Would Sup Forums watch this movie?

Would Sup Forums watch this movie?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=soXkFMO4ixI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

I didn't know Harry Potter was a comedy

Always has been.

that's racist, blacks have less hair than y-ts and not all blacks smoke pot.
I don't know what a hallows is but it's racist

>black
>English

Some white people != diverse
All black people == diverse!

No only because I wouldn't give that stupid whore Jk Rowling any money.

Starring Tyler Perry as Dumbledore.

Sold.

Nogwarts.

Voldemort is still a white guy though right?

Tyler Perry as Madea as Dumbledore

meant for

I'd love for the leftists to falsely say this was better than the original

Except instead of magic it's glocks and crack

what's the movie about? don't say harri potter because that's about a green-eyed boy with wavy black hair. it specifies fairly clearly.

i's watch the african equivalent with witch doctors cursing each others with sticks adorned with severed albino limbs

A magic nigger voodoo kid hero would do well in the box office

FIRST !

and there goes the left trying to be more diverse again

I'm not suprised I'm just disappointed.
>where are the mexicans?

Write the book about black kids then make the movie starring black kids and if it's well written and well acted I will go see your movie.

Replace white people cuz muh diversity and I'll pray to every deity who will listen that you crash and burn.

The only black I’d be seeing is the eternal darkness after gouging my eyes out because I’m trapped watching a reboot of one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

What about this one guys?

The nigger potter doesn't even have the scar.

I don't know but I sure do like Gay Niggers from Outerspace: youtube.com/watch?v=soXkFMO4ixI

lol I like how they turned Harry's scar into a face tattoo. Real subtle.

>Harry Potter isn't holding a glock sideways

Not watching.

No and I never watched the white version either. Millenial trash. In all fields.

Darkie hallows*

>Drake Holes

No because I hate Harry Potter.

can we meme jk stole her work from blacks? i mean she ripped off discworld anyways, just claim she should donate her entire fortune to blacks

Wait....this is just a meme....right ?

Harry Nigger and da Enchanted Crack Pipe n' Sheit

Underrated