Why do you need an assault rifle? Just explain that to me. And don't give me that tyranny, tinfoil hat bullshit.
Because from where I'm standing I see no reason someone should be able to own an assault rifle like this. And it's incredibly telling when teens have to be the voice of reason in this country.
I need it to potentially shoot people if a situation requires.
Thread
Fuck the police
BAIT
A
I
T
SHALL
Obviously to shoot uppity government officials and shills who violate my rights and try to oppress me, as was intended by the Constitution
SHART
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
read your constitution
I own several because you never know when people become impolite and you have to kill several of them rapidly.
It's sort of like a contingency plan, never know when you need to, but nice to know that you're prepared if the potential happens.
Fuck off, it's not called the Bill of Needs.
>if a situation requires.
Um, no, it's called dialing 911 instead of living out one of your little wild west fantasies.
If you’re so insistent on posting this bait every single day, you could do better than to use a squirrel rifle in a cheap plastic stock.
Sage
To defend myself if the need arises. Also for fun. That’s not an “assault” rifle either way. Stop posting bait threads. Sage goes in all fields
Why do you need an assault bait ? Just tell that to me.
also making people dead is real useful
Number of unarmed civilians killed by governments in the 20th century alone:
260 Million
Tyrannic governments can and are overthrown with gun laws. People are renewable resources. Rights are not.
Don't let these shill yanks take away your rights. I wish we had our gun rights still.
>when teens have to be the voice of reason
The same teens we have to tell not to eat tide pods?
It's fun as fuck to shoot beer bottles in the woods with your friends.
>assault rifle
>shows a dressed up hunting rifle from Yugoslavia
Kek
posts pussy assed .22
Is that an sks?
>squirrel rifle
Riiight...stop trying to minimize the issue, shithead!
I'm telling you that people are using guns like that, with extended clips that fire hundreds of rounds in a matter of seconds to kill Americans and you're response is "but it has a cheap stock"? Go fuck yourself.
Why don't you find a new picture you FUCKING FAGGOT
>it's called dialing 911
FUCK THE POLI--- oh wait....
fpbp. shut it down
You would actually need testosterone to understand.
I want one and I'm not going to shoot anyone up with it. Boy that was easy
Why revolution is necessary and hence why America needs guns.
Also the threat of an impending civil war. Probably the only thing keeping that in check is the fact that most of the right wing are gun owners, once they've been disarmed, their asses will be ripe of big black dick.
You mean like dialing 911 and thn having 4 armed police officers wait outside my school until the shooting is almost over?
I need a defense rifle, but nobody has invented one yet. So until they do, I'll take a rifle that shoots out bullets.
Hmmm. Maybe because leftist shitlords like to block freeways, burn down cities, and engage in mob violence?
Nah, can't think of ANY REASON AT ALL to own an "assault rifle".
Erm if you are in the army?
I think guns are cool, having weapons have always been the right of the warrior class. Now anyone can own one and I like exercising that right as a land owning nu yeoman.
1. they're fun
2. people need the ability to outgun the govt
3. ^^^this isn't really needed because the Army won't side with you gun-grabbing kikes when you declare your endgame
4. S A G E
its fun.
to kill people who want to kill me, no other reason required
It takes a really sick faggot to do that to a Ruger 10/22. The only reason for a polymer stock is if you get the takedown model.
No, that’s literally chambered for what appears to be .22, 9mm, or .45 and regardless of ammo type that’s a piece of shit in a composite stock.
I need an assault rifle because killing shills in other various methods is a pain in the ass. When I firebomb a shill’s house with a Molotov, the gasoline stinks up my trunk for days. When I cut one apart with a chainsaw, getting the bloodstained hair out of the teeth is a PITA. I’m running out of cinder blocks for when I have to drown them.
But $20 for a box of 500 rounds....that’s like 500 SharesBlue and CTR shills I can off for cheap.
just like those 4 police officers who were cowards who didn't go in to the Florida highschool to stop the shooting?
calling the police sure worked out there you fucking stupid ass shill
SHALL
Why do you need freedom of speech? Explain that to me.
