Where is Sup Forums on the political spectrum?

Where is Sup Forums on the political spectrum?
>8values.github.io/

Other urls found in this thread:

politiscales.net/en_US/results/
politiscales.net/en_US/results/?m0=36&m1=24&t1=14&t0=57&c0=5&c1=81&p1=40&p0=19&s0=12&s1=71&j0=36&j1=31&femi=10&e0=43&e1=36&b0=5&b1=81&comp=100
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Nice data mining, faggot. Fuck off.

Fuck, you've got me figured out ;)
Your IP address tells me you're John Moore from Austin Texas, can you confirm?

This is now fascist thread

Nice one bro

>8 values
>2018
>not using the superior test

I'm more into pic related, but Hitler had him killed :(

...

Link please

politiscales.net/en_US/results/

Got Family, Fatherland, Revolution on politiscales.

pleb

Holy cow!

Well easy for you, you all have the Nazi gene.

thx

Damn look at all you fascists and Nazis!

You need a dose of... Neo-Liberalism... whatever that is.

R A D I C AL
C E N T R I S M

Most of the questions are too simplistic to derive anything meaningful

hmmm I don't believe in idealism though. I'm very much a pragmatist. Perhaps I answered some question wrong; I'm tired and couldn't understand half of them :P

I'm a centrist, AKA a modern day nazi
(I'd also like to point out that I'm not patriotic for Canada, but I believe that nations should mind their own business, so I guess that's more patriotic)

...

loving the flag of Japan with the colors reversed

...

Tried the other one; PolitiScales, and I guess the outcome is simialr, although some of the questions I couldn't even answer, hence the somewhat large neutrality.

Already did this a while ago

this is how you do it, lads

You haven't gotten me yet Sup Forums

t. baito

Too much communism and regulation. No wonder Sweden is failing. Good sense of nationalism though; maybe Swedes are finally aware of the atrocities flooding in.

I'm answering for a potential utopian, homogenic swedish society. I don't have a problem with regulation and socialism as long as I'm helping my kin.
Swedes are not really prone to go on welfare.
When I have to pay for welfare niggers, I'm way more capitalistic. But still think that companies should be regulated in some ways.

And Sweden is not failing due to socialism or regulation. It's failing because of welfare niggers, crime and outsourcing.

Masterrace

The individual > The nation

had to stop at around question 20. the questions are completely stupid.

The nation = The people.
So since you're from Brazil, I totally get your point. Everyone for themselves in such a case, I guess.

...

Sup Forums is more on a .... different spectrum
if you know what I mean

Anything under 80% essentialism can be considered "master race".

can't*

anyone more then 10% "equality" needs to kill themselves

My presidente doesn't represente me, i think half of America could say the same

Leave my private property alone REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>he is not a right wing populist with libertarian sympathies
SAD!

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right.

politiscales.net/en_US/results/?m0=36&m1=24&t1=14&t0=57&c0=5&c1=81&p1=40&p0=19&s0=12&s1=71&j0=36&j1=31&femi=10&e0=43&e1=36&b0=5&b1=81&comp=100

mirin essentialism score a dearthair

eat dick

Is there more of this comic book? I've been looking everywhere for it. I must have it.

...

Its more fun to help in reducing your life quality by supporting higher taxes.

...

earn your own way you fucking lazy piece of trash

No ill rather take from you tbqh senpai

interesting

You're going to cause someone to tread on you with that attitude, meme flag.

Don't you think there is a middle line?
If Canada was a homogenous society, would you be okay with paying taxes so poor fags could get health care?
If a child get's cancer, and her parents can't pay for it. Do you still think it's everybody for themselves?

Like, I'm not okay with paying fucking 50% in tax money for shitskins and junkies. But I would be if the money went to publicly owned roads, railways, schools and hospitals for white Swedes.

Going full socialism is retarded but so is full capitalism. I don't want to be a slave under a government or some kike insurance company, lol.

...

...

took this test 2 times, got the same results

insurance is a scam. We should be able to just pay for what we want when we want, under no circumstance should we be forced to pay for insurance.

Yeah I got the same shit. Apparently it's the result you get if you are a sane human being.

