes in positive eugenics and capitalism, but muh 6 gorrilion joos.
Richard Spencer, Alt-Right, average Sup Forumsack – all wants white ethnostate and A E S T E T I C S.
Most of us in one way or another are opponents of capitalism in modern interpreting.

...

>DUDE WEED

>fascism, socialism
>types of modern government
pick one

>fascism
Singapore

>socialism
West and North Europe

>being that much Zion retarded
Next thing you will tell me that Jewish race exists, right?