NOT
>from where I’m standing
Not an argument
LOL thats not an assault weapon dude... It shoots .22 LR ammo. Its for hunting small animals
Who said we "need" it? It's just our right, doesn't matter whether we need it or not. Do you "need" a pool in your back yard? No, but you have every right to do so.
And if those moronic teens cared about the lives of other teens, why aren't they trying to ban alcohol and cars? Drunk drivers kill WAY more teens than mass shootings.
Checkmate. You lose.
Seriously, even a near miss from an assault rifle like you pictured will collapse lungs and detach limbs. Pic related, your rifle versus military grade bullet resistant ballistic gel...
Why do I need to need something to justify owning it?
...
...
this
guns are tools
>average 8 minute police response time
>wait for shooting to end before entering
so im supposed to sit at the mercy of an intruder until the officers arrive and decide to help? by that time im likely dead and the perpetrator long gone
>dialing 911
What so they can shoot your dog and call someone to clean up the crime scene?
>Why do you need an assault rifle?
For the same reason Rosa Parks NEEDED to sit in the front of the bus. It's not called the Bill of Needs, you colossal faggot.
what about people who live out in the country were the police response time can be upwards to 15 minutes or more?
WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THE WOLF COMES KNOCKING AT YOUR DOOR?
Why do politicians/celebrities say people shouldn't have guns but they have armed security protecting them?
>tinfoil hat bullshit
You need to wake up friend.
pbs.org
it's a little thing we like to call hypocrisy
>And don't give me that tyranny, tinfoil hat bullshit
That is literally the reason the 2nd amendment was made though. Thats like saying
>why does anyone need food/nutrition?
>and dont give me that “i will starve to death without it” tinfoil hat bullshit
You could use them for target practice, but thats not a need. The right to defend yourself, your land, and your freedom is a need for weapons like the one in your pic. If you disagree you are delusional.
Heres a question for you. Why do you trust politicians to make decisions for your best interest when there is not a single one alive that has shown themselves to be anything other than power grabbing, money stealing, lying human scum?
And what happens when some dip shit HS teacher who is not oh so stable mentally decides to use that tool out of anger?
If you think you can trust people with guns without extensive psychological checks then look at the % of fuckers who shoot people for no substantial reason vs those that went through such psych checks.
Guns make the weak strong. They literally, unironically empower women, sexual and racial minorities who lack in physical prowess or (in their minds) political agency. The second amendment didn't even become a political issue until the black panthers in Oakland started asserting themselves by walking around with shotguns, and when they were harassed by police it got rural whites to flip out and make the protection of gun ownership a major political platform.
Only white soccer moms and white soy boys hate guns, ironically the people who could benefit from them the most if they'd grow a pair and learn how to use one
Where i live it would take the police a good 20 minutes to reach me. Im going to shoot a nigger if he breaks into my house instead of trusting that he is just there to take my stuff and not murder witnesses.
It's called having strong locks, windows, and doors. Are you this stupid?
The NRA supported the CA no open carry laws in 1967, then has the audacity to make CA a butt of their jokes, when they literally started the cancer.
Support the GOA.
Don't play the libtards game. "Assault rifles" cannot be purchased in the United States.
Semi-automatics rifles are not "assault rifles" and anyone who asserts that they are is an Indian of the bad kind.
>hundreds of rounds in a matter of seconds
This is bait. Everyone stop feeding this shit.
Its a 10/22
This
To fight the US government if it ignores the constitution and starts to oppress its own citizens
that's why the other teaches have guns as well to stop threats in the gun free zone
You've reached full-dependence, "only government can protect me"... Pitiful.
FPBP
So that when you try to take them we can shoot you faggot
You expect me to buy windows made out of 1/2” thick shatter proof plexi glass? Because all it takes is a rock to make through anything less than that. I mean if the guy has a gun I basically need bullet proof windows to keep him out. Do you see how expensive and rediculous that sounds?
This is bait. This whole thread is bait.
SAGE
>Spend 50k on anti-niggering your home
VS
>Spend 500 USD on a shotgun and 20 dollars on slugs
Then again, user, let's make a compromise: gas all Jews, Indians, Arabs, Blacks, and Latinos, and then you can have my guns. Deal?
...
