Starting to unironically become a monarchist. Is this the final red pill?

Starting to unironically become a monarchist. Is this the final red pill?

Other urls found in this thread:

stageirites.fr/2014/11/definition-augustinisme-mandonnet/
youtube.com/watch?v=ig_qpNfXHIU
youtube.com/watch?v=B-m9A8mY-U0
youtube.com/watch?v=TYwcgQfh49k
youtu.be/-ZujhoHZBsg
youtu.be/Rzjxy1rrkng
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrygian_cap
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Yes.
Race is extended family, and a family needs a patriarch.
Religious monarchy is the best way to go.

Yes, be the perpetual beta cuck of someone else you call "sovereign."

What is that stick with the red horn on top?

Jesus is the King of Kings, not the President of Presidents. Religion definitely plays a role.

After seeing the movie Black Panther, I too became a monarchist.

Theocratic monarchy.

Best form of government if done correctly.
It will probably never be attempted again though.

This automatically makes the British royal family the best.

Fuck off. Fascism is superior to monarchy. We should have a race based, state based monarchy. Fascism is the modern monarchy.

The founding fathers of the nation literally escaped monarchy to establish their own republic. You sir, are a retard.

You can have any (right wing)ideology + a monarch.
The monarch brings stability, unity and tourism.
It's some french thing?

Wat

you're already living under fascism, it just happens that you're not represented (assuming you're non-muslim)

Should not have absolute monarchies, but definitely need leaders tied to the land and the people.

>putting national-socialism and fascism in the trash
Disgusting.
They are needed to renew the elites when they're too decadent (1789 didn't happen all of a sudden).

Also, the current Houses are completely degenerate.
Thinking that blood carries legitimacy or power is a judeomorph attitude.

Heresy.

For me the Reactionary path made the most sense.

Papa smurfism

Jacobinism ie republicanism

What the hell do you think it's going to be during the millennial reign of Christ?

>wanting to be ruled by reptilians
Take the Icke pill my faggot

Me too user
I love Saudi Arabia

You’re a retard but checked

>unironically supporting inbred degenerates

LMFAO y'all niggas still mad that Louis got the guillotine so many centuries ago

The Reactionary path is fully blown surnaturalism, i.e. a heresy that is the modernists' one.

The "right wing socialism" path is equally shit because it mixes good things (Sorel, Mosley, Schmitt, Codreanu, Degrelle) with bad ones (Duginist bullshit, Cioran) and don't even recommend Hitler nor Mussolini.

As for the central one, libertarians are completely illiterate on the definition of Common Good and are very much a sort of jewry, so, bad.

Theocracy is surnaturalist by essence.
Nature and surnature are two distinct "fields", even if connected. You cannot do a theocratic state if you're a Catholic, since it's a heresy.
It can be called political augustinism, which is « the absence of any distinction between the philosophical and theological fields, i.e. this of the rational truth and that of Revelated truth, ruining the constitution of a genuine political science. »
from stageirites.fr/2014/11/definition-augustinisme-mandonnet/

Christianity is the final red pill. Monarchy is a consequence. (((They))) will tell you otherwise

To have a monarchy, you must have a religious culture since monarchy is a religious system. For this reason, british monarchy is a hoax

I'm afraid that in this age, when so many people live in degenerate big cities, when people have more and more mental issues, a religious monarchy is impossible, because it isn't suited for contemporary temperament of people

Monarchy is for moral, restrained people, capable of respecting tradition, whereas nowadays we have night clubbing, drugged up and vulgar people, and in addition to that radical chauvinists are appearing on the surface in the form of alt right

Monarchy is a gift from Providence. One cannot plan it sadly. We have to wait until Providence decides to endow us with a sane political system

LMFAOOO HOLY SHIT

>new testament
>1984
>animal farm

a mixture of brainlet intellectualism and HURR POL IS A CHRISTIAN BOARD xD

also 'The Prince' is satire

>tier 2

>calvin

lmao

>tier 3
>just getting into kant

OMG this is like a brainlets list lmfao

Yes, you should worship a 90 year old thott in another country. This is the only way to save this country.

Learn to speak properly or kindly fuck off.

Don't be parasite sympathizer O.P

>also 'The Prince' is satire
The other stuff you said is fine but this one statement turned your entire post into a brainlet meme

>To have a monarchy, you must have a religious culture
Only if you have the Prince elected by the people, but you know for sure that democracy is bad in essence.

