How do you debate someone whose entire form is arguing is posing questions.
I was debating my proud globalist roommate and he was saying that we need to eliminate borders. His arguments were
>don't you want to travel without a visa?
>don't you want a universal currency?
>don't you want more free trade?
>don't you want more peace?
I didn't even know to respond to a lot of these without sounding like i hate freedom or convenience
Start asking them questions that support your narrative then.
tell him he's a kike shill and probably gay too
>2018
>not hating freedom
>>don't you want to travel without a visa?
Why would you want to go to a foreign country?
>>don't you want a universal currency?
Who is in charge of the printing press?
>>don't you want more free trade?
What for?
>>don't you want more peace?
No
I prefer debates where I can post pictures of Joe Biden rubbing the back of a young girls hand on the fly of his pants or post Hillary waco memes.
Ask him if he wants white men to be imprisoned in incarceration camps.
Should've asked him to prove it would cause peace.
Not how it would, but prove it would.
/Thread
Ask him if he thinks it's morally responsible to stop beating and fucking his own mother
>don't you want to travel without a visa?
I do, and so does ISIS and every serial killer and bank robber.
>don't you want a universal currency?
Will the people controlling this currency have my best interest at heart?
>don't you want more free trade?
Will it actually be free trade?
>don't you want more peace?
Mass migrations of humans has never resulted in any form of peace.
Lolbergtarians are so fucking autistic holy shit, just ship them to some subhuman lawless shithole where they belong
Ask him if his ideas are so outstanding why does his side need to continuously lie about and suppress the voices from the opposing side. Ask him if he's ever seen a bunch of Republicans shut down a speech given by a Lefty?
Just turn it around on him.
>>don't you want to travel without a visa?
No, I dont want people travelling here unchecked and without permission. Why do you want to open the doors for your enemies?
>>don't you want a universal currency?
No, That limits national freedoms. why would you want a universal currency?
>>don't you want more free trade?
No, I want free and fair trade. Thanks Daddy T. Do you want your group to be ripped off by multi national corporations
>>don't you want more peace?
Eh, war and peace are both beneficial. I Just want civilization to progres by any means necessary. Dont you want to travel the stars?
he's jewish, mate. blow his brains out
Debating without an audience is a waste of time. Argue in front of people who can be convinced, point to the consequences of globalism for whites and ask him why he's defending genocide.
>How do you debate someone whose entire form is arguing is posing questions.
>
>I was debating my proud globalist roommate and he was saying that we need to eliminate borders. His arguments were
>>don't you want to travel without a visa?
Don't you want thousands of cartel members in your neighborhood? Why not? It's open borders after all
>>don't you want a universal currency?
Sure, but the more centralized something is the more easily corruptible it is by a a select few. That's why cryptocurrency is so appealing
>>don't you want more free trade?
Yes, but why should Europe be able to tax our goods 25% and we can't tax them back? Don't you like European policies?
>>don't you want more peace?
Yes, but open border policies without economic prosperity just causes less peace and more cultural tension
>I didn't even know to respond to a lot of these without sounding like i hate freedom or convenience
SAGE
>don't you want more peace?
Since when do open borders cause peace?
For most of feudalistic history, the kings did not care about the borders and people could come and go. Yet, there was much war regardless.
Start asking questions about their questions. You can question the assumptions or conclusions contained in the questions.
Someone who exclusively asks questions about your position and refuses to defend their own position generally has no logical basis for their position and realizes it, but can't bring themselves to abandon it.
No
No
No
No
Done.
Ask them how they would implement these things. The devil is always in the details and it always reveals them for the authoritarians they are. Then transition into how authoritarian governments always abuse power and cause the death and destruction of their citizens.
When he goes to bed tonight, sneak into his room, and punch him in the throat.
>No, I dont want people travelling here unchecked and without permission. Why do you want to open the doors for your enemies?
The question was "don't YOU want to travel without a visa". Please do not side step my questions like a politician. I've done my research :^)
he's literally using fallacies kek. Call him out on it and tell him to learn how to argue
its called begging the question, a logical fallacy. You should easily be able to shoot down his entire argumentation technique instead of even engaging in it because his question begging is an attempt at corrupting your logic supporting your argument. just stay on topic and explain how not being raped and robbed is more important that convenient visa free travel. In fact you should have noticed his questions he begged betray a selfishness on his own behalf.
>don't you want more free trade?
Liberals only talk about free trade when talking about other countries. If you want to buy alcohol, they want to tax you. If you want to buy soda, they want to tax you.
They are offended when imports are taxed but their policy is to tax goods, services, wages and investments within the US.
Also a universal currency would be a disaster. Monetary policies create winners and losers within any country. Do you think Africa has the same monetary needs as Germany?
I'm not against trade at all, just pointing out that taxing imports isn't much different than collecting taxes on a business operating within US borders.
