"Over a 10 week period the scientists showed images to human test subjects and recorded their brainwaves. At times the subjects brains were monitored in real-time while they were looking at the images, other times they were asked to “recall” the images. The researchers used the brain scans to train a deep learning network to “decode” the data and visualize what the person was thinking about."
>anyone but Israel have mind reading satellites lmao retard
Jason Wilson
>>anyone but Israel have mind reading satellites >lmao retard
Israel is up there, yo.
Adrian Taylor
I think he was suggesting that only Israel has mind reading satellites.
Brandon Nelson
>I think he was suggesting that only Israel has mind reading satellites.
No, it's not the only one to have mind control sattelites.
It does have the sneakiest mind control sattelites though.
Jacob Kelly
Basically how it works, is that the US has a group of mind reading/mind control sattelites, that reads your thoughts, and then mind controls everyone around you to punish you for having "bad thoughts".
And Israels mind control sattelites finds those deemed "Bad Goys" and puts bad thoughts in their heads to that the US's mind control sattelites kill them.
Dominic Roberts
I thought they used cell phone towers and TVs for that rather than satellites?
Are you on drugs? It doesn't work that way. It was only able to read what test subjects were thinking about because it studied their brain activity when it was told what they are thinking about. It then correlated certain neural patterns with an image that the test subject was seeing.
There is no way, with this technology, to read the thoughts of a random person who had never been a test subject. Even then, it only knows specific neural patterns like "subject A is thinking about a cat, now he is thinking about the beach" It can't read any thought that it was not programmed to learn for that specific individual. The technology may be able to read when a test subject is thinking about 10 or 20 different objects. Outside of a test subject is thinking about one of those specific objects, it has no idea what the test subject is thinking.
Jonathan Turner
>Outside of a test subject is thinking about one of those specific objects, it has no idea what the test subject is thinking.
*Outside of a test subject thinking about one of those specific objects, it has no idea what the test subject is thinking.
Aiden Thomas
>I thought they used cell phone towers and TVs for that rather than satellites?
all of them, actually.
Logan Rogers
>It doesn't work that way.
classified technology is like 50 years ahead of what they reveal to the public, dood.
Christian Hall
>Believing everything that appears on Sup Forums
Brody Ward
The article wasn't fake.
Noah Cook
Believe me
Kayden Adams
>mind control satellites TV satellites? Yeah we know. Easy to read a mind that you've already programmed (see OP post)
Angel Lewis
You may be right on this but not for certain. It's possible brains operate in a similar way using the same hardware so to speak. It's possible that two people who speak the same language would use a similar brain pattern of signals to form a similar understanding. For example if you and I were to imagine the letter A our brains might do that process in a similar way. We are not unique snowflakes. Even if not exactly the same nuroligical patterns are formed using enough individuals and big data a close kind of map of understanding maybe could be made. Maybe when thinking of certain ideas a shared pattern emerges which could create a kind of brain language. With enough people and big data it could be that the brains of different people work out problems and provide similar patterns as other people.
It is also possible that it could learn abstract ideas. For example if people are lying. It may be that certain familiar patterns emerge when people are lying.
I haven't explained any of that well, but you get the Idea
Anthony Martin
since they are using deep learning this is within the last decade This outlines the current state of the art that can be improved upon. the way they are doing this requires training data to build a prediction model. Right now it is test subjects. Next is like minded people, to progressively lesser degrees as they gather more data. After that is merging models based on personal electronic surveillance data. Then brain scans become routine that give a snapshot of your brain to make individual models. Why this doesn't really bother me is because people need instigation in order to progress and evolve. Over time the game has gone from completely physical to mostly psychic. At the end of what I described the game will be pushed into spirituality. That's the only way left to evade complete control of the technology. By spiritual I mean more subtle and long-term than mental, just as mental is more subtle and long term than physical. Not to say the formers will be eliminated (singularity), just de-emphasized. By that time quantum meddling will be routine which may be domain of soul, as the brain is domain of electromagnetics, physical is domain of newtonian physics.
Anthony Jackson
>since they are using deep learning this is within the last decade
you sure about that?
Luis Torres
Two decades maybe, based on the images used, but not 50. They may have had precursor algorithms but not the machinery. Maybe they could just wait a long time for the results. There's also the fMRI mapping to images that they used. I've seen the video of the cat where they slapped electrodes on its brain but this is different. That's a significant advance in itself. They took that and the available image training software and put them together in an experiment. This stuff is not happening in intelligence agencies, they get academic groups to do it for them. Those people need to share information and work with colleagues - things intelligence can't do freely.
Matthew Morris
>Two decades maybe, based on the images used, but not 50.
I grant you that the technology has become more sophisticated in recent years, but classified technology, even algorithms, are years ahead of public sector work.
And since they had an AI back then, it could decode it for them
You have to realize, that reading someones mind from their EEG, is a lot like cryptography, and classified crypto tech is decades ahead of the rest of the world.
Mason Gray
When a new mind is scanned, it has to "Learn" the new mind, and build up a dictionary of thoughts, and this takes some time.