Why do you need locks? I don't see anything in the constitution about having a right to them. Why don't you just leave your door open and call the police if there's an issue?
Stop calling it a fucking assault rifle. You've made up this retard emotional term as a lynch pin for your no existent argument.
Stop it.
Just fucking stop it.
try hunting a Grizzly bear or mountain lion without one
Yes because you certainly fit the criteria for a well regulated militia.
>I wont accept the reason we have this right as a reason we should have this right, debate me; also any points you have I wont accept either.
>I have the same mental capacity as a child, I follow my feelings and the pretty pictures of a few events on the screen and not logic or reason.
Sorry to burst your little echo chamber bubble, sweetie, but this is not bait.
"Well regulated" as in "a well regulated clock does not need to be periodically adjusted to tell the proper time"
Militia refers to the organized and unorganized militia. The organized militia is the army national guard and the unorganized militia consists of every able bodied man, able and willing to fight, from the ages of 17-45
All of these threads are bait, you pathetic (you) farmer.
First define what an assault rifle is retard, then i can tell you why i need one.
Why did Rosa Parks sit at the front of the bus? We don't need to justify our God given rights to you liberals.
>don't give me that tyranny, tinfoil bullshit
Go look at britian bud, need me a TV license.
>Inb4 You don't need it because I don't want you having it
>Inb4 I feel like it's dangerous so it's time to get rid of them
>Inb4 calling every gun an assault rifle never mind the act of 1994
>Inb4 Look at all these killings. But nvm don't look at all these blacks being only less than 20% of the population, commiting 50% of the murders in the USA.
>Inb4 All this was a troll and I trolled you lololol 2013 was my best year for trolling hahaha lolololol get noob pounded scrub lord.
IGNORE SHILL THREADS
archive.4plebs.org
View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO NOTamusket.jpg, 55KiB, 900x338
Anonymous ID:yMtKvtHP Mon 05 Mar 2018 21:26:44 No.162863831 ViewReport
Why do you need an assault rifle? Just explain that to me. And don't give me that tyranny, tinfoil hat bullshit.
Because from where I'm standing I see no reason someone should be able to own an assault rifle like this. And it's incredibly telling when teens have to be the voice of reason in this country.
View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO 1519975187538.jpg, 55KiB, 900x338
Anonymous ID:uCgilDD1 Fri 02 Mar 2018 20:30:01 No.162483733 ViewReport
Why do you need an assault rifle? Just explain that to me. And don't give me that tyranny, tinfoil hat bullshit.
Because from where I'm standing I see no reason someone should be able to own an assault rifle like this one.
And don't try and tell me it's fun or whatever. I've shot one. They are very loud and make your wrist and shoulder hurt. Not "fun" in the slightest.
View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO NOTamusket.jpg, 55KiB, 900x338
Anonymous ID:ENQjGFEJ Fri 02 Mar 2018 09:19:47 No.162438068 ViewReport
Why do you need an assault rifle? Just explain that to me. And don't give me that tyranny, tinfoil hat bullshit.
Because from where I'm standing I see no reason someone should be able to own an assault rifle like this one.
View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO NOTamusket.jpg, 55KiB, 900x338
Anonymous ID:JC3VKyQR Fri 02 Mar 2018 05:34:14 No.162420085 ViewReport
Why does anybody NEED an assault rifle? These weapons of war have no business on our streets and are only being used to terrorize our nation. The second amendment was written in a time when all we had were primitive guns and does not apply to assault rifles despite what the NRA tries to tell you.
130 replies
307 replies
Over 500 replies with this one, that's enough to answer the question.
UM, NO SWEETIE. HAHHA WRONG BABY OMG YASSSSSSS SLAYYYYYYYYYYYY
...
IF THE folkish and National Socialist State sees its main
task in educating and preserving the bearer of the State,
it is not enough to promote the racial elements as such, to
educate them thereafter and finally to train them for practi-
cal life, but it is necessary that it bring its own organiza-
tion into harmony with this task.
