Is 'muh filtered photographs' a legitimate criticism when it works?
Is 'muh filtered photographs' a legitimate criticism when it works?
Ryan Hernandez
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Jeremiah Thompson
Post more please.
Eli White
It doesnt, though. Someone recently posted a WebM of the KyoAni animation process, and of the 5 steps shown, the product looked by far the best after the 3rd. 4th and 5th was a bunch of filters that made it look worse.
Carson Ward
"Filter" implies you just automate it and run an algorithm over the image and are done.
The pic you posted is mostly manual repainting. The filter is only the first step.
And all professional production is about taking as many shortcuts as possible to an optimal result. Not only would you need much more skilled background artists to paint those backgrounds from scratch, it'd also take much more time for a marginally better end result, which means you just wasted a shitload of money just for the sake of pride.
Christian Young
Repainting a photograph is not same as using filter.
Josiah Richardson
>dat shinkai touch
Worth a damn money for that artbook.
Jace Watson
Only when it's lazily done, which is not your case.
Dominic Turner
/thread
Benjamin Williams
It's only okay when SHAFT did it
Ryan Carter
It's an artistic choice that only us smart people understand.