Does this offend you Russians?

Youtube is officially labelling Russian funded propaganda on their platform
>how will Kremlinbots ever recover?
when will US funded propaganda be labeled?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=nJ_LFQERv9o
youtube.com/watch?v=X1Fq6gtbx4Q
bbc.com/pidgin
youtube.com/watch?v=rBIC-wrAOGQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Do they label everything that’s funded by Soros?

>when will US funded propaganda be labeled?
It is labeled you fucking autist. Nice bait.

...

>flag
>does this offend you Russians
I was born as Russian how the hell can you offend me even more?.

They are doing it with everyone, which is awesome.
Other nations need to back the F up and stop trying to tell Americans what to do.
I really hope that twitter and all the rest do the same and let us know if Germans, Russians or Mexicans are trying to butt in on our stuff.
More Nationalism please.

Example of letting people know about Government funded Propaganda.

mfw no labels for me..
Is it geo-determined/?

>RT is funded by gov't
>BBC is publicly funded
What did they mean by this?

I think they might only be doing this for US users but I'm not 100% on that.

Yeah, but notice the wording.
BBC is publicly funded...but so is RT lol. It's not like British citizens give spontaneous donations to BBC. They are taxed for it.

RT and VoA are labeled as funded.
Both are presumed to be under state authority in terms of editorial content.
BBC and PBS are labeled publicly funded.
They are known to be editorially independent of their state funding.
That is the distinction they're making.

It means that even the concept of BBC is propaganda.
They claim that there is a difference between the money going through the government to the BBC and the government sending the People's money to the BBC.
It's the People's money user, not the governments.

I hope they start labeling their donors

What about the EU & UN vids? Are they labeled too?

>They are known to be editorially independent of their state funding.

>BBC
>Editorially independent
Pick one.

I'm not up on any news organization that these groups fund, so I don't know. But from what I've seen so far the labeling is consistent using the definitions I explained above.

Find me an instance of BBC writing a story at the insistence of Downing Street and we'll talk. Being told to STFU due to the Official Secrets Act maybe, but not told how to cover things.

fpbp

Try these
youtube.com/watch?v=nJ_LFQERv9o
youtube.com/watch?v=X1Fq6gtbx4Q

I want to know more about the corporate media

fpbp

no labels

bbc.com/pidgin

Welcome to Sup Forums. Enjoy your stay.

Find me an instance of RT being ordered by Putin to write something.

Because of technicalities
The BBC if funded by the TV licence, not the government (although its the government that enforces the TV license, so it may as well be)

Find me an instance of RT writing a story at the insistence of the Kremlin and we'll talk.

I want to know more about Illegal Immigrants pretending to be Americans while representing foreign interests, specifically the large number of politically active Mexicans living in America.
I don't see how that is any different to what the Russians were doing.
And I view both as wrong.

BBC propaganda:
youtube.com/watch?v=rBIC-wrAOGQ

Literally who fucking cares? Jesus goddamn christ, autistis are so fucking easily triggered.
RT's EIC Rossiya Segodnya admitted that the organization has dedicated secure phone lines that go directly to state security. That's not something just lying around the offices of PBS or BBC. Everyone knows this.

>Rossiya Segodnya
Top line on wiki:
Not to be confused with RT (TV network) or Russian Federation Today.
Different corporation

And listing their addresses and fears.

Not a fan of the kikes