Blacks vs viKANGZ

Blacks had great empires (Axum, Kush, Zimbabwe, Mali)
Blacks had written language (Ge'ez)
Blacks conquered mighty Egyptian empire
Blacks had cool monuments (Ethiopia, Nubia, Zimbabwe)

viKANGZ were defeated by primitive American Indians
viKANGZ only had shitty Runes
viKANGZ attacked unarmed peasants
viKANGZ were destroyed by real armies

viKANGZ were worse than blacks!

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Constantinople_(860)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paphlagonian_expedition_of_the_Rus'
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rus'–Byzantine_War_(907)
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Always interesting to me that violently taking over another land is seen as a good quality here. It only shows the capacity to subvert human nature and decrease the level of constructive cooperation between populations.

Instead of establishing a trading relationship where both populations could benefit, colonists end up exploiting the host populations and leaving them a violent mess.

I wholeheartedly agree with you

But white morons here love war and sadism

sad...

Isnt it well known that nordics have done fuck all?

Yes, they were shit until recently

Viking age Scandinavia had a population of 250k people, yet it colonized Frankia, which had 14 million people, at it's peak, while simultaneously founding Russia, navigating all the way to the Americas and Persia and so on... "Niggers" don't do that.

>but they lost every battle according to this cherry picked list, they were only feared cus they wuz dumb LOL

15 Byzantine ships vs 1000 viKANG ships

who would win?????

The claim they had 1000 ships is just unreliable byzantine historicity.

The Rus did win several battles against them, though, despite being thousands of miles away from home, to the point where the "strong" Byzantine Empire kept hiring them as mercenaries and holding them as their elite soldiers. Varangian guards were the last defenders of Constantinople when the city was sacked by the Crusaders.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Constantinople_(860)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paphlagonian_expedition_of_the_Rus'
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rus'–Byzantine_War_(907)

Picture is worth a thousand words

Stay salty bitch

>blacks built da pyramids and sheit

Even the Sudan ones, of infinitelly worse quality, were built by Egyptians brought there...

mirror mirror on the wall

Nordics were shit before Christianity

just face it

was this also built by Egyptians

But Ethiopians were great and built a "thriving civilization", despite being christians for longer than Europe?

Sad.

The "shit nordics" also took down the Roman Empire, so cry more...

another picture...

saged faggOP

NordKANGZ hate thread ?

You take pride in destruction of Rome???

Are you a nigger!!???

Blacks were not perfect...

... they were just better than viKANGZ...

We should have just let them invade our lands and enslave us? Are you a cuck?

They are advanced civilization.

They bring progress and science.

You were mindless barbarians.

Once again, are you a nigger????

>muh civilization
>we should be slaves in it because they wuz "much advanced", it's not being cucks
>this, instead of conquering it and becoming it's rulers

And "mindless" barbarians, don't overcome a much bigger and numerically superior empire. Germanics were europeans of good stock, that is a fact. If they lived in tribally, in small populations in a barely farmable land, they had even better craftsmanship than the Romans, like smithing and woodworking, were better organized militarily (the romans INVITED them to be military commanders because they became unable to) and had advanced knowledge of science, like knowing the curvature and circumference of the earth and so on.

If you look at any of their ellaborate burial mounds, you will find rich grave goods that rival even that of Rome. Stop being butthurt and throwing this weak race-bait. All southern europeans descend from Germans now, Italy from Lombards, Spain from Visigoths and so on, like it or not.

Also a reminder that most people in the roman empire also lived in "mudhuts", as did the majority of those in the west, up to the 19th century - because these buildings were fit for their agricultural lifestyle. And they were not "simplistic and nigger-like", we had longhouses, challets and other types of agricultural buildings, like german half-timbered houses, stemming from time immemorial. Pic related.

GTFO cuck.

WE

>Blacks say WE WUZ KANGZ
>Whites say WE WUZ KANGZ
Fucking mongoloid

The difference is... whites WERE the germanic kings of europe and vikings, while blacks just pretend they were whites...

I made you so angry, that you wrote this shit

that precious moments of your life will never return

dude, viKANGZ are subhuman

go back to china chong

Yet you also wasted your time to type this embarassing bait...

so now you are copying my style

maybe you become one day barbarian

yeah... except... even within the last 100 years they had discovered untouched tribes in africa who, once communication was managed, admitted they'd never seen a white person before and their oral history had nothing about us either.

with that... these mfers hadn't even invented something as simple as THE WHEEL

barbarians are unfit to rule

Attached: HA H A HA H A.jpg (496x305, 26K)

>only empires of note were Ethiopia and Mali, first lost to Italy and the second was a decentralized mess whose ruler, who at that point had a infinite supply at gold,was so retarded he decided to spend all his money on foreign tours rather then put it into his country
>the sudanese were the dickwashers of egyptian chads
The vikings were the niggers of Europe through, but at least they were impressive sailors. African empires were shit.

>first lost to Italy
The casualty rate suffered by Italian forces at the Battle of Adwa was greater than any other major European battle of the 19th century, beyond even the Napoleonic Era's Waterloo and Eylau.[38] Riots broke out in several Italian cities, and within two weeks, the Crispi government collapsed amidst Italian disenchantment with "foreign adventures"