What if the Axis won WWII, Sup Forums? Would we really live in a better world today...

What if the Axis won WWII, Sup Forums? Would we really live in a better world today? Would the man we idolize so much be the same hero we see today despite the demonization because he lost? Or would have he fallen to the cliche notion "you either die a hero etc" since, in the end, he was just a human being like us?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wehrbauer#The_SS_Wehrbauern
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No, the human race would be extinct

id be living on mars right now

kill yourself

You would be Turks now, but instead Germans now call you gypsies

Watch Man in the High Castle

I honestly think that it would collapse in on itself. Constant rebellions that would have to be put down would create a harsh and brutal society that no one would want to live in anymore.
And nazi germany was pretty much NO FUN ALLOWED.

ja mein führer

We wuz aryanz n shit according to the Nazis, so opinion discarded.
I did, and honestly, I liked it (aside from some crude manipulations).

>We wuz aryanz n shit according to the Nazis
No, you were Turkic (which is actually your correct origin), being Turkic makes you a part of the lesser races

Once we perfect the surface of the Earth, we shall turn our attention to the stars.

Ugh that line hit me

the paper says that they are from aryan blood.
hes more white than you, Boris

No actually you niggers declared the part that you took over to be German nationals, so they weren't subhumans anymore but Germans, so it was OK to draft them

awwww shiiit it's true, hitler considered turkomen as aryans, explains the lust for turkish genes

Are you projecting because you're a Soviet occupation rape baby or something? Can't explain this aggressive manner...

You're a soviet occupation rape baby, we had Tito you had Stalin, all that I wrote is true buddy, this and the previous post.

Depends, are you a faggot libshit or someone who gives a shit about things Hitler talked about.

>a shit about things Hitler talked about.
Like German supremacy?

Oh, sorry, I thought you were from Slovakia, but it turns out you're from that high cheekbones, slanted eyes wife of Trump's homeland.

>this faggot again
Fuck off, you are not even intellectually honest

So the Netherlands joined Nazi Germany freely? And France, Czechia, Denmark, Norway?

What does this have to do with you being Turkomen?

That we aren't that different, you and I...

No

>you are intellectually dishonest
>oh really? How about more of my intellectual dishonesty
Wow makes you think

Jesus christ you're a nigger was the Netherlands annexed or did they join themselves, it's a simple question you stupid nigger?

Money and bitches.

Actually most of his policies continued to be seen as perfect aryan policies.

That's a loaded question and you know it you butthurt Slovene

Id probably hate him just to be contrarian honestly

>bulgaria
You wouldn't. Most of eastern Europe wouldn't. The Germans and maybe the English would do better, the nordics would be the same as they were, while we would be totally and absolutely fucked.

Sup Forums just goes against whatever the status quo is so if the majority of people liked him most of you would hate him

Look at these poor women, they were probably beaten and raped right before this photo by their evil nazi husbands. BTW the only rebellions that they faced were during the war in foreign countries "which the soviets and western allies faced too, look up Werewolf"

By "fun" i guess you mean raping kids in your local Jewish "child sexual education school"

How is it a loaded question? Did Germany annex the NL or did they have a vote?

But of course they did, why wouldn't they willingly abandon their national identities and reform into Reichskommissariats Belgien-Nordfrankreich, Norwegen & Niederlande? What a silly qestion user.

Read up the definition of loaded question.

He is right here, no matter what his political leanings might be. They were annexed just like we were.

Economics would be like modern Europe except laws would be shit thanks to the despotism inherent in the national socialist system whereby the most ruthless and powerful seizes political power (at least, according to Lincoln Rockwell).


Cons:
Modern Europe socialist micromanaging of the economy
Despotic leadership
lack of free speech, of association, right to bear arms, etc.


