Jewtube censoring the masses

I really do not think people can comprehend the level of threat we are currently under.
We are so close to openly losing our free speech. As we speak youtubers of every sort, from airsoft gun channels to conservative news shows and even SARGON OF KEKAD, are BEING CENSORED... how is this even acceptable around here?? I have heard some of you defend google cause its muh Private company they can do what they want
>your choice for using them
Well this is a poor excuse, and we need to look at this like our forfathers did with king George... We must break apart the monopoly of google and youtube..
we need oragaized efforts, people spaming their forums and twitter. we must attack them at all fronts...
>information warfare
right now 1000s of shills decend upon us as our
>rights wither away
andf we let google trample on us ...
remember free speech is the begining... without it we dont have the rest... 1st and 2nd amendment are the crucial ones.
google is a public forum like a modern day town square and needs to be treated like a utility. and free speech must be respected.

Other urls found in this thread:

littler.com/publication-press/publication/california-supreme-court-permits-picketing-private-property
cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-google-facebook-would-not-exist-without-government-funding
www2.itif.org/2014-federally-supported-innovations.pdf
firstamendmentschools.org/freedoms/faq.aspx?id=13012
theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/25/google-youtube-advertising-extremist-content-att-verizon
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Bump for exposing of the beast

Account Termination Policy

YouTube will terminate a user's access to the Service if, under appropriate circumstances, the user is determined to be a repeat infringer.
YouTube reserves the right to decide whether Content violates these Terms of Service for reasons other than copyright infringement, such as, but not limited to, pornography, obscenity, or excessive length. YouTube may at any time, without prior notice and in its sole discretion, remove such Content and/or terminate a user's account for submitting such material in violation of these Terms of Service.


They can do what ever they want.

Anti trust is coming in hot faggot.

That is the problem...
You know who else used to do whatever he wanted ...
King George!!!! And we fucking 1776'd his twat!!!! We need this mentality again !!!!
>TOS shouldn't be the law of The land

That might work when they were small but we need to demand fairness and basic internet civil rights!!!!

Pic related
>post on kikebook for a 24hr ban

So can you. You're not a legal person online if they ban you. Your content is THEIR content and THEIR liability. Something to remember when you post those cp memes

Also doxxing is not illegal

Ermm...as long as you're not doing anything illegal or promoting hate and fascism I don't see anything wrong...?

Pornhub are even less subtle

there is a difference between a head of state and private corporation.

Keep dreaming that some no name E-celebs will have the money to fight google on legal grounds.

The government has more than enough money.

Is this illegal??? Why is it a banned blacklisted images on Google and facebook...

And what divine person decides what is a "illegal" image in terms of news and information...????

Why doesnt someone just invent a new form of youtube that isnt shit?

>youtube r NATZEES
kys donald redditor scum

Is this video what kikes really believe?

yeah, right after they locked up hillary keep dreaming

liveleak?

Yes. I think this is from The Pianist which was directed by the pedo kike Roman Polanski. It's atrocity propaganda that hasn't stopped since 1941

That wont work faggot. Many have tried and failed. Also it doesn't attack the root of the problem. No difference at all getting banned and censored from one place or another. Look at how many chans there are.

Wtf you gonna do about it?
Write them lol?

Perfect choice for an anti jewtube meme??? Irony??? Niggers??

I think more importantly we need to look at the sjw firing squad.
There needs to be laws implemented to stop big companies from firing their employees simply for expressing conservative political opinions on line
People's livelihoods should not be at risk because they say something like
>bill Cosby did nothing wrong
>gay marriage is evil
>refugees not welcome
the only ones who are protected from being fired for saying things like that are military members
and even that is starting to look like it's being taken away

It should be because your right-wing conspiracy about every single shooting is a false flag to take your guns is deadly, dangerous, and quite frankly: scary.

And Google/Youtube has the right to remove hate, fascism, and looney toon right-wingers from their site because they have a moral obligation to do so + they are a private company and they can do whatever. Don't like it? Go to liveleak or wherever you fucking Nazis roleplay at.

