I've spent some time thinking about the things Sup Forums believes in so strongly, and come to a realization...

I've spent some time thinking about the things Sup Forums believes in so strongly, and come to a realization. Pol is wrong on almost every issue.

To start, you're completely missing the point and everything you think is actually at odds with reality when you look at the data. In fact, you're nowhere close to being accurate. It's simple to understand when you stop for a second and actually look at the issues. Once you open your eyes, you'll see that you're wrong about each and every one of them, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. If the past is any indication of the future, not only is there no chance that you'll ever be right, all signs suggest you will never even come close once in your lifetime.

I wonder how future historians will see this era.

Yet, you can say why people are wrong.

First off
>flag
Second
>shill
Third
>how vague can you be? You never stated anything nor pointed to anything certain. You did not talk about our certain ideologies or beliefs nor did you dispute anything.
Fourth
>tits or gtfo

Yeah they absorbed science until this pointIf you ask them to go further and read the studies that prove that race mixing creates smarter taller healthier individuals they just chimp out and stick the head on the ground.

What are you even talking about op you unspecific faggot.

Are you trying to say you enjoy sharing your towns and cities with chimps?

There are no "studies" proving any such thing. There are only MSM and liberal-biased articles claiming so.

Why are you wasting your time writing such a dumb post when you could just kill yourself instead?

>Are you trying to say you enjoy sharing your towns and cities with chimps?

Of course he doesn't. He's safe and secure in his gated community so he can easily afford to embrace diversity.

The best the left can offer is talking like a 15 year old girl

...

Your best example without going into some (((study))) are central Asian populations which do have many mixed characteristics. If what you're saying is true that could be easily shown - however, reality and history prove you wrong.

Oh look another pretentious condescendin g smugtard, wanting to tell Sup Forums how smart they are and how dumb Sup Forums collectively is and how you are a paragon of virtue who can tell everyone else what to like, say, do, and think.

Fuck off blowhard noone cares about your bullshit.

Cool story, bro. Would you like to point out a single issue you're talking about, or are we just wrong about everything, and that's that?

1 post by this user...

Respond or get saged.

what u want

>If you ask them to go further and read the studies that prove that race mixing creates smarter taller healthier individuals they just chimp out and stick the head on the ground.

Please show me this study? I've combed the literature and I've found that physically there's no improvement in race-mixing, but mixed race-children have 3x the mental illness rate of white people (who have the highest among single-race people). Show me the study or never post here again.

> I wonder how future historians will see this era.

They will not. All of this is just a bunch of 0s and 1s on a computerdisk. In 100-200 years those disks wil either be long gone, erased, or incomaptible with the technology of the day. Everything on the internet today will be lost, including every Sup Forums thread ever made, so nobody wil ever read anything we write here.
Think I'm pessimistic ? Just ask yourself : Do I have the technology to read punchcards/tapes mainframe computertapes, 8inch floppydisks which are only 40 to 50 years old ?
This century will be a blank for historians

>Inb4 Muh internet-archive. Just 0s and 1s on a lot of disks.

This is a very interesting time either way. I believe it's the first time in the history of the world that governments have consciously decided to replace their native population under the idea that "a native population doesn't exist", while simultaneously punishing its own native population for being the majority (in the form of quotas and welfare that excludes its native population). I think the chinks will look back after having conquered the world and have a great laugh about how unimaginably retarded the west could be to choose to commit suicide over being afraid to be called bad buzzwords.

I want you to point out a single issue that you believe Sup Forums holds and disagree with.

This is the post that most accurately describes my views towards the future.
An authoritarian pro-white Trump government was the only hope we had since Hitler. Maybe this was our last chance.
The big question is: will the west(in the leadership with jews/illuminati) form a western new world order to oppose China? A second possibility is: the west works together with China into a global NWO. The third possibility I see is the west simply destroys itself and China dominates everything.
In this last alternative, maybe if China is kind enough the white men can become their slaves. They could make use of our creativity, and they certainly admire us in certain ways.

>This century will be a blank for historians
That's not how this works. That's not how anything works.

This post is like a photograph of someone in the process of being redpilled

>maybe if China is kind enough the white men can become their slaves

0% chance friendo. China still understands the fundamental law of nature: strong conquer the weak. They see that we are weak and will harvest our organs as they currently do to their own population. It will be a brutal world being ruled by the chinks, we will be genocided in gruesome fashion, but that is the price we pay for violating the fundamental law of nature and letting weak people's conquer us

what are the sample sizes of those studies

>Just ask yourself : Do I have the technology to read punchcards/tapes mainframe computertapes, 8inch floppydisks which are only 40 to 50 years old ?

The more I read this the more retarded it becomes.

How do you think we recorded history prior to the Atari?

Exactly my point: on paper, We can still read books from ages ago. 19th century photographers have left us physical negatives of which we can still make prints, Films from the 1920s can still be reprinted from the original negatives or old prints, but those degrage too.
We don t have negatives of our pictures anymore, often not even a print on paper.
If we want to leave anything we write on Sup Forums for future historians to study, we should start making, printing and laminating screencaps.

Oh, and put me in the screencap.