How do you respond to this?

How do you respond to this?

>How do you respond to this?
Anti-White, Judeo Communists have no right to lecture anyone else on ethics.

capitalism was literally made to do this such thing

But seriously consider this for a moment. How do you respond to someone talking shit about capitalism while using an iPhone and drinking Starbucks?

There is no consumption under communism

>Marxist Socialist
I don't.

Remainder to grow up and get a job

was buying her game ethical, Sup Forums?

The wave of the future is sustainability. Capitalism will allow people to invest their own time and money into this new industry. Markets are calling and capitalism is answering.

Nepotistic, oligarchal, state corporatism = capitalism?

a reminder there is no ethical employment under socialism

>muh gabidalism

Literally could not care less t. Third Position

>How do you respond to someone talking shit about capitalism while using an iPhone and drinking Starbucks?
You don't. Capitalism is just as anti-White and Jewish as Communism is.

Fuck materialism.

The Jews use soulless materialism to destroy the White race.

I just gave a dude 100$ for a service he provided to me

I am happy for the service. He is happy for the resources.

Explain how that voluntary exchange is immoral

That exactly, pure irony! Posted on a corporation ran site, with a corporation ran ISP, with a corporation manufactured phone. Drinking coffee from corporation.

Basically, they're retarded. Even if it's all small business it's a product made to sell. Do you want this? Buy it! If not, find another brand or fuck off.

I'll play the liberal

>What about the social economical exploitation of people of color used to make the tools used, or resources stolen from their land?

Citation needed

It was a lame rip off of a much better joke.

>posted from my iphone

>How do you respond to this?
"Marxism and Socialism are both retarded".

They can't make a joke correctly. These libturds would at least try if they wrote "Ethical rules of capitalism " or "Ethics in business ". The joke is ruined by the word "proof " because it makes you see the obvious bias. A guy bashing communist would write "farming in USSR" (in English or Cyrillic) and would let the page blank.

>marxist ethics

Only free-riding nigger mooches with no skillsets, ambition, or respect for the hard work of others talk like that.

Also kikes.

it may be a conundrum, that a society which produces things that aren't necessary, is actually more efficient at producing things that are necessary
the reason for this is that love is fuel for live, as that is a characteristic of the human spirit

kek

I pirated her game and finished it in a single sitting. Ethics are a spook.

Brainlet tier argument

>how can you criticize feudalism when you're eating bread farmed by serfs???

>how can you criticize slavery when you're wearing clothes made from cotton farmed by slaves???

By this commie's argument, he should kill himself. I mean that literally. If he's going to take some kind of extreme moralfag stance like this, then he can't really justify sustenance in any form.

So what he deems ethical is irrelevant to me, because he's morally suicidal.

Capitalism brought about the iPhone. The iPhone wasn't a natural progression of socialism.

Iphone and starbucks are not necessary for survival.

>there were no farms in the ussr
this is what anti-communists unironically believe

What IQ do you need to have to believe a country can survive without any food for 70 years? I doubt you can have an IQ above 80 and believe this.

>commie
With bullets

>How do you respond to someone talking shit about capitalism while using an iPhone and drinking Starbucks?
you stop drinking from whatever Starbucks you bought, then answer.

then stop consuming, you fucking hypocrite. stop eating food

>The iPhone wasn't a natural progression of socialism.
The first cell phone was invented by a Soviet scientist. In case you didn't know, the Soviet Union was a socialist country.

Irrelevant.

With silent contempt and disdain.

With summary executions

>By this commie's argument, he should kill himself.
Only if you have a low IQ. To people with a normal or high IQ, the commie's argument is obvious - we have to overthrow the capitalist class whose rule over society makes ethical consumption impossible.

WRONG
with free helicopter rides!

Came here to say this.

That's the joke. It's about people being starved in the soviet union.
I thought Germans were supposed to be the one with no humor.

I have a higher IQ than you. Guarantee it.

I didn't misinterpret it in some fashion like thinking "ethical consumption" just means food. I get it. It is still suicidal.

Go ahead and define "ethical consumption" for me, and I'll point out how it either isn't ethical, cannot justify sustenance, or is a uselessly specific subjective standard to have incase you try to worm out of things.

Commies are legitimately retarded. There's a reason no communist country exisits and dominates. Because it is a failed, weak system. Weaker than capitalism. Communism can only be born from the ruins of capitalism, and it inevitably destroys itself when the human condition becomes involved and the crutch of capitalism that allowed their society to exist for a short span completely snaps. Communism is for idealistic children.

If you were an abolitionist you should have worn either wool, or Egyptian/Indian cotton, you had other choices. It isn't the same as bread and feudalism but it might be similar to fucking starbucks, you could at least get your coffee from some indy hipster place rather than a massive coporation, it differs in that coffee is a luxury whilst clothes are still a necessity though.

>Go ahead and define "ethical consumption" for me, and I'll point out how it either isn't ethical, cannot justify sustenance, or is a uselessly specific subjective standard to have incase you try to worm out of things.
It's a self-explanatory term. Ethical consumption is consumption that is ethical. If you need me to define such a simple term, I really doubt your claims of high IQ are valid.

Why is ethical consumption impossible under capitalism? Because all the things you use on a daily basis are the result of exploitation, war, and neo-colonial imperialism which slaughters millions.

