>be me
>50% Italian 50% of the purest Thracian DNA
>perfect mix of übermensch
>tall, pale and blue eyed
>named Flavius
>American mutts call me gypsy
>mfw
Be me
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
vocaroo.com
youtube.com
bigthink.com
foxnews.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
archive.is
spiritus-temporis.com
imninalu.net
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>50% of the purest Thracian DNA
Don't you mean Turk?
Really sad, Op.
Tell Dear Abby.
I am 50% greek/italian and 50% thracian myself. congrats bro
Was Latin your first language? Did you grow up in or around Roma?
Simple fact of the matter is that if you live in Romania, and have Turk blood (Thracian DNA is turk DNA at this point), then you are gypsy.
Haha! Well meme'd, my Chinese friend.
Horseshiat...most Romanians share a lot of DNA with us Portuguese since our origins are from that area, so the tall, pale and blue-eye thing is highly dubious.
Be proud of who you are and stop being a negro-peasant trying to suck Nordicuck cock.
...
>romania
>turk blood
did you remember what happened when the turks try to invade transilvania
I speak a Latin language and have no Turkish blood. The Turks didn't really migrate into Europe in any relevant number. Also Turks aren't an ethnicity, they're a language family. Several Turkish people, like the Huns or the Bulgars looked 100% European.
>since our origins are from that area
Haha! What?
Yes, they pushed all the way to Vienna.
Well then, I stand corrected. Im trying to learn Latin on my own, but it is slow going
You are a roach. Pleas stop trying to be anything but the insect you are.
We don't take kindly to commies. :)
>>named Flavius
is your nickname Flavor Flav?
Take all the romanians in Italy back, or we'll be forced to get rid of them by other means
>t. Magyar rape baby with identity crisis
>Transylvania
>Romania
Choose one bro.
"Vlach" isn't an actual ethnicity, fool. It's just the term the Slavs gave ethnic Romanians. It means "stranger".
Hungarians are also the biggest cucks in all of Europe. They entered Europe without even knowing how to farm and just raided and raped for hundreds of years like the pack of niggers they are. They created a "kingdom" in which they were always the ethnic minority. Their biggest and greatest kings were all born to Romanian parents.
Hungarians aren't really even an ethnicity, because they mixed with Europeans so much that they're just typical Central Europeans at this point. Just like how Slovaks are Celts that speak Slavic, Hungarians are only special because of their language.
We deny their right of return as much as possible. We don't want to gypsy subhumans back. Kill them before they multiply.
IOW you look like an American.
Ok gyppo
>tfw the founding dynsaty of Romania used Szekely Symbols and Arpad Stripes in its coat of arms
>tfw both Wallachia and Moldavia were Hungarian colonies created out of Mongolia
>tfw without Hungarians Romania wouldn't even exist to larp as "thracian" KEK
AMERIMUTTS BTFO
>Flavius
That's awesome lmao
>Slovaks are Celts that speak Slavic
Cringe
I have achieved nothing and am a loser: the post.
>Ca*adian responds
WE
El asiano de chango....
I believe you.
but you aren't an ancient thracian, the population of that area has changed genetically. thracians dont exist anymore. you're a turkmutt
>50% X 50% of the purest Y
Mutt.
Well I'm sure your ancestors are ashamed of you now lol.
>not pure blooded
>calling other people mutts
Why does your country have more gypsies than any of the other lower tier countries around you ?
>retard doesn't know that the House of Basarab had elected rulers and not people born into it
>retard educates me on my own country's history while using inaccurate historical flags
>the Celts were a majority in that territory before the Slavic migration
>most of the national symbols in Slovakia are Celtic
>very similar genetically to Austrians
>toothpaste gives his uninformed opinion on the subject anyway
WUZ
Bulgaria and FYROM have more of them percentage wise.
Not sure. Maybe cause we used them as slaves, historically?
They're not that many, anyway. Just about 5% of the population. A lot of them emigrated anyway.
>be me
>100% nordic
>tall, pale and blue eyed
>literally never talk about it or even think about it, except for threads like these, because it's the norm here
Their capital is in your country. They have rebranded as "Romas". You're fucked. Most uneducated idiots (Americans) will associate Roma with Romania, clearly. Kys now, your country is lost.
>tall, pale and blue eyed
>posts roman pic
But hey, congratulations for being an aryan.
>be me
>in Rome born and raised
>refuse to speak any language different from latin (tfw nobody to talk to)
>toned and tanned, i walk a lot
>manlet, also balding
>mfw a mutt tries to call himself "roman"
No one has more than us. Romanians get assosiated with them because of the name.
They don't have a capital. The term "rroma" was pushed by the EU, just like they pushed other social policies of acceptance towards these subhumans.
It's irrelevant, anyway. Most of them are pick-pocketing French whores in Paris, now.
I guess that's why they look like poles. Fuck off with your cringey faggotry.
