How Is Anarchism Far-Left?

When The Right Is The Side Of Small Government?

Usually plain "anarchism" refers to a removal of all hierarchies including capitalism so it's at least economically far-left and attracts loads of commies.

Because we have communistic tendencies. We aren't minarchists, we're anarchists.

I hate people like you.

Why? He's right.

Except he isn't. Excuse my terrible formatting, I'm on my phone.
Rothbard maintains that anarcho-capitalism is the only true form of anarchism—the only form of anarchism that could possibly exist in reality as he argues that any other form presupposes an authoritarian enforcement of political ideology, such as redistribution of private property.[68] According to this argument, the free market is simply the natural situation that would result from people being free from authority and entails the establishment of all voluntary associations in society, such as cooperatives, non-profit organizations, businesses and so on. Moreover, anarcho-capitalists as well as classical liberal minarchists argue that the application of left-wing anarchist ideals would require an authoritarian body of some sort to impose it. In order to forcefully prevent people from accumulating private capital, there would necessarily be a redistributive organization of some sort which would have the authority to in essence exact a tax and re-allocate the resulting resources to a larger group of people. This body would thus inherently have political power and would be nothing short of a state. The difference between such an arrangement and an anarcho-capitalist system is precisely the voluntary nature of organization within anarcho-capitalism contrasted with a centralized ideology and a paired enforcement mechanism which would be necessary under a coercively egalitarian-anarchist system.[58]

The right is about maintaining high civilization.

Anarchists want to tear shit down. Anarchism is the precursor to "change."

In a traditional western civilization the commies start off as anarchists, will destroy the institutions that support civilization so they can implement their own.

Bolsheviks introduced an intermediate phase of lawlessness before founding the soviet union.

This. AnCap allows me the freedom to not participate in capitalism. I have no desire for egalitarianism to be coerced, so I can find like minded individuals with which to communize and withdraw as a self-sustaining community, or (more likely) engage in capitalism as a syndicate.

Idiots "think" quadrant 3, ACTUALLY, exists.

I envy quadrant 1, they get a whole group of useful idiots for free.

anarchism isn't left or right, it's chaos.

If you want the answer you were actually looking for, anarchism is the ultimate culmination of the left's belief in the myth of the noble savage. IE, without civilization, humans are inherently good

Except what happens when the some other group with bigger sticks come around and kill all of you and take your widgets?

There is no such thing as anarcho capitalism, or ancom, or anprim, or anything else. There is only anarchy, and it is the singular rule of force.

Utopian bullshit, the free market can’t exist with law enforcement. Otherwise you eventually end up with a gang of bandits ruled by a warlord just taking everyone’s shit. As long as humans remain mortal there will always be men who choose to take wealth by force

>What if bad things happen?

Holy shit, you think this is an argument? You poor little baby. We aren't selling utopia, unlike all of the liars you're used to.

Life sucks and then you die.

anarchy is not partisan

a voluntarist society will have a more efficient economy that enriches all people

individualism demands more discipline from each person.

but the massive expansion in cumulative wealth will tolerate more enclaves of decadence and nonconformity

I want a society that can support outsiders who push culture forward. but that can only expand from the advancement of the productive and responsible.

the destruction of the state will accelerate this process

I'm not interested in utopia. I'm interested in being left alone and not having force initiated against me

Might be far right in the US far left in europe. There are also right wing (National Anarchists) and left wing (Ancoms) flavors.

All anarchism is utopian and fraudulent. With that said, Ancap is no better. You'd just end up with landed barons filling the void and becoming the new government which would be even worse than the last and unlike real monarchism which is based upon blood and an ancient heroic mythos. Ancap "monarchy" would be strictly based upon material wealth.

You sound super swell, brother. Unfortunately anarchy will probably kill us both, but I look forward to the freedom, and haven't feared death in a long long time.

I found a picture of an Anarcho-Capitalist with a gang of bandits. He doesn't look so bad.

>Except what happens when the some other group with bigger sticks come around and kill all of you and take your widgets?
But even states have this problem, both with individuals within, and other states without.

>"If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism."
>t. Ronald Reagan
>1975

>batman
>ancap
oh, wow. you really don't know what you're talking about.

Yes they do, which is why states have police and a military. In a functioning state, if someone robs me at gunpoint, he does so knowing that if he gets caught, he will go to jail. Or that if I have a gun to defend myself, he might die. In anarchy, he can just shoot me and take whatever he wants. Unless I have a bigger gun, or I shoot him first and take his things. There is no institutional disincentive against violence, and as such devolves into a war of all against all.

At any point, regardless of political organization, you face the risk of murder. That's a fact that will never go away. It's inherent in the human experience because we are mortal and because it is impossible to stop certain people from committing violence. The issue is not getting rid of that risk, but minimizing it via giving government a mandate that it's only responsibility is to protect the rights of its citizens. Same goes for military.

>The Right Is The Side Of Small Government?
lol no

underrated post

What is authoritarian right and libertarian right and why can't we have a small government taxing all the money and telling people how to live their life anyway, the thread.

Because Anarchists truly desire a hive mind.

>nom nom nom nom
>Daddy state, your dick tastes so good! Oh, thank you for stopping that all against all war! I was so scared, but now I don't have to be! I just keep sucking dick, and things aren't even that bad!

I never suggested global anarchy, as it is against human biological nature. Anarchy must exist always in opposition to heirarchical societies, otherwise it's just a reset button.

>using one dimensional political scale
Go back to watching CNN and Fox, you piece of shit.

>Faggot here hasn't read Hobbes or heard of mercenaries.

Go homes statist shill, just because you are so weak that you want someone's to rule over you to safeguard you from bad decisions and the uncertainty of the universe doesn't mean we are all cucked like you.

>Anarchy must exist always in opposition to heirarchical societies,
So you admit that you're literally just edgy teens whining?

At least commies think they have a viable alternative.

What you're talking about is entropy then, not anarchy. And "global anarchy" is really the only even theoretically viable anarchy due to the fact that an anarchist state would have no defense against foreign invaders. And even that necessitates the invocation of the noble savage myth. There is no such thing as an alternative to hierarchy. People will always follow a leader, organization is always more efficient than chaos. The oldest tribes have chieftains. Fucking monkeys have alpha males.

I have a feeling I've read more Hobbes than you. Mercenaries are just a different kind of stick. They are not an institutional disincentive against violence. Someone with more money than you can always hire more mercenaries to kill you and take your things.

This dude is dumb, AND suffering from being in an abusive relationship.

Here bud, I feel real sorry for you. So as an anarchist, I'll give you an actual argument worth a shit. Anarchists, it shall be your job to not just "The free market will fix it" at me when I unleash it:

>You just gonna test your own food for botulism?

Tester animals.
E. coli is the one I'd worry about.

>economically far left

Yes, redistribution and equity will just naturally occur without the state.

That actually makes a lot of fucking sense

it's not its centrists like national socialism
pol spectrums are 2d and 3d

>i hate people who speak fact based truth and destroy my orwellian world building narrative
t. joo

such as trump
>we should've taken the oil.. we were right there"

>quoting a known fascist... who had dementia
t. jooooo