2nd Amendment

Why doesn't the 2nd Amendment allow me to purchase recreational nukes?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Aristotle_Phillips
youtube.com/watch?v=TQ_dTQ8Pnmc
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

They're not real

New E-celeb?

because nukes aren't an extension of your arm. go read the constitution, braindead lefty.

14th amendment's protection of liberty

Why?
Because your post needs more herbs and spices.

>arms dealers deal only in appendage accessories
wew lad

How do I put this gently...
You might be retarded?

This.

fpbp

I'm sure if you're rich enough you could purchase a nuke.

Because republicanism is a backward and deceptive system.

This smells like a "1 post by this ID" thread.

A degenerate South African pagan, lad.

>Why doesn't the 2nd Amendment allow me to purchase recreational nukes?
Because you touch yourself at night.

One of the broader interpretations of the 2A reads it as man-portable arms.

Read US v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939).

whats that sun back there? is she an argentine?

Correct, which also argues that an M16 or M4 would be the current "in common use."

Explosives are ordnance, not armaments.

>Miller was found shot to death in April, before the decision was rendered.[5]
kek

No, she's Human

Checked and feckd

You can with proper atf license

is she american then? doesnt look like that much of a mutt

If you've got enough privately owned land, and don't run afoul of environmental regulations I don't see the problem.

It does.

Why is OP a faggot?

South African

So you should technically be able to own MANPADs, light mortars and anti-tank launchers.

if you can build one you can keep it.... they cannot LEGALLY control your access to arms.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Because his life is shite?

We have no formal law saying you cant only need permits for parts

Too bad commie
Kys

>Implying nukes are recreational

Fuck Tard Liberal detected

it doesnt?

>if you can build one you can keep it
Not true
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Aristotle_Phillips
>Phillips was an underachieving student who played the tiger mascot at Princeton games. Hoping to stay at the school, he proposed a term paper for a seminar on nuclear proliferation outlining the design for an atomic bomb similar to the Nagasaki weapon. Whether the weapon as designed would have actually exploded was questioned. Dr. Frank Chilton, a California nuclear scientist who at that time specialized in nuclear explosion engineering, said Phillips’s design was “pretty much guaranteed to work.”[6] However, Phillips' faculty advisor Freeman Dyson, a renowned physicist, and professor Harold Feiveson, who held the seminar, said Phillips' design was not functional.[7] Nevertheless, the Federal Bureau of Investigation confiscated Phillips's term paper and a mockup he had constructed in his dormitory room.

After the USSR totally collapsed, several hundred nuclear warheads went missing. A significant amount of them have still not been recovered by any governments (as far as we know) and a dozen or so have been reported on the black market in the Middle East and Eastern Europe. They're often sold as just the warhead without a rocket of any kind attached. But yes, you can buy nuclear weapons if you have enough money to buy them from the criminal underworld that's currently in possession of them. I've also heard rumors that North Korea has bough a bunch of these warheads, but take that with a few grains of salt.

Because you can't afford them.

she's a dumb cam whore (literally) that preaches about nofap and muh right wing trad

probably the pinnacle of trad-thotdom

but if I was like you and my dick was an extension of my arm then if America banned guns i'd have to hand my dick in to the kikes
therefore
>gun bans lead to mass circumcision

but if we ban nuclear weapons then only the criminals will use them and we law abiding citizens will be left defenseless

>underachieving
>builds nuclear bomb

okay

It is impossible to detonate a nuke within US borders without destroying public property or private property of other US citizens. When Dequan robs your house, just shoot him.

Not a firearm. It's a Thermo-nuclear weapon. No right afforded to carry those.

youtube.com/watch?v=TQ_dTQ8Pnmc

I'm of the opinion that nuclear weapons are not arms but tools of state and diplomacy.

well I believe they can be used by an individual to protect against a government that would otherwise annihilate them.

If applied properly, nukes can defend you against threats both foreign and domestic.

You're retarded, unhinged, and inherently violent for even suggesting that. Completely unnecessary.

Constitution makes no mention of firearms, only "arms"
Nukes are arms

>Why doesn't the 2nd Amendment allow me to purchase recreational nukes?
It does, the government doesn't let you

>because nukes aren't an extension of your arm. go read the constitution, braindead lefty.
Founding fathers approved ordinance for private use

Kill yourself you uneducated faggot. Let me guess, you like the NRA too?
>lefty
Says the lefty

>total watering down of jurisprudence to get any sort of gun rights back and an absolute joke amongst lawyers of any side is a good decision
>the supreme court is right
>the modern supreme court is ever right
I seriously hope you guys don't believe this, it's embarrassing

because of niggers

what the hell?
also OP, to prevent craters.
I mean, come on now.

1) the point of the second amendment is to defeat a tyrannical government.
2) the founding fathers encouraged the people to own artillery (bombs, mortars, cannons, etc)

there's no reason in the constitution that we shouldn't be allowed to own nukes. affording the materials to make one though... good luck with that.