Africans had Advanced Civilization

“The king's palace or court is a square, and is as large as the town of Haarlem and entirely surrounded by a special wall, like that which encircles the town. It is divided into many magnificent palaces, houses, and apartments of the courtiers, and comprises beautiful and long square galleries, about as large as the Exchange at Amsterdam, but one larger than another, resting on wooden pillars, from top to bottom covered with cast copper, on which are engraved the pictures of their war exploits and battles...“ -Nauwkeurige Beschrijvinge der Afrikaansche Gewesten on Benin City

"The negroes possess some admirable qualities. They are seldom unjust, and have a greater abhorrence of injustice than any other people. Their sultan shows no mercy to anyone who is guilty of the least act of it. There is complete security in their country. Neither traveller nor inhabitant in it has anything to fear from robbers or men of violence. They do not confiscate the property of any white man who dies in their country, even if it be uncounted wealth. On the contrary, they give it into the charge of some trustworthy person among the whites, until the rightful heir takes possession of it. They are careful to observe the hours of prayer, and assiduous in attending them in congregations, and in bringing up their children to them." -Ibn Battuta

Africa was a thriving continent until the wh*te subhumans came to rape, loot, and destroy. No matter how many aryanwarrior666.blogspot.com entries you read, it will never change the fact that Africans had a prosperous and wealthy civilization.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benin_Expedition_of_1897
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

Not a slide thread, fuck off wh*te subhuman.

>Since 1863, the British had been trying to force the King to stop selling slaves to the Arab traders who had replaced the Portuguese after 1836 and to stop the practice of human sacrificial crucifixion

woah sounds like a crime free paradise

>At the end of the 19th century, the Kingdom of Benin had managed to retain its independence and the Oba exercised a monopoly over trade which the British found irksome. The territory was coveted by an influential group of investors for its rich natural resources such as palm-oil, rubber and ivory.[2] After British consul Richard Burton visited Benin in 1862 he wrote of Benin's as a place of "gratuitous barbarity which stinks of death", a narrative which was widely publicized in Britain and increased pressure for the territory's subjugation.[2]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benin_Expedition_of_1897

Classic wh*te behavior. Invade another race's land to rape the women and steal everything that can be stolen, while covering up your subhuman behavior with bullshit "humanitarian" rhetoric.

>Homes, religious buildings and palaces were deliberately torched. On the third day, the blaze grew out of control and engulfed part of the city. The city's walls were once the largest earthworks created in the pre-mechanized era and were estimated to be four times longer in total than the Great Wall of China.[14] Little evidence of these structures still exist after destruction at the hands of the British.[14]

So typical of wh*tes to destroy the achievements of superior races in a wild bloodlust.

If they were so great than why did they fall to the white subhumans?

>and entirely surrounded by a special wall

That wall took nearly a millennium to build

If the Germans were so great then why did they fall to the Asiatic-Slavic subhumans?

Germany is extremely small compared to Asia.

What's your excuse for pic related?

They weren't obviously

>Germany is extremely small compared to Asia.
Irrelevant. Africa could hardly fight off Britain, France, Germany, Portugal, Belgium, and others at the same time, especially because there was no unified African government. Just like Germany could hardly fight off the entire world against them either.

>If the Germans were so great then why did they fall to the Asiatic-Slavic subhumans?
if africans are so great, then why did they fall to white subhumans?

Yes, but if you want to use that example:
Germany today > Africa today (or any country in it)
And Germany is pretty shitty today, so that tells a lot.

Anyway, regarding your OP, all civilizations eventually fall. And I don't think African civilizations were to competitive, like European ones.

Arabs had their golden age, probably Africans too. But by the time the white devils came, yours was already long gone.

And you keep genociding yourselves ever since.

False equivalency
One was an all out war, the other was taking land piece by piece, a lot of times from negroes who even welcomed whites at times

Sorry to hear us anglos burnt your dirt wall down... somehow. And now there's no proof of it one (1) century later.

I'm sure it totally existed.

Picture: wall built by romans 1600 years ago

Yeeeeaahhhhh..........No.

WE WUZ WAKANDANS AND SHEEEEIT

where are the asian wonders, duterflip?
dont tell me ur already too cucked by your brown mutt masters.

And yet, you're here using the writings of a white man, since the niggers didn't have any written account themselves. And of course nigger kings were rich since they made a killing from selling slaves to Europeans and Ottoman T*rks.

>prosperous and wealthy
Through slave trade and very rich natural resources.

>especially because there was no unified African government
Why was that, and why didnt they even make one against invasion like the Greeks did ?

yall need jesus

WE WUZ KANGZ

lol

>Ibn Battuta
Ahh and what flavor of shitskin was he that he was so impressed by your savagery?

What is it like living in this retarded fiction niggers have created for themselves? Space faring empire destroyed by white cave people? How fucking shameful. Retarded niggers somehow made the only more shameful possible history as they quickly attempt to run from their legacy as slaves and bed wenches.

It would be amusing if I were watching from a far and might not one day have to bring some order to your niggering.