> love my race and country, but we don't need to nuke each other. Mass migration == genocide.
> I'm not a commie, just let the free market do its thing
> people should be free to do what they want. No, gay marriage isn't freedom, it's forcing your ideas upon others. You can still buttfuck each other without my blessing.
> scientific progress empowers humanity. Throwing away ethics and morality is not scientific progress.

I mean wtf. Just because I believe that the white race is the master race, I have to be an authoritarian faggot? Just because I like freedom I have to be ok with white genocide?

Yeah just let people die in the streets. Brilliant idea.

Insurance was just an example. And you are already not forced to pay for it, but if tax money is not paying for your health care, you're going to need one.

You're still not answering my questions though. If you're not paying for anything in advance, how do you think you're going to hold up in a crisis.
Let's say you get shot and you don't have an insurance.
Congratulations, that's a tasty bill that may be impossible for you to pay.
You lose your job since you got shot, and all your money was wasted on your operation. Now you're on the street sucking dick for hamburger money and your free market keeps on rolling. Freedom.

Every time

>And you are already not forced to pay for it,
car insurace
>If you're not paying for anything in advance, how do you think you're going to hold up in a crisis.
Save some of your money? Also part of the reason medical bills are so expensive is that they can overcharge due to people not caring how much the bill is cause they have insurance or taxes paying for it.

the guy who shot me should pay the bill. Even if that weren't the case, I can borrow the money and just pay it off over time. In the end, I still end up paying less than if I had insurance. Also, what if I don't get shot? Then I am just paying for a beurocrat to buy his yacht.

> Yeah just let people die in the streets.
You mean people not doing anything for me, themselves or society? absolutely!

Master race reporting in :v)

Based.

I'm scrolling through these threads from time to time. I always see a lot of Centrists. Like 50% or more. Yet, whenever I make a Centrist thread it gets flooded with "kys kike faggot".

Why?

>car insurance
yeah sure, that's a stupid one I agree.
>Save some of your money?
How do you know you got enough money for a cancer treatment? Or a shot wound?
Should you have a buffert if you kid gets diabetes and your dad alzheimers at the same time. What happens if you get terminally ill and can't work?
Eh no, I rather pay a percentage each month so I don't have to stack an unsure amount of money "just in case".
By that way I can also help other families of my people to get treatment if they far ill.

You're also not okay with paying taxes for infrastructure or house building I guess? Just let unregulatd companies have their way for maximum profit.
Share holders are known for being moral when not regulated I've heard.

thats weird because i took the The Political Sextant, and i got the principles of the three people as my first the other two were about fascism and then extreme fascism.

Those tests are shit
I am NS and i already know that

...

>the guy who shot me should pay the bill
Probably would in a fair society. You can't always account for a criminal to have money tough. And after all, it was just an example. There is other ways to far ill then getting shot.

>I can borrow the money
Being in debt to jewish banks is not what I would call a healthy society.
I rather take care of my nation and family. Everybody puts their straw to the stack. Of course this only works in a homogeneous society, with high trust and respect for each other, as I mentioned before.

As Sweden was only 20 years ago.

And if you didn’t have a welfare state, you wouldn’t fail :) shame we’ve all got them...

check this

>*If we didn't have a liberal immigrant policy
Of course you could make the argument that the foreigners are coming for the gibs. Which is true.
But our welfare state worked perfectly before they came. So the problem is not the welfare state itself, it's the abuse of it.

For the record, I don't support people being on welfare. I think they should be forced in to some kind of mandatory labour if they're going to get money. Picking trash, cleaning the streets, building roads, dams or what ever.

yeah no sure it is better to fatten the jew even before getting shot. So if I don't get shot do I get the money back? Having to pay if you get shot discourages risky behavior, you know. It's like communism: if you don't pay for something, you are less careful with it. If I have to pay for my treatment, I will make sure not to get in a dangerous situation. I will not smoke and live healty. If I get ill anyway, I'll pay, it's no big deal. If it's too expensive, maybe that means I'm not so valuable to society. So maybe it's best if I just die. Sometimes the free market tells us something that we don't want to hear.

The wokest

...

Sup Forums is a fascist and national socialist board.

>17% Commie
>Autistic looking flag
>Family * Work * Fatherland
You have it all backwards kiddo

...