Without the CIA massacring workers' rights activists in Central America, you wouldn't be able to get such cheap clothing.

Without the US ruling class upholding the petro dollar through military blackmail, you wouldn't be able to get such cheap oil.

Without rare earth minerals mined from places like the Congo, whose left-wing leaders were assassinated by the CIA decades ago for trying to sever themselves from colonialism, you wouldn't be able to get such cheap electronics.

Shite-wingers don't know history, economics, philosophy, or anything of value. You only know how to regurgitate the same tired one-liners about muh gorillions and muh starvation.

>implying

Well youre funding someones life by buying products they produce. Keeping them in work allows them to live and feel like they have some sort of meaning.

All consumption is ethical.

Remind him that there is no comsumption (food or otherwise) under communism.

>It's a self-explanatory term. Ethical consumption is consumption that is ethical. If you need me to define such a simple term, I really doubt your claims of high IQ are valid.

You've never been in a debate before in your entire life. The very fact that you're trying to question my intelligence for asking you to define a term as subjective and loose as "ethical consumption" just proves you're a moron that's never engaged in any deep thought or serious debate in your life. What is "ethical" is not a matter of shared objective fact.

>Why is ethical consumption impossible under capitalism?

First, you'd have to define what "ethical consumption" actually is, dipshit.

>Because all the things you use on a daily basis are the result of exploitation, war, and neo-colonial imperialism which slaughters millions.

Millions have also been slaughtered in the name of communism, so I'm not sure how you think it's any different. The sad part is it didn't even benefit them that much to do it, they just did it to try and preserve their failing system. Within these communistic systems, the masses are always eventually exploited because it is an untenable idealistic system. The only thing that actually changes is the number of people that benefit and how much they benefit.

("muh version hasn't been tried before!" is not a valid defense in the same way I could not excuse capitalism in the same way)

>Without the CIA massacring workers' rights activists in Central America, you wouldn't be able to get such cheap clothing.
>Without the US ruling class upholding the petro dollar through military blackmail, you wouldn't be able to get such cheap oil.

Neither of these have anything to do with capitalism, really. Nor were any of the other ones you listed related. You're acting as if governments that attempted communist forms of rule never attempted to meddle or gain advantage from other countries. You're historically retarded.

you need to ask?

just one word
"
subjective.
"

please be serious

thats least a textbook ad hominem
plus a few other fallacies

huh?

Helicopter ride

>ethical consumption
No you're allowed to eat lettuce or whatever. Commies keep combining two words hoping it'll make some new buzz phrase that confuses normies and if they repeat it enough in an angry tone then the retards will follow them.

wikipedia blocked for you?

Eating ass is

holy shit
my brother's wife's rants all make sense now

what the fuck is even ethical consumption?

are you quite literally autistic?

There are no ethics under communism

>what the fuck is even ethical consumption?
When rich white people buy you a vegan soy cheese burger, made by rich white people at a hippie commune run by poor black people

Ethical consumption = being able to partake in economic activity without contributing to slavery and mass murder on a world-wide scale.

Right now, this is impossible. 90% of commodities you find in your local store are cheap only because world-wide NATO violence keeps them cheap. Any leader like Gaddafi who stands up for an independent country gets assassinated.

...

proof they want everyone to starve to death.

>IPhone
Built by third worlders in sweatshops
>Starbucks
Made from coffee grown in the Third world, farmers and workers are paid next to nothing
Stop being a brainlet, it’s not hard to understand Marxist thought

so you're saying it's not hypocrisy to talk shit about capitalism and use an iPhone because marxists made the iPhone?

>regional economic differences is world-wide mass murder and slavery
3rd world shit is cheap because everything is cheap there
3rd world wages are low because the prices are low
nobody would work if they'd starve to death while working

i make 800 bucks a month and that's enough for a comfy living
a guy from the middle east makes a fifth of that and that's enough for him to live comfortably
just because we should be starving next to American prices doesn't mean we're starving for real

There’s no hypocrisy in questioning the consumption of products built from exploited resources and people in the third world by the first world

"At least there is consumption" :^)

underrated

Because capitaplism has been improveing society, quality of life and requirements

>ethical consumption

I'm going to need some context here, what the fuck does that even mean?

when Chernobyl exploded the USSR just kept it quiet instead of warning others countries that a lot o radiation was coming.

>improveing society, quality of life and requirements

Gonna need a source on this statement, or at the very least some additional context or explanation; contrary to your opinion, I feel most users here would be inclined to argue, in one way or another, that Western civilization is in a state of undeniable decline. Some have gone so dar as to argue that it is now on the verge of collapse and experiencing final death throes.

It's just word salad pretending to be thought.

With a like and retweet, desu.

you don't, you don't have a conversation with communists niggers jews shitskins moslems all women all non-whites or non-white political religious civilization structures you only talk to white straight males only their opinion matters. Sup Forums is endlessly baited by all who are not white men

this phrase means nothing

>use leftist corporations as an example as to why capitalism is jewish

You could support family owned businesses. Or you could switch out Starbucks and Apple with Black Rifle Coffee and Linux.

What game? Looks like a slower lamer version of Ratchet and Clank's engine.

You respond by nuking them

If you want an actual response, ask him to justify how he's saying it on capitalist based youtube which gets it's money through ad revenue; selling your information to corporations instead of a government ran video server.