>there is a difference between a head of state and private corporation.
yeah the head of state actually had more laws protecting him to do what he wanted
no corporations like Google run us
if anything we should have more reason to despise their tyranny

They fucked Microsoft in the ass, they will fuck google in the ass. Its only a matter of time.

are you against private property? fucking commie

>glowing detected

You fucking Peasant, you fucking tilted the pinball machine fucking nigger faggot

I wish Pewdiepie would launch a new platform, he’s easily got the reach for it

Google is FAR from private

You murrican faggots should be contacting your congressmen about this shit instead of just bitching about it here on Sup Forums.

who owns the servers where youtube is running?

No they dont, not under Califronia law that states public places are protected speech places (a grocery store parking lot which is private property is considered public domain and free speech is protected.)

littler.com/publication-press/publication/california-supreme-court-permits-picketing-private-property

Plus, teh supreme court has ruled, any and all private gateways and lands commonly used by the public is protected under freedom of speech. Google is fucked, its only a matter of time.

People will adapt and move on, this is a common thing and will always happen.
Men get nagged, get annoyed, go somewhere new.
The censorship is just nagging soccer mom culture, the people effected by it will just move to a new platform and youtube will go the way of myspace.

are you for oligarchies?
stupid plebian

you censored yourselves when you let them centralize video hosting
along with everything else

...

Yeah but the same way mgtow is a dead-end, people need to stop seeing mods as necessary and beat them/push them down some stairs like a bitch

interesting.
good argument
if the old geezers that run the government actually cared about the internet this could make a very strong case for getting a court decision against big internet companies from censoring people

cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-google-facebook-would-not-exist-without-government-funding

Who do you think????
>Google is a Vundakin savant company


Orrrrr a government funded and controlled paper tiger ???

Use your head ...

I would have the same stance if youtube had a 1% marketshare. A private company should have the right to do business with whoever the fucking want to.

And if youtube doesnt want to host your videos move to an other provider, thats how free markets work.

you got a link to the Supreme Court ruling?

>German cuck
Than people should post revenge porn of mod's girlfriends. They're dead in the water anyway, and it's youtube's liability not any particular shitposter

Witnesses and great point

Quadroon of Cukkad is the most lite weight le based horseshoe centrist on YouTube, the fact that they have banned him will redpill millions, the tribe has absolutely lost their minds with bloodlust for Europeans, incredible.

youtube and google are now platforms where people have the capability to make money or a career.
deplatforming or censoring users on these platforms denies their opportunity to earn capital. especially if you consider youtube being all but a ubiquitous monopoly.
the denial of entrance to the capital market on a common costless platform is wrong on many levels

Google IS internet.

Your data belongs to US.

And your government fears US.

OMG guys my Myspace account was just banned for sending to many mafia wars requests! It's the got damn Filipino s!! Oy veh.

It's been shown that even private videos getting banned, proving it's an internal issue not a gang of activist abusing the report function.

>tube is a private company
>they can censor content
(((((we))))) don’t care
Create your own platform if you care so much

everyone knows every alphabet agency and government on the planet knows everything about everyone else, no one cares, no one has any shame anymore.

Based leaf. Nice IQ, I like the cut of your Jib!!!

YouTube will crumble but we need to increase the clock speed with pressure

bump

...

I don't think any part of the internet should be considered private property
at least not to the extent that they can censor people
the likelihood of Google ever being eclipsed by another search engine appears to be very low at this time
and deny it all you want but to 90% of the modern world Google defines their reality
have an argument?
check google!
first page is the only thing used to determine the winner
want to see the news?
check Google.
want an answer to any question?
check Google!!!

and every day they censor more and more
and even more than censor they intentionally remove results and push results that float a certain political agenda to the front page
Google in many aspects gets to shape people's perception of reality
and so far they have decided to shape it in a liberal progressive way
this is a problem that needs to be addressed in more ways than
"the free market will fix it!"

They haven't fixed anyone's strikes, ppl are still banned ..

>Google employee
Welcome to the shit show faggot we are coming for you soy sippers!!

Comparing JEWISH censorship, to Nazism. You're a fucking Jew; I hope you get Shoa'd next Kike faggot!

>Germans trying to kill off all jews
>only shoot 1/3 of them
Why?