All these are acceptable. All others are gay nigger faggots.

Hello bruder

>yeah no sure it is better to fatten the jew even before getting shot
Well, I hope your peope, which your government is reflecting is not entirely jewish.

>So if I don't get shot do I get the money back?
Do you get your money back in your free market?

>Sometimes the free market tells us something that we don't want to hear.

"I'm sorry, Tony. Your kid got cancer. We could have saved her, but you couldn't muster up enough money for her treatment so the free market have to do what it got to do. It's time to say good bye. We're not sorry"

>88
nice trips

>0% Ecology
You want to live in a fucking cement park? Live with the nature, not against it.
Good on the essentialism though, that's where you get a gold star.

All those tests are buillshit because they dont take into account intention.

>doing X will be harmfull to Y?
Answering yes will mean you dont want X to happen or dont think it should happen.
But what if the person want to harm Y?

>Implying nature isn't just someone's property
You can be pro-nature/environmentalist without being a command-and-control hippie. Companies shouldn't have the right to dump waste in the rivers because the river is owned by someone or the municipality, not because some overarching federal government 1000 miles away says you can't. If you want to dump in the river you should have to pay the owner. Technology makes it possible to have market based solutions to the problem.

Rate

PIC related is my result.

>If you want to dump in the river you should have to pay the owner
Should be illegal and punished by death. We can't wipe out ecosystems for temporary comfort just because some companies want easy solutions and some mark owner want a fast buck.

I don't want people to build roads or building where ever they like because a mark owner got paid a million bucks by J Murphy & Sons™.
The biological diversity needs to be protected, not toyed around with. I want to leave my country in a good state to my children, and not a smog filled, trash burning shithole like India or China.

>Technology makes it possible to have market based solutions to the problem.
What does this even mean?

bump

Took the second test

You've been fed too many green party lies about industrialization. Le ebil corporations aren't going to tear the environment to shreds if you give them the opportunity. Humans need to generate wealth, grow, and advance technologically. Once healthy families are encouraged over mass immigration, we won't need to grow much more than we already have. Cities are not going to pop up where national parks once were.

We have the technology to measure how much smut and waste factories output. Their pollution is not a right, it is an external cost they charge to the public. With the technology to measure what they're doing we can charge them at a certain rate that encourages them to minimize pollution. You need to grow up and realize the big bad companies aren't destroying mommy earth.

90% of all forest in Sweden is industrial forest. I don't like it. I don't like urbanized society, building shitty commie blocks do inhabit with shit skins. I've been to both India and China, they're building every where, burning trash and dumping waste in beautiful national parks.
If you want to live like them, fine by me. I don't.

Corporations fuck up nature all the time, look at all coral reefs. Plastic floating around in the ocean. All of the baltic sea and the archepilago of Sweden is fucked up due to over fishing and toxic waste being dumped by baltic states.
Algal bloom is rampant, which makes it impossible to even bath in it during a couple of months a year. But yeah, keep on telling me it's a good thing letting the good, peope loving corporations being unregulated.

>Le ebil corporations aren't going to tear the environment to shreds if you give them the opportunity.

Follow the path of least resistance. Corporations will usually take the cheapest approach, whatever that is. It is not evil, but it typically results in pollution.

>We have the technology to measure how much smut and waste factories output.

We don't have the technology to measure where the pollution comes from specifically. A company, when confronted in court about pollution, could point out the lack of evidence that they are the polluter. They will not allow access to their premises for that sort of measurement if it could mean they have to pay up, unless required by law.

>Their pollution is not a right, it is an external cost they charge to the public.

This is actually very well said. I'm going to use that in the future.

>With the technology to measure what they're doing we can charge them at a certain rate that encourages them to minimize pollution.

Again, if they don't allow people access to their premises to confirm without a doubt that they are the polluter, nothing can be done. That is a right they have as a private property owner.

Politiscales.

chill on the black pill bro

just realize that you are living in a time where great things can happen in Sweden.
You just fear the work load.
I'm just saying, git gud at talking sense into retards.

>
just realize that you are living in a time where great things can happen in Sweden.
You just fear the work load.
I'm just saying, git gud at talking sense into retards.

I don't even realise what you're trying to tell me to be honest.