Why are conservatards so dumb?

why are conservatards so dumb?

Other urls found in this thread:

psychologytoday.com/blog/the-imprinted-brain/201004/the-age-asperger-modern-society-is-autistic
psychologytoday.com/blog/the-imprinted-brain/201004/are-conservatives-less-intelligent-or-more-mentalistic
kjplanet.com/amp-31-10-726.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

(((american education)))

Smart enough to be taking over the civilized world right now.

Political leaning and education are two separate things. You can indoctrinate smart people too.
The USSR had rocket scientists, you know.

> be me
> not a conservative, but a traditionalist
> not religious
> have an iq of 132

ITT: Faggots orgasming to their own farts

I have an above average IQ, I strongly oppose what it means to be a modern liberal.
Don't fit the mold. Not a normal person. 5-10 iq points is not much either. Flawed logic to explain flawed logic.

Liberals hold the middle range of i.q. 95-115 but above or below that range and the emotional arguments don't seem to work as well.

Above 115 and you use logic to see truth.
Below 95 you use only simple emotions to see truth.
But that middle sweet spot is where liberal indoctrination takes place.
The neo intellectual shit class.

>be right wing
>worship IQ testing and treat it as divine proof for your racist agenda
>evidence emerges that left wingers are significantly smarter in terms of IQ and right wingers are dumber than average

SCRAMBLE COGNITIVE DISSONANCE

INITIATE MENTAL GYMNASTICS

i dunno, us nationalists have been telling them for years that they are retards

10 Iq points is an order of magnitude, it's a log scale

A graph going from 90 -110 without showing 0-89

If you tell me the average iq of feminazis is 106 something is wrong
Also some of this cgart has to be true based on the average iq of anyone on Sup Forums

Blacks and Hispanics are very socially conservative but vote for Dem cuz wascism and tribalism. For whites that live in the same area right wingers are always smarter.

Who wasn't a liberal when they were young and ignorant?

>starting the scale at 0 when all the data is within the 90 to 110 range

Irish logic and reasoning skills

The Nazi's "took over" during their time too. It didn't end for them or their people in a way you would like.

Liberals, Too smart for their own good.

That's because what is right is what is known innately. In order to accept Marxism and the lies of egalitarianism in general, you must be of a particular status of learned. It is the class of people which go to university that have been hit hardest by the propaganda machine. Those who live simpler lives have never been touched by the indoctrination machine, and they have grown to see things with a more human gaze than those who have been pushed through the thought camps.

I nearly fell for it too. It wasn't until my last two years of education that I broke away from the dogmatic teachings of egalitarianism and Marxism. It took a lot of concentration and a damn powerful natural individualism to disconnect from the leftist hive mind, but I managed it. I'm as far right as you can get, and I guarantee you that I'm far above the average thinker. If you want a more meaningful study, measure the intellectuals of both camps. If you adjust your criteria to instead compare the actual thinkers of both sides, you will rapidly discover that it is the right who has the more diverse group of intellectuals. This is because our conclusions can be reached through rationality and an understanding of human nature. Marxist ideology, on the other hand, does not manifest to the individual unless it has been taught to them. There will be far fewer great thinkers for the modern left than there are for the modern right, because the left generates its understanding of the world through a process of mass group think. Modern leftist thought is generated on placed like Reddit, where the most popular opinions rapidly disseminate to the whole of the leftist horde. The leftist opinions are generated through these channels, and their talking points obtain meaning from them. This is why it is so easy for a leftist to simply scream, and be unable to articulate any rational thought. Their beliefs are founded in an educated ignorance.

Selective polling.

If you're going to accept the idea that IQ==Intelligence, then you have some serious explaining to do Shlomo as to why 50% of blacks are legally retarded.

If you exclude social conservatives, Republicans are more intelligent than liberals. Social conservatives often don’t come to their conclusions through logical inquiry and were instead told what to believe by their religion. According to Jonathan Haidt, libertarians have the highest IQ.