It would be a folly to appraise man's value according to
his race, that means to declare war against the Marxist
viewpoint, Man is equal to man, if on the other hand, one is
nevertheless not determined to draw the ultimate conse-
quences from this. The ultimate consequence of the recogni-
tion of the importance of the blood, that means the racial
basis in general, is, however, the transmission of this evalua-
tion to the individual person. Just as in general I have to
evaluate the nations differently on the basis of the race
to which they belong, thus also the individuals within a
national community. The statement that a people is not
equal to a people is then transmitted to the individual
within a national community in the sense that a head can-
not be equal to a head, because here too the elements of
the blood may be the same, in great lines, but in individ-
ual cases are nevertheless subject to thousandfold, most
minute differentiations.
t The first consequence of this realization is at the same
time, I would say, the cruder one, that is, the attempt to
promote those racial elements that have been recognized as
racially most valuable within the national community and
to care for their special increase.
This task is cruder for the reason that one can recognize,
and solve it almost mechanically. It is more difficult,
however, to recognize, in the community of all, those heads
that are mentally and ideally most valuable indeed, and to
give them that influence which not only is due these superior
minds, but which above all is beneficial to the nation.
>only police and military should be arm-
youtube.com
You wouldn't understand OP we will need the munitions when we eventually build our outer heaven. Hard to fight geopolitical war against the deep state without basic arms.
A view of life which, by rejecting the democratic mass idea,
endeavors to give this world to the best people, that means to
the most superior men, has logically to obey the same aristo-
cratic principle also within this people and has to guarantee
leadership and highest influence within the respective people
to the best heads. With this it does not build up on the idea of
the majority, but on that of the personality.^
He who believes today that a National Socialist folkish
State can be distinguished from other States perhaps purely
mechanically by a better construction of its economic life,
that means by a better balance of richness and poverty or
by granting a greater share in deciding on the economic
process to a larger part of the population, or by a juster
payment for work, by elimination or too great differences in
wages, has become stuck in the most superficial aspect of
the matter and has not the faintest idea of what we call a
view of life. All that has just been described does not offer
the least guaranty for permanency and even far less for a
claim on greatness. A people that would not go beyond
these merely exterior reforms would not in the least receive
by this a guaranty for its victory in the general struggle of
the nations. A movement that sees the substance of its
mission only in such a generally balancing, and certainly
just, development will in reality not bring about a powerful
and genuine, because deep-going, reform of the existing
conditions, as its entire activity gets ultimately stuck in
mere superficialities, without giving the people that inner
preparedness which makes it finally overcome, I almost
want to say with compelling security, those weaknesses
from which we have to suffer today.
In order to understand this more easily it is perhaps
expedient to cast once more a glance at the real origins and
causes of the development of human culture.
To defend against other people with assault rifles.
>And don't give me that tyranny, tinfoil hat bullshit.
Tough shit, it's what you're getting. Give me a reasonable explanation as to why it's bullshit? Representative societies like ours have been VERY rare in the whole scope of human history. We're the exception not the norm.
The first step which visibly distinguished man from the
animal was that towards invention. Invention itself is
originally based upon the finding of tricks and ruses the use
of which makes the struggle for life with other weapons
easier and sometimes alone makes it come out favorably.
These most primitive inventions do not yet allow the
personality to become clearly visible, because they become
conscious to the later, or rather to the present human
spectator, only as a mass phenomenon. Certain tricks and
sly measures which man is able to observe, for instance, in
the animal, catch his eye only summarily, and as he cannot
ascertain or examine their origin any more, he helps himself
simply by calling such incidents 'instinctive 9 ones.
In our case, however, the latter word does not mean
anything. For he who believes in a higher development of
living beings has to admit that any demonstration of their
urge for living and fighting must once have had a begin-
ning; that one individual will have started with this, and
that such a procedure has repeated itself more and more
often and has spread more and more, till finally it passed
into the subconscious mind of all members of a certain
species, and then appeared in the form of instinct.
One will understand and believe this more easily with
man himself. His first intelligent measures in the fight with
other animals have certainly been, according to their
origin, acts of certain particularly able individuals. Here,
too, personality undoubtedly was once motive for decisions
and executions which were later adopted as matters of
course by entire mankind. Exactly as any military matter
of fact, which today has become the basis of all strategy,
primarily owes its origin to some individual head and be-
came completely natural and generally valid only in the
course of many, perhaps even thousands of years.