Why didn't the comparatively much smaller Great Wall of China get "burnt down" or whatever when the Chinese got angloed?

lmao nogs try to start shit and get btfo

>There was evidence of previous human sacrifice found by the British, a tradition they construed as barbaric,[15] with Reuters and the Illustrated London News reporting that the town 'reeked of human blood
disgusting

it's converging on the level of development and civilization that the locals are capable of sustaining

>Why was that, and why didnt they even make one against invasion like the Greeks did ?
Why didn't Europeans create a unified government?

Ibn Battuta was from Morocco, so he was most likely white skinned. BTW while Europeans were burning "witches" alive and massacring each other over laughably petty scriptural minutia, Muslim Spain and North Africa were developing science, art, and astronomy.

It wasn't at the same time, though. When the Portuguese got there, there was no one else in West Africa. In the east, there were Moors, but in the west there were only natives. The Africans couldn't even fight off what was at the time a small, essentially impoverished kingdom on the fringes of Europe.

Wh*tes never got a chance to destroy the Great Wall, because China had too many people for wh*tes to conquer. If they had the opportunity, they would have tore it down with pleasure. Wh*tes are the most envious race on the planet. Whenever they see the achievements of another race, they are overcome with the urge to destroy.

But that doesn't mean they r black

This is like someone starting a thread talking about the great white basketballers.
Not enough substance to claim any sort of superiority or accomplishment as a collective when it comes to civilisation.

You do realise you're a nigger ?

we wuz anunaki gold carriers n shiet

Absolute kangz.

> Sup Forums will deny this

>Africa was a thriving continent

Yes, under European rule.

> blocks your crusade

>"Of the neighbors of the Bujja, Maqdisi had heard that "there is no marriage among them; the child does not know his father, and they eat people -- but God knows best. As for the Zanj, they are people of black color, flat noses, kinky hair, and little understanding or intelligence." Maqdisi (fl. 966 AD), _Kitab al-Bad'_, vol.4

>"The geographer al-Idrisi ascribes 'lack of knowledge and defective minds' to the black peoples. Their ignorance, he says, is notorious; men of learning and distinction are almost unknown among them, and their kings only acquire what they know about government and justice from the instruction of learned visitors from farther north." Bernard Lewis, 1990, Race and Slavery in the Middle East.

>"Like the crow among mankind are the Zanj for they are the worst of men and the most vicious of creatures in character and temperament." Jahiz, _Kitab al-Hayawan_, vol. 2

>"[inhabitants of sub-Saharan African countries] are people distant from the standards of humanity" "Their nature is that of wild animals...." Persian geography _Hudud al-`alam_, 982 AD

>"We know that the Zanj (blacks) are the least intelligent and the least discerning of mankind, and the least capable of understanding the consequences of actions." Jahiz (d. 868 AD), _Kitab al-Bukhala'


>"They [the Shu`ubiyya] maintain that eloquence is prized by all people at all times -- even the Zanj, despite their dimness, their boundless stupidity, their obtuseness, their crude perceptions and their evil dispositions, make long speeches." Jahiz, Al-Bayan wa`l-tabyin, vol. 3

>"Galen says that merriment dominates the black man because of his defective brain, whence also the weakness of his intelligence." Mas`udi (d. 956 AD), Muruj al-dhahab_

>"As regards southern countries, all their inhabitants are black on account of the heat of their climate... Most of them go naked... In all their lands and provinces, gold is found.... They are people distant from the standards of humanity." Hudud al-`Alam_, Persian geography, 982 AD

>About the Zanj: "Their nature is that of wild animals. They are extremely black." About the Sudan: "Among themselves there are people who steal each other's children and sell them to the merchants when the latter arrive." Hudud al-`Alam_, 982 AD

>"If (all types of men) are taken, from the first, and one placed after another, like the Negro from Zanzibar, in the Southern-most countries, the Negro does not differ from an animal in anything except the fact that his hands have been lifted from the earth,--in no other peculiarity or property,--except for what God wished. Many have seen that the ape is more capable of being trained than the Negro, and more intelligent." Philosopher-theologian Nasir al-Din Tusi (1201-74), _Tasawwurat_

>"Therefore, the Negro nation are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because [Negroes] have little [that is essentially] human and have attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals, as we have stated." Ibn Khaldun, _Muqaddimah_, 14th century AD

>"beyond [known peoples of black West Africa] to the south there is no civilization in the proper sense. There are only humans who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings. They live in thickets and caves, and eat herbs and unprepared grain. They frequently eat each other. They cannot be considered human beings." Ibn Khaldun, _Muqaddimah_

>"The Zanj are slight-witted, and God, most high, has created them stupid, ignorant, and foul." anonymous, Iskandarnamah, 1343 AD

...

WE WUZ KAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNGSSSSSSSSSS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Those were not africans, those were the people they sold out. The africans who sold out remained there, the slaves who were purchased from the slave trade are who you speak of. Not all blacks are the same, even the ones in africa have jokes about the slave children abroad. Dont get fooled

they stole the science and culture from the people they sold into slavery