Are Capitalists Even Human?

...

No. They just care about the money, but the call it "freedom", for some reason

Are communists even human?

Well, I mean seeing as they prefer the driving force of their economy to be a COMMUNITY rather than CAPITAL, I'd argue that the humanity is right there in the name.

Yes, but without the CAPITAL, there is less push to make the products that you need to survive.
Community may have some effect but in the end it's the capital that ultimately survives whether it happens or not.

Real Socialism has never been tried. Can people just fucking admit that for once?

You do realize the pig was used for these propaganda images because jews don't like being compared with them

Human, but insane.

No, does this look human to you?

Honestly, I am the least greedy person you will ever meet and I wish more people were like me but unfortunately 99% of them arent which is why communism will never work

no they are pigs

You tell me, do you like owning shit you've worked for?

Listen kid, yes it is fucking easy to look at the world and blame the current problems on capitalism, especially when dozens of retards are pointing fingers at it.
The herd mentality and the fact that even intelligent people refuse to disect the words/system and look at the proper/simple definition.

Capitalism has been turned into a tool for leftists, they've branded it as something bad, because what I described above makes that possible.

In reality capitalism is essentially just the respect for property rights.
Nothing more. When people do just that(respect property rights) ", capitalism is achieved.

If you look further it becomes painfully obvious that 99.9% of the problems that are associated with capitalism are actually caused by a lack of respect for property rights.

The best

Kek

What is USSR for you ?

It's true. The term "screw" came from a capitalist giving your mother old bread in exchange for sex, and pigs have corkscrew dicks.

Capuralism is the most moral system, and it's not even about morals.

Explain

that's a very good photo of winston churchil

Pig reminds me of animal farm!

>economic freedom
commie

Capitalists dont care about people, and socialists provide retarded solutions for people.

Nope. They're jew tools, like you commies. You're all the same lemmings of the kikes who get the ovens, sorry.

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAA

>8
"economic freedom"
But money is created in banks from debt, and returns to the banks. They literally own everyone by this mechanism. It does not matter that you have "freedom", you are just a cow.

>starving to death in hands of state is better,lol stop being a sheep

No, we are now Gods.

I'm not making the argument that we should live from the state. I am making the argument that in the capitlaist system we are slaves of the bankers instead, and the "freedom" you have is the freedom they allow you to have.

Yeah how else would we have a sewer of get-rich-quick schemers who try to buy and sell humans without captialism?

i choose where and how to use my money...

>community, group, etc.
What have they done for me? Aside from those I have actively traded with, anyways.

we kno

Just look at this thriving community.
You can't build a society with a communist pipe dream.
Inb4 that wasn't real communism.

So, your freedom then is determined on how much money you have. So, you are less free than people that has more money.

unlike commies, they don't end up in poverty and killing their own people for the sake of pursuing a vision that has failed over and over

Anyway... myy point is, you are not free if there are banks and central banks in the role of creaqtion of money. I hope that blockchain will change that.. modifying the actual meaning of money. Just then, meritocracy will be a closer reality.

no

What are you even trying to say?
Anyway, owning other humans as property violates the property rights of the owned person.
So thanks for proving my point.

I feel relatively human, and the entirety of my ideological beliefs are based upon serving myself and those around me. Is that not humanitarian enough?

Lol how does that not make it capitalism? I love the way kids talk about this stuff like they're making up rules to a new larping game

>Lol how does that not make it capitalism?

Maybe read my original post again?
Capitalism is not afucking system that is set up by some genius that we all somehow started to follow.
It isnt like communism/socialism in that way, where one dude came up with an idea, made some retarded suggestions ending up killing millions in the process.

Capitalism arose naturally not because anyway put forward the idea, but because one day people got enough morals to understand that respecting other peoples property is the moral thing to do.
The rest evolved naturally.

There is objectively nothing wrong with slavery. It does not violate a person's property rights if they willingly give up their property. In fact, outlawing slavery is a violation of a person's property rights because they can't sell themselves into slavery.

more than commies are, some of them can be reasoned with.

this

I take it you have no drive to better yourself and think everyone else in the world is at fault for your own problems?

That's the problem with you fucking communists no self ownership essentially a ship without a captain at first and then when a self interested party does come around you don't throw him off because human nature dictates a strong leader, and that leader he would rather just sink the boat with all of you in it for himself.

see the difference between communists and capitalists is at least we admit we are self interested and we prepare as such, you cowards hide behind your ideology thinking no one would ever betray you because they wear the same label as you, afraid of finding your life and living resolutely that is why your ideology falls flat.

Its just not truthful.

>There is objectively nothing wrong with slavery. It does not violate a person's property rights if they willingly give up their property.

I guess you have a different definition of slavery, because to me the very definition of slavery is that it requires NO CONSENT at all.
You can be born into slavery...
Slavery is also conditionless, while selling yourself already sets up a condition: namely that you get something in exchange.

So no, I would not call that slavery, you would need a different name for that.