106 is massively retarded, you don't start transcending emotional appeal and sophistry until well past 135 or so

Oh, the "let's pretend niggers in Mississippi are conservative" trick. Again.

Here is a shitty graph I quickly threw together on paint comparing the gdp per capita of Ireland and the UK. Ireland is slightly richer then the UK but if we look at the graph on the left it looks like Ireland is ten times richer then the UK. This is why doing this with a graph is dishonest.

"Social conservatives" turned out in droves to vote for Obama in California while voting down same sex marriage (forget the year, too lazy to look it up). Guess the race

Why are liberals only example of intelligence some lame bar graph other liberals made up for them?
If you were really intelligent, you wouldn't need the graph. It would show. But it doesn't. You can't even meme ( lack of wit and cleverness ).
And if any of your brains ever held an original thought, I'm convinced your noggins would explode.

>libertarian 115
>neo fascist futurist 140

All I ever wanted was the truth. Remember those words as you read the ones that follow. I never set out to topple my party’s web of lies from a sense of misplaced pride. I never wanted to bleed the arguments to their marrow, reaving half the world clean of leftist ideals in this bitter ideological war. I never desired any of this, though I know the reasons for which it must be done. But all I ever wanted was the truth. It all began with Christopher Stevens.

They're actually not. They have high out of wedlock births. This is purely and artifact of liberals cherry picking their definition of "social conservative" to make the stats look bad

True social conservatives used to do things like shun divorcees and force single mommies to give their kids up for adoption. There are hardly any real social conservatives left

What is your source?
I have been looking everywhere for a Levitate study that looked at IS by political group and not education.

Libs adore how studies say they are smarter because they are more likely to have a college education and going to college bumps your IQ by ten points. There are literally zero studies that look at the raw IQs and compare them.

Libs and Jews need to fuck with the goal post to look smarter.

>nigger beats his girlfriend
>count woman beating as conservative
>niggers are dumb
>now niggers are dumb

Anyone who is a literal Conservative or Liberal normie is a fucking retard to begin with.

I don't worship IQ testing.
>be you
>worship soros
>jerk off to hillary
>head in sand
>accepting of all opinions until you disagree
>muslim invaders
>bend over
>liberal

To be fair, OP has a "study" that relies on self-reporting and no controls for selection.

We KNOW niggers have sub-human IQ due to actual standardized testing

>be very liberal
>campaign for Killary
>easy win against a literal retard Donald Trump
>lose

Liberals might be collectively very intelligent but their intelligence is easily corrupted by emotional appeal for whatever reason

According to the Imprinted Brain Theory, it's not necessarily that conservatives are 'dumb', but that they are the more female imprinted group and therefore have mentalistic skills rather than mechanistic. Mechanistic skill when taken to an extreme = autism, mentalism taken to an extreme = schizophrenia. According to wide IQ testing, every generation is gaining a few IQ points on the last, known as the Flynn Effect. According to this, elderly people are actually retarded relative to young people. But the Imprinted Brain suggests that rather than getting 'smarter', we are just becoming more male imprinted. Eating more in pregnancy raises the risk of male imprinting, the rate of autism is going sky high in wealthy western countries, people are improving mechanistically but becoming dumb mentalistically. They are not able to read people as well and they can be rule bound in their ideologies. So, yeah, the conservatives are probably highly skilled mentalistically, some with below average mechanism, which brings down their scores. This is also seen as a decent explanation to differences in IQ scores in poor countries, as schizophrenia is much more common when pregnant women starve/children aren't fed enough growing up (female imprinting).

That's awfully classist of you first of all.

psychologytoday.com/blog/the-imprinted-brain/201004/the-age-asperger-modern-society-is-autistic

Read this, then all his blogs, then the book 'The Imprinted Brain'. The guy teaches evolutionary psychology at London School of Economics.