Alex Jones just got sued by a Jewish individual who used to work for him.

www2.itif.org/2014-federally-supported-innovations.pdf

nothing new, commie

Try and force wallmart to sell something you created in their stores. This is wrong in so many levels. Its their plattform they fucking own it.

Lets imagine you owned a Cinema, should the goverment force you to let me sell Popcorn on youre privately owned ground? NO

If you hate private property so much move to NK commiefucks

If you can see the irony go fucking KYS and make it viral for these jewgle f ucks

>I don't think any part of the internet should be considered private property

So who would own, operate and finance the servers?

Marsh v. Alabama (1946)

States any and all places that even resemble public forum or municipality is protected regions of free speech.

Google is fucked, its only a matter of time until the government or private party fucks them right up the ass.

The fucking internet IS NOT PRIVETELY OWNED !!!! never was... never will be schlomo, stop with the Wal-Mart reference. YouTube is the definition of a free to use legal public forum!!!! Free fucking speech you foreign cocksucker

>The fucking internet IS NOT PRIVETELY OWNED

Nice try, but no one is talking about THE INTERNET fucktard. Is about google and their right to fucking host and serve who ever they fucking want to.

THANK.YOU THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANKS. THANK. YOU THANKS THANK.YOU THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANKS. THANK. YOU THANKS
>THANK.YOU THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANKS. THANK. YOU THANKS

Pic related
>death to shills
We overthrew king George for less
>death to shills
We will overthrow Google

JEWTUBE STRIKES AGAIN!!!
>JEWTUBE STRIKES AGAIN!!!
JEWTUBE STRIKES AGAIN!!!
>JEWTUBE STRIKES AGAIN!!!
JEWTUBE STRIKES AGAIN!!!
>JEWTUBE STRIKES AGAIN!!!
JEWTUBE STRIKES AGAIN!!!
>JEWTUBE STRIKES AGAIN!!!

>jewtubers are getting banned
>use the moment to e-beg
never change

does anyone unironically believe this propaganda? what the fuck

"The town of Chickasaw, Alabama, was predominately a company town near Mobile, Alabama, that was owned and operated by the Gulf Shipbuilding Corporation ("Gulf"). The town exhibited the general characteristics of a more traditional settlement. The town's policeman was a deputy from the Mobile County Sheriff's Department who was paid by Gulf. The town was surrounded by a number of adjacent neighborhoods which were not located on Gulf property. The Court noted that the residents of these non-Gulf neighborhoods were freely allowed to use the company-owned streets and sidewalks to access the town's businesses and facilities.

The appellant, Marsh, a Jehovah's Witness, stood near the post office one day, where she began distributing religious literature. Marsh was warned that she needed a permit to do so, and that none would be issued to her. When she was asked to leave, she refused on the grounds that the company rules against distribution of such materials could not be constitutionally applied to her. The deputy sheriff arrested her and she was charged with the Alabama criminal code's trespassing equivalent."

How can you even compare those two, did you even read what that case was about?

Video content can be privately owned if you look at something like bitchute. The video data is stored on users personal computer hard drives, not a companies server.
Since youtube are being faggots, why not just by-pass them and ignore their moralist censorship. peer-to-peer is the future and resolves the censorship issue.

the internet is the exception
the internet is the greatest platform of free speech that we have ever created
to not protect free speech on the internet is to limit the free speech of so many millions
as far as I know all platforms of speech on the internet are owned by companies and corporations
to say that the private companies should be able to limit free speech if they want to is to say that free speech is simply not a part of the internet
and this isn't acceptable
not protecting free speech on the internet in today's Internet dependent world is really just not protecting free speech in general

and yes I favor free speech over private property rights
and there are already laws prohibiting being denied service based on your political views
they're just not enforced at all

the moment the govt funds your business it should considered public property.
i also dont think its fair to equate walmart or the cinema with youtube either given the type of platform it is. but i could see a reasonable policy for allowing someone like walmart to allow companies to provide products to them as long as they meet the criteria of the business (which im pretty sure they already do). if you cant keep up with the supply and demand of being a business partner with walmart theyll find someone who can. that isnt infringing on your opportunity if you suck at meeting the needs of a potential business partner.
the popcorn at the cinema is a part of their business already. thats not a common platform you can just waltz in and compete with. to compete with cinema popcorn you have to start your own business that provides the same service.
youtube is very different in that it is partially subsidized directly as well as indirectly and is a speech/expression platform with no real attainable opportunity to compete. youre talking about two different ballgames, friend

Google and YouTube are private platforms with rules for participation and the right to withdraw content at any time.

