How???

How???

I plan on using them only for aesthetic purposes, not defense or sport.

None of your business, leaf.
You made it be known you don't have any need for rights

If you're making it actively harder for me to buy a gun and are banning variants which do the same thing as others which you don't want to ban it does infringe on my rights.

Okay. You go enjoy your freedom. I'm going to go enjoy my free healthcare

I use mine as door stops and paper weights, so they're exempt from gun laws

>what is a dangerous person

Libshits seem to think its anyone who disagrees with them.

...

pro tip if you filter all canadian flags Sup Forums becomes four to ten times better.

Is taxed for his healthcare and to pay for Jamal and Abduls family and kids
>Prime minister is bending the country over to minorities
>"At least we don't have scary guns!"

Because the people who commit crimes already get their guns illegally you fucking nincompoop. SO ANY LAW JUST MAKES IT HARDER FOR LAW ABIDING CITIZENS TO GET WEAPONS...simple really and you will just ignore this answer even though it answers your question wholly.

It's not free you fucking idiot.

This. Qualifiers can be used as political tools to silence your opposition.

What exactly is a "dangerous person"? Also,

SHALL

Dangerous person here.
Your laws mean nothing to me.

t. Dangerous person

WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?

Because it's a slippery slope as to what and more importantly, WHO defines "a dangerous person". Today it could be the violent criminals and the mentally ill. Tomorrow is could be those who have certain political affiliations. The day after? Everyone else who isn't in power.

It's the same as people in real pain not being able to get their pain medication because a small percentage of the population abuses the shit out them. Why should legitimate users suffer for the actions of a few degenerates?
Mass shootings are extremely rare, so much so that deaths from them are insignificant when compared to things like medical malpractice.

Denying someone a constitutionally enumerated right without due process is tyranny.

Moar or nah?

because the kikes will classify everyone they don't like as dangerous.

Hey man if you got nothing to hide why can't the cops just enter your house any time without permission? I mean you got nothing to hide, stop being such a right wing nut job! Think about the children!!!2d!!!jwd!

Fucking leaf

Don’t worry goyim, we’re just gonna take the bad guys guns not yours. You can trust us.

>What exactly is a "dangerous person"?
It seems owning a gun would inherently make you more dangerous, perhaps even enough to be considered a "dangerous person", so it seems she's saying all guns should be confiscated.

Who defines "dangerous people"?

It isn't free, your tax rate is insane and the regulations in your country make it impossible for small business to operate efficiently.

t. Married a leaf

...

T O O U R S E L V E S A N D O U R P O S T E R I T Y

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

don't know, why don't these fags just move to a state with retarded gun laws? Massachusetts and California are both very beautiful this time of the year. Why should hillbillies suffer because the urban and suburban retards can't stop shooting each other?

so what if I'm a responsible gun owner but I'm 20?

Kill yourself cuck.

This burger destroyed you. I disown you as a fellow citizen.

>I make 12 payments of 100$ for my dishwater instead of a single payment of 1000$, therefore it's free

A firearm is a force multiplier. If I'm ever targeted by an angry mob there's genuinely fuck-all I can do, even if I'm equipped and trained for melee combat.

Who decides who is "dangerous"
The left ignores niggers while claiming white men are the most dangerous demographic

"Dangerous people" is subjective and suspecting a person of being a criminal before any criminal activity has taken place is a violation of their rights. The government has no business interfering with a person's ability to purchase a gun, and should not force private gun manufacturers to require "background checks" if they don't want to. It is the sole responsibility of a shooter if he or she kills people, not anybody else.

do you retards not even read the sticky anymore? the slippery slope fallacy has been thrown to the wayside lately

...

Canada's healthcare system is generally considered to be a bad example of how to do """free""" healthcare.

The laws apply to everyone.
If you are a "dangerous person" in some legal sense, you already aren't supposed to be able to get a gun.
This is a stupid website full of stupid people saying stupid shit.

Not really subjective m8. Domestic abusers/mentally unstable people are objectively more dangerous than the common citizen and shouldn't be allowed to handle guns plain and simple

"Free health care"

Which is exactly the purpose of the second amendment. To fight tyranny. The left is so retarded, they think Trump is cheeto Hitler, but want him to take the guns from the "undesirables". It's like the brainwash has been 100% effective. You can't even argue with facts anymore. Everything has to be made into an emotional argument to reach them. This is why I created pic related.
>inb4 but he only took them from the jews.
Yeah, I know, the mentally ill are this generations "undesirables".