Unlike in the past, universities today are wrought with progressive thought. This is probably attributable to the Left’s march through the universities in the ‘60s. Is it all that surprising that impressionable, relatively intelligent 18 year olds go into college and adopt the views of their whacky humanities professor when the university culture is so left leaning? People who are successfully turned by indoctrination efforts often are quite open and agreeable, both traits correlated with being liberal.
Importantly, the more a field deals with objective reality or, in other words, the more a field is similar to a hard science, the more conservatives there are occupying said field.

They don't. When they're brought up in the West and tested, they are exactly the same. It's likely that the effect you're talking about comes from imprinted genes, and that if you tested the third worlders mentalistic skill they would outperform westerners

This bothers me. An IQ of 106 is still very average.
It proves nothing.

>IQ testing
>racist agenda

Double-digiter detected

Nazis weren't conservatives, you dumbfuck.

psychologytoday.com/blog/the-imprinted-brain/201004/are-conservatives-less-intelligent-or-more-mentalistic

most on Sup Forums love traps

we *ARE* liberal to very liberal in many ways

for very conservative, go to 8 chn Sup Forums, where they are unironcially "very conserviative" and are all about beating up gays and stuff like that. they most likely are 99 IQ average. and you can see the consequences of that, it's full of conspiracy theories and 11th grade high school degree reading and writing abilities.

Or 106 - 160

hmm let me guess that is a measure of 'social' conservatism, thus meaning hispanics and niggers take the average down to 90s?

Because the environment doesn't select as aggressively for intelligence when your behaviors are logical and not cancerously self-destructive. When you're incapable of meaningfully recognizing threats instinctually and maintaining organization in your daily life it would follow that an elevated level of intelligence would be necessary to achieve evolutionary fitness. Conservatives trend lower on the IQ spectrum not because liberals are more intelligent or liberalism is more logical, but simpy because all the stupid liberals end up dead and all the stupid conservatives acquire a skill, a family and either steady or self employment in a trade.

James woods

Paranoia, seeing connections, ideas of reference etc is associated with female imprinting (psychosis and schizophrenia)

This is so retarded I don't know where to start. What exactly is killing all dumb liberals?!

>When they're brought up in the West and tested, they are exactly the same
Bullshit. Source or you are a lying faggot

There aren't any special qualities present in a person with an IQ of 95 over one with an IQ of 105. IQ isn't static either. It can be improved over time.
I would assume most of /pol has an IQ over 110.

Themselves. Leftist thinking is non strongly amygdala-centric. When surveyed they fail to exhibit strong gut reactions of disgust to things like feces, infections etc etc. The same holds true for moral judgements, for example if they are asked if they would eat their pets or other people if compelled by necessity. They have greater difficulty differentiating aggressive body language and facial expressions from non-aggressive ones. All of the aforementioned are symptoms of a weak amygdala severely damaging their concept of risk assessment. Liberals quite literally do not fear the dangerous unless they have forcibly had the dangerous and the unpleasant forcibly associated in their brains. They exhibit disorder in their personal lives from living spaces to time management to interpersonal relationships.

>Hey look, something that is happening now is debatedly similar to something like what the Nazis did, let's make a full blown comparison. Boy it sure is great to have shallow logic and poor critical thinking skills!!!

The graph doesn't matter you retard. All conservatives have sub 100 iq according to the study, just like you.

There's loads. Go take an evo psych class. The only one I could find for free is old kjplanet.com/amp-31-10-726.pdf

> I would assume most of /pol has an IQ over 110.

Absolutely no chance

Says a Swedish open border shortsighted cuck.
Intelligence gives the ability to think into the future.

That can't be right. Are they throwing away data below 90 and above 110?

Also, that citation isn't a source. I want to see a study, not a half-assed article.

>1 post by this ID
Nvm, sage

That's not that high. It's really not.

LOOOOLL 'non strongly amygdala-centric'. You are talking about the reptilian brain, which fits perfectly with the point I was making about female and male imprinting being the cause of this effect. Female imprinted are relying on gut instincts, whilst male imprinted are using logic and abstract reasoning. But none of these things would mean that whole group of people would take themselves out of the gene pool, lol. If that were true how could IQ be normally distributed?