If not, you have to have a very strong and prepared dictator at first (and that's what we'll need), very fashy and nat-soccy, enforcing Christian morals onto its subjects with very severe punishments for people that publicly go against it, with children taken away from their parents in order to be raised as good Christians and citizens if their parents are known to be degenerate/ill-treating their children.
Then you start to have a more and more virtuous society.

This will never be in the opposite (people starting to get virtuous by themselves and finally wanting a monarchy).

>Then you start to have a more and more virtuous society.
Bullshit

The memory of being brutally forced to adopt certain views and customs would in the end explode in an antichristian resentment because people don't forget the past and people rather prefer to be convinced and respected than brutally forced to do something. Sometimes force is necessary but it's better when people adopt views because they find them convincing and preferable. If they adopt certain views because of fear, then once authority becomes weak, people can abandon those views and lash out against authority

The redpill here is not that this is necessarily the best form of government, but that this is what humans naturally tend towards.

youtube.com/watch?v=ig_qpNfXHIU

This video explains the inherent stablility of a dynastic system.

No is the most stupid one
you should feel bad for being an idiot

National Socialism liked to depict the Fuhrer as a king, and liked to view the national socialist state as some kind of modern anarchy.

this is a lesson on machiavelism more than an explanation on why dynasties are "natural"

True leadership functions through example, not totalitarianism. Forcing people to do [thing] only makes people hate [thing] and indicates that [thing] is invalid.

Ideologues, please leave.

remember when Monarchists ruled in Europe?
what a time it was...
youtube.com/watch?v=B-m9A8mY-U0

>surrendering your life and property to a rich philosopher king
>red pill

Just let his majesty fuck your wife while you're at it

It was better when the Fuhrer ruled Germany.

National transhumanism is the final redpill

Yes. But only if it is an absolute monarchy.
If you think a King is just a clown with a crown, you have more red pills to swallow.

P.S. - A good monarchy is 5% about the King and 95% about his subjects.

Not entirely. Because your Kings don't rule anymore.
And Kings don't need to rule, they just need to be able to rule at any time, by their own volition.

I have taking the king pill. But now I think it should go a step further. Create Monarcho-fascism

based Kaiserreich
>Ruled by intellectuals, aristocracy and centuries old German monarchy.
>Free society that was the financial and cultural centre of Europe
>2nd largest navy in the world
>Largest army in the world
>3rd largest economy in the world
>Born from great politicians, military commanders and victories
>Military commanders appointed on the battlefield
>Had overseas colonies
>Kicked Russia's ass and sent it into total chaos
>Emperor didn't constantly interfere in his generals' plans
>Respected it's allies who were important, helped them and in return their allies helped them
>Enemy armies barley stepped foot in the homeland
>Signed an armistice because they didn't want to drag their people into a war that could no longer be won
>Didn't become communist after falling
>Missed so much by it's people that they were willing to see any sort of return to it

Fuhrer 's third "reich"
>Ruled by occultist drug addicts, commoners and a mentally damaged Austrian
>Brainwashed and enslaved police state that didn't care for German history or culture
>Navy small and weak
>Flag taken from fucking Hindus
>Economy run on an unsustainable model only fit for war
>Country born from coups, treachery and purges
>Military commanders appointed at dinner parties
>Failed miserably in overseas conquests
>Absolutely obliterated by Russia
>"Führer" constantly interfered with his generals' plans, punishing those who slightly opposed anything he did
>Unnecessarily brought the USA against it because gook allies randomly attacked the USA halfway across the world
>Hated it's allies and used them as satellites
>Dragged on the war until the entire country was in literal ruins, it's women raped and military annihilated
>Forced teenagers and pensioners to fight for a cause lost years ago
>Half the country continues as collectivist police state except with a different paint job, still hasn't recovered to this day
>Hated by the German people and the world

monarchy is superior

youtube.com/watch?v=TYwcgQfh49k

>P.S. - A good monarchy is 5% about the King and 95% about his subjects.

gee, why is history so replete with bad monarchs, then? hmmmmmmmmmm

Fascism had its day.
Integralism (you know what I mean) can be revived, and it will be very close to fascism.
What is the problem with fascism? It tends to *need* the support of the masses for legitimacy.

