Human killed by lion

>be human
>have elephant gun 9000
>lion sneaks up behind
>too weak to fight back

If it were the other way around it wouldnt be on the news

bbc.com/news/world-africa-43212350

Somewhere Jimmy Kimmel is crying about this

Lol....it could smell her sweaty/salty pussy...that is so fucking funny, I just shit my pants.

>woman
>human
pick one

Anyone who hunts animals or people that can't fight back is an utter coward.

I'm glad the lion evened out the odds.

That lion literally got dibs on some pussy. The fact it was some roastie who got eaten makes this all the more hilarious.

Ban assault lions now

was she nigger or human?

Nothing wrong with the end result. Humans really have no business killing apex predators for sport or killing for sport in general. Treating life as expendable has destroyed our environment and souls along with it.

This. Humans are just fucking stuff up with artifical selection.

This. Any true alt right member should be an environmentalist and not want to destroy it for fun. Hunting is great for actual consumption but not killing for sport. Blood and SOIL. If we are a conservative movement we should aim to actually, well, conserve.

That is essentially what it is. Kill the biggest and healthiest examples of a species for trophies while letting the weakest specimens spread their genes. It also has a huge effect on the prey species and the environment itself. It causes a trophic cascade that can even affect the environment itself with the lack of balance.

>Humans really have no business killing apex predators for sport or killing for sport in general

Conservation is the only thing keeping threatened species alive and each time liberal cunts get a hunting ban passed the poachers return and there's no money for preservation.

A single hunting tag can bring in tens of thousands to a hundred thousand dollars and it's done to take down problem animals or animals too old to breed or unfit animals. Being against conservation is being for the extinction of animals and for poaching.

Worst things liberals and "greens" ever did was convince people they have environmental policies.

You would not need conservation if you removed the demand for the thrill or the animal parts. I am strictly for poaching the poachers themselves. Sell their organs to fund the program and watch how fast it stops.

>Kill the biggest and healthiest examples of a species for trophies

Wrong.

>Any true alt right member

You're advocating retarded "greens" policies.

>Humans are just fucking stuff up with artifical selection.

Conservation is literally about preserving the species. The "natural" thing would be that they all go extinct due to environmental pressures.

You're all americans too, fucking shameful.

Private game reserves are the best thing you can do for a species, because you make them PROFITABLE.

Removing the economic incentive is the capitalist solution and it works. It proves itself again and again, the only way to make these animals worth preserving is to put a monetary value on them. Fail to do so and they'll always have an illegal value.

>hurr di durr just stop poaching

You'll donate, of course? You'll pay a bunch of africans to protect animals in africa. How much have you donated so far?

We already pay them enough to multiply outside their ability to sustain themselves. MY initial commentary was on the act of killing apex predators for sport in the first place. It's inherently destructive to the environment and the human soul. As far as the Africans are concerned they are doomed whether they kill their native species off or not. I find the act of death tourism to be offensive which is what conservation is all about.

Cecil the lion lives on.

That's just the law of the jungle, man. When your prey kills you while you're hunting for it, then it didn't do anything wrong. It's a different story if it attacked you for no reason, but in this case you were trying to do the same thing that it did to you. Not that there's anything wrong with hunting animals either, it's just that turnabout is fair play here.

>We already pay them enough

No "we" don't. This has happened again and again in various african countries. Hunting is banned, the money is gone and there's not enough to run a conservation program, the animals are worth more dead than alive.

> killing apex predators for sport in the first place. It's inherently destructive

This is a bunch of feelsy garbage that sounds like a woman wrote it. There are plenty of places that make it illegal not to use the entire animal. In Canada you will be fined painful amounts if you don't use every part of a hunting tag, including animals like bears that aren't sought for meat.

Rare exotic animals meat have a high price tag and selling or donating that meat is just an even bigger economic incentive to keep their populations high and healthy.

>I find the act of death tourism to be offensive which is what conservation is all about.

You are too fucking dumb to have an opinion about hunting. It's in the very word itself. Conserve.

Nature is not balanced, nature is not kind. Animals die horrific deaths every single day. Keeping an ecological diversity is something that's only a virtue because we decided it is. The "natural" thing is for all these species to be displaced and die out, and that is what would happen without human intervention.

Our compassion is what gives us the goal of sustaining these animals. The single best way to do so is capitalist incentives using targeted hunting and using the proceeds to pay for the guards and veterinarians and habitat improvements they need to keep those populations stable.

feline of peace

>A single hunting tag can bring in tens of thousands to a hundred thousand dollars and it's done to take down problem animals or animals too old to breed or unfit animals.
In a perfect world, yes, but if a lion corpse is worth $50,000 to your organisation there's a bit of an incentive to create lion corpses don't you think?

Who's a good kitty? Want a treat? Good girl!