If you don't like it, go ahead and create your own platform or use a private medium like IRC.

No Jew-owned global corporation owes you a platform to promote the 2nd Shoah or whatever.

those who choose to make money off of ads
just stop being retarded for one second
big companies like twitter and Facebook aren't going to lose money because they're forced to allow free speech

It's funny to me how reactionary imbeciles truly believe they are being persecuted, to the point of this silly webm

BAKE THE FUCKING CAKE

Bad goyim! That’s hate speech!

>-YOU- tube
>Google and YouTube are private platforms with rules for participation and the right to withdraw content at any time.
what level of ironing are we on now?

The Californian constitution disagrees with you lad

They're private platforms, the right to free speech isn't really relevant to their ability to remove content as they deem fit.

It doesn't even have to be ""hate speech"" they can remove literally any content they feel like for any reason.

f*ck off, don't encourage people to break the law

Google does not owe you a god-damned thing, you pea-brained imbecile. If you don't like their content policy, host your videos elsewhere.

Jews are using this flag alot recently huh??

I believe this and this
firstamendmentschools.org/freedoms/faq.aspx?id=13012

defeat your arguments the internet most definitely deserves public forum status
at least in the US but the UN should agree to enforcing public forum status in as many countries that want to be a part of the UN
and IMO the public forum of the internet should be far more fiercely protected than a public forum in the physical world

Shut up. Companies are America's conscience now. Someone must stop the racists.

>Not migrating to bitchute
>Not creating a far right platform to attack the establishment

>repeats the same point, missing it entirely
fuck off leaf

I just simply post a lot

If you want to make your own rules, put your video on your own damn site.

BAKE THE FUCKING CAKE YOU BIGOT

Yeah the fact that users generate the content and YouTube monetizes it doesn't change anything.

They obviously can't monetize content they ban but that's their call as well.

I just find it ironic that Sup Forums is surprised or upset that a Jewish-owned corporation refuses to serve as a platform for vaguely neo-Nazi views.

Like no shit, next time let's try to not book the Synagogue for our KKK rally.

youtube wasnt always owned by google

What airsoft channel was banned? I like to watch them.

But it was always a private corporation so it changes nothing fundamentally.

The pressure is on from government to all the big corporation to police their content.

I wouldn't be surprised if Sup Forums is taken out someday.

Google and YouTube used USA infrastructure and institutions to grow. The USA made them possible, yet they aren’t required to allow free speech?

>big companies like twitter and Facebook aren't going to lose money because they're forced to allow free speech

theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/25/google-youtube-advertising-extremist-content-att-verizon

Sup Forums cheering for commiefornia, what this place has become

>the moment the govt funds your business it should considered public property.

Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

"No. The Bill of Rights provides protection for individual liberty from actions by government officials. This is called the state-action doctrine. Private property is not government-owned. Restrictions on individuals’ free-speech rights on private property do not involve state action."

My fucking business is not you fucking plattform period.

Gold!!! Free speech on the modern day town square (((internet))) needs to be protected at ALL COSTS .
If sending cherish this right to speak openly then we will all be disappeared
>pic related

it's funny how quickly you kikes change your opinion from private businesses being forced to serve everyone to the zog being allowed to serve only who they like

The Internet itself should remain free, which the USA failed to do by getting rid of Net Neutrality.

In terms of "free speech" vis-a-vis the Internet you're talking about Net Neutrality, not the right to post any content on a private platform.

Free speech in society means a free press, it doesn't mean newspapers are required to print every single letter they receive and not have any editorial policy.

(((Companies))), you mean international Jews.

>you kikes
>Arguing with a strawman
>Implying user has ever said anything in favor of private businesses being forced to serve
>Everyone who disagrees with me is one person

This was one of Hitler's tricks, actually.

so the premise that its a video host FOR YOU means fuck all as long as the letter of the law is followed so no one is offended.

fyi im not a nazi either, you're generalizing pol as though it were one person