It is, it’s the only form of government that has stood the test of time. Welcome to the monarchy pill brother!

>american
>wants a monarchy
are you a nigger or just retarded?

A French anti monarchy pro republic movement, much like the American revolutionaries.

I know you are French.
What if one of the biggest red pills is that France needs to cease to exist?
I mean, before 1789 every region had its own "way" its own Tradition.

Every country needs to find what works for itself. Down with the empires! (France, Spain, Germany)

Silly was well aware of the Jewish problem as well

This.

Did you not notice the misspelling of civilization? Dd you make there yourself. Jesus.

>there are some bad monarchs
>therefore monarchy itself is a bad system
>there are some bad presidents
>therefore republicanism itself is a bad system

EVERY MAN A KING

Willy*

Fascism is reactionary garbage that failed to stand the test of time. Hitler was nothing but a 20th century Napoleon.

Yes, monarchy is the best form of government.

silly Willy

I for monarchy but it can be improved. The best system would be an elective monarchy. Each family of pure local ethnicity would be given the states of noble family. only someone from one of these families would would be able to run for election. Any marrying outside out of the noble cast would mean losing all noble privileges.

Monarchical National Socialism

What people think does not matter if it is erroneous + there is no rational argument against Catholicism.

Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

Perdon me, but you just show that you have the mentality of a democrat.

You cannot understand that true freedom is not about having rights or whatever.

Also, you can have both example AND totalitarianism (which is not negative as you may think). For example, nazi Germany.

Nips or GTFO

A complete tool with a government packed with masons, crypto jews and faggots. One the essential pieces in creating WW1, the Russian Revolution and WW2.

HERESY. DELETE THAT PIC

How about a meritocratic monarchy? You have to prove yourself worthy of the crown.

I miss the Kaiser very much.
youtu.be/-ZujhoHZBsg
youtu.be/Rzjxy1rrkng

Terrible. That defeats the purpose of monarchy

You are a fucking morn and your dog shit country, your inbred retarded soldiers, and the kikes (as well as all those fucking retarded Russians) were the reason the third Reich failed, but there is nothing wrong with the ideology on its own.

1) Monarchy was always the choice of men.
2) Monarchy was always for and by some men, it needs not the consent nor the aproval of the masses for legitimacy. I want it to have, it is good when it has. But an heir to the throne doesn't go asking the poor and downtrodden for votes; much less does he asks leftists for permission.

why?

>Is this the final red pill
No, but it's further along then many on Sup Forums still stuck on egalitarian derived models like Democracy or Communism.

Read Moldbug.

Monarchs are born and bred to rule. They needn’t prove anything. Should one fail his house another will take its place then

>Prove yourself worthy of the crown

To who?

You don’t elect Kings.

A fucking morn? BNP education at its finest!

tell that to the holy roman empire.

...

>what are separations of power
>what are checks and balances
are you a russian with a proxy?

Meh everything is great if you leave communism out

Monarchy is really a hit or miss sort of thing, you can get a great leader or you can get a shit leader, it's just the genetic lottery. Think about it this way, if there were absolute monarchies across the west, the kikes would have only had to convince one man to embrace degeneracy instead of entire countries. Of course, you could just not have Jews, but that is a different issue...

Nah. It's more "greener pastures on the other side" type of stuff

The ultimate redpill is that humanity is cancer and it should all be fully destroyed, something that's doing already by itself

>Hanoverians
>legitimate Heirs
kek.

to the 5 tribes
by fighting their champion if they chose to challenge

Fpbp

There are easier ways, my friend. Easier ways...

Elections create liars and cheats. The contestants will make the same promises all politicians make. You cannot ever trust a word a politician utters. Monarchs do not and should not need to be politicians. This will just turn into every other democratic system

Monarchy is the lead pill, stop larping

And the hre fell to the same political game making that destroys all countries. It is what is going on in America right now

sounds like an anime and anime is gay

Republicanism.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrygian_cap

>I want authoritarianism, nepotism and class divide!!!

OP is retarded

Monarchies are older and were more extensive. Democracy is the larp

Jacobins were much closer to soviets than yanks really, tall poppy syndrome masquerading as equality

On the contrary, empire is the best, if it respects local custom. Nationalist actually tend to destroy local custom for the sake of a unified nation (think destroying dialecgts, banning local traditions in favor of national ones) a good empire respects local custom while performing the duties of a national state