Why do people take National Socialists for granted? You are living in a National Socialist world, you just don't realize it. Everything you think of when you think modern society was created by National Socialists. You are living in a national socialist world with the only real difference being the core ideology of the people which is what ultimately is leading to the corruption and death of our national socialist society.

just checked out the source
>Social conservatives were defined as people who agreed with a laundry list of statements such as "Family life suffers if mum is working full-time," and "Schools should teach children to obey authority."

nice science

This

nice (((study)))
fuck off shill

i didn't say it was a legit study, i just said his point was retarded. nice hiding your flag btw :)

Retards voted for king retard to be placed in his grand throne of retard atop retard mountain and you are proud of that?

Lol 10 IQ points lower and he calls liberals ignorant.

Smart people aren't magically resistant against indoctrination, emotional, irrational or illogical thinking or bad decision making. They have the tools to increase the chances of coming to the right conclusions or decisions, but that doesn't mean their thinking is less biased. The main thing smart people fall victim to is that they (and people in general) base their thinking on core beliefs - things they consider to be true beyond any doubt - things they accept as facts. If one of those core beliefs is not actually true, they will also be wrong about many things they concluded based on that belief.

>we're smart welfare trash!

lol this reads as "I finished college and almost decided to be smart, but I chose stupidity instead. Aren't I a cool guys?"

...

>news sez we smart n gud! u stop u disagee us! pls keep paying my bills doh ok thx
Welfare trash, everyone. Gotta love 'em.

I’m in the $100k-200k range. Just made it into conservative tertoritory.

>Brainlet OP purposefully omitting any data for people above 110 IQ
Gee I wonder why?

first of all, biased study
second, liberalism and conservatism mean entirely different things among people, but to the core, liberalism means the belief of economic and personal freedom, and the fact that social inequalities are a part of nature, while conservatism is the belief of preserving the way things are.

Check the catalog, faggot, there is already a thread for this.

Rule violation. Reported.

Perhaps you could post a real study with political formation and actually measurable things like party affiliation.
The study you post is a well known textbook meme example on how not to do a study.

>announcing reports
>global rule 7

Only the religitard christian conservatives are dumb, they bring the average down

>IQ measure of morality

Conservatives have literally more characteristics of manly persona. Not only in terms of raw gender distinction, but also in many specific characters. Also
>evolutionary psychology
>inb4 MTBI
Still better than evolutionary psychology. Might as well post Kevin McDonald.
As for the negroes, they not only keep their low IQ (as expected, IQ being primarily genetic), they even do in transracial adoption.

Fox news.

*tips fedora*

...

Nobody on Sup Forums has an IQ under 115, ask.

Here you get the full picture with memetics attached.
Never ever trust any study or commentary that uses classification such as "liberal". Always use actually measurable and certain qualities, like party affiliation.
Same thing in the UK with the tories (and they are the fucking tories).

I don't know, but I've found people on Sup Forums, who tend to be conservative, are mostly mentally retarded.

>doing Math PhD
>IQ is 132
>"rightest" fucking poopoo toad you will ever see
Come at me liberal freaks, I will destroy you

Come back when your test levels aren't below 80 y/o men

The Left is the ideology of welfare nigger retards and illegal alien janitors. Don't flatter yourself with this sageworthy horseshit.

The noble lie of traditionalism is designed to keep the masses functioning as a society.
Those who do not see through it will be conservative.
Those who see through it but do not understand why it was told will be leftists.
Those who understand both are not the majority.

>go read the study cited
>asked people on a college campus if they're conservative or liberal
>asked 100 people

Conservatism is DONE

Left-wing retards on the ropes gettin' RAWKED!

Go easy on them, user. They're just emotional children.

shill
also sage

>121 IQ
>Politics don't matter, either revolt or stop bitching

Debate me, you'll probably win

>virgin vote vs Chad insurrection