Let's settle this

So we obviously know that nazism is right-wing socially speaking. But economically speaking, is nazism right-wing or left-wing ?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0fM9oYfkB9Q
youtube.com/watch?v=D2ZR9a_vvfk
youtube.com/watch?v=1FUZFy9Nd9s
youtube.com/watch?v=5EyZCdlKbnE
belliresearchinstitute.com/2017/07/17/songs-of-the-edelweiss-pirates-and-other-german-youth-gangs/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

left

they invented welfare
left
government sponsored vacation
left
child tax credits
left

Right wing. Nazis privatized,

All left. Nothing about the Nazi party is right, except the bit about killing kikes.

Yes. Nazi economics were ahead of their time.

You would define NatSoc with its drastic shift towards authoritarism moreover left or right. Its not very capitalistic, so it'd be more center or even left on the left/right issue.

Why would killing kikes be inherently right-wing? You're a retard.

fascism IS capitalist reaction

youtube.com/watch?v=0fM9oYfkB9Q

youtube.com/watch?v=D2ZR9a_vvfk

both, according to the current circumstances.
don't be fooled by (((their))) false dichotomies.

HEIL HITLER

Third way bro. As old as man himself. The third eye lights the way.

are you a non gender binary?

actually, user it is a well-known fact that Nationalist Socialist Germany strongly supported all non-binary genders. Seriously, making such uneducated posts. Study the sources.

Nazism is extreme left no debate.

even fags were concentrated

exactly!

It's this, it's neither left nor right, if anything I think it's an evolution of the concept of noblesse oblige from feudalism

youtube.com/watch?v=1FUZFy9Nd9s

youtube.com/watch?v=5EyZCdlKbnE

>mfw retarded leftists think fascism is the penultimate form of capitalism because the word "corporate" is in corporatism

I have had it with all these Reddit dipshits not knowing what national socialism is, national socialism is economically corporatist, ultra nationalist (ethnonationalist unlike fascism), totalitarian and traditional. "It's socialism because it has socialism in its name" retarded thinking, socialism was used to attract more left wing parasites to the ideology. Hitler stated that national socialism is different from Marxist socialism because it national socialism allows private property and is meant to help the volk. Commies say that national socialism is Capitalist because rich capitalists funded them, which is retarded because the Bolsheviks were funded by Jewish capitalist. Either that or, "it has corporatism in its name so it must be Capitalist" corporatism is when the government nationalises corporations so they benefit the nation. Fascism/national socialism is not left wing or right, it's the third position.

My understanding is that it doesn’t take a doctrinal or ideological stance on whether or not any particular industry should be nationalized or privatized. Decisions like that are made at given times and contexts to suit the interests of the Volk or people, and eventually an organic economic system would gradually develop that is best suited to their peculiar character.

From "You Can't Do Business with Hitler" by Douglas Miller, 1941:
>Totalitarianism is by nature parasitic and predatory. It cannot live on its own resources, but must forever consume the wealth of its neighbors. The whole technique of German commercial policy is one of exploiting the assets of others. While the Nazi state grows ever more powerful, its citizens suffer continual reductions in their living standards. All totalitarian regimes must keep their peoples warlike and poor in order to hold them in line.

>"It's socialism because it has socialism in its name" retarded thinking
>i-it wasn't REAL socialism!!!!!

...

It's a misnomer. The idea that right and left enters economics is purely a Rand/Rothbard scheme. Now i'm not a national socialist myself, but in the very definition or right wing, there is 0 connections to economic policy. Economics are economics, and got an introductory into to political by Marxists, and even then, it was relative to class itself, and not just "what works better".

Same Shit, Different Assholes.

Natsoc is third position.

I would say it was center right. It definitely had aspects of both sides as far as I know.

I have never been able to determine what economic principles they had - it was all just made up on the spot - whatever seemed to work at the time, with basically theft by the state and redistribution to benefit the party members/ select few according to racial profiling.

so it is more like robber baronism, or feudalism than anything else - essentially parasitical, and ultimately doomed to failure.

>While the Nazi state grows ever more powerful, its citizens suffer continual reductions in their living standards
Massive increase in living standard from 1933 to about 1942 or so.
Economy doing so well people move there from neighboring countries that are still down from the crisis.
>muh war economy
Serious war economy only kicked in at about 1938 or so.

belliresearchinstitute.com/2017/07/17/songs-of-the-edelweiss-pirates-and-other-german-youth-gangs/

You can start with Hitlers revolution by Richard Tedor. That gives a pretty good overview of most of the policies they implemented.
Economic policies were, at least in the beginning, based on Gottfried Feders work.

Nigger I explained why you mouth breathing primate

Pretty centre, similar to social democracy

National socialism. Obviously left

They were both socialists (leftists) and national-
conservative (right wing). Nazis = centrists .