Yes, and I also want to be able to go into people's houses and take their stuff. However, I recognize that if everyone had that ability, it would ruin society and pander to the lowest common denominator.
you are falling for his trap.
"don't you want more peace" don't say no you fucking retard, think for half a second, your opposition to globalism is not because you hate peace, he is trying to present generally positive things as only possible in a "globalist" society which is plainly incorrect, this is basic bitch logically fallacious/ manipulative techniques.
You don't, as the master manipulator kike puppet neocon Ronald Reagan put it.
"If you're explaining, you're losing"
haha fair enough
shouldve the word "and" instead of the comma.
its pretty disappointing how many posters here fall for such shitty logic with the exact response they want to hear.
This.
OP is a retard
You have to stop the fallacy.
Mock and belittle the mental integrity of your friend until they answer the question, and then mock the answer.
That guy picked up that technique because it was used against him and it worked. Im sure he gets increasingly agitated and asks questions faster and faster
>don't you want to travel without a visa?
no, because that implies everyone can come to my land
>don't you want a universal currency?
no, because that implies that only one body which interests are (((unknown))) will regulate it
>don't you want more free trade?
no, because not all "regions" are equally rich and developed
>don't you want more peace?
no, because none above implies that there will be more peace just more strife
This. I have noticed many people from both sides (especially SJWs though) only know how to argue by using fallacies, and sadly most people can't recognize them, or just want to shutdown the other person that fast that they don't pay attention to what is even implied.
One of the reasons SJWs act so smug with their non-arguments is because most of us don't call them out on it. I wish they taught logic at schools, back in the day i think it was taught, but nowadays not...
Totally agree man, i try my best to give the right advice when i see these threads, but by the time i get there alot of the advice is just shitty, and like i said, what a good debater would be prepared to respond to.
Problem is people are understandably angry, and this fucks with their heads and debate skills.
tell him he's right and start letting random people off the street in. Leave your door open for complete strangers.
If he has a problem with it, he's an bigoted asshole.
Store your shit at your parents house first.
Let some homeless people sleep in his bed.
>he's an bigoted asshole.
Also ask him why he hasnt....
AN BIGOTED YET
just say no to all those questions
mention that if he is for open borders he is for letting literally anyone into his house and keeping is doors open all the time. If a hobo comes in, just tell him that there is nothing he can do if a gang of squatters enter and start demanding food. He MUST feed the squatters.
>but by the time i get there alot of the advice is just shitty
>implying there's a need or point in explaining to subhumans why they're subhuman
>implying there is any problem with humans besides non europeans outnumbering europeans by a factor
There is no such thing as debate and there is no persuading cultists to leave their cult.
Flip them back around on him.
>Sure I'd love free travel but do you think we should give free travel to ISIS extremists and and people looking to illigally migrate?
>How can you have both open borders and a welfare state?
You can only have 1 of those make him pick.
>Don't you want a universal currency?
Ask him if he's heard of bitcoin and what he thinks about that. Ask him why he wants a government in charge of printing more $ and loaning it out to their friends for free. Ask him who would be in charge of this global currency. Ask him why we cant just do it decentralized like blockchain. I'm sure he'll reveal he's a statist with this one.
>Don't you want more free trade
That's not what we have right now some countries like China get to dump all their products on us cheap but don't let us sell to them. Free trade is a 2 way street. Ask him why he's so racist against Chinese that he doesn't think the can compete on a level playing field.
>Don't you want more peace
A good war is better then a bad peace I thought every libshit learned about that that appealing Hitler was a bad idea? Peace isn't migrant refugees stealing your country out from you while you do nothing. In the end that's contributing to the genocide of the first nations peoples because every immigrant Trudeau lets in is just dilluting their claim to the land that much more. Ask him why he and Trudeau hate the indigenous and are trying to erase their history. When you're dealing with kikes you have to play the pilpul game this is why it's good to think from their point of view sometimes so you can more easily refute their bs.
ask him to lay out what his beliefs are. Tell him its a deceitful debate tactic to just never state what your overall worldview is. If you can't state your opinions, then you can't be caught having a position that contradicts your worldview/being a hypocrite.
An example of this is how lefties constantly talk about "morality" when trying to shame republicans, yet don't actually believe that morality exists at all.
>How do you debate someone
You don't.
>WE'RE JUST GONNA KILL EM
ffs man. im eating.
How the fuck would a universal currency work? Who would be able to make it? This fucking roommate sounds retarded.
This if he says he's against property take his phone away because you need it more
mandumbz cant stop laffing @ trump/grin. giff
>ty for da laffs my nazi bros
Ask him how many days have gone by since the last time nobody got raped for 24 hours. Ask him if people get raped every single day (duh) what would he do to reduce rape.
Medieval style city states (castle walls) is the answer.
>>>don't you want more peace?
>No
Chad detected.