>>most of the national symbols in Slovakia are Celtic
KEK. They are Hungarian from iii. Bela who was the heir to your precious Roman ancestors.
>inaccurate historical flags
Nothing inaccurate about it, fief.
Basar-aba is an Uralic name meaning Leader-Father. Sorry to burst your bubble.
I'm sure you wuz kangz
>1/32 Irish
>14/88 German
>1/6 Italian
>1/6,000,000 Jewish
>1/2 Burger greese.
>3/5 Congolese
>9/11 Arab
>7/11 South-East Asian
You are getting best of best from Romania lately:
youtube.com
Yea, everyone was a Hungarian. If you love Hungary so much, why'd you migrate to Canada, Attila?
>he actually uses this argument
bigthink.com
I call B.S. on this. Americans don't know what Gypsies are. To the extent that they know about Europe's transients, they'd probably label you a Roma.
Here's how our gypsies look: Irish Travelers.
foxnews.com
We get the swarthy Romnichal types as well. They do a lot of business with the Irish Travelers I think.
Did I say everyone was Hungarian?
Here I will give you a list of countries directly created by Hungary:
>Slovakia
>Bosnia
>Romania
Indirectly:
>Austria
>Czech Republic
>Slovenia
That;s it. Other western countries have a much longer list.
Again, you know absolutely nothing about history.
I think you're referring to Hungary ceding land to those countries, but Hungary did not form any of those countries, nor are the people in those countries Hungarians.
>thracian
>youtube.com
false.
Slovakia is clearly created by Hungary, do u see Slovakia on the map before they arrived?
Bosnia was serb land that Hungarians created for themselves. First ruler of Bosnia was Hungarian
Romania was a turko mongol state before it was colonized by Hungary and made into Romania.
This is all basic stuff. Except you probably were not taught this because your elders suffer from a serious case of inferiority complex.
t. soon to be caliphate that regulates spoon selling
Okay Muhammad
Like the typical Canadian, you're a shitposting maple sucking cunt.
Begone, leaf!
Wow. Nice argument there. kek.
>romania was a turko mongol state
No arguments needed to dismiss a pleb like you.
Are you denying that Romania was NOT part of the Golden Horde?
Are you denying that Wallachia and Moldova were not conquered from the Golden Horde by Hungary and created into colonies? Wtf dude. No wonder u faggots larp as romans, Your elders deny your own history to you. Its all because of Trianon. Idiots. If you weren't such thieves you wouldn't have to cover up your Hungarian origins.
Many such cases. Sad!
Romanians are white
Poles (Slavs) have -ski
>Romanians have -scu
>-(sc)u very close to -(sk)i
>No latins have -(sk) -(sc)
proto-indo evropon suffix cognate such as -avičius (cognate of "-owicz"), -auskas, -eskis, -escu - (cognate of "-owski")
all eastern european.
Latin (Italian, Spanish) surnames do not have this
>Romania crypto-Slavic
>Romania until 1800s had a Slavic language, Cyrillic alphabet
>latinization of Romanian language in 1800s
>romanian language borrowed from French language to transform itself from a Slavic language to a Latin language
Napolean was big in these days and everyone wanted to get a piece of the east which was under Slavic ownership
part of a process of moving away from eastern, Slavic sphere, was to latinize by adopting French
en.wikipedia.org
archive.is
a good portion of romanian is appropriated from modern french
>Romanian simply as a 're-lexified' Slavic language - i.e. one where Vlach and Turkic boyars actively began introducing Romanisms into an essentially South Slavic language, as a sociolinguistic strategem to distinguish themselves politically and ethnically from neighbouring polities in Southeastern Europe
> Southern Slavic, even though such influence has been artificially reduced in the later 19th century c.e. by the so-called "re-Latinization" of Romanian ‒ actually, it must be properly referred to as "Latinization", because it was not a return to a previous situation but the introduction of new foreign elements to reform the language.
>Myth of Romanian
imninalu.net
FACT: Dacia province (modern Romania) to the north of the river was only for 165 years under Roman rule
>Romans officially abandoned Dacia under Emperor Aurelian (r. 270–275)
>Volokhi (Vlachs) seized "the territory of the Slavs"[121] and were later expelled by the Hungarians.[122] Therefore, the Slavs' presence antedates the arrival of the Volokhi in the chronicle's narration.
so Roman presence in Dacia (today Romania) was very short.
FACT: Roman presence in southern Balkans (Croatia, Serbia, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria) was much longer.
The Yugoslavian states were more Roman than Dacia. Around 5th-7th century, the territories of Bulgaria, Romania, Yugoslavia became dominated by Slavs.
FACT: in 1800s, after more than 1000 years of Slavic language with Cyrillic alphabet, a period of latinization occurred to remove Slavic influence. To make Romanian a Latin language.
Latinization only occurred in Romania, not in the much more Roman territories of Yugoslavia. Slavs in other territories (Croatia, Serbia, Bulgaria) could have reverted to Latin language, but did not.