Pros:
White Europe
Masculine Europe
systems based on merit

Did you tell your mom that you're retarded, this is a loaded question but it's true

>hey guys give me your sovreignity
>t. Adolf "Das Proto Merkel" Hitler

Jesus christ Sven just end yourself

Its not meant to create any discussion other than >le you got BTFO by my shitty gotcha

The world would be 10x better no doubt

Except that the Japs are closely related to Turkics and were Germany's allies. Not to mention the Azerbaijan SS groups.

>Hitler literally would have gassed the entirety of Eastern Europe and replace it with Germans
This is such a tired argument...

>What if the Axis won WWII, Sup Forums?

We'll never know now, will we?

The fact that it obviously would be better for me and germans in general, I think it's hard to imagine how it could be worse than our timeline even viewed for europe as a whole long term

Shit would probably suck for the russians desu, but even in the worst case for them they still survived worse in history

>Would we really live in a better world today?
Well kids wouldn't be being turned into trannies and pedophilia wouldn't be coming into the realm of acceptable public discourse, so yes.

Because there's no discussion Germans went full on nigger race war, incorporating countries that didn't want to be with the sour krauts, plain and simple, the Germans declared themselves the most superior race and then it's some how the Jew's fault when the world get together to stomp them

I already corrected myself, the Germans viewed the Turkic race as aryan

Nah the Germans were good blokes, that's why the destroyed Warsaw when they were losing, that's why they executed their own citizens like Sophie School

And let's not pretend that the Germans intended to redraw the borders just out of the kindness of their own hearts towards the east.
Germanization and eventual colonization was in order.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wehrbauer#The_SS_Wehrbauern
>inb4 (((wiki)))
Just read it.

what about strasserism?

Soft communism.

>Because there's no discussion
At least you admit you are not even trying

What's there to discuss about Germany occupying the Netherlands and saying you belong to me now?

Well Madagascar would defnintly have a very high GDP and east africa would probably be economically dominated by it. This would actually be quite interesting scenarion for the whole region.

They actually made some pretty funny movies like "Die Feuerzangenbowle" during the war. They are still watched today. And people dont rebell against a system that get worse continously (boiling frog), just look at your own country

We would have a different foundation myth right now, a positive one that will guarantee the survival of our women and children

How do you recognise a foundation myth? It fulfils three functions. 1)It explains the origin and structure of the world (and society). 2)It defines ultimate good and evil (and from those definitions are derived the values that are used to justify the holding of power). 3)It determines what is held sacred in that society. For modern Westerners the story of WWII has become their foundation myth. It fulfils all three functions. 1)We live in the ‘Post-War World’. The lines on the map, the institutions, the sense of what era we live in, all arise from the starting point of WWII. 2)Ultimate evil is Nazis. Ultimate good is opposing Nazis. The values derived from these definitions are anti-racism, equality, diversity, anti-nationalism and so on. 3)The only thing that is held sacred, that cannot be denied or mocked in the contemporary West, is the Holocaust. The problem is that all three functions are backwards or negative. Instead of the origin event being one of fertility and new life, it was a conflagration of death and destruction. Instead of ultimate good taking the central position in the story that slot is occupied by ultimate evil. Everyone knows that Adolf Hitler, the personification of evil, holds the centre point of the WWII story. Instead of that which is held sacred being something mysterious and sublime it (the Holocaust) is an obscenity. Having a negative foundation myth means the tree of life for Westerners is poisoned.
> Having a negative foundation myth means the tree of life for Westerners is poisoned.

>What's there to discuss
The fact that the only country powerful enough to smash incoming faggotry that is today. The fate of Netherlands is literally irrelevant to this...

...

...

The real question you should ask yourself is what the world would have looked like if WWI ended in a German victory or status quo ante bellum.
The Nazis were not so different than any other revolutionary group like the Soviet Union.

>committing atrocities during war time
Unheard of!
>executing potential collaborators
Unprecedented!
That's so horrible, I couldn't even imagine if that was done today by the ones who defeated the Nazis...

What would happen to us Latinos?