>Muh gibs!
Yes, you have that. Something only losers would appreciate. Winners... they pay for your gibs.

>free healthcare
You don't actually have that
You have state-paid consultations

Because "dangerous people" is vague, all-encompassing terminology that can literally be applied to anyone.

Leftists already refer to your average Trump supporters as Nazis.
What makes you think they also wouldn't consider us to be "dangerous people"?

Stop focusing on gun control and start focusing on government incompetence. The FBI and local law enforcement were warned dozens of times about Cruz but they failed to act. Gun control isn't the problem. Laws are worthless if the ones we already have go unenforced.

The vast majority of domestic abuse is reciprocal, yet only men are charged. And who gets to decide what "mentally unstable" means? (((Psychiatrists)))?

A domestic abuser is a criminal, objectively. A mentally "unstable" person is subjective.

Because we aren't stupid and know that the ultimate goal is a disarmed populace where only the state wields power. Fuck yourself.

Fuck that shit. One fuck up shouldn't have lasting consequences for the rest of your life. We already have solutions for repeat offenders, longer sentences. If they aren't dangerous enough to be in prison for life they should have the right to defend themselves.

anybody whose ever been sad, watched a movie or played video game

Except the slippery slope is real because the people who want the destruction of our people do not stop pushing for it.

you give a little, they take a lot

Who decides who's dangerous? That's the problem.

>Yes, yes! The thin edge of the wedge doesn't hurt, goyim!

>
>Okay. You go enjoy your freedom. I'm going to go enjoy my free healthcare
>FREE HEALTHCARE
what are taxes?

>im going to enjoy prepping the bull
Ftfy

It's even worse than that
No eye-care
No dental
If your baby needs med or dies, you have to pay out of your own pocket

What are these (((laws)))?
Let me know so I can answer it's question.

Get a friend/brother/sister/nanny/mom/pop/stranger
to make the purchase.

Pointing out that something is a fallacy is not an argument and is actually a fallacy in itself.
>"Your point is disproven because the reasoning that you used to arrive at it is flawed."

>slippery slope
>a fallacy
History disagrees

>Mentally ill can't own guns
>racism is a mental illness
Checkmate Sup Forums

>Jews aren't a race
Reversed, bitch!

More superfluous paperwork.

x2

>punch a woman
>cant own a gun
>equal rights
most women deserve to be punched, honestly

Fucking New Jersey. 2 "reputable persons" need to vouch for you. So people with no friends don't get to own a gun.

The 2A is not about self defense, hunting or sport.
It is for WAR.
WAR against a corrupt government.
Which requires weapons of WAR.
It's the same strawman arguments over and over and over and over again.
The 2A is about WAR

This would be logical if Tyrone didn’t have a bunch of JA380s to trade for crack. I’m sure some Ivan would sell a surplus AK or two to a “dangerous person” right?

Why do these kinds of Jewish propagandists always think criminals are going to abide by the laws?

Why american fags get so mad because of Canada free healthcare?

Note the Obama executive order that Trump overturned, that said any Social Security recipient who had a Medicare mental health benefit and had a representative payee (someone who picked up their check for them) was declared mentally unfit and their guns could be legally confiscated.

Not too far from that to declaring anyone who'd used mental health services unfit to own a gun, or equally as bad, requiring you to give the government your medical records to prove your sanity.

The only real effect will be to make people avoid mental health treatment, or (the real intention) make people avoid applying for a gun license because they don't want the state to have their medical records.

Oh, come on. If you need someone designated to get your SS checks, it's because you're legally incompetent. Those fucks shouldn't own a gun.

have fun

Because the only people for whom it is actually free are fucking refugees. Canadians pay like 40-50% in income tax like the Nordics.

your country is one of THE WORST examples of socialised healthcare

Dangerous people will not acquire them lawfully, the legislation only regulates lawful gun owners.

any gun law is an infringement, so it affects everyone's rights

Well they aren't for self defense/sport, they are for busting caps in tyrant's assess.

You'll get yours OP ;)

People are sick of you tyrants.

Also because you faggots are tyrants that make laws many people will agree to and then use these laws to oppress the shit out of people.

Canada healthcare is fucking shit though.