Since the 19th century, many words were borrowed from Romance languages, especially from French and Italian (for example: birou "desk, office", avion "airplane", exploata "exploit"). It was estimated that about 60% of words in Romanian are of French and/or Italian origin (in many cases both languages); and adding this to Romanian's native stock, about 75%–85% of Romanian words can be traced to Latin. The use of these Romanianized French and Italian loans has tended to increase at the expense of Slavic words, many of which have become rare or fallen out of use.
b4 latinization, romanian was 80% slavic, it was like bulgarian
>what is the Romanian–Bulgarian Empire
en.wikipedia.org
Romanian language has received a relevant contribution from Southern Slavic, even though such influence has been artificially reduced in the later 19th century c.e. by the so-called "re-Latinization" of Romanian ‒ actually, it must be properly referred to as "Latinization", because it was not a return to a previous situation but the introduction of new foreign elements to reform the language. It was also within this process that the former national name was changed from Vlah to Român. The original Romanian alphabet, that was Cyrillic until 1868 c.e., was replaced by the Latin alphabet, to which some additional characters (not existing in any other Neo-Latin language) were added in order to represent the phonemic elements that previously were satisfactorily supplied by the Cyrillic characters. Through this process of Latinization, the percentage of Slavic terms in Romanian had been halved. Nevertheless, there are still many Slavic words and other linguistic features that attest the long sojourn of the Vlach/Romanians in the Slavic territories south of the lower Danube, mainly in Bulgaria.
>scu
>ski
Shit. That makes perfect sense. Never realized that, yet I consider myself quite the adpet linguist. 100% spot on friend. Although the Latin origins of Romanians should not be discounted. They were known as Olah in Hungarian in the middle ages, which is a cognate of the Hungarian word for Italian: Olasz.
It is interesting that Romanians gloss over the Hungarian, and Slavic influence on their culture, but fully embrace the ambiguous Thracian, and Dacian "influence". Romania history is like an ala cart buffet. You pick and choose what suits you in the moment.
im 100% italian
>any % Romanian
>human
pick one
Tbqh most of the "vlach royalty" in the 13-14th century were bulgars.
you gotta go back
If it wasn't for those old commies that people like you butchered you'd still be toiling in some field with some boyar's dick up your wife or daughter's cunt.
>spiritus-temporis.com
You forgot about the huge turkic linguistic (and cultural) admixture.
Kek
Also, your link don't work nigger.
Huns were uralic.
>50% Italian
Le 50% face
You're fucking dead if I ever catch you, commie scum.
>The words "torna, torna fratre" recorded in connection with a Roman campaign across the Balkan Mountains by Theophylact Simocatta and Theophanes the Confessor evidence the development of a Romance language in the late 6th century. The words were shouted "in native parlance" by a local soldier in 587 or 588.
>this is la creatura's level of understanding of linguistics
>massive amounts of vocabulary can just be imported and guzzled down like the creatura guzzles down mcdonalds, changing the language from one root to another overnight
You're a living fucking living meme, buddy, citing wikipedia while pretending to speak like an academic about things you dont understand in the slightest. Never stop posting
Wow, I'm really fucking scared of some pisshead keyboard warrior... Where are you from, tough guy? Bet you're from Ploiesti, or Bucuresti or some other putrid mahala.
More like
>be (You)
>go to Sup Forums
>make up bullshit
>attach dumb frogshit to it so everyone knows you are trying to troll
>71 posts and 19 image replies omitted.
Nah, I'm from Iasi, you maggot. Wanna meet up so I can do to you what we did to your love daddy Ceasca?
It's funny because Vee actually 100% believes he is 50% Dacian 50% Roman.
He uses it as an example that multiculturalism has worked.
No, i'm not even kidding.
holy mother fucking god that was a nice headbutt. What kind of a mobster is he? Is it in Sicily?
that fucking sound
Iasi? Holee fuck that's even worse! Goddamn, how come you haven't starved or gotten stabbed in that shithole you filthy moldonigger. Shiieeet. I'm actually sorry for you Stay the fuck away from Brasov, tho, you cunt. We've got enough of you subhuman russkie rape babies here as is.
How does it feel being an ethnic minority in a country that shits on you, faggot?
I knew a big-titted Hungarian whore in high-school. She got romanized pretty hard.
nvm there was a link in the description
> lying on the internet
For shame.
Not even hungarian, tho I may have some ukrainian/russian ancestors on my ma's side.
>complains about Russians
>I have Russian ancestors
I know you're a horse fucker. Don't try to weasel out of it, Attila.
Wow that was a heck of a headbutt, he's done that move before haha.
One thing having distant ancestors that immigrated to an area
Another is being a literal spawn of constant cossack, russian and tatar rapist-cum-slaver raids for hundreds of years.
>being a literal meme people that created a kingdom in which they were never even the majority in
>being proud of having horse rapist ancestors
WEW!
Into the collection you go.
pol is hilarious
Getting mad, Attila?